辽宁省不同熟期水稻品质性状分析
|
吕军,姜秀英,解文孝,刘军,蒋洪波,沈枫,韩勇
|
Analysis on Quality Traits of Rice Varieties (Lines) with Different Maturity Stages in Liaoning Province
|
Jun Lü,Xiuying Jiang,Wenxiao Xie,Jun Liu,Hongbo Jiang,Feng Shen,Yong Han
|
|
表3 不同熟期水稻品种(系)品质性状优质达标率
|
Table 3 The high quality rate of rice varieties (lines) different in maturity
|
|
熟期 Maturity | 级别 Level | 糙米率(%) Brown rice percentage | 整精米率(%) Head rice percentage | 垩白度(%) Chalkiness degree | 透明度(级) Transparency (level) | 碱消值(级) Alkali digestion value (level) | 胶稠度(mm) Gel consistency | 直链淀粉 含量(%) Amylose content | 中早熟 | 一级1nd class | 30.70 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 53.85 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | Early-maturity | 二级2nd class | 100.00 | 100.00 | 7.69 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | | 三级3rd class | 100.00 | 100.00 | 53.85 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 中熟Mid-maturity | 一级1nd class | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 57.14 | 92.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | | 二级2nd class | 50.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 92.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | | 三级3rd class | 92.86 | 100.00 | 35.71 | 100.00 | 92.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 中晚熟 | 一级1nd class | 0.00 | 96.15 | 0.00 | 80.77 | 96.15 | 96.15 | 92.31 | Mid-late maturity | 二级2nd class | 34.62 | 100.00 | 30.77 | 96.15 | 96.15 | 96.15 | 100.00 | | 三级3rd class | 42.31 | 100.00 | 65.38 | 96.15 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 晚熟Late-maturity | 一级1nd class | 0.00 | 84.62 | 7.69 | 84.62 | 61.54 | 100.00 | 100.00 | | 二级2nd class | 46.15 | 100.00 | 30.77 | 100.00 | 61.54 | 100.00 | 100.00 | | 三级3rd class | 61.54 | 100.00 | 84.62 | 100.00 | 76.92 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 总体Total | 一级1nd class | 4.55 | 95.45 | 1.45 | 71.21 | 90.91 | 98.48 | 96.97 | | 二级2nd class | 53.03 | 100.00 | 18.84 | 98.48 | 90.91 | 98.48 | 100.00 | | 三级3rd class | 68.18 | 100.00 | 57.97 | 98.48 | 92.42 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
|
|
|