Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 85-90.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.04.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Yield, Quality Traits and TestingSite Discrimination of Fresh Waxy Corn in Northern China Based on GGE Biplot

Xie Wenjin(), Li Fangming, Li Ning, Yang Hailong, Fu Jun, Zhang Zhongwei, Gao Xudong, Feng Guang   

  1. Dandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fengcheng118109, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2022-01-11 Revised:2022-04-06 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

106

Abstract:

In order to screen excellent waxy corn varieties and provide theoretical basis and reference for its planting and popularization in the representative ecological areas in the north, the yield and other characteristics and pilot discrimination of fresh waxy corn in the north were analyzed by GGE biplot. The results showed that Zhengbaitiannuo 9 and Tianguinuo 932 were excellent varieties with high yield, stable yield and wide adaptability, while Wannuo 188, Zhenzao 2019 and Jingkenuo 617 had better high yield and slightly worse stable yield. Functional diagram analysis of yield-quality traits showed that Wannuo 188, Tianguinuo 932, Jingkenuo 617 and Zhengbaitiannuo 9 were the varieties with excellent comprehensive performance. Screening out the pilot sites with strong discrimination and representativeness were Chifeng city and Shihezi city, which could select excellent varieties and eliminate unstable varieties.

Key words: Waxy corn, R language, GGE biplot, Regional test, Testing site discrimination

Table 1

Varieties and codes of fresh waxy corns in the north"

代号
Code		 品种名称
Variety name		 代号
Code		 品种名称
Variety name		 代号
Code		 品种名称
Variety name
G1 京科糯617 G7 珍早2019 G13 沈糯16号
G2 奥甜糯75 G8 珍珠糯18 G14 万糯188
G3 京科糯928 G9 吉糯50 G15 中硕糯921
G4 金糯1902 G10 郑白甜糯9号 G16 奥甜糯65
G5 吉农糯111 G11 连甜糯209 G17 京科糯569
G6 天贵糯932 G12 黑糯660

Table 2

Testing sites and codes of fresh waxy corns in the north"

试验点代号
Testing
site code		 试验点
Testing site		 试验点代号
Testing
site code		 试验点
Testing site
E1 山西省屯留县 E6 吉林省长春市
E2 河北省承德市 E7 内蒙古呼和浩特市
E3 内蒙古赤峰市 E8 辽宁省沈阳市
E4 河北省张家口市 E9 新疆石河子市
E5 黑龙江省肇东市 E10 北京市

Fig.1

Average yields ofvarieties of waxy corn and testing sites"

Fig.2

GGE biplot for the “which won where” view"

Fig.3

GGE biplot of high and stable yield function of varieties"

Fig.4

GGE biplot for the ideal variety rank"

Fig.5Anal

ysis diagram ofGGEbiplot experimental functionalmorphology (a) Functional plots of site discrimination and representative, (b) Functional diagram of the ideal environment ordering of the test sites"

Fig.6Bipl

ots of varieties and quality traits (a) and varieties and yield×quality traits (b) SRR: seed-coat residue rate; AC: amylose content; CS: coarse starch content; SQ: sensory quality; F: flavor; CL: colour and lustre; S: smell; WX: waxy; T: tenderness; ST: skin thickness; Y: yield, thesame below"

Fig.7

Functional diagram of variety× yield×quality characteristic stability"

[1] 王磊, 程本义, 鄂之国, 等. 基于GGE双标图的水稻区试品种丰产性、稳产性和适应性评价. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4):408-416.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.04.010
[2] 张群远, 孔繁玲, 廖琴, 等. 作物品种区域试验的评价体系及评价方法. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2000, 16(2):81-86.
[3] 杨仕华, 廖琴. 中国水稻品种试验与审定. 北京: 中国农业科学出版社, 2005.
[4] 曾旭辉, 彭宏, 蒋厚良, 等. 利用R语言GGE双标图评价玉米区域试验——以2018年江苏淮北玉米区域试验为例. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5):60-66.
[5] 张祯勇, 高明文, 徐国伦, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在玉米品种区域试验中的应用. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34):238-243.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1448
[6] 金石桥, 许乃银. GGE双标图在中国农作物品种试验中应用的必要性探讨. 种子, 2012, 31(12):89-92.
[7] 严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11):1805-1819.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01805
[8] 孙祎振, 赵森, 吴洪婕, 等. 糯玉米营养品质和风味品质的鉴定分析. 大麦与谷物科学, 2011(4):1-5.
[9] 刘萍, 陆卫平, 陆大雷. 鲜食糯玉米品质差异及品质评价理化指标的筛选. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2009, 30(3):16-21.
[10] 郭敏杰, 邓丽, 任丽, 等. 基于R语言的AMMI和GGE双标图在花生区试中的应用. 花生学报, 2017, 46(2):24-31.
[11] 王大为, 王延波, 常程, 等. 多主成分玉米区域试验数据的GGE双标图分析. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(1):30-39.
[12] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 等. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4):660-671.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04135
[13] 严威凯, 盛庆来, 胡跃高, 等. GGE叠图法分析品种环境互作模式的理想方法. 作物学报, 2001, 27(1):21-28.
[14] 吴珊珊, 张春原, 毛振武, 等. 基于双标图的京津冀早熟夏玉米品种区域试验综合分析. 种子, 2021, 40(11):74-81.
[15] 余泽恩, 罗莉霞, 张芳, 等. 基于GEE的2018年我国冬油菜长江下游区域试验试点与品种评价. 种子, 2020, 39(1):122-131.
[16] 张志芬, 付晓峰, 刘俊青, 等. GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8):1377-1385.
[17] 常磊, 柴守玺. GGE双标图在我国旱地春小麦稳产性分析中的应用. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(5):988-994.
[18] 周长军, 李泽宇, 王迪, 等. GGE双标图分析黑龙江省联合体玉米试验品种适应性和稳定性. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020(8):1-5.
[19] 崔顺立, 何美敬, 侯名语, 等. 利用GGE双标图分析花生品质性状的基因型―环境互作. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(4):617-626.
[20] 杨天育, 常磊, 郭二虎, 等. 应用GGE双标图评价谷子区试品种稳产性及试点代表性. 作物杂志, 2013(5):51-54.
[1] Xiao Jibing, Liu Zhi, Kong Fanxin, Xin Zongxu, Wu Hongsheng. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield Stability of Sorghum Varieties Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 36-45.
[2] Qiao Yujia, Wei Ling, Xiao Junhong, Liu Bo, Yang Haifeng, Duan Xueyan. Analysis on the Yield Differences of Huanghuaihai Summer Soybeans in Different Years and Locations [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 221-226.
[3] Gong Dan, Luo Gaoling, Zhang Xiaoyan, Zhu Xu, Yin Zhengong, Wang Suhua, Sha Aihua, Wang Lixia. Assessment of Adaptability for 34 New Cultivars of Cowpea under Different Eco-Environments [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 89-95.
[4] Qi Jianshuang, Xia Laikun, Huang Bao, Li Chunying, Ma Zhiyan, Ding Yong, Gu Limin, Zhang Jun, Zhang Fengqi, Mu Xinyuan, Tang Baojun, Zhao Faxin, Zhang Lanxun. Discussion on the Application in the Regional Experiment of Maize Varieties by Entropy DTOPSIS Mode and Grey Situation Decision Methods [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!