Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 149-153.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.03.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Paddy-Upland Rotation and Straw Returning on Soil Related Enzyme Activities in Cold Region

Song Qiulai1,2,3, Wang Qi1,2,3, Feng Yanjiang1, Sun Yu1, Zeng Xiannan1, Lai Yongcai1,2   

  1. 1Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
    2Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences Postdoctoral Programme, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
    3Key Laboratory of Combining Farming and Animal Husbandry, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2019-10-11 Revised:2020-02-26 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-10

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

307

Abstract:

In this study, the rice-maize rotation system of Heilongjiang Province was taken as the research method and combined with the long-term located experiment of straw returning to explore the optimal rice-maize rotation model in cold region. This study was conducted to explicit the effects of straw returning on soil enzyme activities under rice-maize rotation system. The results showed that the soil alkaline phosphatase and acetyl β-glucosamine activities under rice→rice→maize rotation treatment were higher than those in rice continuous cropping treatment. The xylanase activity under rice→rice→maize rotation treatment were significantly lower than that in maize continuous cropping treatment. Straw returning increased catalase activity under continuous maize cropping treatment, whereas straw returning decreased catalase activity under rice→rice→maize rotation and continuous rice cropping treatment. Straw returning decreased acetyl β-glucosamine activity under maize continuous cropping treatment, and increased invertase activity under rice→rice→maize rotation treatment.

Key words: Rice-maize rotation, Straw returning, Soil enzyme

Fig.1

Effects of paddy-upland rotation and straw returning on catalase activity in soil Different letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P < 0.05). The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of paddy-upland rotation and straw returning on hydrolase activities in soil"

Table 1

Interaction effect of related enzyme activity in soil under paddy-upland rotation and straw returning condition (P < 0.05)"

项目
Item		 碱性磷酸酶
Alkaline phosphatase		 过氧化氢酶
Catalase		 蔗糖酶
Invertase		 纤维素酶
Cellulase		 乙酰基β-葡萄糖胺酶
Acetyl β-glucosamine		 木聚糖酶
Xylanase		 脲酶
Urease
F-value 0.308 16.730 5.230 1.550 8.506 0.438 0.785
Sig. 0.741 0.000 0.023 0.252 0.005 0.655 0.478
[1] 范明生, 江荣风, 张福锁 , 等. 水旱轮作系统作物养分管理策略. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(2):424-432.
[2] 崔勇 . 稻田水旱轮作的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2018(3):8-14.
[3] 黄冲平, 丁鼎良 . 水旱轮作对作物产量和土壤理化性状的影响. 浙江农业学报, 1995,7(6):448-450.
[4] Timsina J, Jat M L, Majumdar K . Rice-maize systems of South Asia:Current status,future prospects and research priorities for nutrient management. Plant and Soil, 2010,335(1/2):65-82.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0418-y
[5] 王子芳, 高明, 秦建成 , 等. 稻田长期水旱轮作对土壤肥力的影响研究. 西南大学学报, 2003,25(6):514-517.
[6] 王先华 . 稻田不同轮作方式对培肥地力的作用. 耕作与栽培, 2002(6):9-10.
[7] 王人民, 丁元树 . 稻田年内水旱轮作对土壤肥力的影响. 中国水稻科学, 1998,12(2):85-91.
[8] 赵营, 郭鑫年, 冀宏杰 , 等. 施肥对水旱轮作作物产量、土壤无机氮残留及氮素平衡的影响. 土壤通报, 2015,46(4):940-947.
[9] Deforest J L . The influence of time,storage temperature,and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009,41(6):1180-1186.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.029
[10] 刘善江, 夏雪, 陈桂梅 , 等. 土壤酶的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(21):1-7.
[11] 董明哲, 陈香碧, 冯书珍 , 等. 红壤丘陵区典型农田土壤秸秆还田后纤维素降解特征及其影响因素. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(7):1834-1841.
[12] 周勃, 魏彦宏, 朱锦泉 , 等. 水旱轮作对长期连作棉田土壤生物活性的影响. 农村科技, 2014(7):25-27.
[13] 贾伟, 周怀平, 解文艳 , 等. 长期秸秆还田秋施肥对褐土微生物碳、氮量和酶活性的影响. 华北农学报, 2008,23(2):138-142.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2008.02.031
[14] 陶军, 张树杰, 焦加国 , 等. 蚯蚓对秸秆还田土壤细菌生理菌群数量和酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2010,30(5):1306-1311.
[15] 路文涛, 贾志宽, 张鹏 , 等. 秸秆还田对宁南旱作农田土壤活性有机碳及酶活性的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(3):522-528.
[16] 庞荔丹, 孟婷婷, 张宇飞 , 等. 玉米秸秆配氮还田对土壤酶活性、微生物量碳含量及土壤呼吸量的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(1):107-112.
[17] 杨恒山, 萨如拉, 高聚林 , 等. 秸秆还田对连作玉米田土壤微生物学特性的影响. 玉米科学, 2017,25(5):98-104.
[18] 徐忠山, 刘景辉, 逯晓萍 , 等. 秸秆颗粒还田对黑土土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响. 生态学报, 2019,39(12):4347-4355.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201802080344
[19] 刘兰清, 杨晨璐, 王维钰 , 等. 免耕条件下秸秆还田与施肥对小麦-玉米轮作系统土壤养分和酶活性的影响. 华北农学报, 2017,32(6):213-221.
[20] 郑勇, 高勇生, 张丽梅 , 等. 长期施肥对旱地红壤微生物和酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,1(2):316-321.
[1] Qi Hua,Li Congfeng,Zhao Ming,Jiang Ying. Developments and Prospects of Conservation Tillage in the Dryland of Northern China [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 16-19.
[2] Diao Shengpeng,Gao Riping,Gao Yu,Ren Yongfeng,Zhao Peiyi,Yuan Wei,Gao Xuefeng. Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Hydrothermal and Yield of Maize in Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 83-89.
[3] Huang Binglin,Wang Mengxue,Jin Xijun,Hu Guohua,Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Different Tillage Treatments on Soil Microorganisms, Enzyme Activities and Nutrients [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 104-113.
[4] Li Guannan,Huang Lihua,Zhang Lu,Chen Jiaxing,Yang Jingmin. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Straw Returning on Nutrition and Taste Quality of Rice in Saline-Sodic Soil of Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 82-88.
[5] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[6] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[7] Jingang Liang,Zhengguang Zhang. Advance on Effects of Genetically ModifiedCrops on Soil Ecosystems [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 1-6.
[8] Lidan Pang,Tingting Meng,Yufei Zhang,Yuxuan Ma,Sen Zhou,Fulin Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Maize Straw Returning with Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil Enzyme Activity,Microbial Biomass Carbon Content and Respiration [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 107-112.
[9] Runlian Wang,Zhidong Zhang,Jinghui Liu,Huijun Liu,Baoping Zhao. Effects of No-Tillage with Stubble Mulch on Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activities and Oat Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 134-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!