作物杂志, 2026, 42(2): 74-81 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.009

遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术

小豆新品种(系)多点联合鉴定及产量与生态适应性评价

胡亮亮,, 曹榕, 陈天晓, 宋倩楠, 王素华, 程须珍, 王丽侠, 陈红霖,

中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/中国农业科学院东北亚农业科技创新中心100081北京

Multi-Location Evaluation of Yield and Ecological Adaptability for New Adzuki Bean Varieties (Lines)

Hu Liangliang,, Cao Rong, Chen Tianxiao, Song Qiannan, Wang Suhua, Cheng Xuzhen, Wang Lixia, Chen Honglin,

Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Northeast Asia Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Beijing 100081, China

通讯作者: 陈红霖,研究方向为食用豆类种质资源,E-mail:chenhonglin@caas.cn

收稿日期: 2025-01-26   修回日期: 2025-03-10   网络出版日期: 2025-06-03

基金资助: 国家食用豆产业技术体系(CARS-08)

Received: 2025-01-26   Revised: 2025-03-10   Online: 2025-06-03

作者简介 About authors

胡亮亮,主要从事食用豆类种质资源创新与利用研究,E-mail:hu15101081634@163.com

摘要

为筛选适宜不同区域种植的优良小豆品种,于2022-2023年在全国范围内18个试验点对27个小豆新品种(系)开展多环境联合鉴定,系统分析不同生态区间小豆品种(系)的主要农艺性状变异及产量。结果表明,不同试点和生态区间的小豆新品种(系)农艺性状和产量均存在显著差异,其中主茎分枝数、株高和单株荚数等性状的环境互作效应较强(变异系数>30.0%),而生育期、荚长和百粒重等性状遗传稳定性较高(变异系数<15.0%)。保红201429-8、赤红3号和唐红201301-2等9个品种较对照平均增产0.29%~8.79%。保红201429-8和唐红201509-12兼具高产性与广适性。

关键词: 小豆; 新品种(系); 多环境评价; 农艺性状; 生态适应性

Abstract

To identify superior adzuki bean varieties suitable for planting in different regions, a multi- environment evaluation of 27 new adzuki bean varieties (lines) was conducted at 18 test sites nationwide from 2022 to 2023, to systematically analyzed the variations in main agronomic traits and yields of these varieties (lines) across different ecological zones. The results showed that there were significant differences in the agronomic traits and yields of the new adzuki bean varieties (lines) across different test sites and ecological zones. Traits such as the number of main stem branches, plant height, and number of pods per plant had strong environmental interaction effects (coefficient of variation >30%), while traits like growth period, pod length, and 100-grain weight showed higher genetic stability (coefficient of variation <15%). Nine varieties, including Baohong 201429-8, Chihong 3 and Tanghong 201301-2, showed yield increases of 0.29%-8.79% compared with the control. Baohong 201429-8 and Tanghong 201509-12 exhibited both high yield and broad adaptability.

Keywords: Adzuki bean; New varieties (lines); Multi-environment evaluation; Agronomic traits; Ecological adaptability

PDF (508KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

胡亮亮, 曹榕, 陈天晓, 宋倩楠, 王素华, 程须珍, 王丽侠, 陈红霖. 小豆新品种(系)多点联合鉴定及产量与生态适应性评价. 作物杂志, 2026, 42(2): 74-81 doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.009

Hu Liangliang, Cao Rong, Chen Tianxiao, Song Qiannan, Wang Suhua, Cheng Xuzhen, Wang Lixia, Chen Honglin. Multi-Location Evaluation of Yield and Ecological Adaptability for New Adzuki Bean Varieties (Lines). Crops, 2026, 42(2): 74-81 doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.009

小豆[Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi]起源于我国,是我国传统药食同源作物,在我国已有2000余年栽培历史[1],现广泛分布于东北、华北和西北等地区[2-3]。小豆富含优质蛋白质(20%~ 25%)及人体必需的8种氨基酸[4],并含有丰富的铁、钙等矿质元素以及萜类和黄酮类等生物活性物质[5-7]。此外,小豆还具有抗氧化、调节血糖、抗高血压和改善肠道健康等多种生理功效[8-9],是功能性食品开发的理想原料。小豆在我国具有重要的经济价值。然而,相较于其他主要粮食作物,我国小豆生产面临单产水平较低、品种生态适应性不足等瓶颈问题。近年来,我国小豆育种研究在改良高产、广适、抗病及耐逆等性状方面取得了显著进展,并培育出了一批优良新品种,如高产品种中红6号[10]、大粒品种辽红小豆8号[11]、抗旱耐贫瘠品种晋小豆7号[12]、抗叶斑病和霜霉病品种吉红8号[13]和稳产广适品种冀红17号[14]等。然而,由于基因型(G)与环境互作(E)效应的影响,现有小豆品种在跨生态区种植时普遍表现出产量波动较大和稳定性较差等问题。因此,亟需通过联合鉴定筛选出适宜不同区域种植的新品种。

联合鉴定试验可以解析基因型与环境互作(G×E)效应,是筛选特定生态适应性品种的关键手段[15]。该试验方法能够有效揭示G×E规律,进而指导育种家在特定环境下选育表现最优的品种。通过多点多年的田间试验,可以全面评价作物新品种的稳定性和适应性,筛选出适宜推广的优良品种,进而提高作物的生产效率和品质。近年来,联合鉴定试验已在小麦[16]、水稻[17]和玉米[18]等作物育种中广泛应用,并取得了显著成效。与传统单点试验相比,联合鉴定方法能更准确地识别广适性基因型,从而降低品种推广风险[17]。但目前针对小豆的系统性联合鉴定研究仍较缺乏,尤其缺乏覆盖全国主产区的品种适应性数据。

为了系统评价小豆新品种(系)的农艺性状、生态适应性和产量表现,筛选出适宜不同生态区种植的优良品种,本研究汇集了全国18个试验点27个参试品种(系)的联合鉴定试验数据。试验点涵盖了我国主要小豆种植区域,具有较强的区域代表性。通过对上述试验数据进行了系统分析,旨在评估小豆新品种(系)在不同生态区域的表现差异,遴选出适宜各区域推广的优良品种,为未来小豆育种工作提供理论参考。研究结果将为小豆品种的区域化推广应用提供科学依据,对提高我国小豆产业生产水平和可持续发展具有重要意义。

1 材料与方法

1.1 试验材料

本试验采用27个小豆新品种(系)作为参试材料(表1),材料来源于全国14家育种单位。以冀红352作为对照品种(CK),来源于河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所。

表1   参试品种(系)及其来源

Table 1  Test varieties (lines) and their sources

编号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (line)
来源
Origin
1龙11-203黑龙江省农业科学院作物育种研究所
2龙11-805黑龙江省农业科学院作物育种研究所
3H1016吉林省农业科学院
4H1007吉林省农业科学院
5182-320黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院
6195-609黑龙江省农业科学院齐齐哈尔分院
7辽红08704-05辽宁省农业科学院
8辽红08706-12辽宁省农业科学院
9赤红3号内蒙古赤峰市农牧科学研究院
10品红2020-21-12-8-11中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
11品红2020-4-7-2中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
12品红2019-3-3-1中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
13品红2019-22-14-12中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
14冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-4河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所
15冀红1105反-5-4-1-2河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所
16保红201432-8保定市农业科学院
17保红201429-8保定市农业科学院
18唐红201301-2唐山市农业科学院
19唐红201509-12唐山市农业科学院
20同红6号山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所
21同红7号山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所
22苏红17-606江苏省农业科学院
23陇红3号庆阳市农业科学院
24贵红2号毕节市农业科学研究所
25贵红3号毕节市农业科学研究所
26桂红20-9-1广西省农业科学院水稻研究所
27桂红20-21-1广西省农业科学院水稻研究所

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


1.2 试验设计

多点联合鉴定试验于2022-2023年在北京、黑龙江齐齐哈尔和江苏南京等18个试验点进行。根据各试验点地理位置和气候条件的差异,将18个试验点划分为3个生态区(表2)。试验地选择地势平坦、茬口一致、肥力中等偏上且具备灌溉条件的地块。不同生态区域播种期有所差异,北方春播区播期为5月10-25日,北方夏播区为6月15-25日,南方区则根据前茬作物收获时间确定播期。试验采用随机区组设计,设3次重复。小区面积10 m2(种植4行,行长5.0 m,行距0.5 m),播深3~4 cm,播深力求一致、均匀,覆土后进行镇压。成熟期按小区进行收获、脱粒和晾晒。

表2   18个试验点播种期

Table 2  The sowing period at 18 test sites

编号
Number
试验点
Test site
播种期Sowing period
20222023
北方春播区Northern Spring Sowing Area
E1黑龙江哈尔滨05-1505-16
E2黑龙江齐齐哈尔05-1805-18
E3吉林长春05-2805-22
E4辽宁沈阳06-1105-25
E5内蒙古呼和浩特05-1005-15
E6内蒙古赤峰05-2505-12
E7山西太原05-2206-06
E8山西大同05-1905-21
E9河北张家口05-1405-16
E10陕西榆林05-1105-17
北方夏播区Northern Summer Sowing Area
E11河北保定06-2606-21
E12河北石家庄06-2306-25
E13河北唐山06-2406-24
E14北京06-1806-18
南方区South Region
E15江苏南京06-2207-25
E16贵州毕节04-2605-06
E17重庆06-1405-15
E18广西南宁07-0807-29

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


1.3 测定项目与方法

于小豆生长季,定期观测并记录主要农艺性状,包括生育期(从播种至成熟的天数)、株高(从地面至主茎顶端的高度)和主茎分枝数等。收获后,测定单株荚数、百粒重和单荚粒数等产量相关指标。于成熟期每小区随机选取5株测定株高和主茎节数,取平均值;荚长为每小区随机选取5个豆荚测定平均长度,所有农艺性状的测定均参照《小豆种质资源描述规范与数据标准》[19]执行。采用小区实收法测定产量。成熟后,按小区收获、脱粒、晾晒至水分含量12%~14%后,折算为单位面积产量。

1.4 数据处理

采用方差分析(ANOVA)评估不同试验点和生态区小豆新品种(系)的农艺性状与产量表现的差异显著性,基于R统计分析软件(v4.3.1)进行数据分析。采用Eberhart和Russell联合回归模型[20]评估品种稳定性,该方法基于线性模型分析品种产量对环境变化的响应,即产量Yij是环境效应Ij的线性函数,具体公式如下:Yij = μi+βiIj+δij,式中,Yij是第i个品种在第j个环境中的产量;μi是第i个品种的平均产量;βi是第i个品种的回归系数,表示该品种对环境变化的响应程度;Ij是第j个环境的平均效应;δij是回归残差,表示未解释的随机变异。

2 结果与分析

2.1 不同试点间小豆新品种(系)农艺性状变异

方差分析表明,小豆新品种(系)农艺性状在全国18个试验点间存在明显的区域异质性(表3),其中主茎分枝数、株高及单株荚数受环境互作效应较强,变异系数较大。主茎节数次之,单荚粒数、百粒重、荚长及生育期变异系数相对较小。各试验点间,生育期的平均值变幅为71.9~121.1 d;平均株高在黑龙江哈尔滨最高,在广西南宁最低;主茎节数均值变幅为7.2~19.9;单株荚数最多的为南宁,最少的为齐齐哈尔;单荚粒数平均值变幅为5.1~10.7;百粒重均值变幅为9.1~16.7 g。以上结果表明各性状受环境影响程度各异,主茎分枝数、株高和单株荚数等性状受环境影响较大。

表3   不同试点间小豆新品种(系)的主要农艺性状变异分析

Table 3  Analysis of main agronomic trait variations of new adzuki bean varieties (lines) among different test sites

编号
Number
参数
Parameter
生育期
Growth
period (d)
株高
Plant height
(cm)
主茎节数
Number of main
stem nodes
主茎分枝数
Number of main
stem branches
单株荚数
Number of
pods per plant
荚长
Pod length
(cm)
单荚粒数
Number of
grains per pod
百粒重
100-grain
weight (g)
E1最小值111.561.014.51.415.67.86.210.9
最大值127.0155.319.63.137.710.18.117.8
平均值121.1114.216.92.224.68.97.314.1
E2最小值99.529.512.60.68.57.65.27.8
最大值124.580.816.42.720.710.08.219.6
平均值117.859.714.31.613.88.86.713.9
E3最小值101.533.711.51.02.05.97.68.3
最大值112.579.920.93.028.09.010.119.2
平均值107.056.215.62.215.47.69.112.7
E4最小值81.553.516.22.720.47.75.89.9
最大值100.0110.922.65.055.710.38.719.0
平均值93.069.819.04.036.19.17.713.5
E5最小值115.046.111.15.527.27.95.69.7
最大值122.093.815.68.348.311.48.719.5
平均值118.271.613.27.236.29.17.115.0
E6最小值105.055.514.02.012.09.99.012.2
最大值128.5142.720.04.744.313.712.320.3
平均值115.084.916.53.732.512.110.715.5
E7最小值97.535.512.71.84.97.96.09.4
最大值124.085.918.44.938.712.38.623.1
平均值107.852.815.32.919.59.07.116.7
E8最小值98.031.79.21.92.18.06.28.2
最大值110.0101.717.06.165.010.08.818.4
平均值103.960.212.93.637.89.17.613.5
E9最小值93.040.611.91.27.07.85.58.5
最大值124.0111.019.13.834.29.58.519.8
平均值106.271.415.42.124.18.67.113.6
E10最小值88.012.93.22.010.65.95.55.2
最大值122.068.211.67.543.58.68.917.5
平均值102.735.17.03.227.67.87.311.8
E11最小值87.028.712.61.712.46.76.17.4
最大值102.081.320.34.139.29.28.818.3
平均值94.656.217.22.728.08.27.012.6
E12最小值80.028.313.81.117.36.75.36.7
最大值104.0103.323.65.462.68.78.716.1
平均值88.149.618.62.838.78.06.612.1
E13最小值82.043.215.51.618.86.56.16.0
最大值98.584.923.74.938.89.08.818.5
平均值89.262.119.93.226.27.77.213.2
E14最小值95.028.711.71.316.75.74.77.4
最大值125.087.020.77.061.38.99.021.0
平均值108.055.416.53.535.47.46.413.5
E15最小值84.531.412.72.716.56.36.06.5
最大值95.561.817.05.546.98.48.817.2
平均值90.943.614.34.026.27.67.311.7
E16最小值104.528.76.90.912.06.83.98.8
最大值114.558.013.04.033.39.76.519.5
平均值109.236.68.82.120.18.15.113.4
E17最小值102.029.310.10.38.55.94.49.5
最大值126.557.219.84.329.69.78.224.9
平均值117.442.914.82.016.27.96.416.7
E18最小值69.015.111.00.117.46.45.74.8
最大值75.043.920.71.865.79.410.812.7
平均值71.931.716.01.042.77.77.79.1
变异系数Cofficient variation (%)12.332.820.943.230.512.315.213.2

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2 不同生态区间小豆新品种(系)的性状变异

不同生态区间小豆新品种(系)各性状差异显著(图1)。北方春播区平均生育期最长,极显著高于北方夏播区和南方区;株高亦为北方春播区最高,北方夏播区次之,南方区最低;北方夏播区主茎节数最多,北方春播区次之,南方区最少;主茎分枝数南方区最低,极显著低于北方春播区和北方夏播区,北方春播区和北方夏播区无显著差异;单株荚数北方夏播区最高,极显著高于北方春播区和南方区;荚长和单荚粒数均为北方春播区极显著高于其余2个区,北方夏播区和南方区无显著差异;百粒重在3个生态区间无显著差异。上述性状差异可能与生态区气候条件及土壤肥力相关。生态区间气候、土壤及水分条件的差异显著影响小豆生长、发育与产量。随纬度递增,小豆生育期、株高、主茎分枝数和单株荚数等性状呈增大趋势,而百粒重受环境因素影响较小。

图1

图1   不同生态区间小豆新品种(系)的性状差异

A:北方春播区,B:北方夏播区,C:南方区。“*”表示在P < 0.05水平上差异显著,“**”表示在P < 0.01水平上差异极显著,ns表示无显著差异。下同。

Fig.1   Trait differences of new adzuki bean varieties (lines) across different ecological regions

A: Northern Spring Sowing Area, B: Northern Summer Sowing Area, C: Southern Area.“*”indicates significant difference at P < 0.05 level,“**”indicates extremely significant difference at P < 0.01 level, ns indicates no significant difference. The same below.


2.3 不同小豆新品种(系)产量分析

18个试验点产量结果(表4)显示,保红201429-8、赤红3号、唐红201301-2、195-609、品红2019-3-3-1、辽红08704-05、品红2020-4-7-2、同红7号和唐红201509-12平均产量高于CK,增产0.29%~8.79%。保红201429-8平均产量最高,达1690.29 kg/hm2,赤红3号和唐红201301-2次之,分别为1660.52和1652.24 kg/hm2

表4   不同小豆品种(系)间的产量差异

Table 4  The yield difference among adzuki bean varieties (lines)

编号
Number
品种(系)
Variety
(line)
平均产量
Average yield
(kg/hm2)
较CK增产率
Yield increase
over CK (%)
1龙11-2031478.87-4.82
2龙11-8051352.27-12.97
3H10161253.93-19.30
4H10071372.48-11.67
5182-3201521.19-2.09
6195-6091649.306.15
7辽红08704-051597.642.83
8辽红08706-121549.87-0.25
9赤红3号1660.526.87
10品红2020-21-12-8-111453.06-6.48
11品红2020-4-7-21596.752.77
12品红2019-3-3-11599.562.95
13品红2019-22-14-121349.26-13.16
14冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-41521.31-2.09
15冀红1105反-5-4-1-21552.94-0.05
16保红201432-8991.59-36.18
17保红201429-81690.298.79
18唐红201301-21652.246.34
19唐红201509-121558.290.29
20同红6号1440.00-7.32
21同红7号1560.450.43
22苏红17-6061458.98-6.10
23陇红3号726.35-53.25
24贵红2号815.07-47.54
25贵红3号804.88-48.20
26桂红20-9-1811.19-47.79
27桂红20-21-11279.59-17.64
28冀红3521553.74

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


小豆为短日照作物,光温反应较敏感,跨纬度引种显著影响其生长习性、生育期及产量[14]。本研究结果(图2)表明,北方春播区品种引种至北方夏播区和南方区,平均产量无显著变化;北方夏播区品种引至北方春播区和南方区,产量较原产区极显著降低;南方区品种引至北方春播区,产量极显著降低,引至北方夏播区,产量无显著变化。

图2

图2   不同来源小豆新品种(系)在不同生态区的产量表现

Fig.2   Yield performance of new adzuki bean varieties (lines) from different sources across various ecological regions


2.4 不同小豆新品种(系)品种稳定性和适应性分析

高产与稳产是品种推广的基本要求。为了进一步评估小豆新品种(系)的稳定性和适应性,本研究采用了Eberhart和Russell的稳定性分析方法。结果(表5)显示,保红201429-8和唐红201509-12产量高于冀红352,且环境回归系数接近于1,回归残差小,表明其对环境变化的响应稳定,适宜多点种植,具有高产广适特性。其中,保红201429-8在北方春播区和南方区表现突出,唐红201509-12则在北方夏播区表现最佳。赤红3号、195-609、辽红08704-05和同红7号在18个试验点的平均产量虽高于CK,但稳产性欠佳,适宜在北方春播区种植。唐红201301-2、品红2019-3-3-1和品红2020-4-7-2适宜在北方春播区和北方夏播区种植。苏红17-606产量变异系数低,稳产性良好,但产量低于CK。

表5   不同小豆新品种(系)的产量稳定性分析

Table 5  Analysis of yield stability of different adzuki bean varieties (lines)

编号
Number
品种(系)
Variety (line)
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
回归系数
βi
回归残差
δi2
适应地区
Adaptation region
1龙11-2031478.871.050.22E1,E2,E3,E4,E9,E14,E16,E17,E18
2龙11-8051352.270.980.18E1,E2,E4,E6,E7,E9,E15
3H10161253.930.920.20E3,E4,E5,E6,E8,E9,E10,E13,E16
4H10071372.481.100.25E1,E2,E3,E4,E5,E6,E7,E8,E9,E10,E16
5182-3201521.191.020.15E1,E2,E3,E4,E5,E6
6195-6091649.301.080.25E1,E2,E4,E5,E6
7辽红08704-051597.641.000.20E1,E2,E3,E4,E5,E6,E9,E10
8辽红08706-121549.870.950.18E1,E2,E3,E4,E5,E6,E9
9赤红3号1660.521.120.22E1,E2,E4,E5,E6,E7,E8,E9
10品红2020-21-12-8-111453.060.970.20E2,E5,E7,E10,E11,E12,E14,E15
11品红2020-4-7-21596.751.030.22E5,E6,E11,E12,E14,E17
12品红2019-3-3-11599.561.020.19E2,E4,E5,E6,E10,E11,E14
13品红2019-22-14-121349.260.950.25E5,E6,E7,E8,E10,E11,E13,E14,E15
14冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-41521.311.040.23E5,E10,E11,E12,E14,E17
15冀红1105反-5-4-1-21552.941.070.21E5,E8,E11,E12,E13,E14,E16,E17,E18
16保红201432-8991.590.880.30E11,E12,E13,E14,E15,E16,E18
17保红201429-81690.291.150.18E1~E18
18唐红201301-21652.241.090.17E5,E7,E11,E12,E13,E14
19唐红201509-121558.291.050.19E1~E18
20同红6号1440.000.960.22E5,E8,E10,E11,E12,E13
21同红7号1560.451.080.18E1,E2,E4,E5,E7,E8,E9
22苏红17-6061458.980.990.20E1~E18
23陇红3号726.350.750.35E7,E12,E13,E15,E16,E18
24贵红2号815.070.820.30E11,E12,E13,E14,E15,E16,E18
25贵红3号804.880.800.32E7,E11,E12,E13,E14,E15,E16,E18
26桂红20-9-1811.190.850.28E7,E11,E12,E13,E15,E16,E17,E18
27桂红20-21-11279.590.950.25E2,E5,E7,E9,E11,E16,E17,E18
28冀红3521553.741.000.20E4,E5,E6,E10,E11,E12,E14

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.5 不同区域适宜品种(系)的筛选

综合不同生态区间及试验点产量表现(表6),筛选出适宜各区域种植的优良品种(系)。结果表明,赤红3号、195-609和辽红08704-05等适宜北方春播区;唐红201301-2、品红2020-4-7-2、品红2019-3-3-1和冀红1105反-5-4-1-2等适宜北方夏播区;保红201429-8、冀红1105反-5-4-1-2和龙11-203等适宜南方区。此外,鉴于产量性状易受环境影响,建议各试验点因地制宜选择品种(系)。

表6   各生态区及试验点产量排名前3位的小豆品种(系)

Table 6  The top three high-yielding adzuki bean varieties (lines) in each ecological region and test site

生态区Ecological zone编号Number适宜的品种(系)Suitable variety (line)
北方春播区Northern Spring Sowing AreaE1195-609*,辽红08706-12,182-320
E2195-609*,辽红08706-12,同红7号
E3182-320,H1007,辽红08704-05*
E4195-609*,赤红3号*,龙11-805
E5赤红3号*,唐红201301-2,品红2020-4-7-2
E6195-609*,辽红08706-12,赤红3号*
E7赤红3号*,同红7号,品红2020-4-7-2
E8同红6号,H1016(吉红15号),同红7号
E9辽红08704-05*,赤红3号*,龙11-203
E10同红6号,冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-4,品红2019-22-14-12
北方夏播区Northern Summer Sowing AreaE11唐红201301-2*,品红2020-21-12-8-11,冀红1105反-5-4-1-2*
E12冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-4,冀红1105反-5-4-1-2*,品红2020-21-12-8-11
E13冀红1105反-5-4-1-2*,唐红201301-2*,唐红201509-12
E14品红2020-4-7-2*,品红2019-3-3-1,唐红201301-2*
南方区South RegionE15品红2020-21-12-8-11,品红2020-4-7-2,苏红17-606
E16龙11-203*,陇红3号,贵红2号
E17冀红0921反-4-1-3-3-4,保红201429-8*,冀红1105反-5-4-1-2*
E18龙11-203*,陇红3号,贵红3号

“*”表示每个生态区产量排名前3位的小豆品种(系)。

“*”indicates the top three high-yielding adzuki bean varieties (lines) in each ecological zone.

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3 讨论

3.1 不同生态环境对小豆新品种(系)农艺性状的影响

农艺性状大多是由微效多基因控制的数量性状,易受环境因素及基因型与环境互作效应影响[16-18,21-23]。本研究表明27个参试品种(系)各农艺性状在不同试验点存在差异。不同性状对环境的敏感性各异,主茎分枝数、株高和单株荚数等性状变异系数较大;而生育期、荚长和百粒重等性状变异系数相对较小,与前人[24-25]研究结果一致。试点间土壤、气候及管理的差异导致株高、主茎分枝数和单株荚数显著变异。如哈尔滨和辽宁沈阳等试验点土壤肥沃,生育期雨水充足,部分品种株高和分枝数显著高于其他试验点。重庆试验点生育期内雨水和气温适宜,百粒重表现突出。

小豆短日照特性使其生育期与光温条件高度耦合,跨生态区种植易导致生育期失调和产量波动。北方春播区品种南移后生育期缩短,南方品种北移则无法正常成熟。除遗传因素外,地理纬度、日照时数及温度、播期等亦对其生育期产生重要影响[26]。本研究发现,北方春播区生育期长于北方夏播区和南方区,与纬度呈正相关,与日照时数呈正相关。如保红201429-8由哈尔滨引至广西南宁,生育期缩短;南方品种北移,生育期延长甚至无法成熟,如陇红3号等南方品种在哈尔滨等地无法正常结荚,与前人[27-28]研究结果一致。本研究结果表明,生育期受光温强烈调控,符合小豆短日照特性。

3.2 不同生态环境下小豆新品种(系)的产量差异

品种鉴定易受多种因素影响。本研究通过多点试验和综合分析,筛选出了9个产量优势小豆新品种(系),较对照冀红352平均增产0.29%~8.79%。其中,保红201429-8、赤红3号和唐红201301-2产量位列前三。研究[29-31]表明,环境因素及基因与环境互作对作物产量的影响大于基因本身。本研究亦发现,不同生态区小豆新品种(系)产量差异显著。北方夏播区和南方区品种引至北方春播区,产量极显著降低,或因低纬度品种北移后晚熟甚至不能成熟所致。小豆选育应以丰产性为首要目标,兼顾稳产性与生态适应性[32-33]。保红201429-8和唐红201509-12在各试验点均表现优良,兼具高产广适等特性,具有推广价值。

鉴于小豆产量易受环境影响,未来宜扩大试验区域,如增加西北旱作区和东南沿海试验点,并增加试验年份、统一科学管理等,以全面评估新品种(系)的适应性。小豆育种目标亦应多元化,在追求丰产和稳产的基础上,顺应产业发展及市场需求,注重提高小豆品质、抗逆性及商品性,培育早熟、大粒、耐逆、抗病、结荚集中和宜机械化收获等优良性状的小豆品种。此外,未来研究应加强小豆分子标记辅助育种研究,探索抗病性和品质改良的分子机制,尤其针对小豆疫霉病、锈病、花叶病毒病和根腐病等主要病害,利用全基因组关联分析(GWAS)技术定位抗性基因,开发分子标记辅助抗病育种。并借助基因编辑和全基因组选择等现代育种技术,加速优良性状聚合与品种进程,全面提升小豆品种综合性状。

4 结论

基于2年全国多环境联合鉴定,本研究系统解析了27个小豆新品种(系)的多环境变异,筛选出高产广适性品种保红201429-8和唐红201509- 12。同时明确适宜北方春播区(赤红3号等)、北方夏播区(唐红201301-2等)、南方区(冀红1105反-5-4-1-2等)种植的优良品种(系)。

参考文献

陈红霖, 田静, 朱振东, .

中国食用豆产业和种业发展现状与未来展望

中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):493-503.

DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.004      [本文引用: 1]

食用豆在中国粮食组成、人类健康、土壤改良中占有重要地位,尤其是在贫困地区作为蛋白质的主要来源。随着食用豆基因组相继被破译,推动了食用豆分子遗传基础和分子育种研究。国家食用豆产业技术体系成立以来,育成了一批高产、优质、抗病虫、耐逆、适宜机械化收获的食用豆新品种,集成了一批适合不同产区的栽培技术,病虫害绿色防控技术的研发与应用取得了良好的防治效果,生产机械与技术研究初显成效,产后加工技术提升与产品创新研究促进产业提质增效。随着食用豆新品种新技术的示范与推广,食用豆总产和单产水平显著提高,特别是在过去十年内蚕豆、豌豆由干籽粒生产转变为鲜食菜用生产,食用豆种植面积提高了21.1%,单产提高了3.9%,总产提高了36.8%。随着食用豆产业规模不断扩大,越来越多的食用豆种被列为国家农产品地理标志产品,正在形成一批农业企业品牌。在食用豆产业的带动下,品种权保护与转让数量逐渐增多,食用豆种业开始起步发展。随着人们健康意识的提高,国内外市场需求快速上升,国家乡村振兴战略的实施和农业供给侧结构性改革的推进,大力培育壮大贫困地区特色优势产业,给食用豆生产和种业带来了新的机遇;但是中国食用豆生产和种业也面临生产成本较高、生产效率低、科研平台建设有待加强、缺乏突破性大品种、品种权保护力度不够等诸多挑战。本文在总结中国食用豆产业和种业的现状与问题的基础上,讨论了其未来的发展方向。

金文林, 濮绍京.

中国小豆研究进展

世界农业, 2008(3):59-62.

[本文引用: 1]

Hu L L, Wang X L, Zhang Y Z, et al.

High-resolution genomic resources for trait mapping and precision breeding for adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)

Advanced Science, 2026, 13(4):e07157.

DOI:10.1002/advs.v13.4      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Chen H L, Liu L P, Wang L X, et al.

Development of SSR markers and assessment of genetic diversity of adzuki bean in the Chinese germplasm collection

Molecular Breeding, 2015, 35:1-14.

DOI:10.1007/s11032-015-0202-z      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Padhi S R, Gore P G, Tripathi K, et al.

Nutritional potential of adzuki bean germplasm and mining nutri-dense accessions through multivariate analysis

Foods, 2023, 12(22):4159.

DOI:10.3390/foods12224159      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Wang Y, Yao X M, Shen H F, et al.

Nutritional composition, efficacy, and processing of Vigna angularis (adzuki bean) for the human diet: an overview

Molecules, 2022, 27(18):6079.

DOI:10.3390/molecules27186079      URL    

颜军, 杨旭红, 王雨, .

农业农村部科技发展中心:我国小豆品种选育与新品种保护进展

种子, 2021, 40(4):51-58.

[本文引用: 1]

Jiang X J, Xu Q P, Zhang J Y, et al.

Nutrient transfer and antioxidant effect of adzuki bean before and after GABA enrichment

Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023, 10:1123075.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2023.1123075      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kuriya K, Goto S, Kobayashi E, et al.

Cholesterol-lowering activity of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) polyphenols

Molecular Biology Reports, 2023, 50(7):5575-5584.

DOI:10.1007/s11033-023-08481-7      PMID:37160631      [本文引用: 1]

Adzuki beans (ABs; Vigna angularis) were reported to show potential for prevention of cholesterol absorption and lowering of the blood cholesterol level. However, the main active compounds and some cellular effects remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated the potential cholesterol-lowering effects of (+)-catechin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (C7G) and (+)-epicatechin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (E7G), identified as abundant polyphenols in ABs.To investigate the cholesterol-lowering activity in vitro, cholesterol micelles, bile acids, and Caco-2 cells as an intestinal model were used in the study. C7G and E7G each inhibited micellar solubility in a dose-dependent manner, and their inhibitory activity was as strong as that of (+)-catechin (IC values: C7G, 0.23 ± 0.03 mg/ml; E7G, 0.22 ± 0.02 mg/ml; (+)-catechin, 0.26 ± 0.11 mg/ml). The AB polyphenols showed binding activity toward bile acids and changed them into an insoluble form. When Caco-2 cells were treated with C7G or E7G, the amount of incorporated cholesterol was significantly decreased compared with vehicle-treated control cells, and no cytotoxicity was observed under the experimental conditions used. Meanwhile, quantitative real-time PCR revealed that the mRNA level of the cholesterol transporter NPC1L1 remained unchanged in the treated cells.Taken together, the present findings suggest that C7G and E7G are the main active compounds in ABs, and have the ability to inhibit micellar solubility, bind to bile acids, and suppress cholesterol absorption. The present study supports the health benefits of ABs as a medicinal food and the application of AB polyphenols as medicinal supplements to suppress cholesterol elevation.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

华方静, 王乐政, 高凤菊.

中红系列红小豆农艺性状的评价分析

安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(2):36-37.

[本文引用: 1]

赵秋, 何伟锋, 李连波, .

辽红小豆8号新品种选育

辽宁农业科学, 2012(4):80-81.

[本文引用: 1]

张建宏, 韩文清, 申虎飞, .

大粒红小豆新品种晋小豆7号选育及栽培技术

山西农业科学, 2019, 47(6):935-937.

[本文引用: 1]

王桂芳, 徐宁, 王明海, .

红小豆吉红8号的选育及配套栽培技术

现代农业科技, 2013(17):71-79.

[本文引用: 1]

范保杰, 刘长友, 王彦, .

冀红17号新品种选育及高产高效配套栽培技术

现代农村科技, 2021(7):14-15.

[本文引用: 2]

Gill H S, Halder J, Zhang J, et al.

Multi-trait multi-environment genomic prediction of agronomic traits in advanced breeding lines of winter wheat

Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:709545.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.709545      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Mohammadi R, Roustaii M, Haghparast R, et al.

Genotype x environment interactions for grain yield in rainfed winter wheat multi-environment trials in Iran

Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102 (5):1500-1510.

DOI:10.2134/agronj2010.0062      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Nguyen V H, Morantte R I Z, Lopena V, et al.

Multi-environment genomic selection in rice elite breeding lines

Rice, 2023, 16 (1):7.

DOI:10.1186/s12284-023-00623-6      PMID:36752880      [本文引用: 2]

Assessing the performance of elite lines in target environments is essential for breeding programs to select the most relevant genotypes. One of the main complexities in this task resides in accounting for the genotype by environment interactions. Genomic prediction models that integrate information from multi-environment trials and environmental covariates can be efficient tools in this context. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive ability of different genomic prediction models to optimize the use of multi-environment information. We used 111 elite breeding lines representing the diversity of the international rice research institute breeding program for irrigated ecosystems. The lines were evaluated for three traits (days to flowering, plant height, and grain yield) in 15 environments in Asia and Africa and genotyped with 882 SNP markers. We evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction to predict untested environments using seven multi-environment models and three cross-validation scenarios.The elite lines were found to belong to the indica group and more specifically the indica-1B subgroup which gathered improved material originating from the Green Revolution. Phenotypic correlations between environments were high for days to flowering and plant height (33% and 54% of pairwise correlation greater than 0.5) but low for grain yield (lower than 0.2 in most cases). Clustering analyses based on environmental covariates separated Asia's and Africa's environments into different clusters or subclusters. The predictive abilities ranged from 0.06 to 0.79 for days to flowering, 0.25-0.88 for plant height, and - 0.29-0.62 for grain yield. We found that models integrating genotype-by-environment interaction effects did not perform significantly better than models integrating only main effects (genotypes and environment or environmental covariates). The different cross-validation scenarios showed that, in most cases, the use of all available environments gave better results than a subset.Multi-environment genomic prediction models with main effects were sufficient for accurate phenotypic prediction of elite lines in targeted environments. These results will help refine the testing strategy to update the genomic prediction models to improve predictive ability.© 2023. The Author(s).

Wang S Q, Jiang X W, Wang S D, et al.

Genotype by environment interaction analysis in summer maize hybrids for grain yield under multi-environment trials in Huang-Huai-Hai Area, China

International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2019, 22(6):1573-1580.

[本文引用: 2]

程须珍, 王素华, 王丽侠. 小豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.

[本文引用: 1]

Eberhart S A, Russell W A.

Stability parameters for comparing varieties

Crop Science, 1966, 6(1):36-40.

DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Garcia-Barrios G, Crespo-Herrera L, Cruz-Izquierdo S, et al.

Genomic prediction from multi-environment trials of wheat breeding

Genes, 2024, 15(4):417.

DOI:10.3390/genes15040417      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Genomic prediction relates a set of markers to variability in observed phenotypes of cultivars and allows for the prediction of phenotypes or breeding values of genotypes on unobserved individuals. Most genomic prediction approaches predict breeding values based solely on additive effects. However, the economic value of wheat lines is not only influenced by their additive component but also encompasses a non-additive part (e.g., additive × additive epistasis interaction). In this study, genomic prediction models were implemented in three target populations of environments (TPE) in South Asia. Four models that incorporate genotype × environment interaction (G × E) and genotype × genotype (GG) were tested: Factor Analytic (FA), FA with genomic relationship matrix (FA + G), FA with epistatic relationship matrix (FA + GG), and FA with both genomic and epistatic relationship matrices (FA + G + GG). Results show that the FA + G and FA + G + GG models displayed the best and a similar performance across all tests, leading us to infer that the FA + G model effectively captures certain epistatic effects. The wheat lines tested in sites in different TPE were predicted with different precisions depending on the cross-validation employed. In general, the best prediction accuracy was obtained when some lines were observed in some sites of particular TPEs and the worse genomic prediction was observed when wheat lines were never observed in any site of one TPE.

Panda S, Pavani S L, Ganesan S, et al.

Multi-environment evaluation of rice genotypes: impact of weather and culm biochemical parameters against sheath blight infection

Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14:1280321.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1280321      URL    

Hu L L, Luo G L, Zhu X, et al.

Genetic diversity and environmental influence on yield and yield-related traits of adzuki bean (Vigna angularis L.)

Plants, 2022, 11(9):1132.

DOI:10.3390/plants11091132      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Adzuki beans are an important food legume crop in East Asia. A large number of adzuki bean accessions are maintained in the Chinese national seed genebank. A collection of 59 elite cultivars, 389 landraces, and 27 wild adzuki beans were selected and phenotyped extensively for yield and yield-related traits at two different locations (Nanning and Nanyang, China). Ten agronomic and yield-related traits were scored, and the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), correlation, and cluster analysis. Significant variation was observed for genotypes, locations, and genotype x environment interaction for most traits. Also, there were significant differences in the phenotypes among accessions of different germplasm types. The broad-sense heritability of traits studied ranged from 4.4% to 77.8%. The number of seeds per pod (77.8%), 100-seed weight (68.0%), and number of plant branches (63.9%) had a high heritability. A total of 10 traits were transformed into 3 comprehensive factors by principal component analysis, and the first three principal component factors contributed 72.31% of the total variability. Cluster analysis categorized the 475 adzuki bean accessions into five distinct groups. The results described in this study will be useful for adzuki bean breeders for the development of varieties with high end-use quality.

王晓磊, 康泽然, 魏云山, .

20份小豆种质资源农艺性状鉴定与综合评价

江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(2):98-104.

[本文引用: 1]

白鹏, 程须珍, 王丽侠, .

小豆种质资源农艺性状综合鉴定与评价

植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(6):1209-1215.

DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2014.06.007      [本文引用: 1]

通过田间观测和室内分析,对来自全国各生态区的262份小豆优异种质资源在北京试验田连续两年进行了农艺性状鉴定及综合评价。结果表明:262份小豆微核心种质资源在考察的16个形态学性状中均具有丰富的遗传变异类型;不同年份间生态环境尤其是光照条件对小豆农艺性状影响较大;主成分分析确定三类影响因子,表明小豆资源的选育要集中在生长势良好(生育日数较短、株高较矮),单株荚数和单荚粒数多的地方品种;聚类分析结果显示在相似系数为0.40时可将参试材料分为5大类群,各类群间性状差异明显;群体的性状表现跟地理来源之间没有直接的关系。

Dong W X, Zhang Y Y, Zhang Y L, et al.

Short-day photoperiod effects on plant growth, flower bud differentiation, and yield formation in adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)

International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2016, 18(2):337-345.

DOI:10.17957/IJAB      URL     [本文引用: 1]

王丽侠, 程须珍, 王素华, .

我国小豆应用核心种质的生态适应性及评价利用

植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14(5):794-799.

[本文引用: 1]

田静, 范保洁, 程须珍, .

小豆种质资源异地繁殖的可行性分析

华北农学报, 2003(增1):93-95.

[本文引用: 1]

胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, .

小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析

作物学报, 2025, 51(10):2581-2594.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2025.54049      [本文引用: 1]

为明确我国小豆主栽品种的产量潜力、适应性与稳定性, 并指导区域化应用与育种, 本研究于2022年和2023年在我国主要产区遴选8个代表性生态试验点, 对15个小豆基因型进行了多点试验。运用联合方差分析、相关性分析、加性主效应与乘性互作(AMMI)模型及基因型与环境互作效应(GGE)双标图等方法, 对产量及相关农艺性状进行了系统评价。联合方差分析结果表明, 环境是影响除百粒重外各性状变异的主要驱动因素, 百粒重主要受基因型控制。基因型与环境互作效应对产量和主茎分枝数影响极显著。相关性分析显示, 单株荚数是决定产量的关键因子, 二者呈极显著正相关。AMMI与GGE分析揭示了显著的基因型×环境互作效应, 明确了基因型的特定适应区域与稳定性差异。综合评价显示, 赤红3号(G5)表现出高产潜力, 最接近理想基因型; 保红201429-8(G8)等基因型兼具高产与稳产特性;环境评价表明, 榆林(E5)试验点因其优良的代表性和区分能力, 被鉴定为理想测试环境。本研究表明, 环境效应对小豆产量性状具有显著影响, 基因型与环境互作是品种选育和推广中充分考量的关键因素,且单株荚数可作为小豆高产育种的核心选择指标。本研究为我国小豆育种策略的优化和品种的精准推广提供了关键数据支持与科学指导。

胡亮亮, 陈燕华, 王成, .

小豆种质资源产量性状的多环境评价与优异种质筛选

植物遗传资源学报, 2025, 26(7):1342-1354.

Li Y B, Tao F L.

Interactions of genotype, environment and management on wheat traits and grain yield variations in different climate zones across China

Agricultural Systems, 2022, 203:103521.

DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103521      URL     [本文引用: 1]

陈燕华, 罗高玲, 李经成, .

13个小豆新品系在广西地区的引种试验

南方农业学报, 2016, 47(11):1844-1848.

[本文引用: 1]

张春明, 张耀文, 赵雪英, .

小豆品种联合鉴定试验与评价

山西农业科学, 2018, 46(7):1092-1096.

[本文引用: 1]

/