Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 264-271.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.037

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions from Planting Production Based on LMDI Model and Approaches of Carbon Mitigation in Gansu Province

Li Wei1(), Meng Pingzhu2, Li Caidi2, Yan Zhengang2()   

  1. 1College of Finance and Economics, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
    2College of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-05-11 Revised:2022-09-04 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

133

Abstract:

Carbon emission from planting production played large porportion of total amount of carbon emission from agricultural production. Therefore, estimating carbon emissions from planting produciton, analyzing the influencing factors, achieving the carbon sequestration and emission mitigation in regional agricultural production had important significance. Carbon emission evaluation and influencing factors were analyzed for planting production in Gansu, this study was to construct the index system of carbon emission from planting production using LMDI model, and evaluated the carbon emission from the five typical ecological zones in recent ten years. The results showed that carbon emissions from planting production during 2009 to 2019 generally increased first and then declined, but the carbon emission intensity decreased gradually. Hexi region had the highest carbon emissions (0.79t C/ha) from planting production and a lower carbon emission intensity (0.20t C/×104 yuan). The nationality region had the lowest carbon emissions (0.45t C/ha) and the highest carbon emission intensity (0.31t C/×104yuan). Tillage, fertilizer, irrigation and machinery were the dominant sources of carbon emission. Agricultural structure, population and economic factors had effectively effects on carbon emissions, and impact of economy factor was more obvious. Carbon emission intensity and industrial structure had inhibiting effects on carbon emissions, and the impact of carbon emission intensity was more obvious. Thus, to mitigate carbon emissions from planting production in Gansu, the main approaches should be application of agronomic measures of protective crop rotation, no-tillage or less tillage, combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizer, water saving irrigation, use of new energy agricultural machinery. The transformation of traditional agriculture to modern agriculture is the main way to reduce carbon emissions in planting production.

Key words: LMDI factor decomposition model, Planting production, Carbon emissions, Influencing factors, Approaches of carbon mitigation

Table 1

Carbon emission coefficients in crop production"

符号
Symbol		 碳排放源
Carbon emission source		 碳排放系数
Carbon emission coefficient		 文献
Reference
A 化肥生产和使用过程产生的碳排放 0.8956kg C/t [11]
B 地膜生产和使用过程产生的碳排放 5.18kg C/kg [12]
C 农业灌溉过程中用电产生的碳排放 266.48kg C/hm2 [12]
D 农业翻耕造成土壤CO2碳排放 312.6kg C/hm2 [13]
E 农业机械使用过程消耗化石燃料（柴油、电力等）产生的碳排放 0.18kg C/kW [14]

Fig.1

Total carbon emissions and growth rate of planting production during 2009-2019 in Gansu"

Table 2

Carbon emission from regional planting production in Gansu province t/hm2"

地区
Region		 市/自治州
Municipality/
autonomous prefecture		 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 年平均值
Annual
average		 地区平均值
Region
average
河西地区
Hexi oasis		 武威 0.48 0.61 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.57 0.56 0.45 0.52 0.53 0.48 0.54±0.05 0.79±0.14
金昌 0.57 0.80 0.79 0.81 0.86 0.80 0.78 0.72 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.75±0.08
张掖 0.59 0.78 0.83 0.88 0.91 0.93 0.92 0.87 0.86 0.83 0.92 0.85±0.09
嘉峪关 0.69 1.01 1.08 1.11 1.09 1.15 1.11 0.87 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.87±0.03
酒泉 0.71 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.99 1.01 0.98 0.90 0.88 0.90 0.89 0.93±0.08
陇东黄土高原
Loess plateau of east Gansu		 平凉 0.90 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.91 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.73 0.72 0.68 0.85±0.09 0.66±0.19
庆阳 0.44 0.47 0.46 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.48±0.02
陇中黄土高原
Loess plateau of
central Gansu
 兰州 0.48 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.54 0.64 0.63 0.61 0.59±0.04 0.54±0.04
白银 0.46 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.54±0.03
定西 0.43 0.46 0.45 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.48±0.03
秦巴山区
Qianba mountain		 天水 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.50 0.61 0.59 0.62 0.51±0.06 0.51±0.06
陇南 0.45 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.55 0.53 0.52 0.50±0.02
民族地区
Nationality region		 临夏 0.44 0.54 0.52 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.54 0.55 0.53 0.52±0.03 0.45±0.07
甘南 0.35 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.38±0.01

Fig.2

Intensity and growth rate of carbon emission from planting production during 2009-2019 in Gansu province"

Table 3

"

地区
Region		 市/自治州Municipality/
autonomous prefecture		 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 年平均值
Annual
average		 地区平均值
Region
average
河西地区
Hexi oasis		 武威 0.33 0.38 0.35 0.19 0.25 0.24 0.21 0.16 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.24±0.08 0.20±0.06
金昌 0.28 0.35 0.33 0.25 0.27 0.23 0.23 0.19 0.24 0.21 0.16 0.25±0.05
张掖 0.24 0.28 0.27 0.15 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.30 0.24 0.18 0.23±0.04
嘉峪关 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.08±0.02
酒泉 0.23 0.27 0.25 0.13 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.14 0.22 0.19 0.14 0.19±0.07
陇东黄土高原
Loess plateau of east Gansu		 平凉 0.40 0.35 0.33 0.21 0.26 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.25±0.07 0.28±0.04
庆阳 0.46 0.40 0.37 0.24 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.37 0.31 0.25 0.32±0.07
陇中黄土高原
Loess plateau of
central Gansu
 兰州 0.26 0.28 0.25 0.18 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.21±0.04 0.27±0.05
白银 0.36 0.39 0.38 0.21 0.30 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.24 0.19 0.29±0.06
定西 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.25 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.32±0.07
秦巴山区
Qianba mountain		 天水 0.31 0.26 0.24 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.19±0.05 0.24±0.05
陇南 0.49 0.45 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.29±0.10
民族地区
Nationality region		 临夏 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.26±0.05 0.31±0.05
甘南 0.41 0.41 0.48 0.40 0.37 0.34 0.33 0.30 0.37 0.28 0.23 0.36±0.07

Fig.3

Changes of carbon emissions from inputs of planting production during 2009-2019 in Gansu province"

Table 4

Total carbon emissions and percentage from inputs of regional planting production during 2009-2019 in Gansu province"

地区
Region		 市/自治州Municipality/
autonomous
prefecture		 化肥
Fertilizer		 灌溉
Irrigation		 翻耕
Tillage		 农用机械
Farm machinery
总量
Total（×104t）		 比重
Proportion (%)		 总量
Total（×104t）		 比重
Proportion (%)		 总量
Total（×104t）		 比重
Proportion (%)		 总量
Total（×104t）		 比重
Proportion (%)
河西地区
Hexi oasis		 武威 128.73 15.30 49.97 16.97 85.89 6.29 0.62 14.95
金昌 19.90 2.37 16.66 5.66 26.29 1.93 0.19 4.52
张掖 89.43 10.63 49.78 16.90 93.17 6.83 0.43 10.31
嘉峪关 1.80 0.21 0.81 0.27 1.69 0.12 0.02 0.53
酒泉 73.97 8.79 44.53 15.12 60.78 4.45 0.44 10.41
陇东黄土高原
Loess plateau of east Gansu		 平凉 91.75 10.91 11.37 3.86 147.90 10.83 0.23 5.51
庆阳 95.19 11.31 13.34 4.53 208.94 15.31 0.34 8.04
陇中黄土高原
Loess plateau of
central Gansu
 兰州 41.04 4.88 20.70 7.03 71.88 5.27 0.27 6.40
白银 50.47 6.00 26.92 9.14 108.71 7.96 0.39 9.25
定西 84.89 10.09 17.61 5.98 188.67 13.82 0.43 10.28
秦巴山区
Qianba mountain		 天水 74.84 8.90 9.60 3.26 154.50 11.32 0.27 6.56
陇南 64.54 7.67 16.92 5.75 136.85 10.02 0.31 7.38
民族地区
Nationality region		 临夏 21.42 2.55 14.74 5.00 55.52 4.07 0.17 4.07
甘南 3.36 0.40 1.55 0.53 24.35 1.78 0.07 1.78

Table 5

Contribution values of carbon emissions from planting production in Gansu province ×104t"

年份Year ΔCI ΔAI ΔSI ΔEI ΔP ΔC
2009 － － － － － －
2010 -28.95 2.57 27.58 42.76 0.46 44.42
2011 -16.82 -3.64 24.38 46.23 0.38 50.54
2012 -20.90 -0.36 26.71 25.71 1.24 32.40
2013 -19.71 -2.00 25.84 26.19 0.44 30.76
2014 -8.92 -1.34 12.99 19.14 0.83 22.70
2015 -12.99 1.28 12.35 0.62 0.85 2.11
2016 -17.59 -12.90 20.73 11.91 0.99 3.14
2017 -36.88 2.25 15.20 12.66 1.41 -5.35
2018 -19.17 2.93 15.72 21.39 0.99 21.86
2019 -24.74 -2.81 27.58 15.62 0.87 16.51
总计Total -206.66 -14.30 209.09 222.23 8.44 219.07
贡献值
Contribution value		 0.42 0.95 2.42 2.57 1.04 －
[1] 李玉强, 陈云, 曹纹婕, 等. 全球变化对资源环境及生态系统影响的生态学理论基础. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3):603-612.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.019
[2] 林斌, 徐孟, 汪笑溪. 农业生产的温室气体排放研究进展. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(4):500-515.
[3] Yan Z G, Hou F J, Yan T H. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from three contrasting integrated crop and livestock production systems during 1991-2016 in Gansu of China. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(2):469-480.
doi: 10.21162/PAKJAS
[4] 郭险峰, 艾静静. 农业碳排放的时空演变,影响因素及脱钩效应研究——基于31省2000-2019年面板数据. 西昌学院学报(自然科学版), 2022, 36(1):9-15.
[5] 陈炜, 殷田园, 李红兵. 1997-2015年中国种植业碳排放时空特征及与农业发展的关系. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(2):37-44.
[6] Chen G Q, Zhang B. Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: inventory and input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 2010, 38:6180-6193.
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.004
[7] 李政通, 白彩全, 肖薇薇. 基于LMDI模型的东北地区农业碳排放测度与分解. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(4):145-152.
[8] 文清, 田云, 王雅鹏. 中国农业碳排放省域差异与驱动机理研究——基于30个省(市,区)1993-2012年的面板数据分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(11):1-6.
[9] 罗君, 张学斌. 甘肃省农业经济发展的区域差异研究. 农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(6):713-716.
[10] 燕振刚, 李薇, Yan T H, 等. BP神经网络算法在河西绿洲玉米生产碳排放评估中的应用及算法有效性研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(8):1100-1106.
[11] 段华平, 张悦, 赵建波, 等. 中国农田生态系统的碳足迹分析. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(5):203-208.
[12] 李彩弟, 燕振刚. 基于LMDI的张掖市农业碳排放影响因素分析. 生产力研究, 2020(5):98-101,161.
[13] 何炫蕾, 陈兴鹏, 庞家幸. 基于LMDI的兰州市农业碳排放现状及影响因素分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(7):150-158.
[14] 朱巧娴, 梅昀, 陈银蓉, 等. 基于碳排放测算的湖北省土地利用结构效率的DEA模型分析与空间分异研究. 经济地理, 2015, 35(12):176-184.
[15] 严圣吉, 邓艾兴, 尚子吟, 等. 我国作物生产碳排放特征及助力碳中和的减排固碳途径. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4):1-13.
[16] 金书秦, 林煜, 牛坤玉. 以低碳带动农业绿色转型:中国农业碳排放特征及其减排路径. 改革, 2021, 327(5):29-37.
[17] 张琦, 王淑兰, 王浩, 等. 深松与免耕频次对黄土旱塬春玉米田土壤团聚体与土壤碳库的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(14):2840-2851.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.14.008
[18] Chai Q, Nemecek T, Liang C, et al. Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(38):1-12.
[19] 邓长芳, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 等. 黄土高原雨养农业区不同种植模式土壤温室气体排放特征. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9):1-13.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017530
[20] 张勃, 郝建秀, 李太安, 等. 关于河西地区生态经济发展的几个问题. 草业科学, 2003, 20(11):36-39.
[21] Jing Q, Bouman B, Hengsdijk H, et al. Exploring options to combine high yields with high nitrogen use efficiencies in irrigated rice in China. European Journal of Agronomy, 2007, 26 (2):166-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2006.09.005
[22] 赵佐平. 秦巴山区主要农作物肥料投入现状评估分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(4):127-133.
[1] Yan Shengji, Shang Ziyin, Deng Aixing, Zhang Weijian. Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Reduction Approaches of Farmland N2O Emission in China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 1-8.
[2] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Ruizhi Xie,Lulu Li,Bo Ming,Peng Hou,Zhendong Chu,Wanxu Zhang,Chaowei Liu. Grain Breakage Rate of Maize by Mechanical Harvesting in China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 76-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!