藜麦对低氮胁迫的响应研究
|
郭红霞, 王创云, 邓妍, 赵丽, 张丽光, 郭虹霞, 秦丽霞, 高飞, 席瑞珍
|
Response of Quinoa to Low Nitrogen Stress
|
Guo Hongxia, Wang Chuangyun, Deng Yan, Zhao Li, Zhang Liguang, Guo Hongxia, Qin Lixia, Gao Fei, Xi Ruizhen
|
|
表7 各综合指标载荷系数及累计贡献率
|
Table 7 Load coefficient and cumulative contribution rate of each comprehensive index
|
|
指标 Index | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content | 0.711 | -0.288 | 0.243 | -0.382 | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | -0.837 | -0.133 | -0.296 | 0.393 | MDA含量MDA content | -0.869 | 0.419 | 0.114 | 0.160 | NR活性NR activity | 0.930 | -0.095 | -0.157 | -0.176 | Pro含量Pro content | 0.717 | 0.412 | -0.347 | 0.010 | POD活性POD activity | 0.803 | 0.476 | -0.325 | -0.030 | SOD活性SOD activity | 0.403 | 0.826 | -0.260 | 0.190 | 根系活力Root activity | 0.757 | -0.167 | -0.548 | -0.207 | GS活性GS activity | 0.618 | 0.326 | 0.395 | -0.285 | GOGTA活性GOGTA activity | 0.085 | -0.853 | 0.296 | 0.315 | 株高Plant height | 0.507 | -0.126 | 0.598 | 0.531 | 茎粗Stem diameter | 0.494 | 0.468 | 0.579 | 0.239 | SPAD | 0.523 | -0.076 | 0.748 | 0.188 | Fo | -0.839 | -0.185 | -0.151 | -0.425 | Fm | 0.304 | 0.343 | 0.489 | -0.698 | Fv/Fm | 0.815 | 0.406 | 0.362 | 0.029 | 最大根长 Maximum root length | -0.850 | 0.079 | 0.021 | 0.359 | 根系平均直径 Root average diameter | -0.274 | -0.927 | 0.169 | -0.073 | 根系表面积Root surface area | 0.366 | 0.370 | -0.425 | 0.567 | 根系体积Root volume | 0.578 | -0.388 | -0.277 | 0.145 | 根系干重Root dry weight | -0.903 | 0.219 | -0.078 | -0.253 | 茎叶干重Shoot dry weight | 0.244 | -0.196 | -0.300 | -0.415 | 根冠比Root-shoot ratio | -0.856 | 0.289 | 0.111 | 0.042 | 全氮含量N content | 0.886 | -0.285 | -0.149 | 0.176 | 氮积累量N accumulation | 0.910 | -0.312 | -0.204 | 0.085 | 氮利用效率 N utilization efficiency | -0.878 | 0.291 | 0.196 | -0.188 | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribute rate (%) | 47.463 | 65.910 | 75.976 | 83.959 |
|
|
|