Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 215-221.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.02.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Rate and Planting Density on Photosynthetic Rate, Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sesame

Li Feng1(), Gao Tongmei1, Su Xiaoyu1, Wei Libin1, Wang Dongyong1, Tian Yuan1, Li Tongke2, Yang Zihao2, Wei Shuangling1,*()   

  1. 1Henan Sesame Research Center, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huang-Huai-Hai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Henan Key Laboratory of Specific Oilseed Crops Genomics, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2Pingyu County Agriculture Science and Technology Experimental Station, Pingyu 463400, Henan, China
  • Received:2021-09-18 Revised:2021-11-15 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-24
  • Contact: Wei Shuangling E-mail:lifeng4090@126.com;wsl041162@126.com

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on photosynthetic rate, seed yield and nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of sesame, the white sesame variety Zhengtaizhi 1 was used as experimental material with four nitrogen application levels of 0, 60, 100 and 140kg/ha and three planting densities of 112 500, 187 500 and 262 500 plants/ha. The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and chlorophyll content (SPAD) of leaves, nitrogen harvest index, the number of capsules per plant, and 1000-grain weight of sesame decreased gradually with the increase of planting density under the same nitrogen application level, while the nitrogen of plant straw and total nitrogen increased gradually. The nitrogen recovery efficiency and agronomic efficiency were the highest at the planting density 187 500 plants/ha. Among the four nitrogen application levels, the yield of nitrogen aoplication with 100kg/ha treatment was the highest which increased by 19.70% and 16.91% in two years, respectively, compared with the treatment without nitrogen fertilizer. Under the same planting density, the Pn of leaves, the number of capsules per plant, grains per capsule, and 1000-grain weight increased with the increase of nitrogen application levels. The yield of planting density with 187 500 plants/ha treatment was the highest, and compared with 112 500 plants/ha treatment, its yield increased by 15.30% and 16.69% in two years, respectively. The 100kg/ha nitrogen application levels with the planting density of 187 500 plants/ha contribute to obtaining the highest yield. In addition, the nitrogen uptake and use efficiency were more than 50%, and the agronomic utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer reached more than 4.27kg/kg, which was the optimal combination for high-yield and efficient production of white sesame.

Key words: Sesame, Nitrogen rate, Planting density, Photosynthetic rate, Yield, Nitrogen use efficiency

Table 1

Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on Pn and SPAD of sesame at full flowering stage in 2016-2017"

处理
Treatment
2016 2017
Pn [μmol/(m2·s)] SPAD Pn [μmol/(m2·s)] SPAD
N1D1 25.38±0.21b 42.85±0.71c 25.86±0.38cd 44.18±1.12ef
N1D2 24.00±0.65c 41.26±0.32d 25.09±0.20de 42.33±0.36gh
N1D3 20.40±0.12e 38.80±1.09e 21.96±0.61g 40.90±0.62h
N2D1 25.21±0.12bc 46.04±0.61b 26.00±0.64cd 47.32±0.30bcd
N2D2 24.79±0.14bc 43.70±0.86c 25.29±0.23d 45.73±0.28de
N2D3 21.48±0.17de 42.90±0.44c 23.56±0.51f 42.97±0.74fg
N3D1 25.87±0.74ab 48.07±0.99a 27.21±0.37ab 49.73±0.51a
N3D2 25.85±1.11ab 45.93±0.67b 26.31±0.90bc 47.20±0.97bcd
N3D3 22.70±0.83d 43.27±0.36c 24.27±0.16ef 46.71±0.27cd
N4D1 26.82±0.64a 46.09±0.32b 27.39±0.15a 47.43±0.14bc
N4D2 25.83±0.56ab 46.71±0.52b 26.08±0.29cd 48.49±0.49ab
N4D3 21.64±0.74de 43.71±0.29c 24.01±0.54f 46.88±1.88bcd
N ** ** ** **
D ** ** ** *
N×D ns * ns *

Fig.1

Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on grain yield of sesame in 2016-2017 Different lowercase letters indicate significant different (P < 0.05), the same below"

Table 2

Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on grain yield and its components of sesame in 2016-2017"

年份
Year
处理
Treatment
单株蒴数
Capsule per plant
单蒴粒数
Seeds per capsule
千粒重
1000-seed weight (g)
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
2016 N1D1 90.18±2.12de 63.43±1.28def 2.874±0.054de 1436.4±43.8h
N1D2 86.56±2.14ef 65.27±1.11cd 2.862±0.025de 1590.7±65.9g
N1D3 79.50±1.40g 61.30±0.74f 2.698±0.014f 1682.3±53.5f
N2D1 104.41±2.12bc 62.37±0.38ef 2.963±0.030c 1558.3±19.8g
N2D2 100.07±2.27c 63.88±1.62de 2.933±0.061cd 1758.5±40.6de
N2D3 83.53±7.41fg 65.83±0.74cd 2.819±0.011e 1852.2±7.2c
N3D1 129.52±0.13a 67.47±2.38bc 3.053±0.036ab 1675.1±31.1f
N3D2 127.07±2.42a 70.37±0.85a 2.969±0.037bc 2065.3±19.3a
N3D3 93.33±2.33d 65.22±0.92cd 2.834±0.043e 1896.7±10.4bc
N4D1 124.87±4.86a 71.03±0.93a 3.118±0.022a 1703.8±35.1ef
N4D2 107.41±2.01b 69.24±0.71ab 3.082±0.038a 1933.9±20.5b
N4D3 85.67±3.38ef 64.38±0.50de 2.853±0.067de 1827.3±12.1cd
N ** ** ** **
D ** ** ** **
N×D ** ** ns **
2017 N1D1 91.62±3.27ef 67.71±0.24de 2.816±0.061def 1525.7±90.5f
N1D2 88.13±2.51fg 68.38±1.28de 2.755±0.042ef 1744.4±68.8de
N1D3 82.07±0.92g 63.02±1.39g 2.737±0.064f 1819.3±20.8cd
N2D1 110.46±1.76c 69.14±1.50cd 2.961±0.042bc 1706.3±48.3e
N2D2 106.81±3.22c 69.39±0.74bcd 2.913±0.086cd 1984.2±4.1b
N2D3 92.25±0.74ef 64.48±1.13fg 2.830±0.021def 2008.5±5.3b
N3D1 126.07±4.02a 72.32±0.81a 3.091±0.039a 1751.0±33.4de
N3D2 128.20±2.24a 72.01±0.93ab 3.021±0.037ab 2170.9±23.0a
N3D3 98.48±1.57d 66.34±0.89ef 2.857±0.032cde 2028.5±52.9b
N4D1 126.94±4.19a 73.49±1.24a 3.124±0.019a 1843.6±19.2c
N4D2 119.52±1.48b 71.42±1.12abc 3.069±0.039a 2067.1±56.4b
N4D3 94.57±0.84de 64.13±1.27fg 2.784±0.028ef 1995.1±35.5b
N ** ** ** **
D ** ** ** **
N×D ** * * **

Fig.2

Effects of nitrogen rate and planting density on nitrogen accumulation of sesame plant in 2016-2017"

Table 3

Effects of nitrogen rate and plant density on nitrogen utilization efficiency of sesame in 2016-2017"

处理
Treatment
2016 2017
氮肥收获指数
NHI (kg/kg)
氮肥吸收利用率
NRE (%)
氮肥农学利用率
NAE (kg/kg)
氮肥收获指数
NHI (kg/kg)
氮肥吸收利用率
NRE (%)
氮肥农学利用率
NAE (kg/kg)
N1D1 0.52a 0.53a
N1D2 0.49ab 0.48bcd
N1D3 0.43de 0.45cdef
N2D1 0.51a 39.08b 2.03c 0.51ab 39.60cd 3.01ab
N2D2 0.46c 39.99b 2.79b 0.46bcde 47.14ab 4.00a
N2D3 0.44cd 30.56c 2.83b 0.44def 33.05e 3.15ab
N3D1 0.50a 37.40b 2.39bc 0.49abc 41.72bcd 2.25bc
N3D2 0.47bc 51.04a 4.74a 0.48bcd 50.04a 4.27a
N3D3 0.39f 47.35a 2.14c 0.41fg 42.41bc 2.09bc
N4D1 0.45cd 37.28b 1.94c 0.46bcde 36.00de 2.27bc
N4D2 0.40ef 47.06a 2.45bc 0.42ef 47.51ab 2.30bc
N4D3 0.38f 35.48b 1.03d 0.37g 40.92cd 1.26c
N ** ** ** ** * **
D ** ** ** ** ** **
N×D ns ns ns ns ns ns
[1] 王瑞元. 2020年我国粮油产销情况. 中国油脂, 2021, 46(8):1-5.
[2] 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.
[3] Pasley H R, Camberato J J, Cairns J E, et al. Nitrogen rate impacts on tropical maize nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen depletion in eastern and southern Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2020, 116(3):397-408.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-020-10049-x
[4] Ciampitti I A, Vyn T J. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies:a review. Field Crops Research, 2012, 135:22-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.013
[5] Xu C L, Huang S B, Tian B J, et al. Manipulating planting density and nitrogen fertilizer application to improve yield and reduce environmental impact in Chinese maize production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8:1234-1244.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01234
[6] 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 等. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3):763-772.
[7] 曹倩, 贺明荣, 代兴龙, 等. 密度、氮肥互作对小麦产量及氮素利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):815-822.
[8] 肖万欣, 刘晶, 史磊, 等. 氮密互作对不同株型玉米形态、光合性能及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(19):3690-3701.
[9] 左青松, 曹石, 杨士芬, 等. 不同氮肥和密度对油菜机械收获损失率的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(6):1109-1116.
[10] 张平良, 郭天文, 刘晓伟, 等. 密度和施氮量互作对全膜双垄沟播玉米产量、氮素和水分利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4):579-590.
[11] 李鹏程, 董合林, 刘爱忠, 等. 种植密度氮肥互作对棉花产量及氮素利用效率的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(23):122-130.
[12] 刘文萍, 吕伟, 文飞, 等. 种植密度对芝麻干物质量及产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(7):1189-1191,1221.
[13] 李丰, 高桐梅, 卫双玲, 等. 氮肥基追施比例对芝麻产量和氮素吸收、分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5):756-764.
[14] 胡金和, 饶月亮, 赵燕, 等. 不同种植密度下黑芝麻干物质积累与产量关系的研究. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(7):84-85,88.
[15] 李亚贞, 肖国滨, 叶川, 等. 不同氮肥用量对秋播黑芝麻‘赣芝8号’生长发育及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(18):69-73.
[16] 汪瑞清, 胡泊, 吕丰娟, 等. 氮肥用量和基追肥比例对密植秋芝麻产量和冠层结构的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41(2):211-216.
[17] Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, et al. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?. Plant,Cell and Environment, 2006, 29(3):315-330.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x
[18] 蔡瑞国, 王振林, 李文阳, 等, 氮素水平对不同基因型小麦旗叶光合特性和子粒灌浆进程的影响. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(4):36-41.
[19] 刘笑鸣, 顾万荣, 李从锋, 等. 化学调控和氮肥对高密度下春玉米光热水利用效率和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15):3083-3094.
[20] 吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 等. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34(3):447-455.
[21] 黄波, 张妍, 孙建强, 等. 氮密互作对淮北砂姜黑土区冬小麦冠层光合特性和产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(8):994-1002.
[22] 汪瑞清, 肖运萍, 吕丰娟, 等. 氮肥与密度互作对红壤旱地秋芝麻的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2017, 39(4):502-508.
[23] Cameron K C, Di H J, Moir J L. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system:a review. Annals of Applied Biology, 2013, 162(2):145-173.
doi: 10.1111/aab.12014
[24] 曹胜彪, 张吉旺, 杨今胜, 等. 密度对高产夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(5):106-110,120.
[1] Wang Jian, Xu Ailing, Yang Na, Wang Ke, Xi Jilong, Wei Xiaodong, Zhang Jiancheng, Xi Tianyuan. Risk Assessment of Dry-Hot Wind in Different Sowing Dates of Wheat in Yuncheng Basin [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 104-112.
[2] Hao Ruixuan, Sun Min, Ren Aixia, Lin Wen, Wang Peiru, Han Xuyang, Wang Qiang, Gao Zhiqiang. Research on the Relationship between Water Use and Dry Matter Accumulation and Quality of Wide Space Sowing Winter Wheat and the Regulation of Sowing Density [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 119-126.
[3] Zhou Yuzhuang, Wang Rui, Yao Zhaosheng, Zhang Weijun, Liu Tao, Sun Chengming. Effects of Different Soil Surface Structures on Wheat Growth, Development and Yield [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 127-133.
[4] Ma Ruiqi, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Topdressing Nitrogen Rates on Yield and Photosynthetic Performance of Different Quality Types of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 134-142.
[5] Cao Liru, Lu Xiaomin, Wang Guorui, Dang Zun, Qiu Tian, Qiu Jianjun, Tian Yunfeng, Wang Zhenhua, Dang Yongfu. Effects of Foliar Spraying with Carbon-Adsorbed Polyglutamic Acid on Growth and Development of Maize [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 158-166.
[6] Yuan Jingya, Li Wanming, Pang Xueqin, Huang Linhua, Qi Lan, Wang Shengmou, Xie Zhengwei, Qiu Yibiao, Lai Quanhao, Qin Nana. Effects of Different Top Pruning Layers at Flowering Stage on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Broad Bean [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 167-173.
[7] Liu Panfeng, Qin Jie, Hao Shuangnan, Wang Danli, Yang Wude, Feng Meichen, Song Xiaoyan. Effects of Selenium Concentration, Application Stage and Method on Yield and Grain Selenium Content of Different Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 182-188.
[8] Guo Yongxin, Zhou Hao, Sun Peng, Wang Yaqing, Ma Ke, Li Xiaorui, Dong Shuqi, Guo Pingyi, Yuan Xiangyang. Effects of Planting Patterns on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Zhangza 10 in Different Ecological Areas [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 195-202.
[9] Han Lijun, Xue Zhangyi, Xie Hao, Gu Junfei. Effects of Dry-Wet Alternate Irrigation and Nitrification Inhibitor on Rice Yield and Soil Properties [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 222-229.
[10] Gong Dan, Luo Gaoling, Zhang Xiaoyan, Zhu Xu, Yin Zhengong, Wang Suhua, Sha Aihua, Wang Lixia. Assessment of Adaptability for 34 New Cultivars of Cowpea under Different Eco-Environments [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 89-95.
[11] Fang Mengying, Yan Peng, Lu Lin, Wang Qingyan, Dong Zhiqiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Nitrogen Metabolism and Yield of Summer Maize under Different Nitrogen Levels [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 96-103.
[12] Shi Xionggao, Pei Xuexia, Dang Jianyou, Zhang Dingyi. Research Progress on High-Yield, High-Quality, High-Efficiency and Ecology Cultivation of Wheat Micro-Sprinkling and Drip Fertigation [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 1-10.
[13] Liu Menghong, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Zhao Haicheng, Lü Yandong. Effects of Fertilization Method and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 102-109.
[14] He Yuxuan, Li Yajuan, Zhou Mingzhuo, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Calcium Peroxide Application on Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Full-Rate Straw Returning in a Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 116-123.
[15] Cui Shiyou, Zhang Yang, Zhai Caijiao, Dong Shiqi, Zhang Jiao, Chen Pengjun, Han Jijun, Dai Qigen. Performance of Yield and Quality of Japonica Rice under Brackish Water Irrigation on the Reclaimed Tidal Flat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 137-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!