采用DTOPSIS法和隶属函数法对西北春玉米区域试验的综合评价

张正洁, 杨国华, 郭瑞红, 程凯华, 米兴旺, 刘飞

Comprehensive Evaluation of Regional Trials for the Spring Maize in Northwest China Based on DTOPSIS Method and Membership Function Method

Zhang Zhengjie, Yang Guohua, Guo Ruihong, Cheng Kaihua, Mi Xingwang, Liu Fei

表6 不同评价方法排序比较

Table 6 Comparison of different comprehensive evaluation methods and output ranking

品种 Variety DTOPSIS法DTOPSIS method 隶属函数法Membership function method 产量Yield Ci值 Ci value 排序 Ranking 差异率 Difference rate (%) Di值 Di value 排序 Ranking 差异率 Difference rate (%) 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) 排序 Ranking 差异率 Difference rate (%) 万瑞7号Wanrui 7 0.4952 7 27.47 0.4466 9 40.36 17 374.35 1 0.00 棒博士58 Bangboshi 58 0.6828 1 0.00 0.7489 1 0.00 17 325.90 2 0.28 万丰8121 Wanfeng 8121 0.5869 2 14.05 0.6846 3 8.59 17 294.70 3 0.46 龙玉1319 Longyu 1319 0.4656 13 31.81 0.3889 12 48.07 17 259.30 4 0.66 龙玉108 Longyu 108 0.4930 9 27.79 0.4251 10 43.24 17 241.90 5 0.76 万瑞18 Wanrui 18 0.5181 4 24.11 0.5260 5 29.77 17 234.10 6 0.81 DK223 0.5782 3 15.31 0.6863 2 8.36 17 220.15 7 0.89 甘农237 Gannong 237 0.4778 10 30.03 0.3944 11 47.33 17 216.85 8 0.91 金科003 Jinke 003 0.5122 5 24.99 0.5540 4 26.03 17 186.55 9 1.08 新农830 Xinnong 830 0.4986 6 26.98 0.4971 7 33.63 17 085.00 10 1.67 鑫锐3117 Xinrui 3117 0.4696 11 31.23 0.3757 13 49.84 16 809.30 11 3.25 盛玉718 Shengyu 718 0.4942 8 27.62 0.5036 6 32.75 16 789.20 12 3.37 先玉335 Xianyu 335 0.4351 14 36.28 0.2805 15 62.55 16 335.00 13 5.98 龙玉107 Longyu 107 0.4220 15 38.19 0.3613 14 51.76 16 125.00 14 7.19 大汇66 Dahui 66 0.4684 12 31.40 0.4686 8 37.43 15 837.75 15 8.84