Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 97-102.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.01.016

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat

Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou   

  1. College of Life Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China
  • Received:2018-05-21 Revised:2018-12-12 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-02-01

Abstract:

Plot yield is an important evaluation factor in wheat breeding process. The marginal advantage effect impacts on plot yield, so it is important to understand the difference of marginal advantage effects between different wheat varieties to evaluate yield performance of a wheat variety. In this study, four facultative and semi-dwarf wheat varieties with similar plant heights, i.e., Zhoumai 18, Huayu 198, Zhengyu 8, and Bainong 207, from Southern Huang-Huai Rivers Valley Winter Wheat Zone, were used in a plot trial. The yields of side-rows, middle-rows and plot were studied to determine the marginal effects and middle-row performance. The side-row yield of the four varieties were greater than that of the middle rows. Except for Zhoumai 18, the side-row yield of other three varieties were significantly greater than that of middle rows. The yields were calculated on the side-row and plot basis, respectively. The rank of all varieties based on the yield of plot and yield of side-row was Bainong 207, Zhengyu 8, Huayu 198, Zhoumai 18. The yield rank was Huayu 198, Bainong 207, Zhengyu 8, Zhoumai 18 when the yields were calculated by inner-row. The rank of different wheat varieties in the plot yield were affected by the marginal advantage effects and middle-row performance of the varieties. In the process of wheat breeding and cultivation, the marginal effect and the middle-row performance of different varieties should be fully considered.

Key words: Wheat variety, Plot experiment, Marginal advantage effect, Inner-row performance, Plot yield

Table 1

Yields of each row within a plot for different wheat varieties kg/hm2"

品种Variety 西1行First row west 西2行Second row west 中间行Middle row 东2行Second row east 东1行First row east
周麦18 Zhoumai 18 10 022.25a 7 237.05a 7 300.35a 7 054.20a 8 636.70a
华育198 Huayu 198 9 417.45a 7 736.40b 7 722.45b 7 912.35b 9 403.35a
郑育8号Zhengyu 8 9 361.05bB 7 623.90cB 7 469.25cB 7 082.40cB 13 974.90aA
百农207 Bainong 207 9 670.50bB 7 792.65bB 8 017.80bB 7 187.85bB 14 108.55aA

Table 2

Composition and difference of yield components of each row in the plots of different wheat varieties"

项目Item 品种
Variety
西1行
First row west
西2行
Second row west
中间行
Middle row
东2行
Second row east
东1行
First row east
有效穗数Effective ears (万/hm2) 周麦18 Zhoumai 18 619.95a 523.05a 519.15a 548.25a 586.20a
华育198 Huayu 198 628.50a 575.70b 569.40b 574.95b 602.40ab
郑育8号Zhengyu 8 565.20bAB 520.20bAB 502.65bAB 479.40bB 738.75aA
百农207 Bainong 207 560.25ab 493.50b 541.50ab 487.20b 686.10a
穗粒数Grains per spike 周麦18 Zhoumai 18 32.40a 27.50a 26.58a 25.36a 28.44a
华育198 Huayu 198 30.64a 27.66a 27.40a 28.38a 31.90a
郑育8号Zhengyu 8 36.81b 32.26c 33.70c 33.08c 38.83a
百农207 Bainong 207 38.94ab 35.74b 35.17b 35.30b 42.54a
千粒重1000-grain weight (g) 周麦18 Zhoumai 18 49.79a 50.39a 50.38a 50.76a 51.78a
华育198 Huayu 198 48.93a 48.58a 49.52a 48.51a 48.90a
郑育8号Zhengyu 8 44.54a 45.66a 44.10a 44.60a 48.76a
百农207 Bainong 207 44.38ab 44.16ab 44.30ab 41.87b 48.54a

Table 3

Yields of different calculation methods and the yield indexes of the marginal advantage effect"

品种Variety 全小区产量(kg/hm2)
Yield of plots
边行产量(kg/hm2)
Yield of side rows
内行产量(kg/hm2)
Yield of inner rows
边行优势指数(%)
Marginal effect index
周麦18 Zhoumai 18 7 926.15b 9 185.40b 7 086.45a 29.69bB
华育198 Huayu 198 8 309.85ab 9 266.85b 7 671.90a 20.74bB
郑育8号Zhengyu 8 8 963.10a 11 490.45a 7 278.15a 57.85aA
百农207 Bainong 207 9 208.95a 11 708.70a 7 542.45a 55.23aA

Table 4

Side-row and inner-row of yield components and indexes of marginal advantage effect in different varieties"

品种Variety 有效穗数Effective spikes (万/hm2) 穗粒数Grains per spike 千粒重1000-grain weight (g)
内行
Inner row
边行
Side row
边行优势指数(%)
Marginal effect index
内行
Inner row
边行
Side row
边行优势指数(%)
Marginal effect index
内行
Inner row
边行
Side row
边行优势指数(%)
Marginal effect index
周麦18 Zhoumai 18 531.00a 594.15a 11.85bAB 26.48c 30.42b 14.77a 50.51a 50.79a 0.52bc
华育198 Huayu 198 565.05a 606.30a 7.30bB 27.81bc 31.27b 12.47a 48.87ab 48.92a 0.11ab
郑育8号 Zhengyu 8 493.20a 642.30a 30.15aA 33.01ab 37.83ab 14.57a 44.78bc 46.66a 4.21ab
百农207 Bainong 207 491.10a 613.95a 25.00aAB 35.40a 40.74a 15.01a 43.44c 46.46a 6.93a

Table 5

Relationship between yield marginal advantage indexes and marginal effect indexes of yield components"

产量边行优势指数
Marginal effect index of yield
产量要素边行优势指数(x)
Marginal effect index of yield factor
相关系数(r)
Correlation coefficient
决定系数(r2)
Coefficient of determination
y 有效穗数Effective spike number 0.9902** 0.9804
穗粒数Grain number per spike 0.6656 0.4430
千粒重1000-grain weight 0.6354 0.4037
[1] 杜心田, 王同朝 . 作物群体边际效应规律及其应用. 应用生态学报, 1998,9(5):475-480.
[2] 陈雨海, 余松烈, 于振文 . 小麦边际效应的研究. 山东农业大学学报, 1999,30(4):431-435.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.1999.04.024
[3] 吴卫东, 李学军 . 小麦区域试验边际效应的研究. 西北植物学报, 2003,23(12):2167-2171.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2003.12.021
[4] 龚德平, 文家琼 . 小麦品种试验小区边际效应及其对试验准确度的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2017(3):14-17.
[5] 李学军, 刘瀛洲, 王辉 . 小麦品种试验小区边际效应与品种评价的研究. 西北农业大学学报, 2000,28(1):26-30.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2000.01.006
[6] 陈雨海, 余松烈, 于振文 . 小麦边行优势及其利用的研究. 耕作与栽培, 2017(6):3-4,8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2002.06.002
[7] 陈雨海, 李永庚, 余松烈 , 等. 边际效应与种植方式规范化的研究. 麦类作物学报, 2003,23(2):68-71.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2003.02.059
[8] 赵秉强, 余松烈, 李凤超 , 等. 冬小麦边际效应研究Ⅰ.品种与小麦边际效应相关规律. 耕作与栽培, 2017(4):4-7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.1999.04.024
[9] 赵秉强, 余松烈, 李凤超 , 等. 冬小麦边际效应的研究──Ⅱ.播种密度与小麦边际效应相关规律. 耕作与栽培, 2017(5):12-16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.1999.04.024
[10] 赵秉强, 余松烈, 李凤超 , 等. 冬小麦边际效应的研究──Ⅲ.播种期与小麦边际效应相关规律. 耕作与栽培, 2017(6):5-6,10.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.1999.04.024
[11] Wang S L, Hong Q I, Wang Y , et al. Effects of sowing rate on marginal superiority and yield of wheat in wheat-cotton intercropping system. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2015,16(12):2649-2652.
[12] Wang S L, Hong Q I, Wang Y , et al. Analysis on marginal superiority and yield of different wheat varieties in wheat-cotton intercropping system. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016,17(5):1077-1079.
[13] 郭宗学, 张增为, 王清秀 . 小麦边行优势及其对育种选择的影响. 山西农业科学, 2017,45(9):1405-1407.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2017.09.03
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .