作物杂志,2023, 第2期: 145–150 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.02.021

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

氮肥减施下添加硝化抑制剂对夏玉米植株及土壤氮素积累分配及产量的影响

张盼盼(), 李川, 张美微, 赵霞, 黄璐, 刘京宝, 乔江方()   

  1. 河南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所,450002,河南郑州
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-29 修回日期:2022-09-26 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 乔江方,主要从事玉米籽粒脱水研究,E-mail:qiaojf@126.com
  • 作者简介:张盼盼,主要从事玉米氮素营养管理研究,E-mail:zhangpan1602@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省自然科学基金青年科学基金(202300410526);河南省农业科学院基本科研业务费项目(2021ZC12)

Effects of Nitrification Inhibitor on the Nitrogen Concentration and Yield in Summer Maize Plants and Soil under Reduced Nitrogen Application

Zhang Panpan(), Li Chuan, Zhang Meiwei, Zhao Xia, Huang Lu, Liu Jingbao, Qiao Jiangfang()   

  1. Cereal Crops Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2021-09-29 Revised:2022-09-26 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-04-11

摘要:

大田条件下设置常规施氮量(T1)、氮肥减施10%+硝化抑制剂2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶(T2)、氮肥减施10%(T3)、氮肥减施20%+硝化抑制剂(T4)、氮肥减施20%(T5)、氮肥减施30%+硝化抑制剂(T6)和氮肥减施30%(T7)共7个处理,研究不同处理对土壤有效氮含量、夏玉米植株干物质量和氮素积累分配、籽粒产量及其构成因素的影响。结果表明,成熟期T1和T4处理干物质积累量最高,T7处理籽粒重占比最高,为55.98%。吐丝后氮素积累量以T2处理最高,成熟期籽粒氮素积累占比在T6和T7处理达到最大。施肥后,前期土壤铵态氮含量以T4处理最高,硝态氮和Nmin含量以T1处理最高,后期T4处理下3个指标含量均表现出明显优势。籽粒产量平均为11.46t/hm2,T1和T4处理最高,平均为11.87t/hm2。氮肥减施20%下配施硝化抑制剂2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶能够降低农业生态系统氮肥投入,提高土壤有效氮含量和保持玉米生产,达到高产高效。

关键词: 夏玉米, 硝化抑制剂, 氮肥减施, 氮素含量

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted with seven treatments including normal nitrogen (N) rate (T1), N reduced by 10%+nitrification inhibitor, 2-chloro-6-trichloromethylpyridine (T2), N reduced by 10% (T3), N reduced by 20%+nitrification inhibitor (T4), N reduced by 20% (T5), N reduced by 30%+nitrification inhibitor (T6) and N reduced by 30% (T7), to investigate the effects of different treatments on the soil nitrogen concentration, accumulation and distribution of dry matter and nitrogen, and grain yield and its components. The results indicated that, in maturity stage, the highest dry matter accumulations were obtained in the T1 and T4 treatments. T7 treatment had the highest grain proportion by 55.98%. After silking stage, the highest N accumulation was obtained in T2 treatment. The highest grain distributions in the plants were found in T6 and T7 treatments. After fertilizer application, soil NH4+-N concentration was the highest in T4 treatment, NO3--N and Nmin concentrations were the highest in T1 treatment at early stage and the three nitrogen indexes of T4 treatment were higher at later stage. Mean grain yield was 11.46t/ha. The highest yields were obtained in T1 and T4 treatments, the average was 11.87t/ha. Thus, N reduced by 20%+nitrification inhibitor 2-chloro-6- trichloromethylpyridine could decrease the input and increase soil N concentration in the agroecological system and maintain the high-yield and high-efficiency in the maize production.

Key words: Summer maize, Nitrification inhibitor, Nitrogen fertilizer reduction, Nitrogen concentration

图1

不同处理对玉米地上部干物质积累动态的影响

图2

不同处理对成熟期玉米各器官干物质积累量及分配的影响

图3

不同处理对玉米地上部氮素积累动态的影响

图4

不同处理对成熟期玉米各器官氮素积累及分配的影响

图5

不同处理对土壤NH4+-N、NO3--N和Nmin含量的影响 AN、NN和NM分别代表土壤NH4+-N、NO3--N和Nmin含量

表1

不同处理对玉米籽粒产量及其构成因素的影响

处理
Treatment
穗行数
Row number
per ear
行粒数
Kernel number
per row
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
产量
Yield
(t/hm2)
T1 16.4a 34.9ab 363.8ab 11.96a
T2 16.4a 35.4ab 372.9a 11.63ab
T3 16.0a 35.7ab 365.6ab 11.37ab
T4 16.3a 36.9a 359.9b 11.77a
T5 16.4a 34.3b 370.4a 11.51ab
T6 16.3a 34.6b 373.8a 11.07b
T7 16.4a 34.7b 372.1a 10.93b
平均值Average 16.3 35.2 368.4 11.46
[1] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2020. [2021-09-26]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm.
[2] Liu Z, Gao J, Gao F, et al. Late harvest improves yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of summer maize. Field Crops Research, 2019, 232:88-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.014
[3] 马玉平, 孙琳丽, 马晓群. 黄淮海地区夏玉米对干旱和涝渍的生理生态反应. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(4):85-93.
[4] Milroy S P, Wang P, Sadras V O. Defining upper limits of nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of potato in response to crop N supply. Field Crops Research, 2019, 239:38-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.011
[5] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 9(5):915-924.
[6] Jumadi O, Hala Y, Iriany R N, et al. Combined effects of nitrification inhibitor and zeolite on greenhouse gas fluxes and corn growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(2):2087-2095.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06776-6
[7] Zheng W K, Wan Y S, Li Y C, et al. Developing water and nitrogen budgets of a wheat-maize rotation system using auto-weighing lysimeters:Effects of blended application of controlled-release and un-coated urea. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 263:114383.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114383
[8] Zhang L, Wu Z, Jiang Y J, et al. Fate of applied urea 15N in a soil-maize system as affected by urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor. Plant,Soil and Environment, 2010, 56(1):8-15.
doi: 10.17221/129/2009-PSE
[9] Haegele J W, Cook K A, Nichols D M, et al. Changes in nitrogen use traits associated with genetic improvement for grain yield of maize hybrids released in different decades. Crop Science, 2013, 53(4):1256-1268.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0429
[10] Liu S L, Wang X H, Yin X H, et al. Ammonia volatilization loss and corn nitrogen nutrition and productivity with efficiency enhanced uan and urea under no-tillage. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9:6610.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42912-5 pmid: 31036900
[11] 李婷玉. 增效氮肥综合效应及影响因素研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
[12] 米国华, 伍大利, 陈延玲, 等. 东北玉米化肥减施增效技术途径探讨. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14):2758-2770.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.14.013
[13] 王彬, 王玉波, 佟桐, 等. 不同施氮模式对玉米光合特性和氮代谢关键酶的影响. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(2):135-142.
[14] 林昌华, 唐群峰, 唐树梅, 等. 氮肥增效剂农用效应的研究. 热带农业科学, 2005(4):30-33,47.
[15] 姚凡云, 王立春, 多馨曲, 等. 不同氮肥对东北春玉米农田温室气体周年排放的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1303-1311.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.030
[16] 夏婷婷, 苏效坡, 肖焱波, 等. 恩泰克长效稳定性肥料对玉米生长及硝酸盐淋失的影响. 吉林农业科学, 2015, 40(3):46-49.
[17] 邓兰生, 张承林. 玉米滴灌栽培条件下尿素与氢醌、双氰胺配施方法及效果. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(3):498-503.
[18] 杨宪龙, 路永莉, 同延安, 等. 长期施氮和秸秆还田对小麦-玉米轮作体系土壤氮素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(1):65-73.
[19] 崔磊, 李东坡, 武志杰, 等. 高效稳定性硫酸铵氮肥在黑土中的施用效果. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2390-2398.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202007.022
[20] 符佩娇, 吉恒宽, 何秋香, 等. 氮肥分施次数及硝化抑制剂对盆栽玉米N2O排放的影响. 环境科学, 2021, 42(9):4538-4547.
[21] 宋以玲, 贺明荣, 张吉旺, 等. 硝化抑制剂型包膜肥料对玉米生理特性、产量、品质的影响. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2015, 29(1):6-11,80.
[22] 邓松华, 梁富忠. 含硝化抑制剂DMPP的复合肥在玉米上的应用效果研究. 现代农业科技, 2018, 730(20):15-16.
[23] 李艳勤, 刘刚, 红梅, 等. 优化施氮对河套灌区氧化亚氮排放和氨挥发的影响. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(2)::578-584.
[24] 徐玉秀, 郭李萍, 谢立勇, 等. 中国主要旱地农田N2O背景排放量及排放系数特点. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(9):1729-1743.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.09.009
[25] 郝小雨, 马星竹, 高中超, 等. 氮肥管理措施对黑土春玉米产量及氮素利用的影响. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(4):151-159.
[26] 方玉凤, 王晓燕, 庞荔丹, 等. 硝化抑制剂对春玉米氮素利用及土壤pH值和无机氮的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(6):18-22.
[27] 赵自超. 华北平原优化农作条件下作物生产和温室气体减排研究, 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017.
[28] 王玲莉, 古慧娟, 石元亮, 等. 尿素配施添加剂NAM对三江平原白浆土氮素转化和玉米产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(2):34-38.
[29] 王丹阳, 边文范, 董晓霞, 等. 氮肥增效剂用量对玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(12):53-57.
[30] 张英鹏, 李洪杰, 刘兆辉, 等. 农田减氮调控施肥对华北潮土区小麦―玉米轮作体系氮素损失的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1179-1187.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.019
[1] 张东霞, 秦安振. 冬小麦-夏玉米作物蒸散量及其水热关系研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (6): 145–151
[2] 乔江方, 张盼盼, 邵运辉, 刘京宝, 李川, 张美微, 黄璐. 不同种植密度和品种对夏玉米物质生产和产量构成的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (6): 186–192
[3] 韩丽君, 薛张逸, 谢昊, 顾骏飞. 干湿交替灌溉与硝化抑制剂对水稻产量及土壤性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 222–229
[4] 梁茜, 吴清山, 葛均筑, 吴锡冬, 杨永安, 侯海鹏, 张垚, 马志琪. 播期对华北平原雨养夏玉米产量形成与资源利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (4): 136–143
[5] 陈杨,秦永林,于静,贾立国,樊明寿. 内蒙古灌溉马铃薯氮肥减施依据及措施[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (6): 90–93
[6] 董智强,王萌萌,李鸿怡,薛晓萍,潘志华,侯英雨,陈辰,李楠,李曼华. WOFOST模型对山东省夏玉米发育期与产量模拟的适用性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (5): 159–165
[7] 梁茜,刘文亚,葛均筑,赵明,侯海鹏,杨永安,辛德财. 条带深旋小双行精播技术对夏玉米产量调控效应研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (1): 111–115
[8] 张韶昀,李向岭,刘盼,张悦,翟大帅,尹宝重. 土壤耕作与施肥配合对玉米根系微观结构及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (6): 144–148
[9] 吴荣华,庄克章,刘鹏,张春艳. 鲁南地区夏玉米产量对气象因子的响应[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 104–109
[10] 陈瑛瑛,王徐艺凌,朱宇涵,武威,刘涛,孙成明. 水稻穗部氮素含量高光谱估测研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 116–120
[11] 卢霖, 董志强, 董学瑞, 等. 乙矮合剂对不同密度夏玉米茎秆抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (2): 70–77
[12] 冯贺奎, 藏俊岭, 万保恒, 等. 平舆县2013年持续高温干旱对夏玉米生产的影响及对策[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (2): 127–131
[13] 刘梦星, 刘建凤, 丁民伟, 等. 不同矿质元素配施对旱薄区夏玉米长势、光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2013, (5): 133–137
[14] 刘林杰, 高晶. 小麦玉米两熟区夏玉米适宜收获期研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2011, (5): 112–113
[15] 刘克, 张敏洁, 秦欣, 等. 不同水分处理对当季冬小麦及后茬夏玉米生长与产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2010, (5): 70–73
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!