Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 96-101.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight and Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Guixie 3-Derived Wheat Varieties (Lines)

Ge Changbin1(), Zhang Hongtao1, Liao Ping’an1, Cao Yanyan1, Huang Jie1, Qiao Jiliang1, Guo Chunqiang1, Wang Jun1, Qin Suyan1, Zhang Lan1, Xia Mingcong2, Cheng Bin3, Zhang Liyi3   

  1. 1Luohe Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Luohe Research Center of Scab Resistant and High Quality Wheat Germplasm Creation and New Variety Cultivation Engineering Technology, Luohe 462300, Henan, China
    2Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    3Institute of Upland Crops, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2021-02-22 Revised:2021-05-21 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

269

Abstract:

Fusarium head blight in wheat is a harmful worldwide fungal disease for wheat production. It is an effective means to reduce the harm by using the scab resistance varieties. But there are few wheat germplasms had the resistance to Fusarium head blight. The research identified three germplasms of Luokang 1, Luokang 4, and Luokang 6 had moderate resistance to Fusarium head blight and were suitable for planting in Huanghuai wheat region, and the proportions of disease spikelets were 19.0%, 20.9% and 20.2%, respectively, which had significant difference with Sumai 3 (13.8%), but had no significant difference with Yangmai 158 (19.2%). By the analyse of the average severity and percentage of diseased spikelet, the three materials had moderate resistance to Fusarium head blight, which were similar to Yangmai 158. From the analyse of cold tolerance, plant height, 1000-grain weight, grains per spike and spikelet density, Luokang 6 had no significant difference with Zhoumai 22, which was more suitable for breeding and utilization in Huanghuai wheat region.

Key words: Luokang 1, Luokang 4, Luokang 6, Fusarium head blight, Guixie 3, Wheat derived varieties (lines), Resistance evaluation

Table 1

Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in Guixie 3-derived varieties (lines) and control"

品种（系）
Variety
(line)		 亲本组合
Parental combination		 小穗数
Spikelet number		 发病小穗数
Number of diseased
spikelets		 发病小穗率
Percentage of diseased
spikelet (%)		 平均严重度
Average severity		 抗性
Resistance
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 平均
Average		 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
周麦22
Zhoumai 22		 周麦12/温麦6号//
周麦13号		 23.2
24.0
25.5
18.6
18.2
19.5
80.3
75.7
76.5
77.5
4.0
3.8
3.9
S
S
S
贵协3号
Guixie 3		 以色列野生二粒
小麦/光稃野燕麦		 25.7
26.3
28.2
5.4
5.2
5.2
21.2
19.8
18.6
19.9bB
2.3
2.0
1.9
MR
MR
R
苏麦3号
Sumai 3		 阿夫/台湾小麦
19.0
18.3
18.0
2.7
2.9
2.1
14.3
15.7
11.5
13.8aA
1.5
1.7
1.3
R
R
R
扬麦158
Yangmai 158		 扬麦4号//
ST1472/506		 19.6
18.2
18.5
4.0
3.6
3.2
20.6
19.7
17.3
19.2bAB
2.4
2.0
2.0
MR
MR
MR
扬麦13
Yangmai 13		 扬84-84//Maristorve/
扬麦3号		 19.3
18.1
19.0
9.1
7.5
8.6
47.4
41.6
45.2
44.7cC
3.4
3.0
3.0
MS
MS
MS
安农8455
Annong 8455		 不详
18.4
18.0
18.7
15.7
15.8
16.3
85.4
88.0
87.1
86.8dD
3.7
4.0
3.9
S
S
S
漯抗1号
Luokang 1		 新麦9号/贵协3号
22.1
21.4
21.5
4.4
3.9
4.1
19.7
18.4
19.0
19.0bAB
2.2
2.1
2.0
MR
MR
MR
LK1601 矮抗58/漯抗1号 22.7 23.5 22.1 16.3 18.4 16.7 71.7 78.5 75.4 75.2 3.8 3.9 3.7 S S S
LK1602 21.6 22.8 23.0 14.8 18.2 15.8 68.3 80.0 68.7 72.3 3.8 4.0 3.9 S S S
LK1603 22.3 22.7 23.6 17.5 14.6 14.8 78.3 64.1 62.6 68.3 3.6 3.7 3.5 S S S
LK1604 23.5 23.0 22.4 20.0 16.0 16.7 85.0 69.4 74.4 76.3 4.0 3.7 3.6 S S S
LK1605 21.0 22.5 21.9 16.4 16.6 15.7 78.3 73.7 71.8 74.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 S S S
LK1606 23.3 23.5 24.0 18.3 18.8 18.0 78.5 80.0 75.0 77.8 3.7 4.0 3.6 S S S
LK1607（漯抗4号）
LK1607 (Luokang 4)		 24.0
23.2
24.5
4.9
4.7
5.3
20.5
20.3
21.8
20.9bB
2.5
2.2
2.4
MR
MR
MR
LK1608（漯麦53）
LK1608 (Luomai 53)		 23.6
24.0
23.1
9.1
11.1
9.9
38.5
46.1
43.0
42.5cC
2.8
3.4
3.1
MR
MS
MS
LK1609 22.4 23.0 22.8 8.0 18.0 13.7 35.7 78.4 60.2 58.1 2.2 3.9 3.3 MR S MS
LK1610 21.3 22.5 21.7 13.8 17.5 12.9 65.0 77.6 59.5 67.4 3.3 3.9 3.3 MS S MS
LK1611 21.5 21.7 22.0 10.5 16.9 14.9 49.0 78.0 67.9 65.0 3.3 4.0 3.6 MS S S
LK1612 22.8 23.6 23.0 11.0 16.0 11.5 48.3 67.9 50.0 55.4 3.1 3.9 3.2 MS S MS
LK1613 24.6 23.7 24.0 9.8 15.4 14.2 40.0 65.0 59.0 54.7 2.7 3.7 3.0 MR S MS
LK1614 23.0 22.4 21.5 18.0 16.1 12.3 78.3 71.8 57.0 69.0 3.8 3.6 3.0 S S MS
LK1615 25.1 24.7 24.3 19.7 19.3 17.1 78.3 78.1 70.5 75.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 S S S
LK1616 周麦22/漯抗1号 22.0 21.9 22.3 14.3 17.5 11.3 65.0 80.0 50.8 65.3 3.7 3.9 3.2 S S MS
LK1617 25.3 34.6 25.0 16.4 27.7 18.7 65.0 80.0 74.9 73.3 3.9 4.0 3.5 S S S
LK1618 21.4 22.0 21.5 16.1 17.6 12.1 75.0 80.0 56.2 70.4 3.6 4.0 3.3 S S MS
LK1619 20.0 19.4 19.5 9.0 13.5 13.5 45.0 69.7 69.3 61.3 3.0 3.6 3.4 MS S MS
LK1620 21.2 21.0 20.8 15.2 15.0 14.3 71.7 71.4 68.6 70.6 3.6 3.7 3.2 S S MS
LK1621 25.0 24.3 24.6 12.1 19.0 12.9 48.3 78.1 52.4 59.6 3.4 3.6 3.4 MS S MS
LK1622 21.8 22.0 22.7 10.3 11.0 17.5 47.2 50.0 77.3 58.2 3.4 3.1 3.7 MS MS S
LK1623 18.7 19.6 20.1 8.4 15.7 15.3 45.0 80.0 76.0 67.0 3.4 3.9 3.6 MS S S
LK1624 21.6 22.1 21.3 10.4 17.7 11.0 48.0 80.0 51.7 59.9 3.3 4.0 3.2 MS S MS
LK1625 23.5 23.0 24.2 12.1 18.4 11.4 51.7 80.0 47.0 59.6 3.0 4.0 3.0 MS S MS
LK1626 22.7 22.5 23.1 10.5 17.4 9.4 46.1 77.4 40.6 54.7 3.3 4.0 2.7 MS S MR
LK1627 22.0 23.5 24.0 13.6 18.6 8.5 61.7 79.3 35.5 58.8 3.9 4.0 2.7 S S MR
LK1628 21.2 20.5 21.9 9.1 16.2 11.1 42.7 78.9 50.6 57.4 3.3 4.0 3.4 MS S MS
LK1629 22.4 23.0 22.6 15.3 17.6 10.1 68.3 76.4 44.8 63.2 3.6 3.9 3.1 S S MS
LK1630（漯抗6号）
LK1630 (Luokang 6)		 26.4
25.6
25.3
5.4
5.6
4.6
20.4
21.9
18.2
20.2bB
2.0
2.1
2.3
MR
MR
MR
LK1631 23.4 22.7 23.0 9.8 17.9 9.0 41.7 79.0 39.1 53.3 2.9 4.0 2.8 MR S MR
LK1632 22.7 22.1 22.5 10.3 17.2 9.0 45.2 77.8 40.0 54.3 3.1 4.0 2.6 MR S MR
LK1633 23.0 23.3 23.2 15.7 17.0 9.7 68.3 73.1 41.7 61.0 3.7 3.7 2.7 S S MR
LK1634 21.3 20.8 21.0 9.6 16.6 10.5 45.0 80.0 50.2 58.4 3.2 4.0 3.4 MS S MS
LK1635 22.1 23.0 22.5 15.8 17.0 15.7 71.7 73.7 69.6 71.7 3.9 3.7 3.5 S S S
LK1636 20.5 21.0 20.6 9.9 8.7 9.2 48.1 41.5 44.7 44.8cC 3.4 3.4 3.0 MS MS MS
LK1637 23.2 23.5 22.8 10.6 18.8 11.0 45.5 80.0 48.4 58.0 3.4 4.0 3.1 MS S MS
LK1638 22.0 21.5 21.8 10.1 15.8 8.3 46.0 73.3 38.2 52.5 3.4 4.0 2.9 MS S MR
LK1639 21.5 22.0 21.3 10.1 16.5 7.8 47.2 74.8 36.8 52.9 3.0 3.9 2.9 MS S MR
LK1640 23.2 23.5 23.0 11.2 18.2 18.2 48.1 77.5 79.0 68.2 3.1 3.9 3.6 MS S S
LK1641 21.8 22.0 21.7 10.2 16.9 9.1 47.0 76.7 41.9 55.2 3.6 3.9 2.4 S S MR

Fig.1

Responses to Fusarium head blight in resistance varieties (lines) and CK 1: Luokang 1; 2: Luokang 4; 3: Luokang 6; 4: Sumai 3; 5: Yangmai 158; 6: Yangmai 13; 7: Annong 8455"

Fig.2

Resistance of spray inoculated disease resistant varieties (lines) to Fusarium head blight"

Table 2

Main agronomic traits of the parents (Guixie 3), medium-resistance derived varieties, Zhoumai 22, and resistance controls"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 分蘖数
Tillering
number		 耐寒性
Cold
tolerance		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 穗粒数
Grains
per spike		 穗长
Spike length
(cm)		 小穗密度（个/cm）
Spikelet density
(spikelet/cm)		 粒色
Seed
color
贵协3号Guixie 3 4.8 3级 128.5 39.0 55.0 16.5 1.7dC 红
周麦22 Zhoumai 22 5.6 1级 80.0 46.0 43.5 11.0 2.3aA 白
漯抗1号Luokang 1 5.0 2级 82.5 40.5 42.8 11.3 1.9cdBC 白
漯抗4号Luokang 4 5.3 1级 79.5 44.5 42.0 12.5 2.0bAB 白
漯抗6号Luokang 6 5.1 1级 80.0 45.0 43.0 12.0 2.1abAB 白
苏麦3号Sumai 3 4.5 3级 125.3 38.5 49.5 10.0 1.8dC 红
扬麦158 Yangmai 158 4.6 3级 100.0 43.5 43.5 10.5 1.8dC 红
[1] Buerstmayr H, Ban T, Anderson J A. QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat:a review. Plant Breeding, 2009, 128:1-26.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.2009.128.issue-1
[2] 张爱民, 阳文龙, 李欣, 等. 小麦抗赤霉病研究现状与展望. 遗传, 2018, 40(10):858-873.
[3] 金艳, 刘付锁, 朱统泉, 等. 河南省小麦赤霉病的发生情况分析与防治对策. 河南科技学院学报, 2016, 44(6):1-4.
[4] Osman M, He X, Benedettelli S, et al. Identification of new sources of resistance to fungal leaf and head blight diseases of wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2016, 145:305-320.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0843-0
[5] 张晓军, 张树伟, 肖进, 等. 小偃麦衍生品系的赤霉病抗性评价. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):62-73.
[6] 张宏军, 宿振起, 柏贵华, 等. 利用Fhb1基因功能标记选择提高黄淮冬麦区小麦品种对赤霉病的抗性. 作物学报, 2018, 44(4):505-511.
[7] 赵虹, 王西成, 胡卫国, 等. 黄淮南片麦区小麦品种利用现状及建议. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(8):18-24,38.
[8] 朱展望, 徐登安, 程顺和, 等. 中国小麦品种抗赤霉病基因Fhb1的鉴定与溯源. 作物学报, 2018, 44(4):473-482.
[9] Somers D J, Fedak G, Savard M. Molecular mapping of novel genes controlling Fusarium head blight resistance and deoxynivalenol accumulation in spring wheat. Genome, 2003, 46(4):555-564.
pmid: 12897863
[10] Kollers S, Rodemann B, Ling J, et al. Whole genome association mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(2):e57500.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057500
[11] 胡文静, 张春梅, 吴迪, 等. 长江中下游小麦抗赤霉病品种的筛选与部分农艺性状分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21):4313-4321.
[12] 中华人民共和国农业部. 小麦区域试验品种抗赤霉病鉴定技术规程：NY/T 2954-2016. 北京：中国农业出版社: 中国农业出版社.
[13] 程顺和, 张勇, 张伯桥, 等. 小麦抗赤霉病育种2条技术路线的探讨. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 24(1):59-62.
[14] Hajjar R, Hodgkin T. The use of wild relativies in crop improvement:A survery of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica, 2007, 156:1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0
[15] 肖松, 陈天青, 高旭, 等. 贵协3号对小麦赤霉病、条锈病及白粉病的抗病性. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(6):56-59.
[16] 张彬, 李金秀, 王震, 等. 黄淮南片麦区主栽小麦品种对赤霉病抗性分析. 植物保护, 2018, 44(2):190-194.
[17] 苏双飞, 许峰, 张从宇, 等. 145份小麦品种(系)的赤霉病抗性评价. 安徽科技学院学报, 2015, 29(2):13-19.
[18] 陆成彬, 范金平, 印娟, 等. 小麦主要农艺性状对赤霉病抗性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(3):1091-1092,1095.
[1] Huang Liqun, Ma Yue, Qi Xinlei, Sun Qiuyu, Dong Jiayu, Li Guanjia, Ma Zhanhong. Evaluation of Resistance of Corn Varieties to Southern Corn Rust from Different Regions [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 205-210.
[2] Gao Qing, Zhang Yaling, Zhou Yili, Yu Lianpeng, Nie Qiang, Jin Xuehui. Identification of Major Resistance Genes and Resistance Evaluation to Rice Blast in Japonica Rice Varieties in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 59-66.
[3] Miao Jiankun, Xu Han, Yang Hao, Yan Han, Chu Jin, Bai Yuanjun, Dong Hai. Resistance Evaluation of Main Rice Cultivars to False Smut Rice in Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 38-46.
[4] Xiaodong Dai,Xinzhi Xu,Cancan Zhu,Yufeng Yang,Chunyi Wang,Xiaoping Yang,Guohong Yang,Junxia Li. Seeding Stage Response to Different Water Availability and Drought Resistance Evaluation of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 140-143.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!