Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 29-34.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.05.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Chlormequat Chloride and Gypsum Application on Rice Yield and Lodging Risk under Salt Stress

Du Hanmeng(), Chen Yuqiong, Liu Ruotong, Chen Yinglong, Dai Qigen, Zhang Hongcheng, Liao Ping()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Saline-Alkali Soil Reclamation and Utilization (Coastal Saline-Alkali Land) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2024-10-12 Revised:2024-12-19 Online:2025-10-15 Published:2025-10-21

Abstract:

Using an indica-japonica hybrid rice Yongyou 2640 as the material, three treatments of control, chlormequat chloride spray, and gypsum application were set up to explore the effects of different agronomic practices on rice yield and lodging characteristics in the coastal saline-alkali soils. The results showed that compared with the control, the spraying of chlormequat chloride had a tendency to increase yield, but the difference was not significant. The application of gypsum significantly increased the rice yield, with the increase mainly attributed to the rise in the number of grains per panicle. The spraying of chlormequat chloride significantly reduced the lodging index of the first, second and third internodes at the base of rice. The main reason for this was the increase of breaking resistance and the decrease of bending moment at the base internodes. Spraying chlormequat chloride reduced the plant height, center of gravity height and internode length of rice, while increasing the internode thickness and stem wall thickness. From the perspective of the material composition of the stems, spraying chlormequat chloride significantly increased the contents of non-structural carbohydrates, lignin and cellulose in the stems. The application of gypsum significantly reduced the lodging index of the first internode at the base of rice, significantly enhanced the breaking resistance of the first and second internodes at the base of rice, showed an increasing trend towards the bending moment, increased the internode length at the base of rice, and thereby increased plant height and center of gravity height. The application of gypsum increased internode diameter at the base of rice and the thickness of the stem wall, significantly enhancing the contents of non-structural carbohydrates, lignin, cellulose and Ca2+ in the stems. Thus, spraying chlormequat chloride and applying gypsum can reduce the lodging risk in coastal saline-alkali soils while maintaining high rice yield.

Key words: Coastal saline-alkali soil, Rice, Yield, Lodging resistance, Chlormequat chloride, Gypsum

Table 1

Effects of spraying chlormequat chloride and gypsum application on yield and its components of rice under salinity stress"

处理
Treatment
每穴穗数
Panicles per hill
每穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle
结实率
Seed-setting rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
产量(g/盆)
Yield (g/pot)
对照CK 3.89a 226b 86.3a 22.4a 51.4b
矮壮素Chlormequat chloride 3.78a 234a 86.8a 22.6a 54.6b
石膏Gypsum 4.11a 237a 87.8a 22.7a 59.6a

Table 2

Effects of spraying chlormequat chloride and gypsum application on the mechanical traits of rice stems under salinity stress"

处理
Treatment
抗折力Breaking resistance (g) 弯曲力矩Bending moment (cm·g) 倒伏指数Lodging index (cm·g/g)
I1 I2 I3 I1 I2 I3 I1 I2 I3
对照CK 45.5b 31.9b 26.4a 636a 546a 422a 14.0a 17.1a 16.0a
矮壮素Chlormequat chloride 55.7a 36.0a 27.9a 525b 467b 346b 9.5c 13.0b 12.4b
石膏Gypsum 59.5a 35.7a 27.3a 665a 587a 450a 11.2b 16.4a 16.5a

Table 3

Effects of spraying chlormequat chloride and gypsum application on the morphological traits of rice stems under salinity stress"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
重心高度
Gravity center
height (cm)
节间长
Internode length (cm)
节间粗
Internode diameter (mm)
茎壁厚度
Stem wall thickness (mm)
I1 I2 I3 I1 I2 I3 I1 I2 I3
对照CK 78.0b 36.8a 3.31b 8.14ab 11.60ab 5.25b 4.17b 4.02a 1.02a 0.73b 0.61a
矮壮素Chlormequat chloride 74.5c 32.9b 3.03c 7.68b 11.00b 5.70ab 4.81ab 4.41a 1.07a 0.83a 0.70a
石膏Gypsum 80.7a 38.7a 3.58a 8.56a 12.90a 5.87a 5.02a 4.54a 1.08a 0.82a 0.68a

Table 4

Effects of spraying chlormequat chloride and gypsum application on the chemical composition in the second basal internode of rice stem under salinity stress"

处理
Treatment
可溶性糖
Soluble sugar (mg/g)
淀粉
Starch (mg/g)
非结构性碳水化合物
Non-structural carbohydrate (mg/g)
木质素
Lignin (mg/g)
纤维素
Cellulose (mg/g)
Ca2+
(mg/kg)
对照CK 69.6c 227c 297c 97.8b 103b 331b
矮壮素Chlormequat chloride 86.5a 255b 341b 116.0a 110a 336b
石膏Gypsum 81.3b 295a 377a 118.0a 114a 360a

Fig.1

Correlation analysis of rice stem lodging index “*”and“**”indicate significant correlation at the P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 levels, respectively. NSC represents non-structural carbohydrate."

[1] 赵凌, 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 等. 中国水稻生产现状与发展趋势. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(10):105-107.
[2] 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 等. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3):474-479.
[3] 徐明岗, 段英华, 白珊珊, 等. 基于长期定位试验的土壤健康研究与展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(7):1253-1261.
[4] 刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5):789-802.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805001
[5] 中华人民共和国自然资源部.2022年中国自然资源统计公报. (2023-04-13)[2024-10-12].https://www.mnr.gov.cn/dt/ywbb/202304/t20230413_2781423.html.
[6] 赵英, 王丽, 赵惠丽, 等. 滨海盐碱地改良研究现状及展望. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3):67-74.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0255
[7] 李小坤, 李云春, 鲁剑巍, 等. 强降雨致洪涝灾害下不同因素对水稻倒伏的影响. 自然灾害学报, 2012, 21(6):99-103.
[8] 国家防灾减灾救灾委员会办公室应急管理部发布2023年全国十大自然灾害. 安全与健康, 2024(3):45,47.
[9] Luo X Y, Fu L, et al. Evaluation of lodging resistance in rice based on an optimized parameter from lodging index. Crop Science, 2022, 62(3):1318-1332.
[10] 王晓飞, 陆展华, 刘维, 等. “绿色革命”以来水稻抗倒伏研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2022, 49(3):1-13.
[11] Liaqat S, Muhammad Y, Syed M A S, et al. Improving lodging resistance: using wheat and rice as classical examples. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(17):4211.
[12] Okuno A, Hirano K, Asano K, et al. New approach to increasing rice lodging resistance and biomass yield through the use of high gibberellin producing varieties. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(2):e86870.
[13] 邵玺文, 牟金猛, 杨志鑫, 等. 多效唑施用方式对水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2023, 54(1):1-9.
[14] 孟轶, 廖萍, 魏海燕, 等. 施石膏对水稻产量和甲烷排放影响的荟萃分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2023, 31(2):280-289.
[15] 周宾. 添加脱硫石膏对苏打盐碱土理化性质及水稻产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(3):386-390.
[16] 熊素敏, 左秀凤, 朱永义. 稻壳中纤维素、半纤维素和木质素的测定. 粮食与饲料工业, 2005(8):40-41.
[17] 姜龙, 曲金玲, 孙国宏, 等. 矮壮素、烯效唑和多效唑对水稻倒伏及产量的影响. 中国林副特产, 2018(2):10-13,18.
[18] 徐富贤, 蒋鹏, 周兴兵, 等. 多效唑对杂交中稻不同密肥群体产量和抗倒伏性的影响. 核农学报, 2020, 34(5):1088-1096.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.05.1088
[19] Niu Y N, Chen T X, Zhao C C, et al. Improving crop lodging resistance by adjusting plant height and stem strength. Agronomy, 2021, 11(12):2421.
[20] 袁新捷, 刘潇, 陈国兴. 水稻核心种质资源茎秆抗倒伏性研究. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(1):147-153.
[21] Liao P, Bell S M, Chen L, et al.Improving rice grain yield and reducing lodging risk simultaneously: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023,143,126709.
[22] Kashiwagi T. Novel QTL for lodging resistance,PRL4,improves physical properties with high non-structural carbohydrate accumulation of basal culms in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica, 2022, 218(6):1-12.
[23] 孙培杰, 王媛媛, 陈涛, 等. 喷施矮壮素与延缓施氮对冬小麦抗倒伏能力及产量形成的影响. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8):2141-2149.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202408.011
[24] Zhang W J, Ding Y F, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer application affects lodging resistance by altering secondary cell wall synthesis in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Research, 2017, 130:859-871.
[25] 韦还和, 张翔, 朱旺, 等. 盐胁迫对水稻籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3):734-746.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.32021
[26] Zhang D X, Chen D, et al. Effect of elemental sulfur and gypsum application on the bioavailability and redistribution of cadmium during rice growth. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 657:1460-1467.
[27] 陈雨琼, 孟轶, 徐志恒, 等. 石膏用量对滨海盐碱地水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(5):89-92,104.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.05.016
[28] 胡慧, 马帅国, 田蕾, 等. 脱硫石膏改良盐碱土对水稻叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 核农学报, 2019, 33(12):2439-2450.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.12.2439
[29] 杨建昌, 徐国伟, 王志琴, 等. 旱种水稻结实期茎中碳同化物的运转及其生理机制. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2):108-114.
[30] Wang S M. Calcium regulates K+/Na+ homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under saline conditions. Plant Soil & Environment, 2012, 58(3):121-127.
[31] 张丰转, 金正勋, 马国辉, 等. 水稻抗倒性与茎秆形态性状和化学成分含量间相关分析. 作物杂志, 2010(4):15-19.
[32] Veeresh R P G, Amelia H, Akira Y, et al. Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Research, 2011, 22(1):1-13.
[1] Zhou Tingfang, Li Ran, Liu Qianqian, Zhang Ze, Wang Zhenhua, Ma Baoxin, Lu Ming, Zhang Lin, Han Yehui, Yang Bo, Li Mingshun, Zhang Degui, Weng Jianfeng, Yong Hongjun, Xu Jingyu, Han Jienan, Li Xinhai. Analysis of Salt Tolerance at Germination Stage of 118 Maize Hybrids in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 1-10.
[2] Teng Wen, Ye Fan, Zhou Zhou, Wang Yule, Liu Lijun. Effects of Wheat and Rapeseed Straw Returning on Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 11-18.
[3] Ma Qiang, Li Yankun, Wang Gui’e, Wen Tingting, Zhang Tianyu, Tian Jichun, Wang Yanxun. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Quality Characteristics of Colored Wheat Varieties Approved in Shandong Province and Research on Improvement Direction [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 113-119.
[4] Zhi Xianhong, Ji Zixian, Xu Zhenwang, Tan En, Liang Rishen, Ma Shuaipeng, Tang Huiwu. Expression Analysis of the CYP450 Family Gene Os78A5 in Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 135-141.
[5] Peng Binfeng, Lu Chusheng, Yin Yuanhong, Zhu Feifei, Ye Qunhuan, Pan Junfeng, Liu Yanzhuo, Hu Xiangyu, Hu Rui, Li Meijuan, Wang Xinyu, Liang Kaiming, Fu Youqiang. Physiological Mechanism of Ammonium-Nitrate Mixed Nutrition Promoting Rice Growth under High-Temperature Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 165-170.
[6] Li Xiaomin, Gong Hongyu, Tian Bingxin, Liu Donghua, Li Chunxi, Jiang Lina, Ma Jianhui. Effects of Different Row Spacing Arrangements and Planting Density Combinations on Canopy Structure and Nitrogen Utilization in Wheat on the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 171-176.
[7] Li Jiahui, Chen Ruxue, Bai Hongbo, Wang Yonghua. Photosynthesis-Grain Filling Coordination Characteristics of Winter Wheat with Different Plant Types and Their Impact on Yield Components [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 195-203.
[8] Wang Yan, Zhang Qian, Dong Ming, Wang Shulin, Feng Guoyi, Liang Qinglong, Qi Hong. Effects of Mechanical Topping Time on Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Cotton in Southern Hebei Cotton Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 204-208.
[9] Wu Huijuan, Geng Xiaoli, Li Deming, Zhou Dongchang, Fu Ping, Liu Qian, Du Xiaocun. Effects of Foliar Spraying with Different Iron Fertilizers on Seed Yield and Its Components in Oat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 233-238.
[10] Li Xiang, Li Yijie, Wu Xiaojian, Long Shengfeng, Huang Dongmei, Gao Yijing, Wang Zeping. Application Effect of Sugarcane Waste in Cultivation of Dictyophora indusiata [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 260-265.
[11] Li Jie, Zhang Yongqiang, Lei Junjie, Lü Xiaoqing, Chen Chuanxin, Xu Qijiang, Nie Shihui, Xu Wenxiu, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Different Urea Types and Application Methods on Plant Characteristics and Yield Composition of Winter Wheat under Drip Irrigation [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 266-271.
[12] Yan Jingrong, Pang Chunhua, Zhang Yongqing, Wu Yueyue, Hou Yuchen, Wang Jiaqi, Qiao Man. Effects of Desulfurized Gypsum and Humic Acid Interaction on Soil and Quinoa Growth in Saline-Alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 47-53.
[13] Jia Yanli, Zhang Hongfa, Liu Guixia, Huang Sufang, Qu Xinyue, Yue Mingqiang, Han Jiating, Xu Yupeng, Liu Qingsong. Effects of Biological Sulfur Regulator on the Yield, Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Saline-Alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 86-92.
[14] Sun Xianyin, Zhang Jibo, Lü Guangde, Qi Xiaolei, Sun Yingying, Mi Yong, Mu Qiuhuan, Yin Xundong, Wang Ruixia, Qian Zhaoguo, Gao Minggang. Comparison of High and Stable Yield Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Wheat under Dryland and Supplemental Irrigation Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 104-110.
[15] Wang Shengtai, Zhao Baoxie, Du Shikun, Li Yuyang, Yu Hualin, Li Rongxin. Identification of Salt Tolerance and Variety Screening of Flax in Moderately Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 111-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!