Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 170-174.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.06.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Nutrient Absorption and Suitable Quantity of Spring Potato in Hebei Double Cropping Cultivated Region

Yang Yunma1(), Yang Junfang1, Jia Liangliang1, Xing Suli1, Fan Jianying2, Feng Zhiming2, Zhang Shuqing2(), Xiang Congchao2, Huang Shaohui1, Liu Xuetong1   

  1. 1Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Hebei Fertilizer Technology Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, China
    2Shijiazhuang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, Hebei, China
  • Received:2020-02-23 Revised:2020-10-30 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Zhang Shuqing E-mail:yangyunma@163.com;sjzzsq@163.com

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

150

Abstract:

The nutrient absorption and suitable quantity of spring potato were studied through fertilizer effect. An experiment was conducted by using of "NPK 3414" in Hebei double cropping cultivated region. The results showed: requirement of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) for production of 1 000kg potato under optimized fertilization and the amount of NPK were 4.78, 0.47, and 4.64kg, respectively. The absorption rate of N, P, K were 583.0, 43.7, 500.4g/(ha·d) at potato seedling stage, and 686.6, 116.2, 1 105.8g/(ha·d) from seedling to blooming stage, and 3 900.2, 373.9, 3 426.4g/(ha·d) from blooming to harvesting stage, respectively. The key period of potato nutrient absorption was after blooming. The nutrient absorption rate under optimized fertilization treatment was more twice times than that of non-fertilization treatment. The recommended rate of N, P2O5 and K2O was 186, 86 and 212kg/ha in the present experiment condition.

Key words: Potato, Nutrient absorption, Nutrient quantity, Hebei double cropping cultivated region

Table 1

The basic characteristics of the experimental soil"

土层Soil layer (cm) 有机质Organic matter (g/kg) 全N Total N (g/kg) 有效磷P Olsen-P (mg/kg) 速效钾K Available-K (mg/kg) pH
0~20 13.22 1.12 10.8 117 8.03
20~40 9.59 0.57 7.2 82 8.11

Table 2

Rate of nutrient of 'NPK 3414 Test' kg/hm2"

处理Treatment N P2O5 K2O
N0P0K0 0 0 0
N0P2K2 0 90 180
N1P2K2 90 90 180
N2P0K2 180 0 180
N2P1K2 180 45 180
N2P2K2 180 90 180
N2P3K2 180 135 180
N2P2K0 180 90 0
N2P2K1 180 90 90
N2P2K3 180 90 270
N3P2K2 270 90 180
N1P1K2 90 45 180
N1P2K1 90 90 90
N2P1K1 180 45 90
农民习惯Farmers practice (FP) 318 60 300

Table 3

Yield of potato under different fertilization treatments"

处理
Treatment		 块茎总产
Total yield
(kg/hm2)		 商品薯产量
Yield of commercial
potato (kg/hm2)		 商品薯率
Rate of commercial potato (%)
N0P0K0 18 168±1 001f 7 804±1 348e 43.1b
N0P2K2 22 042±1 047ef 14 925±2 178d 68.0a
N1P2K2 31 168±4 425abcd 19 724±3 054abcd 63.5a
N2P0K2 27 063±972de 19 962±1 797abcd 73.8a
N2P1K2 32 302±2 126abcd 22 818±1 596abc 70.6a
N2P2K2 37 645±4 690ab 25 448±2 090ab 67.8a
N2P3K2 34 023±3 143abcd 25 368±2 164ab 74.9a
N2P2K0 32 292±2 445abcd 18 133±4 929cd 56.9ab
N2P2K1 36 041±3 752abc 21 399±3 110abcd 59.3ab
N2P2K3 38 995±7 081a 26 194±2 744a 68.6a
N3P2K2 37 999±5 840ab 24 261±1 871abc 64.5a
N1P1K2 27 977±7 079cde 18 713±5 968bcd 66.4a
N1P2K1 30 308±3 664bcd 17 871±3 506cd 58.7ab
N2P1K1 32 213±551abcd 22 851±4 402abc 71.0a
FP 35 139±7 224abcd 21 946±7 061abc 61.9a

Fig.1

Relationships between N, P2O5, K2O rate and commercial potato yield"

Fig.2

Nutrient absorption of potato at different growth stages"

[1] 张志伟, 梁斌, 李俊良, 等. 不同灌溉施肥方式对马铃薯产量和养分吸收的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(36):268-272.
[2] 段玉, 妥德宝, 赵沛义, 等. 马铃薯施肥肥效及养分利用率的研究. 中国马铃薯, 2008,22(4):197-200.
[3] 程江华, 廖华俊, 刘同革, 等. 安徽省马铃薯主食化加工思路分析. 中国马铃薯, 2017,31(4):240-245.
[4] 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司. 2017中国农村统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2017.
[5] 河北省人民政府办公厅, 河北省统计局. 2018河北农村统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
[6] 张淑青, 张铁石, 封志明, 等. 河北二季作区马铃薯春季多膜覆盖高效种植模式. 中国马铃薯, 2015,29(4):213-216.
[7] 张淑青, 樊建英, 张铁石, 等. 冀中南二季作区冷棚三膜覆盖马铃薯高效栽培技术. 中国马铃薯, 2018,32(3):148-151.
[8] 付勇, 张淑青, 李建芬, 等. 高产高效二季作区马铃薯种植模式及技术. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(36):32-34.
[9] 何文寿, 马琨, 代晓华, 等. 宁夏马铃薯氮、磷、钾养分的吸收累积特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(6):1477-1487.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0618
[10] 陈建国, 何文寿, 代晓华, 等. 施肥对旱作马铃薯干物质及养分吸收的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2016,30(5):282-288.
[11] 曹哲, 何文寿, 侯贤清, 等. 不同施氮量对马铃薯养分吸收及产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(7):1600-1605.
[12] 邢海峰, 石晓华, 杨海鹰, 等. 磷肥分次滴灌施用提高马铃薯群体磷素吸收及磷利用率的作用. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(4):987-992.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0418
[13] 段玉, 张君, 李焕春, 等. 马铃薯氮磷钾养分吸收规律及施肥肥效的研究. 土壤, 2014,46(2):212-217.
[14] 苏小娟, 王平, 刘淑英, 等. 施肥对定西地区马铃薯养分吸收动态、产量和品质的影响. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(1):86-91.
[15] 高媛, 韦艳萍, 樊明寿. 马铃薯的养分需求. 中国马铃薯, 2011,25(3):182-187.
[16] 刘中良, 焦娟, 张艳艳, 等. 二季作区早熟马铃薯的氮磷钾肥料效应试验研究. 东北农业科学, 2018,43(2):35-39.
[17] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[18] 赵欢, 芶久兰, 何佳芳, 等. 钾肥对马铃薯干物质积累、钾素吸收及利用效率的影响. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(2):644-649.
[19] 翁定河, 李小萍, 王海勤, 等. 马铃薯钾素吸收积累与施用技术. 福建农业学报, 2010,25(3):319-324.
[20] 卢建武, 邱慧珍, 张文明, 等. 半干旱雨养农业区马铃薯干物质和钾素积累与分配特性. 应用生态学报, 2013,24(2):423-430.
[21] 梁锦秀, 郭鑫年, 张国辉, 等. 氮磷钾用量对宁南旱地马铃薯产量及水肥利用效率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(6):76-81.
[22] 张朝春, 江荣风, 张福锁, 等. 马铃薯氮磷钾肥料效应的研究. 中国马铃薯, 2004,18(6):326-329.
[23] 张静, 蒙美莲, 王颖慧, 等. 氮磷钾施用量对马铃薯产量及品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2012(4):124-127.
[1] Miao Pinggui, Yu Xianfeng, Zhang Xucheng, Fang Yanjie, Hou Huizhi, Wang Hongli, Ma Yifan, Dou Xuecheng. Effects of Vertical Deep Rotary Tillage on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Potato Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 109-116.
[2] He Wanchun, Huang Kai, Ling Peng, Chen Zixiong, Wang Jingcai, Pan Xiaochun, Zhang Juanning, Li Pengcheng. Effects of Different Ratio of Organic Fertilizer Nitrogen to Fertilizer Nitrogen on the Absorption Capacity and Morphology of Potato Roots [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 132-136.
[3] Chen Juan, He Jinhong, Liu Jili, Kang Jianhong, Wu Na. Effect of Different Planting Patterns on Starch Formation and Yield of Potato in Semi-Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 169-176.
[4] Hao Kai, Jia Liguo, Qin Yonglin, Fan Mingshou. Research Progress about Nitrogen Effects on Potato Source-Sink Relationship [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 22-26.
[5] Qiu Cailing, Fan Guoquan, Shen Yu, Gao Yanling, Zhang Wei, Han Shuxin, Zhang Shu, Dong Xuezhi, Ma Ji, Bai Yanju. Establishment of RT-qPCR Detection System for Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 79-84.
[6] Wang Tianwen,Li Changzhong,Chen Guanghai. Effects of Sowing Dates and Densities on Propagation, Growth and Yield of Potato Seeds [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 162-167.
[7] Guo Qilin,Wu Haiyun,Li Huan,Liu Qing. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Leaves and Stems of Different Types of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 41-47.
[8] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1-7.
[9] Chen Yang,Qin Yonglin,Yu Jing,Jia Liguo,Fan Mingshou. Basis and Measures for Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer on Irrigated Potato in Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 90-93.
[10] Guo Jinting,Teng Yue,Gao Yuliang,Zhang Yan,Li Kuihua. Effects of Different Light Quality on Characteristics of Sessile-Tuberization and Photosynthetic Performance with Single Node Stems in Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 120-126.
[11] Zhang Congying,Jiang Jizhi,Liang Jiao,Qiao Liu,Huang Jie. Identification of Bacterium HT-6 and Its Antagonistic Stability against Phytophthora infestans [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 162-167.
[12] Meng Fanlai,Guo Huachun. Effects of Enhanced UV-B on Photosynthetic Characteristics and UV-Absorbing Compounds of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 114-119.
[13] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120-124.
[14] Wang Jinsong,Dong Erwei,Jiao Xiaoyan,Wu Ailian,Bai Wenbin,Wang Lige,Guo Jun,Han Xiong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Sorghum Jinnuo 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 166-172.
[15] Liang Junmei,Zhang Jun,An Hao,Jing Yupeng,Li Huanchun,Duan Yu. Effects of Recommended Fertilization by Management Nutrition Expert System on Potato Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 133-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!