Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 260-265.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.05.033

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application Effect of Sugarcane Waste in Cultivation of Dictyophora indusiata

Li Xiang1,2(), Li Yijie1(), Wu Xiaojian3, Long Shengfeng4, Huang Dongmei1, Gao Yijing1(), Wang Zeping1()   

  1. 1 Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
    2 Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute / Guangxi Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruits, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China
    3 Microbiology Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
    4 Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2024-05-31 Revised:2024-07-04 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-21

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

161

Abstract:

Sugarcane leaves and bagasse are the main biomass wastes in the process of sugarcane harvesting and processing. In order to improve their comprehensive utilization efficiency, Dictyophora indusiata was planted with different sugarcane leaves and bagasse proportions in different ecological regions of northern, central and western Guangxi in 2023. The results showed that the mycelium germination and feeding days of D.indusiata were roughly the same in the same ecological area. The yield and output-input ratio of D.indusiata were both western Guangxi > northern Guangxi > central Guangxi. The yield and output-input ratio of D.indusiata in the same area showed that the optimum ratio for planting D.indusiata was 70% bagasse+30% cane leaves. The contents of crude protein, crude fiber and polysaccharide of D.indusiata showed a pattern of northern Guangxi > western Guangxi > central Guangxi.

Key words: Sugarcane, Waste, Biomass, Dictyophora indusiata, Yield, Output-input ratio

Table 1

Trial treatments of D.indusiata in field"

区域
Region		 处理
Treatment		 基质配比
Ratio of the substrate		 面积
Area (m2)
桂北
GB		 GB-I 30%蔗渣+70%蔗叶 2250
GB-II 50%蔗渣+50%蔗叶 2250
GB-III 70%蔗渣+30%蔗叶 2250
GB-IV 纯竹屑 2250
桂中
GZ		 GZ-I 30%蔗渣+70%蔗叶 3000
GZ-II 50%蔗渣+50%蔗叶 3000
GZ-III 70%蔗渣+30%蔗叶 3000
GZ-IV 纯竹屑 3000
桂西
GX		 GX-I 30%蔗渣+70%蔗叶 3000
GX-II 50%蔗渣+50%蔗叶 3000
GX-III 70%蔗渣+30%蔗叶 3000
GX-IV 纯竹屑 3000

Table 2

Feeding days and germination status of D.indusiata mycelia"

处理
Treatment		 整齐度
Uniformity (+; ++; +++)		 活力
Vigour (+; ++; +++)		 生长速率
Growth rate (+; ++; +++)		 吃料天数
Feeding days (d)		 整体评估
Overall evaluation
GB-I ++ + + 58 菌丝生长慢，透底
GB-II ++ ++ ++ 59 菌丝生长慢，透底
GB-III ++ ++ ++ 61 菌丝生长慢，透底
GB-IV ++ + + 62 菌丝生长慢，透底
GZ-I + ++ ++ 42 菌丝生长快，表面不均匀
GZ-II + +++ +++ 44 菌丝生长快，表面不均匀
GZ-III + +++ +++ 43 菌丝生长快，表面不均匀
GZ-IV + ++ ++ 42 菌丝生长快，表面不均匀
GX-I ++ +++ +++ 46 菌丝生长快，透底
GX-II ++ ++ ++ 48 菌丝生长快，透底
GX-III +++ +++ +++ 49 菌丝生长快，透底
GX-IV +++ +++ +++ 52 菌丝生长快，透底

Table 3

Descriptive statistics of yield traits of D.indusiata"

处理
Treatment		 菌柄直径
Diameter of
stem (cm)		 菌盖鲜重
Fresh weight of
pileus (g)		 单株鲜重
Fresh weight
per plant (g)		 菌裙长度
Length of
skit (cm)		 菌高
Height of
fungi (cm)		 产出数量
Number of output
(/m2)		 总生物量
Total biomass
(kg/hm2)		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)
GB-I 2.49 4.38 12.78 12.51 15.68 53 9088.80 677.70
GB-II 2.56 4.66 13.21 13.30 16.61 55 9816.90 727.05
GB-III 2.68 4.68 13.45 14.27 17.79 58 10 503.30 780.60
GB-IV 2.69 4.59 13.21 13.28 16.89 56 9956.25 740.25
GZ-I 2.75 5.18 13.67 15.31 18.65 39 7343.40 533.55
GZ-II 2.81 5.25 13.70 15.45 19.51 40 7571.85 548.40
GZ-III 2.86 5.27 13.77 15.86 19.65 41 7798.05 564.90
GZ-IV 2.95 5.29 13.68 15.78 19.68 42 7958.85 574.95
GX-I 3.08 5.53 14.27 16.41 20.17 58 11 472.30 828.30
GX-II 3.14 5.64 14.28 16.59 20.18 61 12 138.90 871.80
GX-III 3.16 5.69 14.60 16.75 21.08 65 13 175.55 949.65
GX-IV 3.12 5.63 14.29 16.67 20.78 62 12 337.95 886.65

Table 4

Comparison of nutrient composition in fruit body of D.indusiata among different treatments %"

处理Treatment 粗蛋白Crude protein 粗纤维Crude fibre 多糖Polysaccharide
GB-I 19.48±0.10aA 18.74±0.10aA 13.54±0.07dA
GB-II 19.38±0.10aA 18.72±0.10aA 13.83±0.07cA
GB-III 19.29±0.10abA 18.68±0.10aA 13.99±0.07bA
GB-IV 19.17±0.10bA 18.67±0.10aA 14.15±0.07aA
平均值Average 19.33 18.71 13.88
GZ-I 16.55±0.09bC 8.44±0.04aC 8.64±0.05bC
GZ-II 16.62±0.09abC 8.23±0.04cC 8.49±0.05cC
GZ-III 16.71±0.09abC 8.32±0.04bC 8.77±0.05aC
GZ-IV 16.79±0.09aC 8.14±0.04dC 8.43±0.04cC
平均值Average 16.67 8.28 8.59
GX-I 18.27±0.10cB 11.72±0.06bB 12.13±0.06bB
GX-II 18.36±0.10bcB 10.39±0.05dB 11.91±0.06cB
GX-III 18.53±0.10bB 12.50±0.07aB 12.63±0.07aB
GX-IV 18.95±0.10aB 11.60±0.06cB 11.43±0.06dB
平均值Average 18.53 11.55 12.02

Table 5

Comparison of economic benefits of D.indusiata among different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 投入（元/hm2）
Input
(yuan/hm2)		 总效益（元/hm2）
Total benefit
(yuan/hm2)		 产投比
Output-input
ratio
GB-I 54 300 70 485.57±387.06bB 1.30±0.11bB
GB-II 55 500 78 518.42±431.07abB 1.41±0.12abB
GB-III 56 700 88 679.38±487.08aB 1.56±0.13aB
GB-IV 52 500 81 130.41±445.57abB 1.54±0.13aB
平均值
Average		 54 750
 79 703.45
 1.46
GZ-I 54 300 55 484.40±305.04aC 1.02±0.09aC
GZ-II 55 500 59 225.69±325.55aC 1.07±0.09aC
GZ-III 56 700 64 180.81±352.55aC 1.13±0.10aC
GZ-IV 52 500 63 016.00±346.06aC 1.20±0.10aC
平均值
Average		 54 750
 60 476.73
 1.11
GX-I 54 300 86 142.31±473.08bA 1.59±0.13bA
GX-II 55 500 94 148.51±517.08abA 1.70±0.14abA
GX-III 56 700 107 892.07±592.59aA 1.90±0.16aA
GX-IV 52 500 97 177.68±533.58bA 1.85±0.15abA
平均值
Average		 54 750
 96 340.14
 1.76
[1] 刘晓雪, 蒙威宇, 李维. 2022/23年榨季国内外食糖市场回顾与2023/24年榨季展望. 甘蔗糖业, 2023, 52(6):69-83.
[2] 黄潮华. 饲用甘蔗家系评价及品系的饲用价值分析. 福州:福建农林大学, 2018.
[3] 李玉铭, 杜瑜欣, 周永升, 等. 甘蔗叶的研究进展. 食品工业, 2018, 39(1):237-239.
[4] 黎金锋, 姚晓华, 邱丰文, 等. 甘蔗叶栽培平菇配方优化试验. 中国食用菌, 2009, 28(4):69-70.
[5] 黎金锋, 姚晓华, 邱丰文, 等. 甘蔗叶袋栽鸡腿菇试验. 中国食用菌, 2010, 29(5):59-60.
[6] 陈代华, 黄绍英, 郑芥丹. 蔗叶料蔗田栽凤尾菇技术. 食用菌, 1989(3):46.
[7] 李丽, 游向荣, 孙健, 等. 甘蔗田间废弃物及制糖副产物综合利用研究进展. 食品工业, 2013(7):170-173.
[8] 刘士哲, 连兆煌. 蔗渣堆沤过程的变化特征与“有效C/N比值”的应用研究. 华南农业大学学报, 1994(4):7-12.
[9] 于文进, 龙明华, 廖易, 等. 甘蔗渣堆积物作为基质在无土栽培无公害蔬菜上的效应. 广西农业生物科学, 2003, 22(4):261-265.
[10] 郭渝南, 刘晓玲, 范娟. 竹荪的营养与药用功效. 食用菌, 2004(4):44-45.
[11] 王元炎, 谢仙环, 吴春泰, 等. 蔗头蔗叶栽培竹荪技术. 食用菌, 1992(2):25-26.
[12] 韦大灼, 李明灌. 甘蔗叶栽培竹荪套种技术. 中国农技推广, 2001(3):26.
[13] 潘启城. 利用甘蔗叶进行露天栽培竹荪技术. 中国农学通报, 2002, 18(2):121-123.
[14] 占秋生. 用甘蔗叶作基质露天栽培竹荪技术. 江西农业科技, 2004(12):31-32.
[15] 林芳能, 董晓娜, 陈喜蓉, 等. 竹荪栽培基质筛选研究. 热带林业, 2012, 40(1):46-48.
[16] Duan M Z, Long S F, et al. Genome, transcriptome, and metabolome analyses provide new insights into the resource development in an edible fungus Dictyophora indusiata. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14:1137159.
[17] Duan M Z, Zhu G H, et al. Soil chemistry, metabarcoding, and metabolome analyses reveal that a sugarcane-Dictyophora indusiata intercropping system can enhance soil health by reducing soil nitrogen loss. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14:1193990.
[18] Duan M Z, Li X, et al. Dictyophora indusiata and Bacillus aryabhattai improve sugarcane yield by endogenously associating with the root and regulating flavonoid metabolism . Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15:1326917.
[19] 李兴奎, 王元忠. 灰褐牛肝菌子实体营养成分分析. 中国食用菌, 2007, 26(1):55-56.
[20] 彭超, 蔡春菊, 涂佳, 等. 以竹屑为主要培养基质的食用菌营养成分差异及评价. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(7):2052-2058.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.07.032
[21] 杜娟, 时文静. 香菇、 金针菇、黑木耳多糖的提取与测定. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(8):347-350.
[22] 李富春, 陈晓文, 张蓉, 等. 光伏钢架塑料大棚袋料栽培黑木耳品种筛选. 寒旱农业科学, 2023, 2(11):1026-1030.
[23] 周宇, 刘朋虎, 刘波, 等. 不同栽培配方对茶树菇生长发育及胞外酶活性的研究. 北方园艺, 2023(19):114-121.
[24] 樊保宁, 游建华, 周秋惠. 我国糖料甘蔗叶有效处理与利用. 中国糖料, 2020, 42(1):77-80.
[25] 路贵龙, 王朔, 连玉珍, 等. 甘蔗制糖副产物的开发与利用. 中国糖料, 2020, 42(2):75-80.
[26] 刘晓雪, 邬志军, 曹付珍. 2020/21年榨季我国糖料产业发展特点、问题与2021/22年榨季发展趋势. 甘蔗糖业, 2022, 51 (3):82-90.
[27] 杨盛叶, 赵圆圆. 乡村振兴背景下地方特色农产品产业发展研究——以织金县竹荪产业为例. 黑河学刊, 2024, 274(4):6-13.
[1] Zhou Tingfang, Li Ran, Liu Qianqian, Zhang Ze, Wang Zhenhua, Ma Baoxin, Lu Ming, Zhang Lin, Han Yehui, Yang Bo, Li Mingshun, Zhang Degui, Weng Jianfeng, Yong Hongjun, Xu Jingyu, Han Jienan, Li Xinhai. Analysis of Salt Tolerance at Germination Stage of 118 Maize Hybrids in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 1-10.
[2] Teng Wen, Ye Fan, Zhou Zhou, Wang Yule, Liu Lijun. Effects of Wheat and Rapeseed Straw Returning on Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 11-18.
[3] Ma Qiang, Li Yankun, Wang Gui’e, Wen Tingting, Zhang Tianyu, Tian Jichun, Wang Yanxun. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Quality Characteristics of Colored Wheat Varieties Approved in Shandong Province and Research on Improvement Direction [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 113-119.
[4] Li Xiaomin, Gong Hongyu, Tian Bingxin, Liu Donghua, Li Chunxi, Jiang Lina, Ma Jianhui. Effects of Different Row Spacing Arrangements and Planting Density Combinations on Canopy Structure and Nitrogen Utilization in Wheat on the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 171-176.
[5] Li Jiahui, Chen Ruxue, Bai Hongbo, Wang Yonghua. Photosynthesis-Grain Filling Coordination Characteristics of Winter Wheat with Different Plant Types and Their Impact on Yield Components [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 195-203.
[6] Wang Yan, Zhang Qian, Dong Ming, Wang Shulin, Feng Guoyi, Liang Qinglong, Qi Hong. Effects of Mechanical Topping Time on Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Cotton in Southern Hebei Cotton Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 204-208.
[7] Wu Huijuan, Geng Xiaoli, Li Deming, Zhou Dongchang, Fu Ping, Liu Qian, Du Xiaocun. Effects of Foliar Spraying with Different Iron Fertilizers on Seed Yield and Its Components in Oat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 233-238.
[8] Li Jie, Zhang Yongqiang, Lei Junjie, Lü Xiaoqing, Chen Chuanxin, Xu Qijiang, Nie Shihui, Xu Wenxiu, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Different Urea Types and Application Methods on Plant Characteristics and Yield Composition of Winter Wheat under Drip Irrigation [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 266-271.
[9] Du Hanmeng, Chen Yuqiong, Liu Ruotong, Chen Yinglong, Dai Qigen, Zhang Hongcheng, Liao Ping. Effects of Chlormequat Chloride and Gypsum Application on Rice Yield and Lodging Risk under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 29-34.
[10] Yan Jingrong, Pang Chunhua, Zhang Yongqing, Wu Yueyue, Hou Yuchen, Wang Jiaqi, Qiao Man. Effects of Desulfurized Gypsum and Humic Acid Interaction on Soil and Quinoa Growth in Saline-Alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 47-53.
[11] Jia Yanli, Zhang Hongfa, Liu Guixia, Huang Sufang, Qu Xinyue, Yue Mingqiang, Han Jiating, Xu Yupeng, Liu Qingsong. Effects of Biological Sulfur Regulator on the Yield, Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Saline-Alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 86-92.
[12] Sun Xianyin, Zhang Jibo, Lü Guangde, Qi Xiaolei, Sun Yingying, Mi Yong, Mu Qiuhuan, Yin Xundong, Wang Ruixia, Qian Zhaoguo, Gao Minggang. Comparison of High and Stable Yield Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Wheat under Dryland and Supplemental Irrigation Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 104-110.
[13] Wang Shengtai, Zhao Baoxie, Du Shikun, Li Yuyang, Yu Hualin, Li Rongxin. Identification of Salt Tolerance and Variety Screening of Flax in Moderately Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 111-117.
[14] Li Xiushi, Li Yingtao, Fu Yuhua, Luo Renshan, Li Shouling, Shang Kun, Zhu Jiabao, Yu Chun. The Impact of Different Ecological Conditions on Yield of Coix Varieties [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 157-163.
[15] Wang Xingya, Chen Yuhan, Zhang Mengwen, Sun Linlin, Chen Lirong, Guo Yuqiu, Gong Kuijie. The Effects of ABA Application at Different Stages on Maize Grain Filling and Dehydration [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 173-180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!