节水灌溉栽培模式对稻米品质和淀粉RVA谱的影响
|
薛菁芳, 蔡永盛, 陈书强
|
Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation Cultivation Model on Rice Quality and Starch RVA Profiles
|
Xue Jingfang, Cai Yongsheng, Chen Shuqiang
|
|
表2 不同灌溉处理下品质指标的差异(n=16)
|
Table 2 Differences in quality indexes under different irrigation treatments (n=16)
|
|
处理 Treatment | 米质性状 Rice quality | 变幅 Amplitude | 极差 Range | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Variation coefficient (%) | 置信区间Confidence interval | 95% | 99% | TI | 糙米率Brown rice rate (%) | 76.10~83.48 | 7.38 | 80.24 | 2.53 | 3.16 | 78.89~81.59 | 78.38~82.11 | | 精米率Milled rice rate (%) | 60.04~74.65 | 14.61 | 67.63 | 3.84 | 5.68 | 65.58~69.68 | 64.80~70.47 | | 蛋白质含量Protein content (%) | 7.27~8.67 | 1.40 | 7.94 | 0.39 | 4.92 | 7.73~8.14 | 7.65~8.22 | | 直链淀粉含量Amylose content (%) | 19.17~22.40 | 3.23 | 20.32 | 0.97 | 4.79 | 19.80~20.83 | 19.60~21.03 | | 食味评分Taste value | 77.50~93.80 | 16.30 | 85.61 | 8.24 | 8.63 | 81.68~89.55 | 80.17~91.06 | WI | 糙米率Brown rice rate (%) | 75.78~84.16 | 8.38 | 80.91 | 2.53 | 3.13 | 79.56~82.26 | 79.05~82.77 | | 精米率Milled rice rate (%) | 62.68~74.53 | 11.85 | 67.90 | 3.73 | 4.90 | 66.13~69.68 | 65.45~70.35 | | 蛋白质含量Protein content (%) | 7.13~8.17 | 1.04 | 7.76 | 0.32 | 4.14 | 7.58~7.92 | 7.51~7.99 | | 直链淀粉含量Amylose content (%) | 19.17~21.23 | 2.06 | 20.07 | 0.74 | 3.67 | 19.68~20.46 | 19.53~20.61 | | 食味评分Taste value | 72.13~91.60 | 19.47 | 87.88 | 7.39 | 9.38 | 83.49~92.27 | 81.81~93.96 |
|
|
|