Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 69-76.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.04.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive Identification and Selection System and Method for Rape Germplasm with High Photosynthetic Efficiency

Zhang Yaowen,Hou Junli,Zhao Xiaoguang,Guan Zhoubo,Li Dianrong,Tian Jianhua,Dong Yuhong,Wang Zhuyun   

  1. Hybrid Rape Research Center of Shaanxi Province/Shaanxi Rape Branch of National Oil Crops Genetic Improvement Center, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2018-12-29 Revised:2019-06-17 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-06

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

242

Abstract:

High photosynthetic efficiency germplasm is the basis for the high photosynthetic efficiency breeding of crops. Based on the analysis of the requirements, despite the difficulties and research deficiencies of high photosynthetic efficiency germplasm screening in rape, our research team constructed a comprehensive screening index system and method for rape with high photosynthetic efficiency to meet the breeding objectives of super high yield rape and the practical production demand. Quantitative comprehensive evaluation of rape germplasm was conducted and directional breeding and crossbreeding improvement was developed. Practical application achieved good results and a number of high photosynthetic efficiency germplasms were obtained, which laid a material foundation for rape breeding with high photosynthetic efficiency by a way called high photosynthetic efficiency + heterosis.

Key words: Rape, High photosynthetic efficiency germplasm, Comprehensive identification and selection, Index system and method, Effect of screening

Fig.1

The methods for screening the rape germplasm resources with high photosynthetic efficiency"

Fig.2

The methods for screening rape core germplasm resources with high photosynthetic efficiency"

Table 1

The effects of main traits of rape germplasm "7792-95/772//772" with high photosynthetic efficiency by directed breeding (comparison between 2014 and 2018)"

性状Trait 2014年数值
The value
in 2014		 2014与2018年比较(%)
Comparison between
2014 and 2008		 性状Trait 2014年数值
The value
in 2014		 2014与2018年比较(%)
Comparison between
2014 and 2008
光合性状
Photosynthetic trait		 叶绿素含量(SPAD)
Chlorophyll content		 55.36±3.71 5.53** 产量构成性状
Yield component		 单株角果数
Siliques per plant		 239.10±52.24 6.25**
叶绿素a/b值
Ratio of chlorophyll a content to chlorophyll b content		 3.52±0.02 2.46* character
 单株分枝数
Branches per plant		 6.30±1.10 3.27*
净光合速率[μmolCO2/(m2·s)]
Net photosynthetic rate		 26.68±2.03 8.32** 千粒重(g)
1000-seed weight		 2.73±0.04 1.24*
水分利用效率(μmolCO2/mmolH2O)
Water use efficiency		 3.96±0.39 3.78* 角粒数
Seeds per silique		 30.22±1.37 0.96*
群体净光合速率[g/(d·m2)]
Net photosynthetic rate of population		 2.42±0.28 3.13* 单株生物量(g)
Weight of biomass per plant		 52.88±3.42 3.10*
株型性状
Plant-type trait		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 134.00±7.35 -6.52** 单株产量(g)
Grain yield per plant		 18.56±9.76 4.21**
主序长/株高(%)
Ratio of main inflorescence length to plant height		 45.11±3.78 -2.68* 收获系数
Harvest index		 0.35±0.01 3.51**
分枝位/株高(%)
Ratio of branch position to plant height		 35.55±3.43 -5.22** 品质性状
Quality trait		 硫苷含量(mg/g)
Glucosinolates content		 23.80±1.92 -2.25
分枝与主茎夹角(°)
The angle of branches to main stem		 22.60±2.21 -7.61** 蛋白质含量(%)
Protein content		 22.92±0.84 -11.18**
短柄叶片与主茎夹角(°)
The angle of short petiole leaf to main stem		 30.26±1.82 -6.18** 含油量(%)
Oil content		 51.49±0.90 3.23**
叶面积系数
Leaf area index		 1.48±0.28 1.36* （油+蛋白质）含量(%)
Content of oil and protein		 75.42±0.24 4.60**
角果皮面积系数
Green silique area index		 3.54±0.36 -0.92 芥酸含量(%)
Erucic acid content		 0.96±0.09 -1.12

Table 2

The effects of chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate of rape with high photosynthetic efficiency germplasm "7792-95/772//772" from 2006 to 2014 by directional selection"

年份
Year		 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate
测定值(SPAD)
The determination value		 比较结果(%)
Result of comparison		 测定值[μmolCO2/(m2·s)]
The determination value		 比较结果(%)
Result of comparison
7792-95/
772//772		 CK1 CK2 与CK1比较
Compared with CK1		 与CK2比较
Compared with CK2		 7792-95/
772//772		 CK1 CK2 与CK1比较
Compared with CK1		 与CK2比较
Compared with CK2
2006 52.52 47.47 - 10.63 - 23.62 21.70 - 11.84 -
2007 56.50 50.89 - 11.03 - 22.62 19.87 - 12.16 -
2008 54.08 48.74 - 10.96 - 24.63 23.34 - 12.37 -
2009 53.20 47.60 50.04 11.76 6.32 24.26 21.05 22.96 13.24 5.65
2010 54.70 48.64 51.01 12.46 7.23 25.25 21.75 23.65 13.88 6.53
2011 56.23 49.71 52.13 13.12 7.87 23.41 19.99 21.86 14.61 7.08
2012 52.96 46.60 48.90 13.66 8.31 24.01 20.39 22.34 15.11 7.49
2013 54.16 47.38 49.84 14.32 8.67 25.62 21.66 23.78 15.46 7.82
2014 55.36 48.21 50.83 14.82 8.91 26.68 22.46 24.75 15.82 8.22
[1] 王汉中 . 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略. 中国油料作物学报, 2018,40(5):613-617.
[2] 张耀文, 赵小光, 王学芳 , 等. 油菜高光效育种的思路、方法与选育效果. 西北农业学报, 2017,26(5):647-656.
[3] 杜维广, 陈怡, 张桂茹 , 等. 高脂肪和高光效的高产稳产抗病大豆新品种黑农41选育与推广. 黑龙江农业科学, 2003,26(1):1-4.
[4] 栾晓燕, 陈怡, 杜维广 , 等. 超高产、抗病、广适应性大豆黑农51的选育研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012,35(10):8-12.
[5] 崔文娟, 倪建福, 欧巧明 , 等. 春小麦新品种陇春32号选育报告. 甘肃农业科技, 2014,40(12):3-4.
[6] 丁位华, 冯素伟, 王丹 , 等. 不同穗型小麦籽粒灌浆、干物质积累与转运特性及其与产量的关系. 河南农业科学, 2018,47(6):13-17,97.
[7] 季芝娟, 曾宇翔, 梁燕 , 等. 超级早籼稻“中早39”的高产育种研究. 中国生物工程杂志, 2017,37(12):21-26.
[8] 刘文炳, 张建新, 罗维禄 , 等. 光身杂交稻选育研究进展. 杂交水稻, 2005,20(1):6-10.
[9] 王汉中, 殷艳 . 我国油料产业形势分析与发展对策建议. 中国油料作物学报, 2014,36(3):414-421.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.03.020
[10] 张耀文, 赵小光, 关周博 , 等. 油菜高光效育种的难点及解决策略. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(1):1-9.
[11] 李俊 . 油菜高光效生理特征体系的建立及其调控研究. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2014.
[12] 许大全 . 光合作用效率. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2002: 163-168.
[13] 王爱凡, 康雷, 李鹏飞 , 等. 我国甘蓝型油菜远缘杂交和种质创新研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2016,38(5):691-698.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2016.05.021
[14] 冷锁虎 . 油菜的光合生理.//江苏农学会. 江苏油作科学. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1995: 220-247.
[15] 张耀文, 赵小光, 关周博 , 等. 功能相对稳定期内油菜3类主要光合器官间光合性状差异的比较. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(2):296-304.
[16] 王锐 . 油菜群体冠层结构特性及光能利用率的研究. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2012.
[17] 白桂萍 . 密植条件下油菜理想冠层结构研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2014.
[1] Fan Huiling,Bai Shengwen,Zhu Xuefeng,Li Zhenzhou,Qin Minggang,He Zhijun. Difference of Salt-Alkaline Tolerance of Three Rape and Its Two Relatives at Germination Stage [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 178-184.
[2] Zepeng Yang,Honglin Chen,Juan Guo,Changtao Wang,Dinghui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Lodging Traits of Rape in the Hilly Central Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 150-155.
[3] Min Hu,Jianwei Lu,Zhen Wang,Qiuxiang You. Study on the Appropriate Seeding Rate of Late Sowing Oilseed Rape as Green Manure [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 120-123.
[4] Peng Wang,Yinchu Chen,Wanyun Li,Shengli Liu,Yantao Liu,Gang Zhao. The Effect of the Botanical Traits on the Yield Model in Broomrape Resistant Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 38-45.
[5] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 63-66.
[6] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 29-31.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[2] Yuan Wang,Ze Guo,Xiaohui Li,Shixiao Xu,Xuexia Xing,Siqi Zhang,Jia He,Chao Liu,Fang Chen,Tiezhao Yang. Effects of Meloidogyne incognita Infection on Tobacco Root System under Different Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 161 -166 .
[3] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167 -174 .
[4] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28 -31 .
[5] Yanfang Hao,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Wei Zhang,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Establishment of Sorghum Cell Suspensions with Young Leaves[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 35 -40 .
[6] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56 -61 .
[7] Jie Wang,Bo Zeng,Cailin Lei,Zhichao Zhao,Jiulin Wang,Zhijun Cheng. Variety Analysis of Northern Rice Regional Trials in Recent 15 Years[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 71 -76 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2010, 26(4): 4 -9 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(5): 84 -89 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(5): 3 .