Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 47-54.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.03.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Development Tendency of Global Green Pea Production from 1961 to 2018

Tong Yueqiang(), Nie Jiangwen, Zang Huadong(), Yang Yadong, Zeng Zhaohai   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2021-04-23 Revised:2021-05-21 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-06-20
  • Contact: Zang Huadong E-mail:SY20193010112@cau.edu.cn;zanghuadong@cau.edu.cn

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

317

Abstract:

China is the world's top producer and exporter of green peas. However, the spatio-temporal dynamics of green pea crop area and yield in major countries on a global scale are not clear, which limits the sustainable development of green pea production in China. Here we analyzed the spatio-temporal dynamics of global green pea production from 1961 to 2018 using the linear regression model and the dominance index. We found that before 1990, world production of green peas was concentrated in Europe, whose harvesting area and total yield accounted for 42.5% and 41.5% of the world, respectively. Global green pea production shifted to Asia after 1990, and the harvesting area and total yield accounted for 71.1% and 77.9% of the world, respectively. Compared with the United States, Britain, India and other major green pea producing countries, advantage indexes before 1990 were weak. However, production scale index of China had a significant advantage over other major producing countries and an efficiency advantage of the index gradually declined after 1990. Although the increase of green pea harvesting area of China recent years has driven the shift of global green pea production to Asia. Compared with other major producing countries, Chinese production efficiency did not show significant advantages. Therefore, optimizing and adjusting planting distribution and improving yield are of great importance for increasing international competitiveness and sustainable development of green pea production of China.

Key words: Green pea, Spatio-temporal dynamics, Efficiency advantage, Scale advantage, Sustainable production

Fig.1

Changes of green pea harvesting area and total yield in major producing areas in the world from 1961 to 2018"

Table 1

Annual change of harvesting area, yield per unit area and total yield in major green pea producing areas from 1961 to 2018"

地区
Area		 收获面积
Harvesting area
(×104 hm2)		 单产
Yield per unit
area (t/hm2)		 总产量
Total yield
(×104 t)
1961-1990年
全球Global 1.07*** 0.06*** 12.34***
亚洲Asia 0.71*** 0.08 7.95***
非洲Africa 0.08*** 0.05 0.53***
欧洲Europe 0.31*** -0.04*** 3.28***
美洲America -0.02*** -0.02*** 0.44
东亚East Asia 0.37*** 0.06 3.11***
南亚South Asia 0.31*** 0.12*** 4.67***
1991-2018年
全球Global 6.25*** 0.01 49.08***
亚洲Asia 6.54*** -0.06 53.40***
非洲Africa 0.26*** 0.01*** 1.54***
欧洲Europe -0.36*** -0.04 -3.06***
美洲America -0.12 -0.09*** -2.47***
东亚East Asia 5.06*** 0.01 40.77***
南亚South Asia 1.49*** -0.14 12.40***

Fig.2

The distribution of green pea harvesting area, yield per unit area and yield across continents from 1961 to 1990"

Fig.3

The distribution of green pea harvesting area, yield per unit area and yield of Africa, America, Asia, and Europe from 1961 to 1990"

Fig.4

Changes of harvesting area and total yield in major green pea producing countries from 1961 to 2018"

Table 2

Annual change of harvesting area, yield per unit area and total yield in major green pea producing countries from 1961 to 2018"

主产国
Major producer		 1961-1990 1991-2018
收获面积
Harvesting area
(×104 hm2)		 单产
Yield per unit
area (t/hm2)		 总产量
Total yield
(×104 t)		 收获面积
Harvesting area
(×104 hm2)		 单产
Yield per unit
area (t/hm2)		 总产量
Total yield
(×104 t)
中国China 0.40*** 0.07 3.29*** 5.08*** 0.01 40.86***
印度India 0.28*** 0.13*** 4.50*** 1.41*** -0.15 11.88***
法国France -0.01 0.21*** 0.71 0.02 0.04 0.23
美国US -0.09*** 0.05 0.97 -0.29*** -0.14 -3.16***
埃及Egypt 0.02*** 0.18*** 0.26*** 0.04 -0.04 0.36
秘鲁Peru 0.03*** -0.01 0.06*** 0.07*** 0.04 0.34***
其他国家
Other countries		 0.44*** 0.03 3.39*** -0.08 -0.02 -1.21

Table 3

Contribution rate of harvesting area, yield per unit area and yield of main green pea producing countries from 1961 to 2018 %"

主产国
Major producer		 收获面积贡献率
Contribution rate of harvesting area		 单产贡献率
Contribution rate of yield per unit area		 产量贡献率
Contribution rate of yield
1961-1990 1991-2018 1961-1990 1991-2018 1961-1990 1991-2018
中国China 71.0 1170.0 5.0 9.0 7.0 1.0
印度India 58.0 390.0 17.0 27.0 30.0 7.0
法国France -10.0 14.0 120.0 94.0 -1210.0 690.0
美国US -660.0 -2540.0 910.0 260.0 -140.0 -10.0
埃及Egypt 40.0 170.0 24.0 43.0 59.0 25.0
秘鲁Peru 130.0 250.0 -12.0 45.0 -9.0 18.0
澳大利亚Australia -840.0 -970.0 2190.0 260.0 -260.0 -27.0

Fig.5

Scale advantage and efficiency advantage indexes analysis between China and major green pea production countries in the world from 1961 to 2018"

[1] 李明达. 半无叶型豌豆研究现状及发展前景. 农业科技与信息, 2009(5):53-55.
[2] 郑殿升, 方嘉禾. 高品质小杂粮作物品种及栽培. 2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009.
[3] 杨晓明, 任瑞玉. 国内外豌豆生产和育种研究进展. 甘肃农业科技, 2005(8):3-5.
[4] 纵瑞敬. 萧县菜用豌豆产业生产现状与发展建议. 基层农技推广, 2016, 4(5):86-87.
[5] Hu F L, Tan Y, Yu A Z, et al. Strip width ratio expansion with lowered N fertilizer rate enhances N complementary use between intercropped pea and maize. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):19969.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76815-7
[6] Tan Y, Hu F L, Chai Q, et al. Optimizing water use between intercropped pea and maize through strip row ratio expansion and N fertilizer reduction in arid areas. Field Crops Research, 2021, 260:108001.
[7] Powers S, Mirsky E, Bandaranayake A, et al. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) shows genetic variation in phosphorus use efficiency in different P environments. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):18940.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75804-0 pmid: 33144592
[8] 周俊玲, 张蕙杰. 世界豌豆生产及贸易形势分析. 世界农业, 2015(9):131-135.
[9] 白冰, 杨雨豪, 王小慧, 等. 基于农作制分区的1985-2015年中国小麦生产时空变化. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10):1554-1564.
[10] 孙悦, 刘斌, 傅漫琪, 等. 1985-2015年中国胡麻子生产时空动态变化. 作物杂志, 2019(6):8-13.
[11] 王小慧, 姜雨林, 刘洋, 等. 基于县域单元的中国水稻生产时空动态变化. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11):1704-1712.
[12] 尹小刚, 陈阜. 1961-2017年全球大豆生产时空变化. 世界农业, 2019(11):65-71.
[13] 联合国粮食及农业组织. 联合国粮食及农业组织统计资料. 粮食和农业数据. (2019-04-14)[2021-04-23]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/.
[14] 尹小刚, 王猛, 孔箐锌, 等. 东北地区高温对玉米生产的影响及对策. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(1):186-198.
[15] 佴军. 近30年江苏省水稻生产的时空变化与效益分析. 扬州:扬州大学, 2013.
[16] 李会忠. 中国主要农作物省级区域比较优势实证分析. 北京: 清华大学, 2006.
[17] 贺光云, 侯雪, 闫志农, 等. 国际有机农业发展及其对中国的启示. 农产品质量与安全, 2020(5):86-91.
[18] 王东阳. 20世纪80-90年代欧洲有机农业政策回顾与探究. 世界农业, 2018(7):71-76.
[19] 唐轲, 周易. 中美欧有机农业对比研究. 中国食物与营养, 2016, 22(7):26-30.
[20] 林玉桓, 王晓红. 中国居民膳食营养状况分析与对策. 江苏调味副食品, 2019(2):1-3.
[21] 黄季焜. 中国粮食安全与农业发展:过去和未来. 中国农业综合开发, 2020(11):8-10.
[22] 石元亮, 王玲莉, 刘世彬, 等. 中国化学肥料发展及其对农业的作用. 土壤学报, 2008(5):852-864.
[23] Cui Z L, Zhang H Y, Chen X P, et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555(7696):363-366.
doi: 10.1038/nature25785
[24] 巨晓棠, 谷保静. 中国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):783-795.
[25] Mus F, Crook M B, Garcia K, et al. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and the challenges to its extension to nonlegumes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 82(13):3698-3710.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01055-16
[26] Carlsson G, Huss-Danell K. Nitrogen fixation in perennial forage legumes in the field. Plant and Soil, 2003, 253(2):353-372.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024847017371
[27] 曾昭海. 豆科作物与禾本科作物轮作研究进展及前景. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1):57-61.
[28] Robinson G H J, Domoney C. Perspectives on the genetic improvement of health- and nutrition-related traits in pea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 158:353-362.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.020
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!