Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 225-230.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.06.028

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Topdressing Ratios of Potassium Fertilizer on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Honghuadajinyuan and Yunyan 300

Xia Yulan1(), Zhao Yuanyuan1, Li Juan2, Wang Dexun2(), Wang Tingting1, Yang Chengwei2, Shi Hongzhi1()   

  1. 1 College of Tobacco of Henan Agricultural University / Research Center for Tobacco Agriculture Harm Reduction, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
    2 Yunnan Tobacco Company Dali Prefecture Company, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2024-06-04 Revised:2024-07-19 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-12-12

Abstract:

In order to explore the differences in growth, yield and quality of the new flue-cured tobacco variety Yunyan 300 with Honghuadajinyuan, and to find out the ratio of potassium fertilizer topdressing suitable for Yunyan 300, Honghuadajinyuan and Yunyan 300 were used as materials, and the treatment without topdressing potassium sulfate was set as the control. Different ratio of potassium were applied to roots at 20, 40 and 50 days after rosette (CK=0:0:0; T1=5:4:1; T2=3:4:3; T3=1:4:5), and a total of eight treatments were set. The results showed that, with the increase of the ratio of potassium fertilizer topdressing 20 days after rosette, the plant height, stem girth, bottom leaf length, bottom leaf width, cutter leaf length, cutter leaf width, single leaf weight, leaf density, reducing sugar content, total sugar content, potassium content, potassium- to-chloride ratio, yield, output value, average price and the proportion of middle and high tobacco of Honghuadajinyuan and Yunyan 300 all showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. Under T2 treatment, compared with Honghuadajinyuan, the plant height, top leaf width, single leaf weight, reducing sugar content, total sugar content, potassium-to- chloride ratio and output value of Yunyan 300 increased by 5.74%, 4.24%, 3.81%, 5.04%, 4.05%, 4.78% and 3.08%, respectively, and nicotine and chlorine content decreased by 11.79% and 3.45%, respectively. In summary, the growth, yield and quality of Honghuadajinyuan and Yunyan 300 were the best under the treatment of the top dressing of potassium fertilizer=3:4:3 treatment. The part of agronomic traits, physical properties, chemical composition and economic traits of Yunyan 300 were better under the same top dressing ratio of potassium fertilizer.

Key words: Potassium fertilizer, Flue-cured tobacco, Honghuadajinyuan, Yunyan 300, Topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer, Growth, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Experiment design %"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
追肥比例Topdressing ratio
团棵后20 d
20 days after
rosette
团棵后40 d
40 days after
rosette
团棵后50 d
50 days after
rosette
红花大金元
Honghuadajinyuan
HCK 0 0 0
H1 50 40 10
H2 30 40 30
H3 10 40 50
云烟300
Yunyan 300
YCK 0 0 0
Y1 50 40 10
Y2 30 40 30
Y3 10 40 50

Table 2

Effects of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on agronomic traits of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
茎围
Stem girth
(cm)
底叶长
Bottom leaf
length (cm)
底叶宽
Bottom leaf
width (cm)
腰叶长
Cutter leaf
length (cm)
腰叶宽
Cutter leaf
width (cm)
顶叶长
Top leaf
length (cm)
顶叶宽
Top leaf
width (cm)
叶片数
Number
of leaves
HCK 125.90±1.10d 10.07±0.35c 69.83±0.81c 32.00±0.65c 74.57±1.20d 30.07±0.13c 60.83±1.19d 20.83±0.40c 19.00±0.65b
H1 129.37±1.01b 10.63±0.25b 73.76±1.00b 34.53±0.24b 78.13±1.17b 35.27±1.43a 69.07±0.92a 23.57±0.50a 20.00±0.36ab
H2 135.17±1.68a 11.00±0.34a 75.80±0.68a 36.27±0.87a 80.27±0.32a 36.68±1.20a 65.63±0.95b 22.90±0.86b 20.00±0.82a
H3 127.73±1.67c 10.33±0.05bc 74.03±1.13b 35.47±1.42ab 76.20±1.39c 32.37±0.49b 64.27±0.94c 21.13±0.52c 20.00±0.08a
YCK 127.20±0.62d 10.03±0.10c 72.30±0.54c 32.70±1.19c 74.63±0.33d 29.23±0.15c 63.17±0.28d 20.00±0.64d 19.00±0.32c
Y1 129.70±0.94c 10.93±0.30a 75.30±0.78b 34.80±0.95b 78.70±1.44b 35.50±0.06a 69.73±1.04a 22.37±0.28b 20.00±0.33b
Y2 142.93±1.26a 11.23±0.33a 77.07±0.55a 36.74±1.40a 80.53±0.98a 37.10±1.49a 66.73±1.05b 23.87±0.77a 21.00±0.37a
Y3 133.53±1.16b 10.33±0.11b 75.57±1.06b 35.63±0.30ab 76.40±0.54c 32.63±0.78b 65.53±0.14c 21.33±0.72c 20.00±0.14b

Fig.1

Effect of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on SPAD values of flue-cured tobacco Different lowercase letters among different treatments indicate significant differences at the P < 0.05 level."

Table 3

Effect of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on economic traits of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
产值(元/hm2
Output value (yuan/hm2)
均价(元/kg)
Mean price (yuan/kg)
中上等烟比例
Proportion of medium and high quality tobacco (%)
HCK 2225.96±42.35d 65 238.57±479.43d 29.31±0.34d 78.50±1.18d
H1 2601.30±51.01b 86 370.37±654.94b 33.21±0.40b 85.28±0.59b
H2 2786.49±37.61a 95 174.77±498.29a 34.16±0.28a 86.35±1.19a
H3 2564.01±26.40c 82 994.02±625.24c 32.37±0.09c 83.13±0.45c
YCK 2317.18±55.01d 68 612.82±412.61d 29.62±0.53d 79.89±0.36d
Y1 2636.10±40.08b 88 327.50±611.53b 33.51±0.28b 86.37±0.04b
Y2 2842.41±51.17a 98 101.57±628.05a 34.52±0.40a 87.93±1.06a
Y3 2578.93±30.77c 84 596.56±507.42c 32.81±0.19c 84.39±0.66c

Table 4

Effects of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on the physical properties of middle leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
叶长
Leaf length (cm)
叶宽
Leaf width (cm)
叶面积
Leaf area (cm2)
单叶重
Single leaf weight (g)
叶质重
Leaf density (g/m2)
含梗率
Midrib ratio (%)
HCK 66.60±0.57d 23.70±0.88d 1001.83±45.71d 11.66±0.27d 84.95±0.60d 29.91±0.24a
H1 71.24±0.44b 26.62±0.38b 1203.38±24.81b 13.28±0.17b 91.39±0.44b 28.24±0.23c
H2 73.28±0.48a 28.86±0.30a 1341.97±22.88a 14.59±0.28a 95.67±0.27a 27.15±0.25d
H3 70.12±0.45c 25.62±0.89c 1140.12±47.07c 12.82±0.10c 88.65±0.64c 29.24±0.27b
YCK 68.62±0.43c 24.22±0.78d 1054.56±35.80d 12.87±0.27d 89.54±0.48d 31.54±0.16a
Y1 71.24±0.18b 28.43±0.26a 1285.12±15.16a 13.61±0.31b 94.01±0.73b 27.92±0.20c
Y2 73.59±0.51a 26.58±0.37b 1241.22±25.98b 14.78±0.27a 99.31±0.42a 26.48±0.28d
Y3 70.60±0.56b 25.78±0.75c 1155.10±42.87c 13.18±0.18c 91.44±0.36c 29.01±0.30b

Table 5

Effects of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on chemical composition of middle leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
烟碱含量
Nicotine
content (%)
还原糖含量
Reducing sugar
content (%)
总糖含量
Total sugar
content (%)
总氮含量
Total nitrogen
content (%)
钾含量
Potassium
content (%)
氯含量
Chlorine
content (%)
钾氯比
Potassium-to-
chloride ratio
HCK 3.07±0.07a 19.80±0.52d 25.70±0.28d 2.04±0.04a 1.62±0.03c 0.40±0.08a 4.23±0.87c
H1 2.52±0.02b 22.80±0.17b 31.20±0.34b 1.63±0.01b 1.98±0.06b 0.32±0.02ab 6.20±0.28b
H2 2.29±0.01c 23.80±0.15a 32.10±0.27a 1.56±0.04c 2.11±0.02a 0.29±0.03b 7.33±0.62a
H3 2.63±0.10b 21.70±0.46c 30.00±0.53c 1.69±0.01b 1.96±0.07b 0.34±0.01ab 5.76±0.00b
YCK 3.14±0.01a 19.50±0.31d 25.60±0.57c 2.19±0.08a 1.67±0.04d 0.38±0.01a 4.39±0.04d
Y1 2.17±0.07c 24.40±0.26b 32.80±0.25a 1.60±0.04c 2.07±0.06b 0.31±0.01c 6.75±0.15b
Y2 2.02±0.02d 25.00±0.08a 33.40±0.52a 1.52±0.01d 2.15±0.04a 0.28±0.01d 7.68±0.07a
Y3 2.55±0.05b 23.90±0.12c 31.30±0.22b 1.68±0.06b 2.00±0.08c 0.33±0.02b 6.06±0.06c

Table 6

Effects of different topdressing ratios of potassium fertilizer on sensory quality of middle leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
香气质
Aroma
quality (9-0)
香气量
Aroma
quantity (9-0)
浓度
Concentration
(9-0)
杂气
Offensive
odor (9-0)
劲头
Stiffness
(9-0)
刺激性
Irritancy
(9-0)
余味
Aftertaste
(9-0)
甜度
Sweetness
(9-0)
燃烧性
Flammability
(4-0)
总分
Total point
HCK 6.70±0.25c 6.20±0.14b 6.40±0.26c 6.30±0.12c 5.40±0.14c 6.50±0.23b 6.30±0.04c 6.60±0.01b 3.00±0.05d 53.40±1.22d
H1 7.10±0.16ab 6.50±0.02a 6.70±0.20ab 6.50±0.17ab 5.60±0.09b 6.70±0.09ab 6.50±0.04ab 6.90±0.01ab 3.30±0.12b 55.80±0.90b
H2 7.30±0.10a 6.60±0.23a 6.80±0.07a 6.60±0.03a 5.80±0.00a 6.80±0.06a 6.60±0.09a 7.00±0.23a 3.50±0.05a 57.00±0.86a
H3 6.90±0.04bc 6.40±0.25ab 6.50±0.04bc 6.40±0.18bc 5.50±0.05bc 6.60±0.24ab 6.40±0.14bc 6.80±0.22ab 3.20±0.07c 54.70±1.22c
YCK 6.80±0.17c 6.20±0.19d 6.30±0.10b 6.30±0.01c 5.40±0.20c 6.60±0.00b 6.30±0.22b 6.70±0.21c 3.20±0.07d 53.80±1.17d
Y1 7.30±0.29b 6.40±0.11b 6.50±0.23b 6.50±0.16ab 5.60±0.07ab 6.90±0.10a 6.50±0.02ab 7.00±0.12b 3.50±0.05b 56.20±1.14b
Y2 7.50±0.29a 6.80±0.15a 6.80±0.01a 6.60±0.12a 5.70±0.12a 7.00±0.27a 6.60±0.08a 7.20±0.15a 3.60±0.08a 57.80±1.27a
Y3 7.20±0.19b 6.30±0.18c 6.40±0.04b 6.40±0.14bc 5.50±0.15bc 6.80±0.12ab 6.40±0.18ab 6.90±0.10b 3.40±0.13c 55.30±1.23c
[1] 闫慧峰, 石屹, 李乃会, 等. 烟草钾素营养研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2013, 15(1):123-129.
[2] Wang Y, Wu W H. Regulation of potassium transport and signaling in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2017, 39:123-128.
doi: S1369-5266(17)30031-6 pmid: 28710919
[3] 鲁黎明, 陈勇, 鲁逸飞, 等. 低钾胁迫对烟草幼苗叶中基因表达的影响. 核农学报, 2016, 30(7):1273-1280.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.07.1273
[4] 汤宏, 李向阳, 王建伟, 等. 施钾量对烤烟品质及钾吸收利用的影响. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(2):86-91.
[5] 霍光, 文涛, 吴珊, 等. 提高烤烟叶片钾含量途径的研究进展. 湖南农业科学, 2020(2):112-114.
[6] 李静, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 钾肥运筹对烤烟钾吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4):969-978.
[7] 许杰, 潘磊, 杨帅, 等. 烤烟烟叶钾含量的遗传效应分析. 作物杂志, 2018(2):30-34.
[8] 卢剑, 王龙, 孙曙光, 等. 不同钾肥种类对烤烟品质的影响. 山西农业科学, 2012, 40(12):1277-1281.
[9] 张翔, 马聪, 毛家伟, 等. 钾肥施用方式对烤烟钾素利用及土壤钾含量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(5):50-53.
[10] 刘国栋, 刘更另. 论缓解我国钾源短缺问题的新对策. 中国农业科学, 1995, 28(1):25-32.
[11] 朱丽, 张军, 李朋彦, 等. 不同钾肥施用方式下烟草钾素积累动态模型与特征分析. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(9):132-135.
[12] 张明发, 朱列书. 烤烟不同生育期供钾水平对叶片钾含量的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(1):23-25.
[13] 钟晓兰, 张德远, 周生路, 等. 钾肥用量及基追肥比例对烤烟干物质累积和钾素吸收动态的影响. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(2):251-255.
[14] 杨海燕, 张金峰, 沙雪康, 等. 烤烟红花大金元“两黑一青”病的预防及补救措施. 现代农业科技, 2018(5):113-114.
[15] 夏玉兰, 王德勋, 赵园园, 等. 钾肥用量和追肥时期对抗黑胫病红花大金元烟叶化学成分及产量和质量的影响. 作物杂志, 2024(3):133-140.
[16] 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查方法:YC/T 142-2010. 北京: 国家烟草专卖局, 2010.
[17] 中国国家技术监督局. 烤烟:GB/T 2635-1992. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992.
[18] 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品标准体系:YC/Z 240-2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[19] 王江洪. 烤烟钾肥不同基追比及根部追钾时期对上部烟叶产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(17):106-108.
[20] 王同朝, 刘作新, 高致明, 等. 分期追施钾肥对烤烟生长和品质的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2002, 36(4):348-351.
[21] 代晓燕, 郭春燕, 王海波, 等. 钾肥施用方式对豫西烤烟钾含量及产质量的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(3):42-49.
[22] 王治伟, 朱列书, 谭智勇, 等. 钾肥用量及施用方法对烟叶钾含量的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2015(9):48-50.
[23] Dai X Y, Su Y R, Wei W X, et al. Effects of top excision on the potassium accumulation and expression of potassium channel genes in tobacco. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60(1):279-289.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern285 pmid: 19112172
[24] 郭丽琢, 张福锁, 李春俭. 打顶对烟草生长、钾素吸收及其分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(7):819-822.
[25] 舒海燕, 常胜合, 杨铁钊. 烟草钾素外排及其预防的初步研究. 作物杂志, 2005(2):16-17.
[26] 沈方科, 韦忠, 黄芩芬, 等. 断根、环割对烟草体内钾、钙、镁循环和积累的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(1):127-131.
[27] 戴林建, 徐双红, 王翔, 等. 施钾对烤烟高钾新品系生长发育及含钾量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(30):152-158.
[28] 戴勋, 王毅, 刘彦中, 等. 不同钾肥追施量对烤烟K326生长及产质量的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2009, 30(1):19-22.
[29] 罗建新, 肖汉乾, 彭建伟, 等. 施钾方法对土壤供钾能力及烤烟钾累积的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 26(5):352-354.
[30] 代晓燕, 郭春燕, 刘国顺, 等. 钾肥不同追施时期对烤烟品质和产量的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(2):421-426.
[1] Wang Zhi, Zhou Wenli, Zhao Yao, Liu Zheng, Li Congfeng, Zhang Renhe. Effects of New Chemical Control Combinations on Photosynthetic Performance and Yield Improvement of Maize [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 112-120.
[2] Li Qingxin, Jin Xiuliang, Song Xiao, Zhang Keke, Guo Tengfei, Huang Shaomin, Yue Ke, Ding Shijie, Huang Ming, Li Youjun. Effects of Partial Replacement of Nitrogen Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth of Winter Wheat and Soil Properties in Eastern Henan [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 121-131.
[3] Chen Lei, Tang Maoyan, Zhang Zhanying, Zhong Xiaoyuan, Gao Guoqing, Zhang Xiaoli, Liang Tianfeng, Pan Yinghua. Analysis and Evaluation of Grain Appearance Quality Traits in Rice Germplasm Resources under Heat Stress during Flowering Stage [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 132-139.
[4] Gao Wenrui, Sun Yanjun, Han Bing, Zhang Xiaoqing, Wang Xiansheng, Zheng Zisong. Effects of Exogenous Organic Selenium on Yield and Fruit Quality of Facility Cherry Tomato [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 140-147.
[5] Chen Zhihao, Wang Ting, Chang Xuhong, Wang Yanjie, Liu Xiwei, Yang Yushuang, Wang Yujiao, Wang Demei, Zhao Guangcai. Comprehensive Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Wheat Lines in the Northern Huang-Huai Winter Wheat Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 148-155.
[6] Lan Xiu, Liang Zhenhua, Yang Haixia, Li Hengrui, Ruan Lixia, Wei Wanling, Chen Huixian, He Hongliang, Huang Ruolan, Zhao Chunhui, Tang Danfeng. Effects of Sugarcane and Platostoma palustre Intercropping on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Crop Yield [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 156-163.
[7] Qin Nana, Huang Linhua, Chen Ying, Wang Shengmou, Xie Yong, Miao Kai, Li Wanming, Qi Lan. Effects of Foliar Propionyl Brassinolide Application on Photosynthesis, Agronomic Traits and Yield of Summer Soybean [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 164-171.
[8] Wang Shuqi, Li Jianbo, Liu Zhiping, Ma Yu, Qu Jiahui, Batu , Xu Shoujun. Physiological Mechanism of Yield and Protein Formation in Barley under Different Cultivation Modes [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 172-180.
[9] Zhong Guoxing, Yang Xin, Zhang Shaobo, Guo Wei, Yang Qihang, Li Huaiyuan, Chen Jianjun, Chen Xiaoheng, Huang Ruiyin, Deng Shiyuan. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Tobacco-Planting Soil and Root Growth of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 181-188.
[10] Yan Xiaowen, Liang Junchao, Zeng Pan, Zhou Hongying, Wang Zhiqi, Le Meiwang, Sun Jian. Effects of Late Sowing on Main Agronomic Traits and Yield of Autumn Sesame [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 189-194.
[11] Zhang Aiying, Zhao Yuan, Liu Min, Xue Hongtao, Wang Guoliang, Wang Rui, Guo Erhu. Effects of Different Harvest Time and Harvesting Methods on Yield and Quality of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 195-202.
[12] Guo Longyu, Gao Xinmei, Fu Ying, Zhang Mingwei, Wang Ying, Li Wurijimusi, Wurilige , Wang Yingjie, Wang Jingyu, Yang Fengting, Gu Yanru, Quan Yu. Effect of Immune Inducer ZNC on Seedling Growth and Physiological Response of Oat under Saline-Alkali Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 203-209.
[13] Dong Xiaohui, Jing Yuliang, Liu Lichao, Wang Cuiling, Zhang Liguo, Sun Luhong. Effects of Different Phosphorus Supply Levels and Varieties on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Industrial Hemp [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 216-224.
[14] Wang Zhanhai, Li Long, Zhao Haibo. The Impact of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Facility Soil Environment and Tomato Quality [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 231-239.
[15] Fan Guohua, Feng Xiaomin, Gao Xiang, Lü Huiqing, Yang Jing, Zhang Xuli, Hao Zhiping, Zhou Zhongyu, Zhang Li, Li Hong. Effects of Ridge Mulching and Organic Fertilizer Application on Yield Formation and Soil Organic Carbon Components of Small Black Bean [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 240-247.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!