Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 143-148.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.04.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province

Shang Na,Yang Zhongxu,Li Qiuzhi,Yin Huihui,Wang Shihong,Li Haitao,Li Tong,Zhang Han   

  1. Liaocheng Research Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-10-20 Revised:2018-05-10 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-23

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

122

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effect of plant density on yield and fiber quality of cotton with vegetative branches with conventional cotton Liaomian 6, field experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016 at Liaocheng experimental station, Shandong Province. The results indicated that: 1) The leaf area index increased with the increase of density, and high density (90 000 plants/hm 2) could cause serious concealment in the field. 2) The yield of low density (30 000 plants/hm 2) was the highest among the desity from 30 000 to 90 000 plants/hm 2, and the contribution rate of vegetative branches to cotton yield decreased with the increase of density. 3) The weight of the boll and the micronaire value decreased significantly with the increase of density. Nevertheless, there was no significant differences in lint percentage and other fiber quality indexes. It was concluded that 30 000 plants/hm 2 was appropriate for the cultivation of cotton with vegetative branches in the Western of Shandong Province, but it was necessary to avoid excessive vegetative growth in rainy year.

Key words: Liaomian 6, Maintenance of vegetative branches, Plant density, Yield, Fiber quality, Dry matter accumulation

Table 1

Monthly mean temperature, precipitation and sun shine during experiment period"

时间Time 降水量Precipitation (mm) 气温Temperature (℃) 日照Sun shine (h)
2015 2016 常年Perennial 2015 2016 常年Perennial 2015 2016 常年Perennial
4月上Early April 34.0 0.0 3.9 8.4 14.8 12.9 31.9 - 78.5
4月中Mid April 18.5 7.6 14.4 13.7 15.9 14.7 70.1 - 82.7
4月下Late April 2.3 0.0 10.4 19.0 18.4 16.7 68.8 - 81.5
5月上Early May 37.1 19.9 20.1 17.4 18.6 18.7 35.6 65.4 81.3
5月中Mid May 9.0 13.5 18.4 20.2 18.3 19.7 80.3 84.4 83.7
5月下Late May 0.1 1.2 16.3 21.8 20.5 22.1 97.6 61.4 93.1
6月上Early June 0.0 4.9 15.1 25.7 22.8 24.0 88.6 59.7 81.8
6月中Mid June 0.7 85.0 16.6 25.5 26.2 25.8 98.6 97.0 79.0
6月下Late June 49.6 60.9 36.2 24.0 26.4 26.3 45.6 87.9 75.8
7月上Early July 1.3 1.0 54.7 26.5 26.3 26.8 67.1 45.3 69.4
7月中Mid July 31.0 152.9 50.7 26.6 25.3 26.7 32.4 20.8 63.0
7月下Late July 26.5 23.7 52.5 27.6 28.9 27.1 76.2 75.2 69.1
8月上Early August 69.1 48.1 47.0 26.5 26.5 26.8 62.6 22.8 66.8
8月中Mid August 25.9 71.5 40.0 25.6 26.6 25.5 83.8 35.2 67.4
8月下Late August 25.9 27.3 34.5 22.9 23.5 24.2 83.1 106.8 71.8
9月上Early September 8.4 5.6 22.6 21.7 23.0 23.9 54.8 78.7 66.2
9月中Mid September 3.4 0.0 20.2 19.2 21.6 20.8 89.2 81.6 68.9
9月下Late September 0.0 13.0 12.3 20.7 20.0 18.9 54.9 58.2 67.2
10月上Early October 6.4 7.2 10.8 16.9 18.4 17.0 77.1 63.3 62.4
10月中Mid October 0.0 9.1 16.0 16.4 16.5 14.8 73.0 47.0 61.7
10月下Late October 0.5 18.3 6.2 11.4 10.9 12.4 42.8 27.8 70.2

Fig.1

Effects of different density on LAI of cotton with vegetative branches（2015） Different lowercase letters represent significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)"

Fig.2

Effects of different density on LAI of cotton with vegetative branches（2016）"

Fig.3

Effects of different density on The leaf area ratio of vegetative branches (LARVB) of cotton with vegetative branches(2015)"

Fig.4

Effects of different density on The leaf area ratio of vegetative branches (LARVB) of cotton with vegetative branches(2016)"

Fig.5

Effects of different density on dry mass accumulation (DMA), cotton boll dry mass ratio (CBDMR) and vegetative branches boll dry mass ratio (VBBDMR) of cotton with vegetative branches (2016)"

Table 2

Effects of different density on unginned cotton yield and contribution rate of fruit branches, vegetative branches to total yield of cotton with vegetative branches"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 子棉产量
(kg/hm2)
Unginned
cotton yield		 子棉产量贡献率(%)
Yield contribution rate
of unginned cotton
果枝
Fruit branch		 叶枝
Vegetative branch
2015 PD3.0 10 736.0a 75.26b 24.74a
PD6.0 10 255.0b 83.44a 16.56b
PD9.0 9 535.3c 88.12a 11.88b
2016 PD3.0 7 185.1a 81.16c 18.84a
PD6.0 6 864.9b 87.84b 12.16b
PD9.0 6 536.0b 93.59a 6.41c

Table 3

Effects of different density on boll numbers,boll weight and lint percentage of cotton with vegetative branches"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 铃数Bolls (number/m2) 铃重Boll weight (g) 棉衣分Lint percentage (%)
整株
Whole
plant		 果枝
Fruit
branch		 叶枝
Vegetative
branch		 整株
Whole
plant		 果枝
Fruit
branch		 叶枝
Vegetative
branch		 整株
Whole
plant		 果枝
Fruit
branch		 叶枝
Vegetative
branch
2015 PD3.0 106.1a 79.2b 26.9a 7.57a 7.80a 6.93a 45.5a 45.5a 45.4a
PD6.0 102.5ab 83.9ab 18.6ab 7.03ab 7.17ab 6.37ab 44.8a 45.7a 44.6a
PD9.0 98.4b 85.1a 13.3b 6.80b 6.90b 6.07b 45.6a 45.7a 45.5a
2016 PD3.0 86.4a 69.7b 16.7a 6.37a 6.57a 5.40a 42.2a 42.3a 42.1a
PD6.0 84.2ab 72.9ab 11.3ab 5.83ab 5.87b 5.11a 43.3a 43.4a 42.5a
PD9.0 80.8b 73.9a 6.9b 5.80b 5.83b 4.63b 42.4a 42.4a 41.8a

Table 4

Effects of different density on fiber quality of cotton with vegetative branches"

年份
Year		 部位Position 处理
Treatment		 上半部平均长度
UHML (mm)		 整齐度指数
UNI (%)		 断裂比强度
STR (cN/tex)		 马克隆值
MIC		 伸长率
ELG (%)
2015 叶枝Vegetative branch PD3.0 29.90a 82.97a 29.23a 5.12a 6.77a
PD6.0 29.33a 82.30a 30.00a 4.93ab 6.73a
PD9.0 29.40a 81.10a 28.93a 4.90b 6.70a
果枝Fruit branch PD3.0 29.97a 82.80a 31.73a 5.37a 6.87a
PD6.0 30.20a 84.03a 31.00a 5.23ab 6.83a
PD9.0 29.83a 82.27a 31.37a 5.13b 6.83a
2016 叶枝Vegetative branch PD3.0 29.50a 84.27a 25.80a 4.60a 6.07a
PD6.0 29.50a 85.10a 25.60a 4.33b 5.90a
PD9.0 29.43a 83.77a 25.57a 3.87c 6.20a
果枝Fruit branch PD3.0 29.87a 86.10a 28.00a 4.97a 5.80a
PD6.0 29.17a 85.40a 27.27a 4.93a 6.33a
PD9.0 29.70a 84.83a 27.37a 4.63b 6.00a
[1] Bednarz C W, Bridges D C, Brown S M . Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities. Agronomy Journal, 2000,92(1):128-135.
doi: 10.1007/s100870050015
[2] Davidonis G H, Johnson A S, Landivar J A , et al. Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location and planting date. Agronomy Journal, 2004,96(1):42-47.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0042
[3] 董合忠, 李维江, 李振怀 , 等. 棉花营养枝的利用研究. 棉花学报, 2003,15(5):313-317.
[4] 戴敬, 郑伟, 杨举善 . 棉花叶枝的生长及利用研究进展. 中国棉花, 2003,30(6):2-5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2003.06.001
[5] 董合忠, 李振怀, 李维江 , 等. 抗虫棉保留利用营养枝的效应和技术研究. 山东农业科学, 2003(3):6-10.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2003.03.002
[6] 申贵芳, 王景会, 王宗文 , 等. 不同生态区抗虫杂交棉稀植留叶枝效应研究. 山东农业科学, 2008(5):34-37.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2008.05.009
[7] 董合忠, 牛曰华, 李维江 , 等. 不同整枝方式对棉花源库关系的调节效应. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(4):819-824.
[8] 徐立华, 何循宏, 李国锋 , 等. 留叶枝棉花的成铃规律. 江苏农业学报, 2002,18(1):37-41.
[9] 李维江, 董合忠, 李振怀 , 等. 棉花简化栽培技术在山东的效应研究. 中国棉花, 2000,27(9):14-15.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2000.09.006
[10] 孙学振, 施培, 单世华 , 等. 留营养枝棉花群体干物质积累分配规律研究. 华北农学报, 2000,15(3):77-81.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2000.03.016
[11] 董合忠, 李维江, 唐薇 , 等. 留叶枝对抗虫杂交棉库源关系的调节效应和对叶片衰老与皮棉产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(10):909-915.
[12] 徐立华, 朱永歌, 王铁书 , 等. 密度对棉花叶枝利用的调节效应. 江苏农业科学, 2000(5):26-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2000.05.007
[13] 王汉霞, 范希峰, 田晓莉 , 等. 黄河流域棉区北部留叶枝棉栽培的适宜密度研究. 棉花学报, 2010,22(5):430-436.
doi: 1002-7807(2010)05-0430-07
[14] 王国印, 李妙, 张晓 . 抗虫杂交棉种植密度与叶枝利用效应研究. 河北农业科学, 2003,7(2):1-5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2003.02.001
[15] 卢合全, 李振怀, 董合忠 , 等. 杂交棉种植密度与留叶枝对产量及其构成因素的互作效应研究. 山东农业科学, 2009(11):11-15.
[16] 钟吉萍, 李景龙 . 棉花叶枝的利用研究. 中国农学通报, 1999,15(2):18-20.
[17] 李伶俐, 马宗斌, 房卫平 , 等. 稀植留叶枝棉花的光合特性和产量品质研究. 棉花学报, 2007,19(1):8-12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7807.2007.01.002
[18] Siebert J D, Stewart A M, Leonard B R . Comparative growth and yield of cotton planted at various densities and configurations. Agronomy Journal, 2006,98(3):562-568.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0181
[19] Bednarz C W, Shurley W D, Anthony W S , et al. Yield,quality,and profitability of cotton produced at varying plant densities. Agronomy Journal, 2005,97(1):235-240.
[20] 董合忠 . 棉花重要生物学特性及其在丰产简化栽培中的应用. 中国棉花, 2013,40(9):1-4.
doi: 1000-632X(2013)09-0001-03
[21] 董合忠 . 棉花轻简化栽培的若干技术问题分析. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(4):115-117.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2013.04.035
[22] 董合忠, 杨国正, 田立文 , 等. 棉花轻简化栽培. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 202-208.
[23] 董合忠, 李振怀, 罗振 , 等. 密度和留叶枝对棉株产量的空间分布和熟相的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2010(4):792-798.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.00792
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[12] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[13] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[14] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
[15] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9" [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149 -153 .