Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 112-117.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.03.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Grain Dehydration and Gelatinization Characteristics of Waxy Maize at Different Harvesting Time

Shi Yaxing,Dong Hui,Lu Baishan,Zhao Jiuran,Fan Yanli,Xu Li,Yu Ainian   

  1. Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Beijing 100097, China
  • Received:2019-01-30 Revised:2019-04-19 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Baishan Lu,Jiuran Zhao

RichHTML

7

PDF (PC)

193

Abstract:

In order to study the change of grain dehydration and gelatinization characteristics of waxy maize at different harvesting time, 7 days after potlination (DAP), DAP 20, DAP 23, DAP 26 and DAP 29, seven waxy maize varieties such as Jingkenuo 2000 were used as materials, which are the main waxy maize varieties in China. The results showed: There were significant differences in grain moisture content among varieties and harvesting time. The grain dehydration rates of Jingkenuo 2000, Jingkenuo 2000E were significantly lower than those of other varieties in the suitable harvesting time. There were significant differences in gelatinization characteristics among varieties and harvesting time. With the postponement of harvest, the peak viscosity, final viscosity, breakdown value and setback value of starch showed the trend of “increased first and then decreased”. The peak viscosity, final viscosity and breakdown value of Jingkenuo 2000, Jingkenuo 2000E, Jingkenuo 2000K, Heinuo 101 and Yunuo 7 reached the peak values at 20d after pollination, but Tianzi 23 and Xiandanuo 001 at 23d after pollination. Setback value of Jingkenuo 2000K (252) was the lowest, while Heinuo 101 was the highest (343). The starch gelatinization characteristics of Jingkenuo 2000 and Jingkenuo 2000K had the highest peak viscosity, breakdown value and the lowest setback value, so they belonged to the best viscosity characteristic; Heinuo 101, Tianzi 23, Xiandanuo 001 and Yunuo 7 had lower peak viscosity, breakdown value and the lowest peak viscosity. Therefore, there were significant differences in grain moisture content and starch viscosity among waxy maize varieties and harvesting time. Jingkenuo 2000 had the slowest precipitation rate and the best viscosity characteristics in five harvesting time, with low setback and good quality.

Key words: Harvesting time, Waxy maize, Grain dehydration characteristics, Starch gelatinization characteristics

Table 1

The tested waxy maize varieties"

品种
Variety		 选育单位
Breeding department		 审定信息
Audited information		 品种特点
Variety characteristic
京科糯2000
Jingkenuo 2000




 北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心




 国审玉2006063
吉审玉2008056
沪农品审玉米2009008
闽审玉2010003
京审玉2010014
新审糯玉2014年第52号
宁审玉2015030		 糯玉米品种,子粒白色,百粒鲜重37.1g,北京地区播种至采收92d,适宜在四川、重庆、湖北、湖南、云南、贵州、福建、吉林、北京、北疆糯玉米种植区、宁夏等地种植。
京科糯2000K Jingkenuo 2000K 北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心 京审玉20170014
 糯玉米品种,子粒白色,百粒鲜重36.34g,北京地区播种至鲜穗采收92d,适宜在北京地区作为鲜食糯玉米品种种植。
京科糯2000E
Jingkenuo 2000E		 北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心 黑审玉20182001
 糯玉米品种,子粒白色,百粒鲜重44.2g,出苗至鲜果穗采收95d,适宜在黑龙江省≥10℃活动积温2 300℃以下区域种植。
先达糯001
Xiandanuo 001		 先正达（中国）投资有限公司隆化分公司 冀审玉2012020
 糯玉米品种,子粒黄色,百粒鲜重37.8g,出苗至鲜果穗采收84d,适宜在河北省春播和夏播。
天紫23
Tianzi 23		 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 津审玉2004014
 糯玉米品种,子粒为紫白相间,百粒鲜重27.6g,出苗至采收83d,适宜在天津作鲜食玉米品种推广。
渝糯7号
Yunuo 7		 重庆市农业科学院研究所
 渝农作品审蔬第24号
国审玉2003032		 糯玉米品种,子粒白色,百粒鲜重30g,出苗至采收94d,适宜在浙江、上海、广西、安徽种植。
黑糯101
Heinuo 101		 北京市农林科学院玉米研究中心 待审品种
 糯玉米品种,子粒紫色,北京地区出苗至采收86d,适宜在北京、天津、河北等地春播。

Table 2

The change of grain moisture content of maize varieties at different harvesting time %"

品种
Variety		 子粒含水量Grain moisture content
DAP17 DAP20 DAP23 DAP26 DAP29
京科糯2000
Jingkenuo 2000		 69.27cd 64.19b 56.52c 55.27b 53.96a
京科糯2000E
Jingkenuo 2000E		 73.99b 67.77a 59.74b 57.78a 53.51a
京科糯2000K
Jingkenuo 2000K		 69.26cd 64.75b 60.90a 54.70b 48.32b
黑糯101
Heinuo 101		 69.93cd 56.78e 54.31d 51.94d 46.89c
天紫23
Tianzi 23		 68.93e 60.51d 53.51d 52.44c 42.89e
先达糯001
Xiandanuo 001		 75.08a 66.28a 61.31a 58.13a 53.35a
渝糯7号
Yunuo 7		 70.05c 62.73c 53.25d 46.57e 44.13d
平均值
Average		 70.93 63.29 57.08 53.83 49.01

Fig.1

The change of decrease rate of grain moisture content from 23 to 29 days after pollination"

Table 3

Variance analysis of grain moisture content of maize varieties at different harvesting time"

变异来源Source of variation 自由度Degree of freedom 平方和Sum of squares 均方Mean square F P
品种Variety 6.00 843.41 140.57 965.03** 0.0001
采收期Harvesting time 4.00 6 720.48 1 680.12 11 534.27** 0.0001
品种×采收期Variety×harvesting time 24.00 271.94 11.33 77.79** 0.0001
误差Error 68.00 9.91 0.15
总变异Total variation 104.00 7 850.12

Table 4

Starch viscosity characteristics of tested maize varieties at different harvesting time cP"

指标Index 授粉后天数(d)
Days after pollination		 京科糯2000
Jingkenuo 2000		 京科糯2000E
Jingkenuo 2000E		 京科糯2000K
Jingkenuo 2000K		 黑糯101
Heinuo 101		 天紫23
Tianzi 23		 先达糯001
Xiandanuo 001		 渝糯7号
Yunuo 7
峰值黏度 17 1 688e 1 516e 2 456b 1 591b 1 106d 1 535d 890d
Peak viscosity 20 2 436a 2 158a 2 485a 1 627a 1 258c 1 718b 1 902a
23 2 321b 1 939b 2 457b 1 483c 1 664a 1 766a 1 881a
26 1 917c 1 731c 2 196c 1 187d 1 597b 1 599c 1 380b
29 1 811d 1 656d 1 885d 1 100e 1 576b 1 056e 965c
平均值Average 2 035 1 800 2 296 1 398 1 440 1 535 1 404
终值黏度 17 1 275e 1 317e 1 373d 1 406b 1 236e 1 366b 1 130b
Final viscosity 20 1 585a 1 651a 1 633a 1 515a 1 395b 1 364b 1 422a
23 1 523b 1 547b 1 480b 1 315c 1 424a 1 436a 1 083c
26 1 392c 1 494c 1 456c 1 340c 1 382c 1 271c 1 006c
29 1 348d 1 442d 1 276e 1 248d 1 330d 1 097d 931d
平均值Average 1 425 1 490 1 444 1 365 1 353 1 307 1 114
崩解值 17 674e 835b 1 156c 423c 144e 468d 418d
Breakdown 20 1 163a 938a 1 337a 566a 286d 646b 1 009a
23 1 124b 560c 1 262b 487b 549a 747a 843b
26 843c 443d 958d 223d 536b 500c 589c
29 716d 417e 809e 182e 507c 234e 314e
平均值Average 904 639 1104 376 404 519 635
回复值 17 241c 244e 225d 319d 274d 251d 258c
Setback 20 292b 413a 333a 376a 423a 299b 463a
23 306a 376b 261b 347b 315b 337a 317b
26 298ab 338c 242c 345b 310b 292b 307b
29 293b 274d 201e 329c 296c 275c 258c
平均值Average 286 329 252 343 324 291 321

Table 5

Variance analysis of starch viscosity characteristics of tested maize varieties at different harvesting time"

指标
Index		 变异来源
Source of variation		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 平方和
Sum of squares		 均方
Mean square		 F P
峰值黏度Peak viscosity 品种Variety 6 11 306 402.72 1 884 400.45 2 734.86** 0.0001
采收期Harvesting time 4 4 323 858.68 1 080 964.67 1 568.82** 0.0001
品种×采收期Variety×harvesting time 24 3 647 906.42 151 996.10 220.59** 0.0001
误差Error 68 46 853.99 689.03 - -
总变异Total variation 104 19 326 220.16 - - -
终值黏度Final viscosity 品种Variety 6 1 408 803.00 234 800.50 543.95** 0.0001
采收期Harvesting time 4 433 384.30 108 346.10 251.00** 0.0001
品种×采收期Variety×harvesting time 24 937 751.20 39 072.96 90.52** 0.0001
误差Error 68 29 352.82 431.66 - -
总变异Total variation 104 2 810 599.00 - - -
崩解值Breakdown 品种Variety 6 6 385 421.76 1 064 237.00 2 872.01** 0.0001
采收期Harvesting time 4 2 681 066.87 670 266.70 1 808.81** 0.0001
品种×采收期Variety×harvesting time 24 1 353 062.03 56 377.58 152.14** 0.0001
误差Error 68 25 197.80 370.56 - -
总变异Total variation 104 10 445 147.49 - - -
回复值Setback 品种Variety 6 81 418.46 13 569.74 206.27** 0.0001
采收期Harvesting time 4 67 778.99 16 944.75 257.57** 0.0001
品种×采收期Variety×harvesting time 24 175 350.21 7 306.26 111.06** 0.0001
误差Error 68 4 473.54 65.79 - -
总变异Total variation 104 329 200.99 - - -

Fig.2

Cluster analysis of peak viscosity and disintegration value of tested waxy maize varieties"

[1] 赵耀 . 西南糯玉米地方品种waxy基因突变类型的初探. 成都:四川农业大学, 2008.
[2] 陆大雷, 王鑫, 孙旭利 , 等. 基肥配施和拔节期追氮对糯玉米粉糊化特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(5):909-916.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.005
[3] 陆大雷, 王德成, 赵久然 , 等. 收获期对秋播糯玉米不同品种产量与淀粉糊化(RVA)特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008(12):4048-4054.
[4] 张海艳, 高荣岐, 董树亭 , 等. 不同类型玉米发育过程中淀粉糊化特性的比较. 中国粮油学报, 2010,25(9):13-16.
[5] Wilkins M R, Wang P, Xu L , et al. Variability in starch acetylation efficiency from commercial waxy corn hybrids. Cereal Chemistry, 2003,80:72-75.
doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.1.72
[6] 陆芳芳, 陆卫平, 刘萍 , 等. 糯玉米淀粉RVA黏度的杂种优势分析. 作物学报, 2006,32(4):503-508.
[7] 陆大雷, 王德成, 赵久然 , 等. 生长季节对糯玉米淀粉晶体结构和糊化特性的影响. 作物学报, 2009,35(3):499-505.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00499
[8] 张凯, 李新华, 赵前程 , 等. 不同品种玉米淀粉糊化特性比较. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2005,36(1):107-109.
[9] 刘春菊, 卓成龙, 陈伟 , 等. 鲜食糯玉米农艺性状和品质的关系及适采期研究. 江苏农业科学, 2013,41(11):82-85.
[10] 陈江, 王燕, 黄斌全 , 等. 不同类型玉米籽粒淀粉积累、相关酶活及基因表达差异分析. 核农学报, 2012,26(2):217-230.
[11] Chang Y, Lin J, Lii C . Effect of ethanol concentration on the physicochemical properties of waxy corn starch treated by hydrochloric acid. Carbohydrate Polymer, 2004,57:89-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.008
[12] Lu D, Cai X, Shi Y , et al. Effects of water logging after pollination on the physicochemical properties of starch from waxy maize. Food Chemistry, 2015,179:232-238.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.096 pmid: 25722159
[13] 邢燕菊, 阴卫军, 邱登林 , 等. 鲜食玉米的品质评价及采收期品质变化. 山东农业科学, 2010(11):44-46.
[14] 辛德财, 王鹏文 . 不同糯玉米品种籽粒灌浆特性与采收期研究. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(5):2290-2291.
[15] 董立红, 陈永欣, 翟广谦 , 等. 山西省甜糯玉米产业现状与发展对策. 山西农业科学, 2013,41(12):1405-1408.
[16] 陆大雷, 郭换粉, 陆卫平 . 播期、品种和拔节期追氮量对糯玉米淀粉粒分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(2):263-270.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.02.005
[17] 王鑫 . 基肥配施和拔节期追氮对鲜食糯玉米籽粒产量和品质的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2014.
[18] 周建新, 杨晓蓉, 张瑞 , 等. 高湿条件下储藏温度与时间对稻谷糊化特性的影响研究. 粮食储藏, 2010,39(2):38-40,56.
[1] Yaxing Shi,Li Xu,Jiuran Zhao,Baishan Lu,Yanli Fan. Waxy Maize Industry Advantages in China and Opportunities in the Development of the Belt and Road [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 15-19.
[2] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[3] Qiang Guo,Lingling Yu,Guiyuan Zhao. Effects of Different Harvest Date on Grain Quality of Waxy Maize [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 126-129.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yudong Fang,Tianfu Han. Research Progress in Speed Breeding of Crops[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 1 -7 .
[2] Zhang Meng,Gou Jiulan,Wei Quanquan,Chen Long,He Jiafang. Effects of Different Biological Organic Fertilizers on the Growth of Spring Potato and Soil Fertility at High Altitude Region in Guizhou Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 132 -136 .
[3] Fu Jing,Sun Ningning,Liu Tianxue,Ma Junfeng,Yang Yulong,Zhao Xia,Mu Xinyuan,Li Chaohai. The Effects of High Temperature at Spike Stage on Grain-Filling Physiology and Yield of Maize[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 118 -125 .
[4] Quan Baoquan,Lü Ruizhou,Wang Guijiang,Ren Jiecheng. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures during Vegetative Propagation on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 158 -161 .
[5] Lu Shouping,Zhang Hua,Meng Zhaodong,Mu Chunhua. Improvement of Grain Oil Content in Maize Inbred Lines by Molecular Markering Technology[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 24 -28 .
[6] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29 -36 .
[7] Ma Mingchuan,Liu Longlong,Zhang Lijun,Cui Lin,Zhou Jianping. Morphological Identification and Analysis of EMS-Induced Mutants from Ciqiao[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 37 -41 .
[8] Fan Huiling,Bai Shengwen,Zhu Xuefeng,Li Zhenzhou,Qin Minggang,He Zhijun. Difference of Salt-Alkaline Tolerance of Three Rape and Its Two Relatives at Germination Stage[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 178 -184 .
[9] Ye Wenbin,He Yupeng,Wang Yu,Wang Han,Zhao Qingfang. Effects of Alkalized Olive Oil Processing Liquid Wastes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Zea mays L.[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 185 -191 .
[10] Wang Yonggang,Ji Mingze,Zhao Xuhan,Yu Lihe,Xue Yingwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 106 -111 .