Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 55-60.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.05.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification of Morinda officinalis and Its Three Close Plant Species Based on ITS2 and psbA-trnH

Wei Ying1,Zhan Ruoting2,Liang Hongling1,Wang Haohan1,Huang Haibo1   

  1. 1School of Chinese Meteria Medica,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong,China
    2Research Center of Chinese Herbal Resource Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2017-06-05 Revised:2017-08-08 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Haibo Huang

Abstract:

To identify Morinda officinalis and its three close related plant species based on ITS2 and psbA-trnH, the ITS2 and psbA-trnH of Morinda officinalis and its three close related plant species were amplified by PCR and sequenced. Genetic distance analysis, DNA Barcoding Gap and NJ tree were used to identify the above species. The results showed that the length of ITS2 was 237bp, the GC content was 70.3%, the conserved rate was 86.08%, and the mutation rate was 13.92%. The interspecific variation based on ITS2 was greater than the intraspecific variation, and there was significant DNA Barcoding Gap. The NJ tree based on ITS2 can accurately identify all the experimental species. The length of psbA-trnH was 290bp, the GC content was 20.2%, the conserved rate was 53.10%, and the mutation rate was 46.55%. The interspecies variation based on psbA-trnHwas greater than the intraspecies variation, and there was no obvious DNA Barcoding Gap. PsbA-trnH can only accurately identify two species. The species identification ability of ITS2 is better than psbA-trnH, which can accurately identify Morinda officinalis and its three closely related plants. In conclusion, based on the ITS2 and psbA-trnH sequences, Morinda officinalis and its three closely related plants can be successfully identified.

Key words: Morinda officinalis How, Morinda umbellata L. subsp. obovata Y. Z. Ruan, Morinda hainanensis Merr. et How, Morinda citrifolia L., DNA barcode, Molecular identification, DNA Barcoding Gap, Phylogenetic tree

Table 1

Experimental sample information"

编号
Serial number
植物名
Species name
采集地点
Collecting locations
采集日期(年/月/日)
Collecting date
凭证标本号
Voucher number
B1

巴戟天
M. officinalis
海南省琼海市会山镇
N:19°3′32.11″
E:110°14′55.03″
2016/8/31

HS201608311

B2

巴戟天
M. officinalis
福建省漳州市南靖县和溪镇林中村
N:24°53′53.16″
E:117°13′21.15″
2015/11/29

HX201511292

B3

巴戟天
M. officinalis
福建省漳州市南靖县和溪镇月明村
N:24°57′26.81″
E:117°15′46.77″
2015/11/29

HX201511293

B4

巴戟天
M. officinalis
福建省漳州市南靖县和溪镇林坂村
N:24°53′4.80″
E:117°14′0.59″
2015/11/29

HX201511294

B5

巴戟天
M. officinalis
福建省漳州市南靖县和溪镇迎新村
N:24°54′14.05″
E:117°17′39.63″
2015/11/29

HX201511295

B6

巴戟天
M. officinalis
广东省云浮市罗定市附城街道康任村
N:22°50′24.49″
E:111°32′38.48″
2015/1/30

LD20150130

HB1

海滨木巴戟
M. citrifolia
海南万宁兴隆热带植物所
N:18°43′56.39″
E:110°11′46.09″
2016/8/29

WN2016082913

HB2

海滨木巴戟
M. citrifolia
海南万宁兴隆热带植物所
N:18°44′0.96″
E:110°11′39.56″
2016/8/30

WN2016083015

HB3

海滨木巴戟
M. citrifolia
海南万宁兴隆热带植物所
N:18°44′2.42″
E:110°11′39.50″
2016/8/29

WN2016082911

HB4

海滨木巴戟
M. citrifolia
海南万宁兴隆热带植物所
N:18°44′1.40″
E:110°11′39.91″
2016/8/29

WN2016082916

HN1

海南巴戟
M. hainanensis
海南省乐东县尖峰镇
N:18°44′51.89″
E:108°52′34.56″
2016/8/30

JF2016083025

HN2

海南巴戟
M. hainanensis
海南省乐东县尖峰镇
N:19°3′34.89″
E:110°14′56.46″
2016/8/31

JF2016083121

HN3

海南巴戟
M. hainanensis
海南省乐东县尖峰镇
N:18°44′45.20″
E:108°52′6.57″
2016/8/30

JF2016083023

Y1

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
广东省梅州市平远县仁居镇
N:24°48′40.22″
E:115°53′21.93″
2016/7/16

RJ201607162

Y2

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
福建省龙岩市长汀县汀州镇
N:25°50′7.09″
E:116°21′28.28″
2016/2/8

TZ201602082

Y3

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
广东省梅州市平远县上举镇相思谷
N:24°47′53.84″
E:115°56′54.88″
2016/1/24

SJ201601241

Y4

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
广东省梅州市平远县石正镇南台山
N:24°32′25.84″
E:115°50′21.24″
2016/1/23

SZ201601231

Y5

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
广东省广州市番禺区大学城广州中医药大学
N:23°3′36.93″
E:113°23′46.32″
2016/4/20

PY201604202

Y6

羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
福建省龙岩市长汀县汀州镇
N:25°50′7.09″
E:116°21′28.28″
2016/2/8

TZ201602083

Table 2

Primer sequence information"

条形码片段
Bar code fragment
引物名称
Primer name
碱基序列
Base sequence
ITS2 ITS2F 5'-ATGCGATACTTGGTGTGAAT-3'
ITS3R 5'-GACGCTTCTCCAGACTACAAT-3'
psbA-trnH Fwd 5'-GTTATGCATGAACGTAATGCTC-3'
Rev 5'-CGCGCATGGTGGATTCACAATCC-3'

Table 3

Sequence information"

ITS2 psbA-trnH
序列数Sequence No. 19 19
序列长度Sequence length (bp) 237 290
GC含量GC content (%) 70.3 20.2
保守率Conservative rate (%) 86.08 53.10
变异率Variation rate (%) 13.92 46.55
简约信息率Simple information rate (%) 13.08 46.55
单碱基突变率(%)
Single base variation rate
0.84
0
平均种内序列分歧度
Mean diversity of intraspecific sequence
0.001
0.000
平均种间序列分歧度
Mean diversity of interspecific sequence
0.063
0.279
总序列分歧度
Total diversity of sequence
0.065
0.279
遗传变异系数
Genetic coefficient of variation
0.982
1.000

Table 4

Intraspecific and interspecific genetic distance ITS2, psbA-trnH"

物种名
Species Name
巴戟天
M. officinalis
羊角藤
M. umbellatasubsp.obovata
海南巴戟
M. hainanensis
海滨木巴戟
M. citrifolia
巴戟天M. officinalis 0,0
羊角藤M. umbellata subsp. obovata 0.041,0.004 0.005,0
海南巴戟M. hainanensis 0.038,0 0.046,0.004 0,0
海滨木巴戟M. citrifolia 0.127,0.797 0.134,0.787 0.144,0.797 0,0

Fig.1

DNA Barconding Gap"

Fig.2

The NJ tree of Morinda officinalis and its three closely related plants based on the ITS2 sequence"

Fig.3

The NJ tree of Morinda officinalis and its three closely related plants based on the psbA-trnH sequence"

[1] 陈伟球 . 中国植物志.第71(2)卷.北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 179.
[2] 吴岩斌, 吴锦忠, 张巧艳 , 等. 巴戟天属植物化学成分及生物活性研究新进展.解放军药学学报, 2009(1):64-67.
[3] 国家药典委员会. 《中华人民共和国药典》一部.北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2015: 81-82.
[4] 丁平, 方琴 . 巴戟天与常见混伪品的rDNA-ITS序列分析及其分子鉴定.中草药, 2005(6):908-911.
[5] 黄琼林, 郑夏生, 蔡春 . 基于ITS2条形码的南药巴戟天真伪鉴别.热带作物学报, 2014(8):1571-1576.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2014.08.021
[6] 姬生国, 王东, 张春荣 , 等. 巴戟天及其伪品的psbA-trnH序列鉴定.广东药学院学报, 2011(3):253-255.
[7] 陈士林 . 中药DNA条形码分子鉴定.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 14-15.
[8] Chen T, Taylor C M. Flora of China. Vol. 19.北京:科学出版社,美国: 密苏里植物园出版社, 2011: 220-230.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .