Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 140-143.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.01.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Seeding Stage Response to Different Water Availability and Drought Resistance Evaluation of Foxtail Millet

Dai Xiaodong,Xu Xinzhi,Zhu Cancan,Yang Yufeng,Wang Chunyi,Yang Xiaoping,Yang Guohong,Li Junxia   

  1. Cereal Crops Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,Henan,China
  • Received:2015-10-10 Revised:2015-11-17 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2018-08-25
  • Contact: Junxia Li

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

207

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of drought on plant growth and root growth of foxtail millet seedlings subjected to well watered, moderate water stress and severe water stress, respectively, with six varieties and evaluated drought resistance. The results indicated that well watered was the most advantages for plant growth and root growth, and plant height, leaf area of top three leaf, root length, root surface, root surface area, root volume, root tip number decreased, along with the water stress strengthening. Root-shoot ratio of Shanxi 2010 had a maximal increase slope, 15.95% and 25.36% under moderate water stress and severe water stress, respectively, among six varieties. So Shanxi 2010 showed better drought resistance.

Key words: Foxtail millet, Drought stress, Drought resistance evaluation

Table 1

Effects of different water treatments on plant height, leaf area of top three leaf,shoot dry weight, root dry weight and root-shoot ratio"

材料
Material		 水分处理
Water treatment		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 顶三叶叶面积
Leaf area of top three leaf (cm2)		 幼苗干物质质量
Shoot dry weight (g)		 根干物质质量
Root dry weight (g)		 根冠比
Root-shoot ratio
山西2010
Shanxi2010		 W1 43.0a 76.70a 4.12a 3.15a 0.765c
W2 36.7b 48.11b 3.43b 3.04b 0.887b
W3 27.1c 36.59c 3.04c 2.92c 0.959a
郑12
Zheng12		 W1 63.7a 123.81a 4.71a 3.54a 0.752c
W2 50.7b 74.84b 3.95b 3.19b 0.809b
W3 35.1c 45.16c 3.40c 3.01c 0.886a
A1
 W1 66.9a 147.93a 4.89a 3.61a 0.739c
W2 51.7b 61.88b 3.97b 3.20b 0.807b
W3 39.1c 57.56b 3.46c 3.01c 0.868a
郑9188
Zheng9188		 W1 52.0a 90.65a 4.21a 3.36a 0.797b
W2 41.4b 51.56b 3.61b 3.19b 0.886a
W3 35.5c 21.92c 3.39c 3.04c 0.897a
冀谷31
Jigu31		 W1 58.3a 118.27a 4.48a 3.54a 0.792b
W2 47.4b 82.13b 3.83b 3.31b 0.865a
W3 35.5c 43.42c 3.40c 2.99c 0.880a
太选14号
Taixuan14		 W1 55.6a 89.87a 4.00a 3.26a 0.815b
W2 41.9b 55.72b 3.36b 2.98b 0.887a
W3 28.1c 24.66c 3.16c 2.87c 0.908a

Table 2

Effects of different water treatments on the root growth"

材料名称
Material		 水分处理
Water treatment		 根长
Root length (cm)		 根表面积
Root surface area (cm2)		 根体积
Root volume (cm3)		 根尖数
Root tip number
山西2010 W1 1 179.26a 198.38a 2.67a 3 050.33a
Shanxi2010 W2 1 087.02a 166.76b 2.04b 2 383.33b
W3 516.31b 63.95c 0.64c 1 135.33c
郑12 W1 1 164.24a 168.33a 1.96a 2 695.67a
Zheng12 W2 464.57b 78.35b 1.06b 985.00b
W3 97.27c 15.89c 0.22c 189.67c
A1
 W1 1 537.02a 285.65a 4.23a 3 039.33a
W2 938.09b 182.83b 2.84b 1 830.67b
W3 679.51c 85.86c 0.86c 1 622.67b
郑9188 W1 1 099.05a 203.37a 3.01a 2 221.33a
Zheng9188 W2 891.18b 141.29b 1.79b 1 682.33b
W3 639.71c 79.38c 0.79c 1 341.00c
冀谷31 W1 994.37a 216.16a 3.74a 2 057.00a
Jigu31 W2 770.42b 156.20b 2.54b 1 514.00b
W3 539.38c 89.44c 1.20c 1 094.00c
太选14号 W1 829.98a 149.40a 2.16a 1 754.33a
Taixuan14 W2 454.10b 77.44b 1.06b 846.00b
W3 344.45c 39.11c 0.35c 822.33b

Fig.1

Cluster analysis of relative increase value of root-shoot ratio of six varieties under moderate drought"

Fig.2

Cluster analysis of relative increase value of root-shoot ratio of six varieties under severe drought"

[1] 柴岩 . 中国小杂粮产业发展报告.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007: 32-43.
[2] 代小冬, 杨育峰, 朱灿灿 , 等. 谷子萌芽期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价. 华北农学报, 2015,30(4):139-144.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2015.04.024
[3] 张文英, 智慧, 柳斌辉 , 等. 谷子孕穗期一些生理性状与品种抗旱性的关系. 华北农学报, 2011,26(3):128-133.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2011.03.026
[4] 张文英, 智慧, 柳斌辉 , 等. 谷子全生育期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010,11(5):560-565.
[5] 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利 , 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(8):2667-2675.
[6] 李秧秧, 刘文兆 . 土壤水分与氮肥对玉米根系生长的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2001,9(1):13-15.
[7] 李德顺, 刘芳, 马永光 . 玉米根系与抗旱性关系研究. 杂粮作物, 2010,30(3):195-197.
[8] 孙彩霞, 沈秀英 . 玉米根系生态型及生理活性与抗旱性关系的研究. 华北农学报, 2002,17(3):20-24.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2002.03.004
[9] Qian Y L, Fry J D, Upham W S . Rooting and drought avoidance of warm-season turfgrasses and tall fescue in Kansas. Crop Science, 1997,37(3):905-910.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030034x
[10] 吴子恺 . 玉米抗旱育种. 玉米科学, 1994,2(1):6-9.
[11] 柴丽娜, 路苹, 王金淑 . 干旱胁迫冬小麦幼苗根冠比的动态变化与品种抗旱关系的研究. 北京农学院学报, 1996,11(2):19-23.
[12] 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川 , 等. 杂交中稻发根力与抽穗开花期抗旱性关系的研究. 作物学报, 2003,29(2):188-193.
[13] Jia W S, Zhang J H . Stomatal movements and long-distance signaling in plants. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2008,3:772-777.
doi: 10.4161/psb.3.10.6294
[14] Smucher A M, Aiken R M . Dynamic root responses to water deficits. Soil Science, 1992,154(4):281-289.
doi: 10.1097/00010694-199210000-00004
[15] 冯广龙, 刘昌明, 王立 . 土壤水分对作物根系生长及分布的调控. 生态农业研究, 1996,4(3):5-9.
[16] 李博, 王刚卫, 田晓莉 , 等. 不同干旱方式和干旱程度对玉米苗期根系生长的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008,26(5):148-152.
[17] 杨振德, 赵岩岩, 宇舒中 , 等. 干旱胁迫对降香黄檀幼苗生理特性及根系形态特征的影响. 林业科技开发, 2014,28(3):63-66.
[18] 张爱良, 苗果园, 王建平 , 等. 作物根系与水分的关系.作物研究, 1997(2):4-6.
[19] 杨晓康, 柴沙沙, 李艳红 , 等. 不同生育时期干旱对花生根系生理特性及产量的影响. 花生学报, 2012,41(2):20-23.
[1] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[2] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[3] Jiao Zhang,Qi Wu,Yufei Zhou,Yitao Wang,Ruidong Zhang,Ruidong Huang. Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 148-154.
[4] Guolong Li,Yaqing Sun,Shiqin Shao,Yongfeng Zhang. Response of Antioxidant System to Drought Stress in Sugar Beet Leaves at Seedling Stage [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 73-79.
[5] Gouliang Song,Xiaolei Feng,Guangyu Fan,Gaolei Shi,Shuangdong Li,Feng Wang,Xiaoming Wang,Zhihai Zhao. Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 44-50.
[6] Xiaodong Dai,Cancan Zhu,Na Qin,Yufeng Yang,Yannan Wang,Guohong Yang,Bing Si,Shihui Liu,Junxia Li. Effects of Uniconazole and Plant Density on Yield and Its Relavent Components of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 104-108.
[7] Lijuan Zhao,Jinfeng Ma,Yandong Li,Xiangyu Li,Zhijiang Li,Hongmei Yuan,Wendong Guo. Mutagenic Effects of 60Co-γ-Ray Radiation on Dry Seeds of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 38-43.
[8] Tingting Mu,Huiling Du,Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Qi Guo,Gang Tian,Huixia Li,Zhang Liu. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Yield Components and Selenium Content in Grain of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 73-78.
[9] Zhihua Li,Xiaolan Jing,Huixia Li,Gang Tian,Xin Liu,Tingting Mu. Safety and Weed Control Efficiency of Foxtail Millet Seedling Stage Herbicides [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 150-154.
[10] Jiao Wang,Yongqing Zhang. Observation on Growth Pattern of Root System in Different Adzuki Bean Varieties under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 112-119.
[11] Xiaodong Dai,Xinzhi Xu,Cancan Zhu,Yufeng Yang,Na Qin,Yannan Wang,Chunyi Wang,Xiaoping Yang,Guohong Yang,Junxia Li. Study on the Effects of N P K Fertilizer in Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 147-151.
[12] Yingmei Zuo,Weize Yang,Tianmei Yang,Meiquan Yang,Zongliang Xu,Shaobing Yang,Jinyu Zhang. Comparison of Resistant Physiological Index among Four Species in the Genus Panax under Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 84-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .