Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 207-211.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.01.031

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Analysis of Yield and Quality of Yunyan 87 with Different Moderate Plant Shapes in Guiyang Tobacco Area

Meng Lin1(), Zu Qingxue2, Nie Zhongyang2, Feng Yuyang2, Xian Liguo1, Zhu Guobing1, Yang Xiujun1, Sun Fushan1()   

  1. 1Institute of Tobacco Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China
    2Guiyang Branch of Guizhou Provincial Tobacco Company, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2021-09-29 Revised:2021-11-02 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-22

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

198

Abstract:

In order to improve the flue-cured tobacco quality and provide the discriminant standard of ideal moderate plant shapes in Guiyang tobacco area, Yunyan 87 was used as material to study the yield and quality of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes (T1: small, T2: medium, T3: large). The results showed that, there were significant differences in economic characters and quality of flue-cured tobacco among different plant shapes: the yield and quality of T2 treatment was the most coordinated, the output value was the highest, reaching 55 188.15 yuan/ha, and the proportion of high-grade tobacco reached 60.23%, which was 12.34, 8.59 percentage points higher than that of the T1 and T3 treatments, respectively. The average price of T2 treatment was the highest (27.12 yuan/kg), 2.14 and 1.47 yuan/kg higher than that of the T1 and T3 treatments, respectively. T2 treatment had more oil content and strong chromaticity, and its chemical coordination was better than that of the other two plant shapes. The total score of sensory quality of the T2 treatment tobacco was 2.30, 1.63 points higher than that of the T1 and T3 treatments, and the honey sweet fragrance style was more prominent. To sum up, the morphological parameters of ideal moderate plant shapes in Guiyang tobacco area were plant height 109.30cm, stem girth 10.70cm, pitch 5.70cm, remaining leaf number 17.33, cutters length 73.97cm and cutters leaf width 32.43cm.

Key words: Moderate plant shapes, Honey sweet fragrance style, Morphological parameters, Guiyang

Table 1

Morphological parameters of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎围
Stem girth
(cm)		 节距
Pitch
(cm)		 留叶数
Number of
leaves		 腰叶长
Middle leaves
length (cm)		 腰叶宽
Middle leaves
width (cm)
T1 98.32±4.13c 7.90±0.20c 5.27±0.06c 15.33±0.58c 63.03±3.35c 27.93±1.46c
T2 109.30±3.51b 10.70±0.50b 5.70±0.10b 17.33±0.58b 73.97±2.90b 32.43±0.61b
T3 122.27±4.50a 11.73±0.45a 5.87±0.15a 19.33±0.58a 82.03±1.40a 36.73±1.46a
一般优质烟株型
General plant shape of high-quality tobacco		 100.00~120.00 8.00~10.00 5.00~7.00 15.00~20.00 70.00~80.00 28.00~32.00

Table 2

Economic characters of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes"

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)		 产值（元/hm2）
Output value
(yuan/hm2)		 上等烟比例
High grade
leaf proportion (%)		 中等烟比例
Middle grade
leaf proportion (%)		 下等烟比例
Low grade
leaf proportion (%)		 均价(元/kg)
Average
price (yuan/kg)
T1 1855.05±26.40b 46 338.75±660.90c 47.89±6.81c 29.16±4.14a 11.26±1.03c 24.98±5.02b
T2 2035.05±13.20a 55 188.15±357.75a 60.23±7.33a 18.79±6.22c 14.85±4.35b 27.12±3.25a
T3 2074.95±30.45a 53 223.75±794.25b 51.64±6.09b 22.14±4.12b 18.31±3.21a 25.65±6.18b

Table 3

Appearance quality of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes"

处理
Treatment		 颜色（分）
Color (score)		 成熟度（分）
Maturity (score)		 结构（分）
Structure (score)		 身份（分）
Body (score)		 油分（分）
Oil (score)		 色度（分）
Color intensity (score)		 总分
Total score
T1 橘（9.5） 成熟（9.0） 疏松（9.0） 中等（9.0） 有（7.0） 中（5.0） 83.25
T2 橘（9.5） 成熟（9.0） 疏松（9.0） 中等（9.0） 有+（7.5） 中++（6.0） 85.25
T3 橘（9.5） 成熟（9.0） 疏松（9.0） 中等（9.0） 有+（7.5） 中+（5.5） 84.75

Table 4

Main chemical components content of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes"

处理
Treatment		 淀粉
Starch
(%)		 总糖
Total sugar
(%)		 还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)		 总氮
Total nitrogen
(%)		 烟碱
Nicotine
(%)		 蛋白质
Protein
(%)		 两糖比
Reducing sugar/
total sugar		 糖碱比
Reducing sugar/
nicotine		 氮碱比
Total nitrogen/
nicotine
T1 5.08b 25.89b 22.80a 2.27a 3.79a 5.28a 0.88a 6.02b 0.60a
T2 5.34b 26.86a 23.14a 2.26a 3.63b 5.29a 0.86a 6.37a 0.62a
T3 5.87a 25.44b 20.95b 2.19a 3.73a 5.30a 0.82a 5.62c 0.59a

Table 5

Sensory quality of tobacco with different moderate plant shapes"

处理
Treatment		 香韵
Like nuances		 劲头
Momentum		 浓度
Concentration		 香气质
Aroma
quality
（9）		 香气量
Aroma
amount
（9）		 杂气
Mixed
gas
（9）		 余味
Aftertaste
（9）		 刺激性
Irritant
（9）		 燃烧性
Combustibility
（5）		 灰分
Cigarette ash
（5）		 总分
Total score
（82）
T1 蜜甜、清香 中等 中等 6.25 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 57.25
T2 蜜甜、清香 中偏浓 中偏浓 6.50 6.42 6.33 6.17 6.08 4.00 4.00 58.88
T3 蜜甜、清香 中等 中等 6.08 6.25 6.00 5.92 5.83 4.00 4.00 56.58
[1] 吴明, 孙书斌. 我国主产烟区中棵烟培育技术研究进展. 现代农业科技, 2019(15):15-16.
[2] 顾会战, 母明新, 史洪涛, 等. 关于烤烟“中棵烟”培育的若干思考. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(6);89-96.
[3] 张崇范. 怎样栽成中棵烟. 烟草科技, 1983(2):64.
[4] 徐畅, 江厚龙, 汪代斌, 等. 施氮量与种植密度对中棵烟生长发育和品质形成的影响. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(8):73-79.
[5] 黄凯. 金神农山地中棵烟理想株型调控的技术途径. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(5):41-44.
[6] 冯国忠. 烟草株型结构及其在生产上的意义. 中国烟草, 1981(3):18-24.
[7] 王丰, 丁伟, 冯勇刚, 等. 烤烟优质适产理想株型探讨. 种子, 2007(5):84-87.
[8] 徐新雯, 沈嘉, 拓阳阳, 等. 烟株定型后株高对烤烟产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(8):30-32.
[9] 仙立国, 黄一兰, 王松峰, 等. 翠碧一号鲜烟叶素质及烘烤特性研究. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(3):66-73.
[10] 杨树勋. 烟叶烘烤原理及技术研究进展. 作物研究, 2018, 32(6):541-544.
[11] 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[12] 刘辉, 祖庆学, 王松峰, 等. 不同成熟度对鲜烟素质和烤后烟叶质量的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2020, 41(2):66-71,78.
[13] 潘飞龙, 杨洋, 鄢敏, 等. 不同素质烟叶烘烤过程中生理及质地变化研究. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(9):2216-2221.
[14] 宋鹏飞, 苏燕妮, 黄翯, 等. 打顶留叶数对烤烟产量、质量及焦油释放量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(2):51-53.
[15] 徐晓武, 李静超, 余铭华, 等. 不同种植密度对烤烟产质量的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2019(1):12-14,18.
[16] 姜茱, 谢胜利, 范洪慈, 等. 烤烟叶片大小与烟叶化学成分的关系研究初报. 中国烟草, 1991(2):13-17.
[17] 董祥立, 罗玉英, 张维军, 等. 不同打顶时期及留叶数对遵义市烤烟产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(20):31-33,72.
[18] 许自成, 黄平俊, 苏富强, 等. 不同采收方式对烤烟上部叶内在品质的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(11):13-17.
[19] 李冉, 程森, 周超, 等. 烟叶发育状况与其感官评吸质量关系研究. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(21):209-213.
[20] 黄一兰, 王瑞强, 王雪仁, 等. 打顶时间与留叶数对烤烟产质量及内在化学成分的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2004(4):18-22.
[21] 邹诗恩, 田仁进. 打顶时期与留叶数对兴烟一号农艺性状及产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(27):13297-13299,13377.
[1] Tian Chaohua, Zhang Xuewei, Guo Wei, Liu Wenjian, Liu Yonglai, Cao Mingfeng, Zhu Li, Deng Yong, Jing Yanqiu, Liu Dong. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Available Boron in Guiyang Tobacco Area and Its Effects on the Boron and Main Nitrogen-Containing Compounds Contents of Tobacco Leaves [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 218-224.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!