Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 176-183.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.01.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sowing Date on the Growth, Quality and Yield of Safflower in Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Area

Su Cuicui(), Wu Lingling(), Zhao Xi, Shi Zhiguo, Zhou Yanfang, Wei Yujie   

  1. Gansu Academy of Agri-Engineering Technology/Gansu Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Innovation and Safety Utilization of Special Drug Sources, Wuwei 733006, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Revised:2022-04-26 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-22

Abstract:

In order to clarify the suitable sowing date of safflower in Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Area, three safflower cultivars Yunhong 7, YM18-6 and Dahongpao were used as materials, and four sowing dates (March 16th, March 26th, April 6th, April 15th) were set up to study the effects of different sowing dates on the growth period, agronomic traits, filaments and grain yield and quality of safflower. The results showed that, with the delay of sowing date, the stage from sowing to seedling and from seedling to bud stage were significantly shortened, and the whole growth period of safflower was also shortened. The influence of sowing date on the agronomic traits, yield and quality traits of safflower was dominant. Most of the traits increased first and then decreased with the delay of sowing date, and reached the highest on April 6th and then on March 26th, and there were significant difference with the other two sowing dates. The agronomic characteristics of safflower were correlated with yield and quality. Suitable sowing date could realize reasonable transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth, and prompted it to make full use of light and heat resources of planting region, so as to achieve higher quality and higher yield. The suitable sowing date of safflower in Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Area is between March 26th and April 6th.

Key words: Sowing date, Safflower, Agronomic characteristics, Quality, Yield

Table 1

The changes of growth period of safflower under different sowing dates d"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
播种―出苗
Sowing-sprouting
出苗―现蕾
Sprouting-bud
现蕾―终花
Bud-final flower
终花―收获
Final flower-harvest
生育期
Growth period
云红7号
Yunhong 7
T1 20a 84a 43a 22a 149a
T2 13b 80b 43a 17b 140b
T3 8c 72c 41a 23a 136c
T4 6d 66d 43a 23a 132d
YM18-6 T1 20a 84a 43a 15c 142a
T2 13b 77b 44a 18b 139b
T3 6c 69c 41b 26a 136c
T4 6c 66d 38c 26a 130d
大红袍
Dahongpao
T1 20a 86a 44a 16c 146a
T2 13b 80b 43a 20b 143b
T3 8c 72c 44a 22a 138c
T4 6d 68d 42a 23a 133d

Table 2

The agronomic traits of safflower under different sowing dates"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
株高
Plant
height
(cm)
茎粗
Stem
diameter
(cm)
根长
Root
length
(cm)
第1分
枝高度
First
branch
height
(cm)
一级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches
of the first
order
二级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches
of the second
order
三级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches
of the third
order
单株有效
果球数
Number of
effective
balls per
plant
顶果球
直径
Apex
bulb
diameter
(cm)
千粒重
1000-
grain
weight
(g)
单株籽
粒产量
Grain
yield per
plant
(g)
单株
干花重
Dry
flower
yield per
plant
(g)
云红7号
Yunhong 7
T1 104.13b 13.90b 21.26a 22.58b 14a 20b 2a 32b 32.54a 35.77b 52.49b 4.01b
T2 108.25a 13.67b 17.82b 28.26a 13a 21b 1a 38a 32.02a 36.35a 58.89a 6.17a
T3 105.75a 25.30a 20.42a 14.06d 14a 24a 2a 40a 33.18a 37.98a 61.81a 6.67a
T4 104.80b 12.69b 18.01b 16.71c 12a 25a 1a 35ab 32.24a 35.13b 55.91b 4.64b
YM18-6 T1 84.88c 13.41b 21.55b 9.26a 15b 33c 4a 46d 25.71a 37.83b 48.91d 5.33b
T2 98.04a 14.70ab 18.16bc 10.42a 19a 42b 1b 57b 25.53a 40.25a 63.61a 7.08a
T3 99.17a 15.61a 30.55a 11.25a 20a 48a 5a 69a 27.43a 42.88a 66.51a 8.04a
T4 91.24b 13.28b 18.99b 9.84a 16b 32c 2b 49c 25.83a 39.03ab 61.81a 6.48ab
大红袍
Dahongpao
T1 103.77b 13.39a 19.85ab 12.43c 13b 30b 2a 41b 31.28a 33.83c 51.90b 5.19b
T2 106.21a 12.97a 19.09ab 17.63b 15a 31ab 1a 43a 31.38a 38.90a 57.53ab 6.05ab
T3 109.90a 13.36a 20.95a 19.11b 16a 33a 1a 44a 32.49a 38.77a 63.89a 7.27a
T4 102.39b 13.64a 18.51b 24.40a 13b 24c 1a 40b 29.29b 36.93b 54.35b 5.47b

Fig.1

The HSYA content of safflower under different sowing dates The different lowercase letters means significant difference at the 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.2

The oil content of safflower grain under different sowing dates"

Table 3

The dry flower and grain yields of safflower varieties under different sowing dates and interaction effects"

种植时间
Sowing date
小区干花产量Dry flower yield per plot (g) 小区籽粒产量Grain yield per plot (kg)
云红7号
Yunhong 7
YM18-6 大红袍
Dahongpao
平均值
Average value
云红7号
Yunhong 7
YM18-6 大红袍
Dahongpao
平均值
Average value
T1 374.76cB 462.93bA 440.89bA 426.19c 1.95cB 2.21bA 2.47bA 2.21c
T2 487.09aA 519.78aA 484.82aA 497.23a 2.82aB 3.23aA 3.00aA 3.02a
T3 506.44aA 524.96aA 513.27aA 514.89a 3.18aB 3.77aA 3.32aB 3.42a
T4 420.74bC 504.36abA 463.34bB 462.81b 2.54bA 3.08abA 2.70bA 2.77b
平均值Average value 447.26B 503.01A 475.58A 2.62B 3.10A 2.87A
F
F-value
种植时间Sowing date 179.002** 12 498.798**
品种Variety 78.707* 5592.584*
种植时间×品种Sowing date×variety 25.878** 3715.498**

Table 4

Correlation coefficients between agronomic characteristics, yield and quality of safflower"

性状
Characteristic
株高
Plant
height
茎粗
Stem
diameter
根长
Root
length
第1分
枝高度
First
branch
height
一级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches
of the first
order
二级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches of
the second
order
三级有效
分枝数
Number of
effective
branches
of the third
order
单株有效
果球数
Number of
effective
balls per
plant
顶果球
直径
Apex
bulb
diameter
千粒

1000-
grain
weight
单株
籽粒
产量
Grain
yield
per
plant
单株干
花产量
Flower
yield
per
plant
小区
籽粒
产量
Grain
yield
per
plot
小区干
花产量
Dry
flower
yield
per
plot
HSYA
含量
HSYA
content
籽粒
含油率
Oil
content
of
grain
株高Plant height 1.000
茎粗Stem diameter 0.082 1.000
根长Root length -0.116 0.162 1.000
第1分枝高度
First branch height
0.717** -0.167 -0.326 1.000
一级有效分枝数
Number of
effective branches
of the first order
-0.707* 0.048 0.605** -0.630* 1.000
二级有效分枝数
Number of
effective branches
of the second order
-0.705 -0.189 0.633* -0.654* 0.875** 1.000
三级有效分枝数
Number of
effective branches
of the third order
-0.203 0.105 0.677* -0.536 -0.396 -0.418 1.000
单株有效果球数
Number of effective
balls per plant
-0.683* -0.017 0.730** -0.625* 0.918** 0.954** 0.477 1.000
顶果球直径
Apex bulb diameter
0.767** 0.242 -0.205 0.618* 0.665* 0.666* -0.488 -0.684* 1.000
千粒重
1000-grain weight
-0.138 0.670* 0.122 -0.250 0.075 0.010 0.289 0.153 0.238 1.000
单株籽粒产量
Grain yield per plant
0.478* 0.377* 0.489 0.297 0.241 0.096 -0.126 -0.030 0.448* 0.242 1.000
单株干花产量
Flower yield per
plant
0.043 0.157 0.280 0.195 0.380 0.200 -0.148 -0.299 -0.037 0.538 0.768* 1.000
小区籽粒产量
Grain yield per plot
0.382* 0.412* 0.493 0.264 0.700* 0.710** -0.295 0.648* 0.379* 0.533* 0.495* 0.639* 1.000
小区干花产量
Dry flower yield
per plot
0.037 0.209 0.585* 0.085 0.517* 0.539* -0.157 0.595* 0.217 0.347 -0.031 0.735** 0.707* 1.000
HSYA含量
HSYA content
-0.698* 0.234 0.229 -0.612* 0.517* -0.469 -0.585* 0.504 -0.713** 0.498 -0.112 0.300 -0.181 0.179 1.000
籽粒含油率
Oil content of grain
-0.213 0.364 -0.006 0.081 0.088 0.054 -0.094 0.101 -0.006 0.627* 0.249 0.343 0.278 0.470 0.404 1.000
[1] 霍琳, 王成宝, 杨思存, 等. 甘肃引黄灌区玉米茬耕层土壤状况调查. 甘肃农业科技, 2019(10):51-56.
[2] 李昂, 吴应珍, 台喜生, 等. 甘肃沿黄灌区种植豆禾混播牧草对土壤盐分和养分的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4):664-670.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.04.004
[3] 蔡玲慧. 甘肃引黄灌区林草间作系统节水调控效应研究——以枸杞||红豆草为例. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2021.
[4] 赖桑迪, 齐广平, 蔡玲慧, 等. 甘肃引黄灌区不同施氮水平对枸杞间作大豆光合特性、产量和品质的影响. 作物研究, 2021, 35(3):218-224.
[5] 梁慧珍, 董薇, 余永亮, 等. 我国红花育种研究进展与评价. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(34):13160-13161,13163.
[6] 扶胜兰, 张艳玲, 张红瑞, 等. 播期对红花生长发育、产量及品质的影响. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(2):91-95,119.
[7] 周慧君, 彭云承, 程小波, 等. 伊犁河谷红花品种密度播期试验研究. 现代农业科技, 2015(10):75-76.
[8] 何立威. 播期和打顶对红花生长及产量品质的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[9] 富财生, 范兴忠, 魏野畴, 等. 红花不同播种期对生长发育和产量性状的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2013(2):100-102.
[10] 许兰杰, 余永亮, 杨红旗, 等. 播期播量对中药材红花产量和品质的影响. 现代中药研究与实践, 2019, 33(3):1-5.
[11] 杨建国, 刘旭云, 严兴初, 等. 红花种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007:3-42.
[12] 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:一部. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020.
[13] 王沛琦, 胡学礼, 李雪蓉, 等. 红花种质资源表型多样性分析. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6):1102-1107.
[14] 许兰杰, 梁慧珍, 余永亮, 等. 河南红花种质资源表型性状的综合评价. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(10):26-31.
[15] 郭丽芬, 张跃, 胡尊红, 等. 云南红花地方种质资源品质特性与农艺性状的聚类分析及评价. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(增):22-28.
[16] 贾东海, 王秀珍, 侯献飞, 等. 32份油药兼用红花种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10):1775-1784.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.10.002
[17] 田艺心, 高凤菊, 曹鹏鹏, 等. 播期对高蛋白大豆新品种(系)农艺性状、品质及产量的影响. 核农学报, 2021, 35(8):1900-1907.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.08.1900
[18] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 王瑾, 等. 播期对花生农艺性状、产量和品质的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(5):898-905.
[19] 潘高峰, 汪本福, 陈波, 等. 播期对鄂中北地区不同类型粳稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(4):105-111.
[20] 申晓慧, 姜成, 何宁, 等. 播期与气象因子对红小豆生长发育及产量性状的效应研究. 延边大学农学学报, 2021, 43(2):31-36.
[21] 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 任仰涛, 等. 播期、密度和氮肥运筹对瑞华麦520产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(3):348-354.
[22] 周磊, 王璐, 米俊珍, 等. 不同播期下水热因子对燕麦生长、产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(10):1281-1290.
[23] 商振达, 谭占坤, 李家奎, 等. 种植时间对西藏地区青贮玉米发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2):488-496.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.030
[24] 张垚, 葛均筑, 周广生, 等. 播期对饲用油菜鲜草产量和品质的调控研究. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(5):851-858.
[25] 王欣, 王才. 不同播期和播种量对冬小麦生长特征和产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(6):182-188.
[26] 马祥, 贾志锋, 刘勇, 等. 播期对青燕1号燕麦产量、光合及生物学特性的影响. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(3):83-89.
[27] 李雯, 马琳峰, 曹熙敏, 等. 播期对冀西北坝上农牧交错区青贮玉米产量和品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5):1050-1086.
[28] 尹学伟, 李强, 王秋月, 等. 播期对西南地区垄作直播高粱生长、干物质积累及产量的影响. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(5):880-886.
[29] 陈奕浪, 范道付, 吴应齐, 等. 播期对藜麦农艺性状及产量的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(8):1492-1496.
[30] 许兰杰, 刘新梅, 梁慧珍, 等. 红花种质顶果球籽粒质量及其相关农艺性状的回归分析和通径分析. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(2):55-60.
[1] Xia Yuying, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Hu Chuanjun, Lü Yandong, Zhao Haicheng, Zheng Guiping. Effects of Seedling Raising Methods on Seedling Quality, Yield and Quality of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 103-108.
[2] Gao Wei, Hao Qingting, Zhang Zeyan, Wang Qian, Yan Hubin, Zhu Huijun, Zhao Xueying, Zhang Yaowen. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on Yield, Root Morphology and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 109-114.
[3] Wang Yujiao, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield and Quality of Different Varieties of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 122-128.
[4] Chen Dong, Zou Jing, Guo Ganggang, Dai Wendian, Song Shaoguang, Huang Ying. Effects of Different Specifications of Seedling Trays on Quality and Main Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 129-135.
[5] Zhao Jingyun, Lü Xinyun, Liu Xiaorong, Ren Haihong, Ren Xiaojun, Ma Junkui. Effects of Strip Compound Intercropping under Young Walnut Forest on Soybean Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 136-142.
[6] Yu Yongtao, Zhang Nan, Xie Lihua, Li Guangyu, Liu Jianhua, Li Wu, Li Gaoke, Hu Jianguang. A Preliminary Study on Preference of Consumers in Eating Quality Evaluation of Sweet Corn Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 14-19.
[7] Zhai Caijiao, Zhang Jiao, Cui Shiyou, Chen Pengjun, Han Jijun. Effects of Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 143-151.
[8] Li Wenshan, Zhang Junyao, Tang Jianghua, Xu Wenxiu, Xu Qinghua. Effects of Different Doses of AFD on Growth and Yield of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 158-162.
[9] Ma Ruiqi, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Weak Gluten Wheat in Northern Winter Wheat Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 163-169.
[10] Jia Zhengrong, Hao Jiali, Hao Yanfang, Bai Wenbin, Zhang Jianhua, Guo Ruifeng, Liu Yong. Effects of Four Bacillus Species on Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato at Different Stages [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 170-175.
[11] Zhang Lixia, Guo Xiaoyan, Shi Pengfei, Nie Liangpeng, Ling Jingwei, Shen Peilin, Ding Li, Zhang Lin, Lü Yuhu, Pan Ziliang. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth, Yield and Benefits of Kenaf in Vigorous Growing Period [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 184-189.
[12] Zhang Yonggang, Ren Zhiguang, Xu Zhiqiang, Liu Jianguo, Zhang Xiaobing, Liu Huabing, Xia Chen, Cheng Changhe. Chemical Quality Evaluation of Flue-Cured Tobacco Based on Maximization of Deviation and BP Neural Network [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 190-195.
[13] Jin Haiyang, Zhang Suyu, Cui Jingyu, Li Xiangdong, Yue Junqin, Zhang Deqi, Yang Cheng, Fang Baoting, Wang Hanfang, Qin Feng. Regulatory Effects of Different Nitrogen Management Methods on Quality of Strong and Medium-Strong Gluten Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 212-218.
[14] Wang Yanxun, Tian Jichun. Wide Adaptability Performance and Genetic Analysis of National Certified Wheat Variety Shannong 20 with High and Stable Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 46-51.
[15] Wang Qi, Xu Yanli, Yan Peng, Dong Haosheng, Zhang Wei, Lu Lin, Dong Zhiqiang. Effects of Polyaspartic Acid-Chitosan on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nitrogen Use of Spring Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!