Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 162-167.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.02.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sowing Dates and Densities on Propagation, Growth and Yield of Potato Seeds

Wang Tianwen,Li Changzhong,Chen Guanghai()   

  1. Shandan County Seed Industry Development Center, Shandan 734100, Gansu, China
  • Received:2019-10-16 Revised:2019-11-19 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-13
  • Contact: Guanghai Chen E-mail:1871960379@qq.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

278

Abstract:

In the production of potato seed, the sowing density and sowing date have obvious influence on the yield of seed and the size of tubers. Main local variety 'Atlantic' was selected to carry out different sowing dates and density experiments in the cold and cool area of Shandan County from 2017 to 2018. Five different sowing dates was selected on i.e. April 25th, May 5th, May 15th, May 25th and June 5th. Planting density was set at five levels: 60 000, 90 000, 120 000, 150 000 and 180 000 granule/ha. The results showed that under big ridge and two lines film mulching during the period from April 25th to May 15th with planting density of 120 000 and 150 000 granule/ha, the yield was 45 285-46 770kg/ha, the rate of medium potato is 75.3%-79.6%, There are many qualified seed potatoes, all of which are the highest, and the yield difference in this range is not significant. Considering saving the input of original seeds and reducing the cost the optimal planting density of 120 000 granule/ha is preferred in the production and planted between April 25th and May 15th is the best choice for ‘Atlantic’ potato seed breeding.

Key words: Potato, Seed potato propagation, Sowing date, Density, Yield

Table 1

Phenophase of tested variety Atlantic under different sowing date (2017-2018)"

因素
Factoy		 年份
Year		 播种期(日/月)
Sowing
(Day/Month)		 出苗期(日/月)
Emergence
(Day/Month)		 现蕾期(日/月)
Bud flower
(Day/Month)		 开花期(日/月)
Flowering
(Day/Month)		 成熟期(日/月)
Maturity
(Day/Month)		 收获期(日/月)Harvesting
(Day/Month)		 生育期
Growth
stage (d)
A1 2017 25/04 28/05 13/06 26/06 14/09 20/09 109
2018 25/04 28/05 15/06 28/06 15/09 20/09 110
A2 2017 05/05 05/06 17/06 04/07 20/09 26/09 107
2018 05/05 04/06 18/06 06/07 20/09 20/09 108
A3 2017 15/05 11/06 25/06 10/07 23/09 26/09 104
2018 15/05 11/06 27/06 12/07 24/09 28/09 105
A4 2017 25/05 16/06 28/06 15/07 25/09 01/10 101
2018 25/05 15/06 29/06 17/07 26/09 28/09 103
A5 2017 05/06 23/06 05/07 21/07 28/09 01/10 97
2018 05/06 23/06 04/07 23/07 30/09 03/10 99

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on biological and economic characteristics (2017-2018)"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant
height (cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (cm)		 单株结薯数Tuber number
per plant		 单株产量
Yield per
plant (kg)		 单薯重
Weight per tuber (g)
A1B1 50.6 1.2 5.0 0.66 132.0
A1B2 50.3 1.2 3.8 0.48 126.3
A1B3 50.3 1.1 3.0 0.39 130.0
A1B4 50.2 1.1 2.7 0.32 118.5
A1B5 49.9 0.9 2.2 0.25 113.6
A2B1 50.5 1.2 4.4 0.66 150.0
A2B2 50.2 1.1 3.5 0.45 128.6
A2B3 50.0 1.1 3.1 0.39 125.8
A2B4 49.7 1.0 2.7 0.31 114.8
A2B5 50.1 0.9 2.1 0.23 109.5
A3B1 50.6 1.1 5.3 0.65 122.6
A3B2 50.3 1.0 3.4 0.46 135.3
A3B3 50.4 1.0 3.0 0.40 133.3
A3B4 50.5 0.9 2.7 0.32 118.5
A3B5 49.6 0.8 2.0 0.24 120.0
A4B1 50.3 1.0 4.3 0.61 141.8
A4B2 50.2 1.0 3.3 0.45 136.4
A4B3 50.3 0.9 2.8 0.36 128.6
A4B4 49.8 0.9 2.6 0.29 111.5
A4B5 50.2 0.8 1.9 0.23 121.0
A5B1 49.8 0.9 4.3 0.60 139.5
A5B2 49.6 0.9 3.5 0.39 111.4
A5B3 50.1 0.8 3.0 0.32 106.7
A5B4 49.8 0.8 2.4 0.25 104.2
A5B5 49.4 0.7 1.8 0.18 100.0

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on seed potato (2017-2018)"

处理
Treatment		 大薯数(>200g)
Big tuber
number		 中薯数(50~200g)
Middle tuber
number		 小薯数(<50g)
Small tuber number		 中种薯率
Middle tuber percentage (%)
A1B1 1.5 3.37 0.13 67.4
A1B2 1.0 2.66 0.14 70.0
A1B3 0.6 2.26 0.14 75.3
A1B4 0.4 2.15 0.15 79.6
A1B5 0.4 1.57 0.23 71.4
A2B1 1.4 2.85 0.15 64.8
A2B2 0.7 2.63 0.17 75.1
A2B3 0.5 2.40 0.20 77.4
A2B4 0.4 2.05 0.25 75.9
A2B5 0.3 1.50 0.30 71.4
A3B1 1.4 3.68 0.22 69.4
A3B2 0.7 2.48 0.22 72.9
A3B3 0.4 2.35 0.25 78.3
A3B4 0.3 2.12 0.28 78.5
A3B5 0.2 1.45 0.35 72.5
A4B1 1.2 2.93 0.17 68.1
A4B2 0.6 2.48 0.22 75.2
A4B3 0.4 2.17 0.23 77.5
A4B4 0.3 2.05 0.25 78.8
A4B5 0.2 1.40 0.30 73.7
A5B1 1.1 2.97 0.23 69.1
A5B2 0.8 2.45 0.25 70.0
A5B3 0.3 2.38 0.32 79.3
A5B4 0.2 1.86 0.34 77.5
A5B5 0.0 1.25 0.55 69.4

Table 4

Variance analysis of yield results(2017-2018)"

变异来源
Sources of variation		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 2017 2018 F0.05 F0.01 2017-2018
SS MS F SS MS F 自由度
Degree of freedom		 SS MS F F0.05 F0.01
年份间Years 1 28.78 28.78 10.24** 3.96 6.96
区组间Blocks 2 10.96 5.48 2.92 0.25 0.13 0.05 3.19 5.08 20 11.21 0.56 0.20 1.70 2.12
处理(组合)间
Treatments (combinations)		 24 1 697.52 70.73 37.62** 2 443.01 101.79 36.35** 1.75 2.20 48 4 140.56 86.26 30.70** 1.52 1.80
播种期Seeding date 4 862.82 215.70 114.74** 948.19 237.05 84.66** 2.57 3.74 4 1 788.67 447.20 159.14** 2.49 3.56
密度Density 4 690.18 172.54 91.78** 1 310.55 327.64 117.01** 2.57 3.74 4 1 940.18 485.10 172.62** 2.49 3.56
播种期×密度
Seeding date×Density		 16 144.52 9.03 4.80** 184.27 11.52 4.11** 1.86 2.40 16 299.64 18.73 6.67** 1.77 2.23
播种期×年份
Seeding date×Year		 4 22.38 5.60 1.99 2.49 3.56
密度×年份Density×Year 4 60.55 15.14 5.39** 2.49 3.56
播种期×密度×年份
Sowing date×Density×Year		 16 29.14 1.82 0.65 1.77 2.23
随机误差Random error 48 90.11 1.88 134.58 2.80 80 224.69 2.81
总变异Total variation 74 1 798.59 2 577.84 149 4 405.24

Table 5

New repolarization test of sowing date and density plot average yield（2017-2018）"

播期
Sowing date		 产量Yield
(kg/12m2)		 差异显著性Significance of difference 密度
Density		 产量Yield
(kg/12m2)		 差异显著性Significance of difference
5% 1% 5% 1%
A3 50.87 a A B3 52.19 a A
A1 50.56 a A B4 52.17 a A
A2 50.38 a A B5 46.74 b B
A4 46.42 b B B2 45.97 b B
A5 41.94 c C B1 43.10 c C

Table 6

Summary of potato yield results(2017-2018)"

处理Treatment 2017 2018 2年总和
Two years combined
Tsv		 小区平均
产量
Plot average yield		 折合产量
Equivalent
yield
(kg/hm2)		 位次
Rank		 差异显著性
Difference significant
小区产量(kg/12m2)
Yield per plot		 Tsvy 小区产量(kg/12m2)
Yield per plot		 Tsvy
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ 0.05 0.01
A1B1 45.90 46.20 44.10 136.20 43.90 42.60 42.00 128.50 264.70 44.12 36 785 19 d CD
A1B2 47.35 48.30 48.60 144.25 51.31 47.90 50.35 149.56 293.81 48.97 40 830 10 bc BC
A1B3 55.50 51.20 54.80 161.50 54.50 54.20 55.70 164.40 325.90 54.32 45 285 6 a A
A1B4 54.15 52.75 53.70 161.60 57.55 55.75 54.19 167.49 329.09 54.85 45 735 5 a A
A1B5 50.64 48.25 51.40 151.29 53.50 50.75 47.73 151.98 303.27 50.55 42 150 7 b B
Trsy 253.54 246.70 252.60 754.84
(Tsy)		 260.76 251.20 249.97 761.93
(Tsy)		 1 516.77
(Ts)
A2B1 47.15 46.00 43.47 136.62 43.60 45.61 42.81 132.02 268.64 44.77 37 335 18 d CD
A2B2 45.23 46.95 45.85 138.03 45.75 48.57 45.85 140.17 278.20 46.37 38 655 14 cd C
A2B3 54.95 54.00 56.50 165.45 54.94 57.00 58.93 170.87 336.32 56.05 46 740 3 a A
A2B4 54.55 53.90 55.30 163.75 58.55 58.02 56.20 172.77 336.52 56.09 46 770 1 a A
A2B5 46.35 48.53 48.10 142.98 50.30 48.35 50.10 148.75 291.73 48.62 40 545 12 bc BC
Trsy 248.23 249.38 249.22 746.83
(Tsy)		 253.14 257.60 253.89 764.58
(Tsy)		 1 511.41
(Ts)
A3B1 45.02 44.17 45.27 134.46 43.20 42.15 44.85 130.20 264.66 44.11 36 780 20 d CD
A3B2 48.30 47.10 45.96 141.36 47.90 48.10 51.10 147.10 288.46 48.08 40 095 13 c BC
A3B3 53.00 54.00 55.00 162.00 58.00 58.63 57.80 174.43 336.43 56.07 46 755 2 a A
A3B4 54.00 53.45 56.00 163.45 57.40 58.20 57.00 172.60 336.05 56.01 46 695 4 a A
A3B5 50.55 49.17 47.70 147.42 53.18 51.25 48.70 153.13 300.55 50.09 41 760 8 bc B
Trsy 250.87 247.89 249.93 748.69
(Tsy)		 259.68 258.30 259.45 777.46
(Tsy)		 1 526.15
(Ts)
A4B1 40.00 41.90 43.90 125.80 40.00 40.90 44.92 125.82 251.62 41.94 34 965 22 e D
A4B2 44.70 46.16 46.90 137.76 44.70 43.90 45.90 134.50 272.26 45.38 37 830 17 d C
A4B3 48.15 47.34 50.40 145.89 48.40 51.62 46.23 146.25 292.14 48.69 40 590 11 bc BC
A4B4 48.50 50.75 52.04 151.29 50.91 49.25 48.40 148.56 299.85 49.98 41 670 9 bc B
A4B5 46.85 44.98 46.50 138.33 44.20 45.70 48.50 138.40 276.73 46.12 38 460 15 cd C
Trsy 228.20 231.13 239.74 699.07
(Tsy)		 228.21 231.40 233.95 693.53
(Tsy)		 1 392.60
(Ts)
A5B1 40.45 42.55 41.55 124.55 39.25 40.55 39.00 118.80 243.35 40.56 33 825 24 e DE
A5B2 40.65 39.15 41.35 121.15 42.65 42.43 40.15 125.23 246.38 41.06 34 230 23 e DE
A5B3 45.40 42.45 44.95 132.80 45.38 47.85 48.95 142.18 274.98 45.83 38 205 16 d C
A5B4 44.35 40.25 43.25 127.85 43.68 45.70 46.35 135.73 263.58 43.93 36 630 21 de CD
A5B5 39.60 38.10 36.30 114.00 38.30 39.00 38.74 116.04 230.04 38.34 31 965 25 f E
Trsy 210.45 202.50 207.40 620.35
(Tsy)		 209.26 215.50 213.19 637.98
(Tsy)		 1 258.33
(Ts)
3569.78
(Ty)		 3635.48
(Ty)		 7205.26
(T)		 48.04
[1] 扬帅, 闵凡祥, 高云飞 , 等. 新世纪中国马铃薯产业发展现状及存在问题. 中国马铃薯, 2014,28(5):311-316.
[2] 赵婧, 赵贵宾, 李星 , 等. 甘肃省推进马铃薯主粮化行动的几点思考. 中国马铃薯, 2015,29(3):182-185.
[3] 吴正强, 岳云, 赵小文 , 等. 甘肃省马铃薯产业发展研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2008,29(6):67-72.
[4] 王润琴, 刘元寿 . 甘肃省马铃薯生产现状及发展对策. 农业科技管理, 2010,29(1):56-58.
[5] 吕文河, 申忠宝 . 不同密度和种薯大小对产量及主要农艺性状的影响. 中国马铃薯, 1997(4):205-208.
[6] 柴武高, 马庆融, 巴兰清 . 河西沿山冷凉区马铃薯垄膜沟灌高效节水栽培技术. 中国马铃薯, 2014,28(4):208-209.
[7] 杨祁峰, 岳云, 熊春蓉 , 等. 中国马铃薯种植技术发展的方向-标准化栽培. 中国马铃薯, 2012,26(2):122-125.
[8] 高昌青, 张瑞军, 王智慧 . 脱毒马铃薯原种的扩繁技术. 现代农业, 2006(1):22.
[9] 聂战声, 谢延林, 王耀 , 等. 旱寒区不同覆膜栽培模式对马铃薯产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2011,25(4):213-217.
[10] 王耀 . 不同覆膜栽培模式与播期互作对寒旱区马铃薯商品性和产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2016,30(3):149-152.
[11] 沈娇娇, 王婧, 潘学标 , 等. 播种期对农牧交错地带马铃薯生长发育和产量形成及水分利用率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012,30(2):137-143.
[12] 游正礼, 钟芹辅, 冉启峰 . 不同栽培密度对马铃薯产量和性状的影响. 现代农业科技, 2015(24):91-93.
[13] 赵沛义, 妥德宝, 段玉 , 等. 内蒙古后山旱农区马铃薯适宜播期种密度和播期研究. 华北农学报, 2005,20(A1):10-14.
[14] 李保伦 . 播期对马铃薯产量的影响研究. 中国园艺文摘, 2010,26(6):41.
[15] 王怀勇 . 不同播期及密度对秋马铃薯产量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2009(4):24-26.
[1] Yan Hua,Yan Zhongwen,Lei Jie. Climate Change Characteristics of Xinyuan during 1981-2018 and Its Impact on Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 140-146.
[2] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[3] Li Ruijie,Tang Huihui,Wang Qingyan,Xu Yanli,Fang Mengying,Yan Peng,Dong Zhiqiang,Zhang Fenglu. Effects of 5- Aminolevulinic Acid and Ethylene Compounds on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 125-133.
[4] Chen Diwen,Zhou Wenling,Ao Junhua,Huang Ying,Jiang Yong,Han Xihong,Qin Yimin,Shen Hong. Effects of Seaweed Extract on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sweet Corn [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 134-139.
[5] Zhou Wei,Cui Fuzhu,Duan Hongkai,Hao Guohua,Yang Hui,Liu Ruirui. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Waxy Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 156-161.
[6] Fan Yegeng,Yan Haifeng,Chen Rongfa,Qiu Lihang,Zhou Huiwen,Huang Xing,Weng Mengling,Wu Jianming,Li Yangrui,Wei Shengman. The Difference of Single Bud Seedling of the Third Generation of Sugarcane Virus-Free Plantlets with Different Seedcane Sizes and Transplanting Effect [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 194-199.
[7] Liu Xin,Zhu Rong,Yang Mei,Liu Zhangyong. Screening of High-Yield Germplasms for Ratoon Rice and Analysis of High Yield Composition [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 28-33.
[8] Guo Qilin,Wu Haiyun,Li Huan,Liu Qing. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Leaves and Stems of Different Types of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 41-47.
[9] Liu Weixing,He Qunling,Zhang Fengye,Fan Xiaoyu,Chen Lei,Li Ke,Wu Jihua. AMMI Model Analysis on Regional Trials of Large-Seeded Peanut Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 60-64.
[10] Yang Zhichang,Shen Tao,Luo Zhuo,Peng Zhi,Hu Yuqian,Zi Tao,Xiong Tinghao,Song Haixing. Effects of Low Nitrogen Rate Combined with High Planting Density on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Machine-Transplanted Double Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 71-81.
[11] Chen Tianxin,Wang Yanjie,Zhang Yan,Chang Xuhong,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Demei,Yang Yushuang,Zhu Yingjie,Liu Akang,Shi Shubing,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Different Nitrogen Rates on Photosyntheticand Physiological Indexes and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 88-96.
[12] Zhang Bo,Gao Tiantian,Cheng Hongbo,Li Rui,Chai Yuwei,Li Yawei,Chai Shouxi. Effects of Mulching on Water Content of Plant and Flag Leaves and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 97-104.
[13] Zhao Zhun,Li Jian,Song Ruijiao,Guo Yan,Ling Jiangrui,Qi Juncang. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Biomass Yield and Silage Quality of Barley [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 110-116.
[14] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Analysis of the Characteristics of Dry Matter Production and Light Energy Utilization of Waxy Sorghum Applied in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 41-46.
[15] Jing Peipei,Ren Hongru,Yang Hongjian,Dai Qigen. Effects of Saline Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis Characteristics and Grain Yield of Two Rice Cultivars (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 67-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1 -7 .
[2] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20 -26 .
[3] Sun Yue,Liu Bin,Fu Manqi,Wang Jing,Wang Xiaohui,Chen Fu. Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Changes of Linseed Production in China from 1985 to 2015[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 8 -13 .
[4] Zhu An,Gao Jie,Huang Jian,Wang Hao,Chen Yun,Liu Lijun. Advances in Morphology and Physiology of Root and Their Relationships with Grain Quality in Rice[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 1 -8 .
[5] Zhang Xin,Cao Liru,Wei Liangming,Zhang Qianjin,Zhou Ke,Wang Zhenhua,Lu Xiaomin. Expression Analysis and Interaction Prediction of Maize Glucose Transporter Gene ZmGLUT-1[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 22 -28 .
[6] Pan Lei,Xu Jie,Yang Shuai,Chen Yunsong,Chen Lianhong,Ma Wenguang. Pollen Viability, Morphology and Physiological Indexes of Three Tobacco Varieties at Different Storage Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 112 -118 .
[7] Yan Hua,Yan Zhongwen,Lei Jie. Climate Change Characteristics of Xinyuan during 1981-2018 and Its Impact on Spring Maize[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 140 -146 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 200 -204 .
[9] Ma Hui,Jiao Xiaoyu,Xu Xue,Li Juan,Ni Dahu,Xu Rongfang,Wang Yu,Wang Xiufeng. Advances in Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Cadmium Metabolism in Rice[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 1 -8 .
[10] Wang Meichun,Lian Rongfang,Xiao Gui,Mo Jinping,Cao Ning. Review and Industrial Development Countermeasures of Lentils in China[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 13 -16 .