Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 180-187.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.05.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Economic Analysis of Garlic Machine Seeding Based on the Ratio of Output to Input

Wu Xiaowei1(), Chen Xinhua1(), Cui Jun1, Yuan Hong1, Zhang Fei2, Dai Er’jian3, Wang Kai4   

  1. 1Jiangsu Agricultural Machinery Technology Extension Station, Nanjing 210017, Jiangsu, China
    2Jiangsu Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210036, Jiangsu, China
    3Pizhou Agricultural Machinery Technology Extension Station, Xuzhou 221130, Jiangsu, China
    4Siyang Agricultural Machinery Technology Extension Station, Suqian 223700, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-07-02 Revised:2021-09-23 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2022-10-19

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

174

Abstract:

In view of the unclear economic effects of different types of garlic planter, the economic experiments of different types of garlic planters were carried out. Compared with artificial seeding (control), the growth and output value of positive bud machine seeding, non-positive bud machine seeding (random machine seeding) under flat mode were compared, and the economic benefits under different planting areas were analyzed. The results showed that the production cost of mechanical seeding varied with the area and the number of machines. Under the condition of small planting area and short planting years, 8-row random planter was the optimal seeding method. With the increase of planting area and years, the benefit of mechanical seeding was higher than that of artificial seeding, the law of the benefits was 12-row positive bud planter > 8-row random planter > artificial seeding, and the larger area, the more obvious. In the 5-years cycle, the benefits of 8-row planter seeding were increased compared with artificial seeding. The highest efficiency was 10.1%, and the lowest was 4.1%. The relative benefits of the three seeding methods varied greatly when the planting area was small, and the trend becomes smaller with the increase of planting area.

Key words: Garlic, Positive bud planter, Random planter, Seeding costs, Economy

Table 1

Parameters of different types garlic planters"

类别
Category		 正芽播种机
Positive
bud seeder		 非正芽播种机
（摆播机）
Non-positive
bud seeder
型号Model 2BUX-12 DB-DSQ-8
行距Line spacing (cm) 20 20
株距Plant spacing (cm) 12 12
工作行数Number of lines 12 8
效率Effectiveness (hm2/h) 0.33 0.19
配套动力Supporting power (kW) 66 33
单价（万元）Price (×104 yuan) 12.4 1.5

Table 2

"

类别
Category		 正芽机播
Positive bud seeding		 非正芽机播
Non-positive bud seeding		 人工播种
Artificial seeding
播种机及配套动力折旧费Seeder and tractor depreciation 621.0 117.0 /
人员工资Employment salary 150.0 268.5 6750.0
机具燃油费Fuel charge 150.0 127.5 /
机械维修及其他费用Maintenance and other costs 52.5 52.5 /
合计Total 973.5 565.5 6750.0

Table 3

Garlic value distribution from different sowing methods 万元/hm2 ×104 yuan/hm2"

横径规格
Garlic specification
(cm)		 正芽机播
Positive
bud seeding		 非正芽机播
Non-positive
bud seeding		 人工播种
Artificial
seeding
4.5 1.61 2.56 2.60
5.0 2.87 2.51 2.69
5.5 3.29 2.89 2.86
6.0 4.30 3.79 3.67
合计Total 12.07 11.75 11.82

Fig.1

Production cost under different sowing methods and areas"

Fig.2

Production cost under different areas and planting years"

Fig.3

Output benefits under different sowing methods and areas"

Fig.4

Relative benefits under different sowing methods"

Fig.5

Relative benefits under different sowing methods and areas"

[1] 吴小伟, 武文娟, 钟志堂, 等. 江苏省大蒜机械化播种技术与装备. 中国蔬菜, 2020(11):107-110.
[2] 崔荣江, 荐世春, 杨继鲁, 等. 链勺式大蒜取种器的优化设计与试验. 农机化研究, 2017, 39(2):99-102,107.
[3] 侯加林, 王后新, 牛子孺, 等. 大蒜取种装置取种清种性能离散元模拟与试验. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24):48-57.
[4] 李玉华, 张智龙, 李天华, 等. 轮勺式大蒜单粒取种装置设计与试验. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(3):61-68.
[5] 侯加林, 黄圣海, 牛子孺, 等. 双鸭嘴式大蒜正头装置调头机理分析与试验. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(11):87-96.
[6] 李天华, 黄圣海, 牛子孺, 等. 行星轮式大蒜插播机播种直立度优化与试验. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(3):37-45.
[7] 耿爱军, 栗晓宇, 侯加林, 等. 自动定向大蒜播种机的设计与试验. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(11):17-25.
[8] 侯加林, 田林, 李天华, 等. 基于双侧图像识别的大蒜正芽及排种试验台设计与试验. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1):50-58.
[9] 金文忻, 刘永华, 张东风, 等. 大蒜直立种植装置设计与试验. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(6):37-42.
doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2020.06.006
[10] 金诚谦, 袁文胜, 吴崇友, 等. 大蒜播种时鳞芽朝向对大蒜生长发育影响的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(4):155-158.
[11] 吴小伟, 武文娟, 钟志堂, 等. 大蒜机械化播种技术研究现状与问题分析. 中国蔬菜, 2021, 1(3):9-16.
[12] 吴小伟, 钟志堂, 崔军, 等. 江苏大蒜生产机械化技术. 农机科技推广, 2018(12):43-44.
[13] 河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究中心,农业部农产品质量监督检验测试中心(郑州). 大蒜等级规格:NY/T 1791-2009. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010.
[14] 虞松波, 刘婷, 曹宝明. 农业机械化服务对粮食生产成本效率的影响—来自中国小麦主产区的经验证据. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(4):81-89.
[15] 张宇青, 周应恒, 易中懿, 等. 农民纯收入影响了农业物质要素投入产出弹性吗—基于江苏地区面板数据的门槛模型分析. 当代经济科学, 2014, 36(2):110-117.
[16] 李睿. 我国粮食主产区农业生产要素投入的产出效应分析. 南方农业学报, 2016, 47(1):153-158.
[17] 翁生余, 黄宗飞, 厉维江. 毛豆播种机械的对比试验. 现代农机, 2013(5):28-29.
[18] 季中亚. 不同机械播种方式对稻茬小麦生长、产量及效益的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2015.
[19] 黄婷, 杜小娟, 刘成刚, 等. 不同机械播种方式对小麦产量和籽粒品质的效应. 陕西农业科学, 2018, 64(10):55-57.
[20] 王海燕. 不同小麦播种机械的性能比较. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(29):10439-10440.
[21] 胡国平, 邹建国, 郑威, 等. 不同播种方式对稻茬小麦生长发育和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(20):4814-4816.
[22] 乐韬. 机械耕作、播种方式和氮肥运筹对稻茬小麦生长、产量和效益的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2019.
[23] 王在满, 张明华, 郑乐, 等. 不同播种方式对直播水稻产量形成的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(4):601-606.
[24] 杨立年, 李进前, 周定邦, 等. 不同播种方式对水稻产量的影响. 现代农业科技, 2016(9):14-15,17.
[25] 赵云, 徐彩龙, 杨旭, 等. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(4):114-120.
[26] 林延慧, 王彩洁, 张彦威, 等. 不同类型播种机对大豆农艺性状和产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(7):45-47.
[27] 隋华, 侯海鹏, 刘强, 等. 不同播种机具与种植密度对玉米植株及产量构成因素的影响. 天津农林科技, 2018(1):9-12.
[28] 吴小伟, 武文娟, 钟志堂. 玉米播种机具规模配置模型建立与分析. 农机化研究, 2017, 39(7):48-52.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[2] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[3] Yuan Wang,Ze Guo,Xiaohui Li,Shixiao Xu,Xuexia Xing,Siqi Zhang,Jia He,Chao Liu,Fang Chen,Tiezhao Yang. Effects of Meloidogyne incognita Infection on Tobacco Root System under Different Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 161 -166 .
[4] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167 -174 .
[5] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28 -31 .
[6] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69 -78 .
[7] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141 -146 .
[8] Chunlei Wang,Zhijun Fang,Yanrui Xu,Xiaoping Lu,Chunhua Mu,Kai Shan,Lujiang Hao. Effects of Starane on the Community Diversity of Maize Root Endophytes Analyzed Using High-Throughput Sequencing Technology[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 160 -165 .
[9] Yanfang Hao,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Wei Zhang,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Establishment of Sorghum Cell Suspensions with Young Leaves[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 35 -40 .
[10] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56 -61 .