种植密度与整枝方式对蒜后直播棉产量和品质的影响
|
|
樊海潮, 张志恒, 赵中亭, 张桂花
|
Effects of Planting Density and Pruning Method on Yield and Quality of Direct-Seeded Cotton Following Garlic Harvest
|
|
Fan Haichao, Zhang Zhiheng, Zhao Zhongting, Zhang Guihua
|
|
表3 种植密度和整枝方式对总铃数、铃重和衣分的影响
|
Table 3 Effects of planting density and pruning methods on total bell number, bell weight, and lint percentage
|
|
整枝方式 Pruning method | 种植密度 (万株/hm2) Planting density (×104 plants/hm2) | 2022 | | 2023 | 总铃数 Total boll number (×104/hm2) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | | 总铃数 Total boll number (×104/hm2) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | | RMVB | 6.75 | 72.9±4.1d | 5.6±0.3a | 41.3±0.3a | | 77.1±1.9e | 5.6±0.2a | 41.5±0.3a | | 8.25 | 81.4±4.2bc | 5.3±0.2a | 41.6±0.2a | | 86.2±2.1cd | 5.4±0.2ab | 41.4±0.3a | | 9.75 | 84.5±2.2bc | 5.3±0.2a | 41.6±0.3a | | 89.8±2.4bcd | 5.4±0.2ab | 41.3±0.4a | | 11.25 | 91.1±2.5a | 4.9±0.2b | 41.4±0.4a | | 96.5±2.4a | 4.9±0.2cd | 41.4±0.3a | | RTVB | 6.75 | 80.5±2.5c | 5.6±0.2a | 41.8±0.3a | | 85.4±2.2d | 5.6±0.2a | 41.6±0.3a | | 8.25 | 85.2±2.6b | 5.3±0.2a | 41.4±0.4a | | 90.2±2.5bc | 5.3±0.2ab | 41.4±0.3a | | 9.75 | 85.8±2.4b | 5.2±0.2ab | 41.5±0.3a | | 91.2±2.5b | 5.2±0.2bc | 41.4±0.3a | | 11.25 | 84.4±2.1bc | 4.8±0.2b | 41.5±0.3a | | 89.5±2.4bcd | 4.9±0.2d | 41.5±0.3a | 均值 Average value | RMVB | 82.5±2.5a | 5.3±0.1a | 41.5±0.2a | | 87.4±2.4a | 5.3±0.2a | 41.4±0.2a | | RTVB | 84.0±1.8a | 5.2±0.2a | 41.5±0.2a | | 89.1±2.5a | 5.3±0.2a | 41.5±0.3a | | 6.75 | 76.7±3.1c | 5.6±0.1a | 41.6±0.2a | | 81.3±2.1c | 5.6±0.1a | 41.5±0.2a | | 8.25 | 83.3±2.0b | 5.3±0.4ab | 41.6±0.1a | | 88.2±1.8b | 5.4±0.2b | 41.4±0.2a | | 9.75 | 85.2±2.0ab | 5.3±0.2b | 41.5±0.2a | | 90.5±1.7ab | 5.3±0.2b | 41.4±0.3a | | 11.25 | 87.8±2.1a | 4.8±1.1c | 41.5±0.3a | | 93.0±2.1a | 4.9±0.1c | 41.5±0.3a | 变异来源 Source of variation | VB | ns | ns | ns | | ns | ns | ns | | PD | ** | ** | ns | | ** | ** | ns | | VB×PD | ** | ns | ns | | ** | ns | ns |
|
|
|