Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 137-141.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Performance of Yield and Quality of Japonica Rice under Brackish Water Irrigation on the Reclaimed Tidal Flat

Cui Shiyou1(), Zhang Yang2, Zhai Caijiao1, Dong Shiqi2, Zhang Jiao1, Chen Pengjun3, Han Jijun3, Dai Qigen2()   

  1. 1Jiangsu Yanjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences/Nantong Public Technology Service Platform of Salt-tolerant Plants, Nantong 226541, Jiangsu, China
    2College of Agronomy, Yangzhou University/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
    3Institute of Geochemical Exploration and Marine Geological Survey, East China Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-04-02 Revised:2021-12-23 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16
  • Contact: Dai Qigen E-mail:cuisy198@163.com;qgdai@yzu.edu.cn

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

161

Abstract:

To clarify the yield and quality performance of different Japonica rice varieties in coastal tidal flats of Jiangsu province. In this study, 23 new varieties (lines) bred recently were used as experimental materials, Yandao 12 as control, to compare the yield and quality of Japonica rice under salt stress in the reclaimed beach land with medium and low salinity (2g/kg) and irrigation with brackish water (mineralization degree, 0.94-2.44g/L). The results showed that the average yield of the tested varieties was 8.21t/ha, ranging from 6.19 to 11.74t/ha, which was about 85% of the yield of the old reclamation area without salt stress; the main characteristics of panicle grain structure were more panicles and less grains, increasing the number of spikelets per panicle was one of the important ways for high-yield cultivation of rice in tidal flat. Considering rice quality, medium and low salt stress had little effect on brown rice rate, milled rice rate, length-width ratio and taste value, and a certain impact on whole rice rate, but had greater influence on chalkiness rate and chalkiness degree. In the breeding and selection of salt tolerant varieties, the selection of chalkiness degree should be strengthened.

Key words: Brackish water, Yield, Quality, Rice, Tidal flats

Fig.1

Dynamic changes of soil and irrigation water salinity during rice growth in coastal saline soil of Jiangsu province"

Table 1

Performance of yield and its components of tested rice varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 产量
Yield (kg/m2)		 每平方米穗数
Number of panicles per square meter		 穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle		 结实率
Seed setting rate (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
V01 0.685efghi 331.3cd 65.6gh 90.7a 28.8bc
V02 0.758defg 345.0bcd 73.1fgh 93.7a 29.6abc
V03 1.128a 339.0bcd 106.9a 94.3a 26.3efghi
V04 0.761def 366.3abcd 98.8abc 88.5a 26.0fghi
V05 0.655fghi 322.7d 105.5a 94.4a 25.4hi
V06 0.784cdef 340.5bcd 84.0bcdefgh 94.8a 26.6efghi
V07 0.907bc 395.8abc 91.4abcdef 91.8a 25.8ghi
V08 0.741defghi 369.0abcd 69.3gh 96.9a 27.1ef
V09 0.726defghi 356.3abcd 75.2efgh 86.4a 26.5efghi
V10 1.174a 393.0abc 94.9abcde 90.2a 26.7efgh
V11 0.815bcde 369.0abcd 74.0fgh 93.1a 26.5efghi
V12 0.757defg 354.7abcd 100.8ab 64.4b 25.4hi
V13 0.854bcd 378.6abcd 91.7abcdef 90.8a 23.0j
V14 0.854bcd 401.3ab 75.4efgh 90.9a 25.5ghi
V15 0.865bcd 413.3a 74.8efgh 92.0a 25.3i
V16 0.793bcdef 397.7ab 71.6fgh 88.7a 26.2efghi
V17 0.931b 400.7ab 79.3cdefgh 96.1a 26.8efg
V18 0.834bcd 373.0abcd 96.9abcd 92.0a 28.6cd
V19 0.841bcd 365.3abcd 75.0efgh 94.3a 30.4a
V20 0.619ghi 345.0bcd 63.4h 91.0a 29.9ab
V21 0.792bcdef 354.7abcd 77.0defgh 89.9a 25.6ghi
V22 0.791bcdef 351.3abcd 106.7a 95.8a 27.5de
V23 0.915bc 404.0ab 84.3bcdefg 93.7a 28.6cd
变幅Range 0.619~1.174 331.3~413.3 63.4~106.9 64.4~96.9 23.0~30.4
平均值±标准差
Mean±standard deviation		 0.821±0.130 368.1±25.9 84.1±13.7 91.1±6.4 26.9±1.8

Table 2

Performance of rice quality under medium and low salinity stress in tidal flat"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 糙米率
Brown rice
rate (%)		 精米率
Milled rice
rate (%)		 整精米率
Whole rice
rate (%)		 长宽比
Length-width
ratio		 垩白粒率
Chalkiness
rate (%)		 垩白度
Chalkiness
degree (%)		 食味值
Taste
value
V01 85.1gh 73.3bcd 64.9bcd 1.73ghijk 100.0a 98.9a 84.8a
V02 86.1bc 75.7ab 72.3a 1.78efghi 53.3bc 21.7bcd 62.0ef
V03 85.2fg 72.9cde 52.6jkl 1.76fghij 18.3j 4.9j 55.8hi
V04 85.5defg 67.1i 54.0hijkl 1.82def 53.1bc 19.9cdef 63.0ef
V05 85.3efg 69.3ghi 53.3ijkl 1.66k 41.3cdefg 13.9efghi 65.5de
V06 85.5defg 71.5cdefg 55.9ghijkl 1.80defgh 56.9b 23.4bc 62.0ef
V07 85.6cdefg 70.3efg 62.5cdef 1.82def 47.4bcde 28.5b 60.3fg
V08 84.7h 72.4cdef 57.8fghijk 1.80defgh 100.0a 98.6a 75.8b
V09 85.8cdef 70.5efg 58.5efghij 1.75fghij 42.9cdef 15.3defgh 52.5i
V10 85.7cdefg 76.0a 70.2ab 1.87bcd 34.3efghi 9.5ghij 53.8i
V11 85.2gh 70.5efg 64.4bcde 1.81defg 41.6cdefg 16.9cdefg 59.5fgh
V12 86.6a 70.5efg 54.1hijkl 1.94b 38.8defgh 13.4fghi 55.3hi
V13 86.0bcd 67.6hi 59.3defghi 1.91bc 28.8ghij 8.8hij 54.3i
V14 85.3efg 70.8defg 60.1defgh 1.77fghij 52.0bcd 19.4cdef 68.3cd
V15 86.1bc 73.8abc 67.2abc 1.71hijk 54.1bc 22.4bcd 70.8c
V16 85.3efg 69.7fgh 60.9defg 1.87bcd 47.1bcde 21.3cde 61.8ef
V17 85.8bcde 72.2cdef 60.6defg 1.83cdef 27.1hij 9.4ghij 56.8ghi
V18 85.9bcd 73.7abc 69.7ab 1.73ghijk 45.4bcde 18.3cdef 69.5cd
B19 86.4ab 71.6cdefg 52.1kl 1.83cdef 42.7cdef 13.0fghi 55.8hi
V20 81.9i 70.0fgh 50.9l 2.27a 24.7ij 7.05ij 55.3hi
V21 85.6cdefg 69.4ghi 55.7ghijkl 1.69jk 41.2cdefg 13.9efghi 62.5ef
V22 85.2gh 71.8cdefg 55.3ghijkl 1.86cde 27.3hij 9.1hij 56.0ghi
V23 85.3efg 70.1fgh 53.0jkl 1.81defg 30.1fghij 10.2ghij 63.0ef
变幅Range 81.9~86.6 67.1~76.0 50.9~72.3 1.66~2.27 18.3~100.0 4.9~98.9 52.5~84.8
平均值±标准差
Mean±standard deviation		 85.4±0.9 71.3±2.2 59.4±6.3 1.82±0.12 45.9±20.1 22.5±24.8 61.7±7.8

Table 3

Correlation between rice yield and quality under medium and low salinity stress in tidal flat"

指标
Index		 糙米率
Brown rice
rate		 精米率
Milled rice
rate		 整精米率
Whole rice
rate		 长宽比
Length-width
ratio		 垩白粒率
Chalkiness
rate		 垩白度
Chalkiness
degree		 食味值
Taste
value
产量Yield 0.33 0.39 0.23 -0.15 -0.39 -0.32 -0.32
每平方米穗数Number of panicles per square meter 0.22 0.03 0.32 0.00 -0.12 -0.16 -0.04
穗粒数Spikelets per panicle 0.33 -0.12 -0.20 -0.18 -0.46* -0.42* -0.34
结实率Seed setting rate -0.26 0.20 0.11 -0.23 0.08 0.13 0.21
千粒重1000-grain weight -0.32 0.44* 0.04 0.26 0.13 0.16 0.13
[1] 张文渊. 沿海滩涂围垦造田种稻技术. 农业科技通讯, 1999(5):9.
[2] 倪秀红, 陈春雷, 顾春军, 等. 盐碱滩涂水稻耐盐品种筛选试验初报. 上海农业科技, 2012(2):37-38.
[3] 姚立生, 何冲霄, 孙明法, 等. 沿海滩涂耐盐水稻高效筛选. 大麦与谷类科学, 2012(4):10-12.
[4] 蒋荷, 孙加祥, 汤陵华. 水稻种质资源耐盐性鉴定与评价. 江苏农业科学, 1995(4):15-16.
[5] 方先文, 汤陵华, 王艳平. 耐盐水稻种质资源的筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5(3):295-298.
[6] 荆培培, 崔敏, 秦涛, 等. 土培条件下不同盐分梯度对水稻产量及其生理特性的影响. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4):26-33.
[7] 周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 等. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2):146-154.
[8] 谷娇娇, 胡博文, 贾琰, 等. 盐胁迫对水稻根系相关性状及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(4):176-182.
[9] 魏义长, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 等. 基于ASI法的滨海滩涂地水稻土壤有效氮、磷、钾丰缺指标. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1):138-143.
[10] 孙明法, 严国红, 唐红生, 等. 江苏沿海滩涂盐碱地水稻种植技术要点. 大麦与谷类科学, 2012(1):6-7.
[11] 石晓旭. 盐胁迫下氮肥运筹对水稻产量及其生理的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2018.
[12] 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 张蛟, 等. 盐分胁迫对稻米品质性状的影响. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(2):44-48.
[13] 肖丹丹, 李军, 邓先亮, 等. 不同品种稻米品质形成对盐胁迫的响应. 核农学报, 2020(8):1840-1847.
[14] 张蛟, 翟彩娇, 崔士友. 微咸水灌溉滩涂稻田盐分动态及其水稻产量表现. 江苏农业学报, 2018(4):799-803.
[15] 王相平, 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 等. 苏北滩涂水稻微咸水灌溉模式及土壤盐分动态变化. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(7):54-63.
[16] 余为仆. 秸秆还田条件下盐胁迫对水稻产量与品质形成的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2014.
[17] 李红宇, 潘世驹, 钱永德, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(12):2100-2105.
[18] 杨福, 梁正伟, 王志春, 等. 水稻耐盐碱品种(系)筛选试验与省区域试验产量性状的比较. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007, 29(6):596-600.
[19] 步金宝, 赵宏伟, 刘化龙, 等. 盐碱胁迫对寒地粳稻产量形成机理的研究. 农业现代化研究, 2012, 33(4):485-488.
[20] 褚贵发, 郎素秋, 周新, 等. 水稻微咸水灌溉试验及开发研究. 中国农村水利水电, 1999(2):15-18.
[21] 韦还和, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 等. 盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8):1238-1247.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.02001
[22] 罗成科, 肖国举, 张峰举, 等. 不同浓度复合盐胁迫对水稻产量和品质的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(1):137-141.
[23] 张春红, 李金州, 张亚东, 等. 食味仪测定与感官评价相结合鉴定优质粳稻食味特性. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(5):958-965.
[1] Shi Xionggao, Pei Xuexia, Dang Jianyou, Zhang Dingyi. Research Progress on High-Yield, High-Quality, High-Efficiency and Ecology Cultivation of Wheat Micro-Sprinkling and Drip Fertigation [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 1-10.
[2] Liu Menghong, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Zhao Haicheng, Lü Yandong. Effects of Fertilization Method and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 102-109.
[3] Liu Lei, Song Nana, Qi Xiaoli, Cui Kehui. Research Advances on the Relationship between Root Characteristics and Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization Efficiency in Rice [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 11-19.
[4] He Yuxuan, Li Yajuan, Zhou Mingzhuo, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Calcium Peroxide Application on Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Full-Rate Straw Returning in a Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 116-123.
[5] Long Ruiping, Zhang Chaozhong, Ge Qinying, Wan Weidong, Wang Qin, Li Guiyong, Xia Qiongmei, Zhu Haiping, Yang Congdang. Analysis of Growth Characteristics and Economic Benefit of Mechanical Transplanted Japonica Rice with Applying Panicle Nitrogen under Rotation of Paddy-Upland [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 124-129.
[6] Liu Zigang, Lu Haibo, Wu Minhua, Zhao Haichao, Wei Dong, Huang Zhihong. Effects of Chemical Regulator of Yuhuangjin on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 142-146.
[7] Jin Dan, Feng Naijie, Zheng Dianfeng, Wang Shiya. Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Carbon Metabolism and Yield of Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 147-153.
[8] Xie Huimin, Wu Ke, Liu Wenqi, Wei Guoliang, Lu Xian, Li Zhuanglin, Wei Shanqing, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of Partial Substitution of Seaweed Fertilizers and Microbial Inoculant for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 161-166.
[9] Bai Junbing, Wang Yanjie, Wang Demei, Yang Yushuang, Wang Yujiao, Guo Dandan, Liu Zhewen, Chang Xuhong, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Yield and Quality of Strong Gluten Wheat to Different Soil Conditions and Nitrogen Levels [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 167-173.
[10] Du Xin, Li Bo, Mao Luxiao, Chen Wei, Zhang Yuxian, Cao Liang. Effects of Melatonin on Yield and AsA-GSH Cycle in Soybean under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 174-178.
[11] Wang Qingbin, Lu Jiechun, Peng Chun’e, Meng Hui, Liu Zhiguo, Wang Hongfeng, Zhang Min. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates Combined with Extracts of Paecilomyces variotii (ZNC) on Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Pakchoi [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 190-195.
[12] Yang Zhinan, Huang Jinwen, Han Fanxiang, Li Yawei, Ma Jiantao, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Yang Delong, Chang Lei. Effects of Straw Strip Mulching on Soil Temperature and Yield of Potato Field in Rain-Fed Region in Northwest China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 196-204.
[13] Duan Liuying, Wu Ting, Li Xia, Xie Jiankun, Hu Biaolin. Progress on Cytoplasmic Male Sterility and Fertility Restoration Genes in Rice [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 20-30.
[14] Li Runqing, Shen Yong, Zhu Kuanyu, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on the Grain Yield, Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Super Rice Nanjing 9108 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 205-212.
[15] Feng Sufen, Liu Yuanjian, Xu Ruiqi, Zhang Wei. Analysis on Main Traits of Fresh Corn Varieties Recently Approved in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 220-226.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!