检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2022, 第1期: 205–212 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.031

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

施氮量对超级稻南粳9108产量、淀粉RVA谱特征值和理化特性的影响

李润卿(), 申勇, 朱宽宇(), 王志琴, 杨建昌   

  1. 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/扬州大学农学院,225009,江苏扬州
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-28 修回日期:2021-08-17 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 朱宽宇
  • 作者简介:李润卿,研究方向为水稻栽培与生理,E-mail： lirunqing12@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32071943)

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on the Grain Yield, Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Super Rice Nanjing 9108

Li Runqing(), Shen Yong, Zhu Kuanyu(), Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang   

  1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Agricultural College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-07-28 Revised:2021-08-17 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16
  • Contact: Zhu Kuanyu

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

294

摘要：

为探明施氮量对水稻RVA谱特征值、稻米淀粉结构和理化特性的影响,以超级稻品种南粳9108为材料,在大田种植,设置3个施氮水平,分别为全生育期不施氮（N0）、施纯氮180kg/hm2（N180）和360kg/hm2（N360）,研究了淀粉结构和理化性质与RVA谱特征值的关系。结果表明,与N0相比,N180和N360处理下南粳9108的产量显著增加,氮肥利用率则逐渐降低。与N0相比,N180处理下南粳9108的崩解值、热浆黏度、峰值黏度、糊化温度和胶稠度提升,消减值和直链淀粉含量降低;提高了支链淀粉中短中链含量、淀粉的无序结构、溶解度和膨胀度,降低了糊化焓和结晶度。N360处理的结果与上述结果相反。相关性分析表明,支链淀粉短中链含量与崩解值、淀粉的无序结构、溶解度和膨胀度呈显著或极显著正相关,与糊化焓、结晶度和消减值呈显著或极显著负相关。综上可得,全生育期施纯氮180kg/hm2时南粳9108支链淀粉结构和淀粉理化性质得到改善,优化了RVA谱特征值,使蒸煮食味品质变优。

关键词: 超级稻, 施氮量, 产量, 蒸煮食味品质, 淀粉理化特性, 支链淀粉结构

Abstract:

In order to elucidate the effects of nitrogen application rates on rapid visco analyzer (RVA) profile characteristics of rice and the structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch, a super rice variety Nanjing 9108 was used and grown in the paddy field under three nitrogen application rates of 0 (N0), 180 (N180) and 360kg N/ha (N360). The relationships between structure and physicochemical properties of starch and eating quality were investigated. Results showed that grain yields of Nanjing 9108 were significantly increased under N180 and N360 treatments, whereas the result was reversed in nitrogen use efficiency in comparison to N0. Compared with the N0 treatment, the RVA profile characteristics of Nanjing 9108, breakdown value, hot paste viscosity, peak viscosity, pasing temperature and gel consistency were increased, while the setback value and amylose content were decreased, as well as the mid-short chain content of amylopectin, starch disordered structure, solubility and swelling degree were increased, the enthalpy value and crystallinity were decreased under N180 treatment, whereas the results were reversed in a high N application rate (N360). Correlation analysis showed that short-mid chain content of amylopectin was positively correlated with breakdown value, starch disordered structure, solubility and swelling degree (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), whereas negatively correlated with enthalpy value, crystallinity and setback value (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The results suggested that the optimized amylopectin structure and starch physicochemical properties accounted for the better RVA profile characteristics of Nanjing 9108 under 180kg N/ha, which was conductive to a better cooking and eating quality.

Key words: Super rice, Nitrogen application rate, Yield, Cooking and eating quality, Physicochemical properties of starch, Amylopectin structure

表1

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108产量及其构成因素

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield (t/hm2)		 穗数（穗/m2）
Panicle (panicle/m2)		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 总颖花量
Total spikelets (×103/m2)		 结实率
Filled grain percentage (%)		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
N0 6.26c 233c 116c 26.9c 83.7a 27.2a
N180 9.16b 288b 150b 43.2b 80.4b 27.5a
N360 10.40a 316a 158a 47.5a 78.7c 27.2a

表2

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108的吸氮量及氮肥利用率

处理
Treatment		 总吸氮量
Total N uptake (kg/hm2)		 氮肥农学利用率
AEN (kg/kg)		 氮肥偏生产力
PFPN (kg/kg)		 氮素产谷利用率
IEN (kg/kg)		 氮素收获指数
HIN (%)
N0 95.7c – – 65.5a 66.9a
N180 164.0b 15.6a 50.4a 55.4b 60.6b
N360 197.0a 11.2b 28.6b 52.6c 55.1c

表3

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108的蛋白质、直链淀粉含量和胶稠度

处理
Treatment		 蛋白质含量
Protein content
(%)		 直链淀粉含量
Amylose content
(%)		 胶稠度
Gel consistency
(mm)
N0 7.44c 15.8a 78.9b
N180 9.84b 14.6b 83.6a
N360 10.60a 13.8b 79.8b

表4

不同施氮量下南粳9108籽粒淀粉RVA谱特征值

处理
Treatment		 峰值黏度
Peak viscosity (cP)		 热浆黏度
Hot paste viscosity (cP)		 崩解值
Breakdown viscosity (cP)		 消减值
Setback viscosity (cP)		 峰值时间
Peak time (min)		 糊化温度
Pasing temperature (℃)
N0 2620b 1587b 1033b 171b 5.93a 72.25c
N180 2711a 1597a 1114a 153c 5.93a 75.65a
N360 2568c 1539c 1029b 178a 5.93a 75.45b

表5

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108淀粉的结晶度与傅里叶变换红外光谱（IR）值

处理
Treatment		 结晶度
Crystallinity (%)		 傅里叶变换红外光谱值IR value
1045/1022cm-1 1022/995cm-1
N0 23.5a 0.558b 1.21b
N180 23.1b 0.519c 1.29a
N360 23.8a 0.586a 1.15c

表6

不同施氮量下南粳9108淀粉热力学特征值

处理
Treatment		 起始温度
Onset
temperature (℃)		 峰值温度
Peak
temperature (℃)		 终止温度
Conclusion
temperature (℃)		 糊化焓
Enthalpy of
gelatinization (J/g)		 回生焓
Enthalpy of
regenerative(J/g)		 回生度
Degree of
regeneration (%)
N0 66.6a 62.2b 74.9ab 8.24b 2.56b 0.314b
N180 66.8a 62.7a 75.6a 7.49c 2.71a 0.339a
N360 66.9a 60.9c 74.3b 8.78a 2.51c 0.285c

表7

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108淀粉的溶解度和膨胀度

处理
Treatment		 溶解度
Solubility (%)		 膨胀度
Swelling degree (g/g)
N0 19.5b 21.4b
N180 20.2a 22.6a
N360 16.3c 19.7c

表8

不同施氮量条件下南粳9108支淀粉不同链长分布比例

处理
Treatment		 A链
A chain		 B1链
B1 chain		 B2链
B2 chain		 B3链
B3 chain		 A+B1链
A+B1 chain		 B2+B3链
B2+B3 chain
N0 30.1b 46.8b 9.62b 13.3a 77.0a 22.9b
N180 31.4a 47.2a 9.54b 13.1a 77.4a 22.6b
N360 28.9c 46.3b 10.10a 13.4a 75.3b 23.4a

表9

南粳9108籽粒淀粉晶体稳定性与其理化性质的相关性分析

指标
Index		 崩解值
Breakdown viscosity		 消减值
Setback viscosity		 糊化焓
Enthalpy of gelatinization		 糊化温度
Pasing temperature		 溶解度
Solubility		 膨胀度
Swelling degree
结晶度Crystallinity -0.882* 0.872* 0.973** 0.993** -0.984** -0.993**
1045/1022cm-1 -0.842* 0.788 0.979** 0.969** -0.959** -0.989**
1022/995cm-1 0.826* -0.935** -0.968** -0.925** 0.683 0.923**

表10

南粳9108籽粒支链淀粉脱分支链长分布与淀粉理化性质的相关性分析

指标
Index		 结晶度
Crystallinity		 1045/1022cm-1 1022/995cm-1 崩解值
Breakdown
viscosity		 消减值
Setback
viscosity		 糊化焓
Enthalpy of
gelatinization		 糊化温度
Pasing
temperature		 溶解度
Solubility		 膨胀度
Swelling
degree
A链含量A-chain content -0.923** -0.863* 0.798* 0.917* -0.847* -0.995** -0.974** 0.980** 0.991**
B1链含量B1- chain content -0.976** -0.969** 0.944** 0.932* -0.815* -0.994** -0.976** 0.948** 0.979**
B2链含量B2- chain content 0.976** 0.936** -0.856* -0.989** 0.685 0.963** 0.964** -0.986** -0.994**
B3链含量 B3-chain content 0.936** 0.943** -0.923** -0.815* 0.703 0.962** 0.946** -0.806* -0.858*
[1] Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Production Science, 2009, 12(1):3-8.
doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3
[2] 张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(7):1273-1289.
[3] Peng S B, Khush G S, Virk P. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research, 2008, 108(1):32-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.04.001
[4] Zhu K Y, Zhou Q, Shen Y, et al. Agronomic and physiological performance of an indica-japonica rice variety with a high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency. Crop Science, 2020, 60(3):1556-1568.
doi: 10.1002/csc2.v60.3
[5] Cheng S H, Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, et al. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice:a super-domesticate in China. Annals of Botany, 2007, 100(5):959-966.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm121
[6] 张超普, 余四斌, 张启发. 绿色超级稻新品种选育研究进展. 生命科学, 2018, 30(10):1083-1089.
[7] Zhu D W, Zhang H C, Guo B W, et al. Effects of nitrogen level on yield and quality of japonica soft super rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(5):42-51.
[8] Wang F, Peng S B. Yield potential and nitrogen use efficiency of China’s super rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(5):1000-1008.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61561-7
[9] 赵春芳, 岳红亮, 黄双杰, 等. 南粳系列水稻品种的食味品质与稻米理化特性. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5):909-920.
[10] Chen H, Li Q P, Zeng Y L, et al. Effect of different shading materials on grain yield and quality of rice. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):8129-8133.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44634-0
[11] 刘秋员, 周磊, 田晋钰, 等. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻产量、品质及氮素吸收性状的相互关系分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5):904-914.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02050
[12] 朱正斌, 杨勇, 冯琳皓, 等. 太湖地区地方特色糯稻品种鸭血糯和苏御糯稻米理化特性研究. 作物杂志, 2020(4):91-98.
[13] Zhang C Q, Chen S J, Ren X Y, et al. Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of starches from rice with different amylose contents resulting from modification of OsGBSSI activity. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(10):2222-2232.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05448
[14] 杨静, 刘彦伶, 吴良欢, 等. 传统水作及覆膜旱作下包膜控释尿素对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(3):368-372.
[15] 王艳, 崔晶, 王小波, 等. 施肥对中日水稻品系土壤养分及食味品质的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2):286-289.
[16] 贺晓鹏, 朱昌兰, 刘玲珑, 等. 不同水稻品种支链淀粉结构的差异及其与淀粉理化特性的关系. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2):276-284.
[17] Chung H J, Liu Q, Lee L, et al. Relationship between the structure,physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of rice starches with different amylose contents. Food Hydrocolloids, 2011, 25(5):968-975.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.09.011
[18] Gu J F, Chen J, Chen L, et al. Grain quality changes and responses to nitrogen fertilizer of japonica rice cultivars released in the Yangtze River Basin from the 1950s to 2000s. The Crop Journal, 2015, 3(4):285-297.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.007
[19] Syahariza Z A, Li E P, Hasjim J. Extraction and dissolution of starch from rice and sorghum grains for accurate structural analysis. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2010, 82(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.014
[20] Tran T T B, Shelat K J, Tang D, et al. Milling of rice grains. The degradation on three structural levels of starch in rice flour can be independently controlled during grinding. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(8):3964-3973.
doi: 10.1021/jf105021r
[21] Li H Y, Fitzgerald M A, Prakash S, et al. The molecular structural features controlling stickiness in cooked rice,a major palatability determinant. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:43713.
doi: 10.1038/srep43713
[22] Zhang H, Jing W J, Xu J J, et al. Changes in starch quality of mid-season indica rice varieties in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River in last 80 years. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(12):2983-2996.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63431-1
[23] Hermans P H, Weidinger A. Quantitative X-ray investigations on the crystallinity of cellulose fibers. A background analysis. Journal of Applied Physics, 1948, 19(5):491-506.
doi: 10.1063/1.1698162
[24] Wu A C, Li E P, Gilbert R G. Exploring extraction/dissolution procedures for analysis of starch chain-length distributions. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014, 114:36-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.001
[25] 陈丽, 马静, 亢玲, 等. 杂草稻稻米RVA谱特征值与外观品质及蒸煮食味品质性状的相关性分析. 宁夏农林科技, 2020, 61(6):1-4.
[26] Xue Y G, Duan H, Liu L J, et al. An improved crop management increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in rice. Crop Science, 2013, 53(1):271-284.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.06.0360
[27] 付鹏浩. 氮肥运筹对大穗型水稻颖花分化、籽粒灌浆和产量的影响及机理. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2020.
[28] 陈建珍. 大穗型水稻品种的物质生产、灌浆及结实稳定性研究. 荆州:长江大学, 2016.
[29] 白羽. 施氮水平对大穗型水稻品种籽粒灌浆结实的影响及其机制. 南京:南京农业大学, 2012.
[30] 帅鹏. 不同氮肥水平下超级杂交稻与普通杂交稻农艺表现的比较研究. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2019.
[31] 付景, 王志琴, 袁莉民, 等. 施氮量对超级稻产量和一些生理性状的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4):391-400.
[32] 熊飞, 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 等. 施氮时期对扬稻6号颖果发育及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 6(13):637-642.
[33] 陈培峰, 董明辉, 顾俊荣, 等. 麦秸还田与氮肥运筹对超级稻强弱势粒粒重与品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6):715-722.
[34] 许仁良, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 等. 施氮量对水稻不同品种类型稻米品质的影响. 扬州大学学报, 2005(1):66-68.
[35] 李运祥, 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 等. 施氮处理对稻米淀粉积累的影响. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2003(3):68-71.
[36] 刘立军, 李鸿伟, 赵步洪, 等. 结实期干湿交替处理对稻米品质的影响及其生理机制. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1):77-84.
[37] 范名宇, 王晓菁, 王旭虹, 等. 稻米支链淀粉结构的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(2):124-132.
[38] Champagne E T, Bett-Garber K L, Thompson J, et al. Effects of drain and harvest dates on rice sensory and physicochemical properties. Cereal Chemistry, 2005, 82(4):369-374.
doi: 10.1094/CC-82-0369
[39] Li H Y, Gilbert R G. Starch molecular structure:The basis for an improved understanding of cooked rice texture. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2018, 195:9-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.065
[40] 彭小松, 朱昌兰, 王方, 等. 籼粳杂种后代支链淀粉结构及其与稻米糊化特性相关性分析. 核农学报, 2014, 28(7):1219-1225.
[41] María B A, Amaury T R, Antonio L G, et al. Quick cooking rice by high hydrostatic pressure processing. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2013, 51(1):196-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.021
[42] 王丹英, 徐春梅, 褚光, 等. 水稻高产与优质栽培的冲突与协调. 中国稻米, 2021, 4(4):1-5.
[43] 闫湘. 我国化肥利用现状与养分资源高效利用研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2008.
[44] 刘郁, 于亚辉, 桑海旭, 等. 滨海稻区中日水稻品质食味比较分析. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(3):53-56.
[45] 包劲松. 稻米淀粉品质遗传与改良研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2007, 5(6):1-20.
[46] 剧成欣, 陈尧杰, 赵步洪, 等. 实地氮肥管理对不同氮响应粳稻品种产量和品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3):237-246.
[47] 刘立军, 吴长付, 张耗, 等. 实地氮肥管理对稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 4(6):625-630.
[48] 杨建昌, 袁莉民, 唐成, 等. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对稻米品质及籽粒中一些酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2005, 4(8):1052-1057.
[49] Zhang H, Hou D P, Peng X L, et al. Optimizing integrative cultivation management improves grain quality while increasing yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Journal of integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(12):2716-2731.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62836-4
[50] 徐国伟. 种植方式、秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理的研究. 扬州:扬州大学, 2007.
[51] 郝建华. 麦秸还田对水稻产量和品质形成及土壤特性的影响. 南京:南京农业大学, 2009.
[52] 剧成欣. 不同水稻品种对氮素响应的差异及其农艺生理性状. 扬州:扬州大学, 2017.
[53] 梁健, 吕修涛, 冯宇鹏, 等. 我国超级稻发展现状及建议. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(3):1-4.
[1] 石雄高, 裴雪霞, 党建友, 张定一. 小麦微喷（滴）灌水肥一体化高产优质高效生态栽培研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 1–10
[2] 刘梦红, 王志君, 李红宇, 赵海成, 吕艳东. 施肥方式和施氮量对寒地水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 102–109
[3] 何宇轩, 李雅娟, 周明卓, 眭锋, 吕伟生, 张俊, 曾勇军, 黄山. 秸秆全量还田下施用过氧化钙对南方双季稻产量和稻田温室气体排放的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 116–123
[4] 崔士友, 张洋, 翟彩娇, 董士琦, 张蛟, 陈澎军, 韩继军, 戴其根. 复垦滩涂微咸水灌溉下粳稻产量和品质的表现[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 137–141
[5] 刘子刚, 卢海博, 武敏桦, 赵海超, 魏东, 黄智鸿. 化控剂玉黄金对春玉米抗倒伏性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 142–146
[6] 靳丹, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 王诗雅. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸对绿豆碳代谢及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 147–153
[7] 谢慧敏, 吴可, 刘文奇, 韦国良, 陆献, 李壮林, 韦善清, 梁和, 江立庚. 海藻肥与微生物菌剂部分替代化肥对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 161–166
[8] 柏军兵, 王艳杰, 王德梅, 杨玉双, 王玉娇, 郭丹丹, 刘哲文, 常旭虹, 石书兵, 赵广才. 强筋小麦产量和品质对不同土壤条件及施氮水平的响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 167–173
[9] 杜昕, 李博, 毛鲁枭, 陈伟, 张玉先, 曹亮. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下大豆产量及AsA-GSH循环的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 174–178
[10] 王庆彬, 卢洁春, 彭春娥, 孟慧, 刘治国, 王洪凤, 张民. 不同氮量处理配施宛氏拟青霉提取物对小白菜生长和氮素吸收的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 190–195
[11] 杨志楠, 黄金文, 韩凡香, 李亚伟, 马建涛, 柴守玺, 程宏波, 杨德龙, 常磊. 秸秆带状覆盖对西北雨养区马铃薯农田土壤温度及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 196–204
[12] 冯素芬, 刘元剑, 许蕊淇, 张薇. 云南省近年审定鲜食玉米品种的主要性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 220–226
[13] 张胜全, 叶志杰, 任立平, 高新欢, 王拯, 杨永利, 穆磊, 董艳华, 陈兆波. “十五”以来我国杂交小麦审定品种分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 38–43
[14] 宋全昊, 金艳, 宋佳静, 白冬, 赵立尚, 陈杰, 朱统泉. 人工合成六倍体小麦在黄淮麦区育种中的利用性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 56–64
[15] 唐刚, 廖萍, 眭锋, 吕伟生, 张俊, 曾勇军, 黄山. 秸秆全量还田下晚稻季翻耕对双季稻田温室气体排放和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (6): 101–107
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!