Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 125-131.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.03.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Meteorological Conditions on Formation of High Quality Ratoon Rice

Tian Yucong1,2, Duan Menjun1,2, Zhu Jie3, Feng Xiangzhao1,2, Gao Zhenzhen1,2, Liu Zhangyong1,2, Chen Fu4, Jin Tao1,2()   

  1. 1Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China
    2Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland of Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China
    3Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei, China
    4College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2019-10-29 Revised:2019-12-21 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-10
  • Contact: Tao Jin E-mail:jintao@yangtzeu.edu.cn

Abstract:

In order to study the main meteorological factors affecting the quality of ratoon rice, a field experiment was carried out in Shakou Town, Honghu City, Hubei Province from 2016 to 2017 with ratoon rice varieties of Yongyou 4949, Xinliangyou 223 and Fengliangyouxiang 1, for comparing and analyzing the difference of rice quality and its correlation with meteorological factors in the main rice and ratoon rice. The results showed that there were significant differences in rice quality among different varieties of ratoon rice. Among the tested varieties, Yongyou 4949 was the best in terms of milling, appearance and cooking quality, and its whole milled rice rate was 68.5% in 2016 and 66.2% in 2017, which was significantly higher than other two varieties. The chalky grain rate, chalkiness degree and amylose content of Yongyou 4949 were the lowest, which were 2.5%, 1.4% and 17.4% in 2016, 2.9%, 1.6% and 16.5% in 2017, respectively. The nutritional quality of Fengliangyouxiang 1 was the best and its contents of albumin, globulin, gluten and total protein were the highest and significantly higher than Yongyou 4949. The total protein content of Fengliangyouxiang 1 reached 9.23g/100g in 2016 and 9.16g/100g in 2017. The milling quality of ratoon rice was significantly positively correlated with the daily minimum temperature (Tmin), daily average temperature (Tmean), effective accumulated temperature (EAT) before the initial heading and during the filling stage of the main rice. The appearance, cooking and nutritional quality were significantly negatively correlated with the Tmean and EAT during the vegetative growth period of the main rice, and significantly positively correlated with the Tmin before the initial heading and the Tmin, maximum daily temperature and Tmean during the filling stage of the ratoon rice. The meteorological conditions of the vegetative growth stage of the main rice and the filling stage of the ratoon rice can significantly affect the quality of the rice, whereas, the temperature is the main meteorological factor affecting the quality of ratoon rice.

Key words: Ratoon rice, Rice quality character, Meteorological factor, Variety difference

Table 1

Meteorological factors of the test site in 2016-2017"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
有效积温(℃)
Effective accumulated temperature
降水量(mm)
Precipitation
日照时数(h)
Sunshine duration
光合有效辐射(MJ/m2)
Photosynthetically active radiation
头季
Main rice
再生季
Ratoon rice
头季
Main rice
再生季
Ratoon rice
头季
Main rice
再生季
Ratoon rice
头季
Main rice
再生季
Ratoon rice
2016 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
2 045.1 1 019.1 1 298.2 149.4 816.3 407.4 2 580.02 1 176.01
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
1 671.8 941.4 1 297.2 103.7 769.5 450.7 2 453.93 1 269.68
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
1 671.8 944.3 1 297.2 104.6 769.5 450.7 2 453.93 1 273.08
2017 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
2 141.9 932.5 984.9 192.0 923.5 290.0 2 853.10 896.25
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
1 785.0 817.0 980.6 196.3 898.2 268.0 2 776.92 869.82
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
1 785.0 817.0 980.6 196.3 898.2 268.0 2 776.92 869.82

Table 2

Comparison of milling and appearance quality of the ratoon rice"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
糙米率(%)
Brown rice rate
精米率(%)
Polished rice rate
整精米率(%)
Whole polished rice rate
垩白粒率(%)
Chalky grain rate
垩白度(%)
Chalkiness degree
长宽比
Length-width ratio
2016 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
79.5±0.3a 69.7±0.2a 68.5±0.3a 2.5±0.1b 1.4±0.2a 2.1±0.1c
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
80.5±0.1a 68.7±0.1b 62.2±0.5b 4.7±1.0ab 1.1±0.2a 2.9±0.1a
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
80.9±2.2a 67.7±0.6c 60.2±1.2c 7.4±2.2a 2.3±1.1a 2.8±0.1b
2017 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
76.8±0.6a 67.6±0.6a 66.2±0.8a 2.9±0.2b 1.6±0.3a 2.1±0.1b
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
77.7±0.4a 65.9±0.2b 60.0±0.6b 7.0±0.9a 2.1±0.2a 2.8±0.1a
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
77.7±1.0a 66.4±0.9ab 58.9±1.2b 8.5±1.4a 2.6±0.9a 2.7±0.1a

Table 3

Comparison of amylose content and protein content of the ratoon rice"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
直链淀粉(%)
Amylose
清蛋白(g/100g)
Albumin
球蛋白(g/100g)
Globulin
醇溶蛋白(g/100g)
Gliadin
谷蛋白(g/100g)
Glutenin
总蛋白(g/100g)
Total protein
2016 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
17.4±0.6b 0.75±0.10b 0.47±0.06b 0.46±0.03a 6.45±0.25b 8.13±0.20b
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
20.7±0.8a 0.91±0.09ab 0.57±0.01ab 0.43±0.02a 6.85±0.04ab 8.76±0.08a
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
20.4±0.9a 0.95±0.02a 0.62±0.06a 0.47±0.01a 7.20±0.51a 9.23±0.45a
2017 甬优4949
Yongyou 4949
16.5±0.9b 0.73±0.09b 0.45±0.06b 0.43±0.04a 6.42±0.25b 8.02±0.20b
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
18.8±0.5a 0.90±0.10a 0.55±0.02ab 0.42±0.01a 6.83±0.04ab 8.70±0.09a
丰两优香1号
Fengliangyouxiang 1
18.6±1.0a 0.93±0.03a 0.60±0.07a 0.45±0.01a 7.18±0.51a 9.16±0.44a

Table 4

The Pearson correlation coefficient between meteorological conditions and rice quality in the main rice"

品质指标
Quality index
播种-始穗Sowing-Initial heading 始穗-齐穗Initial heading-Full heading 齐穗-成熟 Full heading-Maturation
Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine
duration
PAR Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine
duration
PAR Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine
duration
PAR
糙米率Brown rice rate -0.197 -0.969** -0.428 -0.238 -0.945** -0.988** -0.984** 0.270 0.386 0.321 -0.949** -0.263 -0.703 -0.767 -0.952** -0.951** -0.950** -0.789 -0.877* -0.886* -0.902*
精米率Polished rice rate -0.821* -0.472 -0.367 -0.596 -0.798 -0.634 -0.557 -0.266 0.062 -0.142 -0.714 -0.378 -0.742 -0.778 -0.752 -0.743 -0.751 -0.920** -0.824* -0.744 -0.778
整精米率Whole polished rice rate -0.928** -0.189 -0.854* -0.957** -0.273 -0.010 -0.089 -0.485 -0.276 -0.443 -0.198 -0.687 -0.474 -0.461 -0.213 -0.204 -0.213 -0.547 -0.358 -0.253 -0.282
垩白粒率Chalky grain rate -0.878* -0.155 -0.788 -0.872* -0.267 -0.037 -0.061 -0.351 0.063 0.246 -0.199 -0.511 0.369 -0.381 -0.194 -0.181 -0.192 -0.507 -0.392 -0.201 -0.242
垩白度Chalkiness degree -0.639 -0.229 -0.358 -0.496 -0.479 -0.361 -0.293 0.194 -0.258 -0.046 -0.445 -0.194 0.376 -0.429 -0.424 -0.411 -0.420 -0.607 -0.566 -0.400 -0.442
长宽比Length-width ratio -0.794 -0.531 -0.958** -0.979** -0.084 -0.350 -0.441 0.500 0.455 0.556 -0.182 -0.744 0.203 -0.159 -0.145 -0.152 -0.144 -0.209 -0.018 -0.089 -0.069
清蛋白含量Albumin content -0.797 -0.536 -0.958** -0.962** -0.096 -0.354 -0.447 0.453 0.330 0.451 -0.170 -0.663 0.157 -0.128 -0.165 -0.173 -0.164 -0.196 -0.032 -0.122 -0.095
球蛋白含量Globulin content -0.726 -0.574 -0.923** -0.913* -0.165 -0.407 -0.494 0.468 0.322 0.440 -0.215 -0.639 0.096 -0.067 -0.226 -0.235 -0.226 -0.129 -0.043 -0.177 -0.153
醇溶蛋白含量Gliadin content -0.172 -0.523 -0.165 -0.023 -0.564 -0.546 -0.544 0.043 -0.108 -0.096 -0.491 -0.083 -0.522 -0.518 -0.577 -0.582 -0.580 -0.488 -0.477 -0.569 -0.564
谷蛋白含量Glutenin content -0.744 -0.439 -0.854* -0.874* -0.040 -0.274 -0.359 0.471 0.262 0.401 -0.071 -0.611 0.195 -0.177 -0.095 -0.103 -0.095 -0.244 -0.066 -0.047 -0.023
总蛋白含量Total protein content -0.739 -0.491 -0.882* -0.890* -0.088 -0.325 -0.411 0.465 0.276 0.409 -0.126 -0.617 0.154 -0.133 -0.146 -0.155 -0.147 -0.200 -0.027 -0.099 -0.074
直链淀粉含量Amylose content -0.487 -0.827* -0.893* -0.826* -0.486 -0.707 -0.769 0.542 0.593 0.627 -0.543 -0.721 -0.114 -0.185 -0.522 -0.524 -0.519 -0.190 -0.406 -0.434 -0.434

Table 5

The Pearson correlation coefficient between meteorological conditions and rice quality in the ratoon rice"

品质指标
Quality index
播种-始穗 Sowing-Initial heading 始穗-齐穗 Initial heading-Full heading 齐穗-成熟 Full heading-Maturation
Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine duration
PAR Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine duration
PAR Tmin Tmax Tmean EAT 降水量
Precipitation
日照时数
Sunshine duration
PAR
糙米率Brown rice rate -0.677 -0.994** -0.965** -0.570 -0.858* -0.975** -0.978** 0.810 -0.928** -0.861* 0.418 -0.820* 0.539 0.569 -0.599 -0.725 -0.709 -0.534 -0.558 -0.935** -0.955**
精米率Polished rice rate -0.160 -0.556 -0.387 -0.989** -0.185 -0.704 -0.694 0.795 -0.611 -0.773 0.731 -0.547 0.793 0.759 -0.203 -0.057 -0.083 -0.956** -0.436 -0.708 -0.695
整精米率Whole polished rice rate -0.723 -0.068 -0.256 -0.782 -0.437 -0.124 -0.106 0.426 -0.053 -0.320 0.643 -0.051 0.571 0.518 -0.740 -0.648 -0.669 -0.799 -0.117 -0.176 -0.146
垩白粒率Chalky grain rate -0.623 -0.030 -0.198 -0.772 -0.434 -0.159 -0.144 -0.342 -0.001 -0.252 -0.525 -0.029 -0.412 -0.366 -0.607 -0.532 -0.554 -0.811 0.258 -0.240 -0.203
垩白度Chalkiness degree -0.203 -0.296 -0.170 -0.771 -0.044 -0.443 -0.438 -0.407 -0.243 -0.405 -0.274 -0.195 -0.239 -0.195 -0.146 -0.063 -0.087 -0.802 0.425 -0.508 -0.487
长宽比Length-width ratio -0.907* -0.415 -0.576 -0.488 -0.711 -0.243 -0.264 -0.127 -0.266 -0.006 -0.589 -0.241 -0.482 -0.438 -0.935** -0.895* -0.906* -0.498 -0.100 -0.195 -0.233
清蛋白含量Albumin content -0.884* -0.414 -0.569 -0.507 -0.737 -0.234 -0.252 -0.079 -0.319 -0.049 -0.468 -0.301 -0.319 -0.272 -0.877* -0.844* -0.858* -0.547 -0.023 -0.156 -0.197
球蛋白含量Globulin content -0.880* -0.467 -0.610 -0.438 -0.751 -0.292 -0.308 -0.006 -0.375 -0.112 -0.333 -0.342 -0.180 -0.126 -0.850* -0.828* -0.841* -0.491 -0.070 -0.209 -0.247
醇溶蛋白含量Gliadin content -0.274 -0.540 -0.500 -0.312 -0.494 -0.518 -0.512 0.590 -0.633 -0.589 0.624 -0.582 0.778 0.806 -0.130 -0.221 -0.218 -0.214 -0.147 -0.427 -0.440
谷蛋白含量Glutenin content -0.795 -0.337 -0.487 -0.524 -0.627 -0.161 -0.175 -0.112 -0.250 -0.009 -0.308 -0.221 -0.175 -0.115 -0.755 -0.714 -0.730 -0.582 -0.013 -0.079 -0.110
总蛋白含量Total protein content -0.827* -0.386 -0.534 -0.493 -0.678 -0.210 -0.225 -0.069 -0.301 -0.040 -0.315 -0.272 -0.172 -0.115 -0.789 -0.756 -0.771 -0.550 -0.028 -0.126 -0.160
直链淀粉含量Amylose content -0.985** -0.758 -0.867* -0.086 -0.880* -0.628 -0.644 0.234 -0.581 -0.359 -0.239 -0.497 -0.122 -0.071 -0.977** -0.997** -0.997** -0.109 -0.397 -0.585 -0.616
[1] Yuan S, Cassman K G, Huang J L , et al. Can ratoon cropping improve resource use efficiencies and profitability of rice in central China?. Field Crops Research, 2019,234:66-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.004
[2] Harrell D L, Bond J A, Blanche S , et al. Evaluation of main-crop stubble height on ratoon rice growth and development. Field Crops Research, 2009,114(3):396-403.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.011
[3] 段门俊, 吴芸紫, 田玉聪 , 等. 不同品种再生稻产量及品质比较研究. 作物杂志, 2018(2):61-67.
[4] 陈杰, 涂军明, 曹志刚 , 等. 24个水稻品种作再生稻比较试验结果及评价. 湖北农业科学, 2018,57(24):28-32.
[5] Alizadeh M R, Habibi F . A comparative study on the quality of the main and ratoon rice crops. Journal of Food Quality, 2016,39(6):669-674.
doi: 10.1111/jfq.2016.39.issue-6
[6] 吴延寿, 姚晓云, 曹国军 , 等. 优质再生稻产量形成和稻米品质比较分析. 杂交水稻, 2019,34(5):57-63.
[7] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林 , 等. 杂交中稻留桩高度对再生稻米质的影响及其与头季稻米质的关系. 中国稻米, 2014,20(1):86-87,89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2014.01.021
[8] 蒋鹏, 熊洪, 张林 , 等. 不同生态条件下施氮量和移栽密度对杂交稻氮、磷、钾吸收积累的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(2):342-350.
[9] 蒋鹏, 徐富贤, 刘茂 , 等. 不同移栽密度下氮素调控对杂交中稻-再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2019,25(3):37-43.
[10] 蒋鹏, 刘茂, 秦俭 , 等. 施氮量对超级杂交稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2017,23(4):102-106.
[11] 严凯, 蒋玉兰, 唐纪元 , 等. 盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(2):67-74.
[12] 杨坚, 陈恺林, 赵正洪 , 等. 不同种植方式对再生稻产量和品质的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,43(3):234-237.
[13] Krishnan P, Ramakrishnan B, Reddy K R , et al. High-temperature effects on rice growth,yield,and grain quality. Advances in Agronomy, 2011,111:87-206.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00004-7
[14] 段骅, 佟卉, 刘燕清 , 等. 高温和干旱对水稻的影响及其机制的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2019,33(3):206-218.
[15] 童浩 . 稻米品质的品种差异及与淀粉酶和蛋白组分的关系. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2014.
[16] 刘建, 谢锐萍, 常立新 , 等. 生物菌肥对水稻食味品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(9):124-127.
[17] 谢成林, 唐建鹏, 姚义 , 等. 栽培措施对稻米品质影响的研究进展. 中国稻米, 2017,23(6):13-18,22.
[18] 李冠男, 黄立华, 张璐 , 等. 施用有机肥和秸秆还田对东北苏打盐碱地水稻营养与食味品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(5):82-88.
[19] 徐锡明, 张欣, 施利利 , 等. 直链淀粉含量偏低型杂交粳稻组合的稻米品质评价. 作物杂志, 2016(6):44-48.
[20] 徐庆国, 童浩, 胡晋豪 , 等. 稻米蛋白组分含量的品种差异及其与米质的关系. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,41(1):7-11,41.
[21] 刘国华, 邓化冰, 陈立云 , 等. 中稻头季稻与再生稻的品质比较研究. 杂交水稻, 2002,17(1):45-47.
[22] 阳作明, 刘海隆, 王玲 . 光温变化对再生稻产量的影响研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2007,15(1):87-90.
[23] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 乔中英 , 等. 水稻不同粒位籽粒米质对花后不同时段温度胁迫的响应. 作物学报, 2011,37(3):506-513.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00506
[24] Xiong D L, Ling X X, Huang J L , et al. Meta-analysis and dose-response analysis of high temperature effects on rice yield and quality. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017,141:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.06.007
[25] Sharma K P, Sharma N . Influence of high temperature on sucrose metabolism in chalky and translucent rice genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B:Biological Sciences, 2018,88(3):1275-1284.
[1] Liu Xin,Zhu Rong,Yang Mei,Liu Zhangyong. Screening of High-Yield Germplasms for Ratoon Rice and Analysis of High Yield Composition [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 28-33.
[2] Yang Wenbiao,Zhang Huiyu,Li Ying,Qi Zewei,Liu Kaikai,Gao Zhiqiang,Sun Min,Xue Jianfu. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Potential Productivity of Winter Wheat and Meteorological Factor Analysis in Shanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 161-167.
[3] Wu Ronghua,Zhuang Kezhang,Liu Peng,Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!