Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 128-131.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.06.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Slow-Release Fertilizer Mix Proportions on the Growth and Yield of Dryland Flax

Qian Aiping(), Cao Xiuxia(), Zhang Wei, Yan Kuanjiang, Lu Junwu   

  1. Guyuan Branch of Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Guyuan 756000, Ningxia, China
  • Received:2020-03-13 Revised:2020-07-15 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Cao Xiuxia E-mail:gyqap@163.com;kyglk@126.com

Abstract:

Flax was used as the test material.The growth and development, agronomic characters and seed yield performance of dryland flax were studied under the different mixture proportion of 60d slow-release fertilizer and 90d slow-release fertilizer. The results showed that slow-release fertilizer could promote the growth of dryland Flax plant, increase the fresh weight and dry weight of shoot plant, and increase the plant height, branch number of main stem, number of fruit per plant and grain weight per plant. The ratio of 3:1 for 60d slow-release fertilizer and 90d slow-release fertilizer was the most effective, with the yield of 1 608.56kg/ha, increasing by 18.26%.

Key words: Slow-release fertilizer, Flax, Growth, Yield

Table 1

Growth amount of dry land flax under different proportions of two slow-release fertilizers"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
地上部鲜重
Fresh weight
of shoot (g)
地上部干重
Dry weight
of shoot (g)
T1 44.84±0.38b 2.89±0.24bc 0.67±0.04b
T2 44.32±0.30b 2.75±0.07cd 0.67±0.01b
T3 44.52±0.58b 2.73±0.10cd 0.69±0.01b
T4 44.43±0.88b 3.20±0.30ab 0.79±0.08a
T5 46.43±0.36a 3.57±0.28a 0.85±0.07a
CK 44.17±0.31b 2.47±0.14d 0.63±0.04b

Table 2

Output of flax in dryland with different proportions of two kinds of slow-release fertilizers"

处理
Treatment
小区产量Plot yield (kg) 平均值
Average (kg)
折合产量
Equivalent yield (kg/hm2)
较CK ±
Compare to CK ± (%)
位次
Order
T1 2.362 2.156 2.157 2.225 1 545.80a 13.64 2
T2 2.190 2.111 2.197 2.166 1 504.80a 10.63 5
T3 2.108 2.272 2.217 2.199 1 527.73a 12.32 3
T4 2.162 2.192 2.225 2.193 1 523.45a 12.00 4
T5 2.350 2.317 2.279 2.315 1 608.56a 18.26 1
CK 2.034 1.834 2.005 1.958 1 360.17b 6

Table 3

Related factors of flax yield under different proportions of two kinds of slow-release fertilizers"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height
(cm)
主茎分枝数
Branch number
of main stem
单株结果数
Number of
fruiting per plant
每果粒数
Grain number
per fruit
单株粒重
Grain weight
per plant (g)
千粒重
1000-seed
weight (g)
T1 56.54±0.18a 6.53±0.39a 17.72±1.07ab 7.25±0.28b 1.10±0.18a 8.60±0.01a
T2 56.39±2.44a 6.26±0.43ab 17.45±2.71ab 7.35±0.18ab 1.01±0.19a 8.67±0.20a
T3 56.08±1.96a 6.43±0.07a 16.82±1.55ab 7.57±0.45ab 0.84±0.05a 8.46±0.18a
T4 56.55±3.74a 6.32±0.44a 17.12±1.15ab 7.40±0.35ab 1.10±0.19a 8.59±0.02a
T5 57.10±2.67a 6.24±0.30ab 18.81±1.55a 7.87±0.42a 1.03±0.17a 8.65±0.10a
CK 54.51±1.46a 5.56±0.34b 14.25±2.23b 7.73±0.29ab 0.78±0.16a 8.49±0.22a
[1] 曲志华, 白苇, 张丽丽, 等. 170份亚麻种质资源主要农艺性状分析. 作物杂志, 2019(4):77-83.
[2] 冯学金, 郭秀娟, 杨建春, 等. 喷施硒肥对胡麻籽粒硒含量、产量及品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(3):155-157.
[3] 狄济乐. 亚麻籽作为一种功能食品来源的研究. 中国油脂, 2002,27(4):55-57.
[4] 崔红艳, 许维成, 孙毓民, 等. 有机肥对胡麻产量和品质的影响. 核农学报, 2014,28(1):518-525.
[5] 陆俊武, 曹秀霞, 钱爱萍, 等. 宁夏胡麻产业现状及发展对策建议. 宁夏农林科技, 2017,36(11):39-40.
[6] 崔红艳, 胡发龙, 许维诚, 等. 施用有机肥对土壤水分、胡麻干物质生产和产量影响的研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(4):59-64.
[7] 崔红艳, 胡发龙, 许维诚, 等. 氮磷配施对旱地胡麻干物质积累和籽粒产量的影响. 核农学报, 2017,31(5):0996-1004.
[8] 杨天庆, 高玉红, 牛俊义, 等. 肉蛋白生物有机肥对胡麻干物质积累、产量及品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(1):69-75.
[9] 张德奇, 季书勤, 王汉芳, 等. 缓/控释肥的研究应用现状及展望. 耕作与栽培, 2010(3):46-48.
[10] 刘宁, 孙振涛, 韩晓日, 等. 缓/控释肥料的研究进展及存在问题. 土壤通报, 2010,41(4):1005-1007.
[11] 党建友, 杨峰, 屈会选, 等. 复合包裹控释肥对小麦生长发育及土壤养分的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2008,16(6):1365-1370.
[12] 谭德水, 江丽华, 房灵涛, 等. 控释氮肥一次施用对小麦群体调控及养分利用的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36(11):1523-1531.
[13] 史桂芳, 董浩, 衣文平, 等. 不同用量长效控释肥对夏玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(7):95-98.
[14] 谷佳林, 徐凯, 张东雷, 等. 硫包衣尿素在夏玉米上的应用效果研究. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(21):194-197.
[15] 彭玉, 马均, 蒋明金, 等. 缓/控释肥对杂交水稻根系形态、生理特性和产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1048-1057.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0503
[16] 彭玉, 孙永健, 蒋明金, 等. 不同水分条件下缓/控释氮肥对水稻干物质量和氮素吸收、运转及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2015,40(5):859-870.
[17] 郑亚萍, 孙秀山, 成强, 等. 缓释肥对旱地花生生长发育及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2011(8):68-70.
[18] 唐启义, 马明光. DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[19] 谢亚萍, 吴兵, 牛俊义, 等. 施氮量对旱地胡麻养分积累、转运及氮素利用率的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2014,36(3):357-362.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.03.010
[1] Wang Chuanqi, Wang Hongmei, Wei Xiaoxing, Ma Xiang, Zhou Qingping. Research Progress of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 1-7.
[2] Wang Huiwen, Li Lei, Yu Shaobo, Wang Qiang, Feng Yu, Ren Aixia, Lin Wen, Sun Min, Gao Zhiqiang. Contribution of Deep Ploughing and Furrow Sowing to Yield and Its Formation of Dryland Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 116-122.
[3] Xu Lin, Wu Kaichao, Pang Tian, Deng Zhinian, Zhang Ronghua, Huang Chengfeng, Huang Hairong, Li Yijie, Liu Xiaoyan, Qin Wenxian, Wang Weizan. Effects of Root Promoting Agent on the Development and Yield in Single Bud of Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 132-136.
[4] Liu Zhenxing, Zhou Guimei, Ya Xiuxiu, Chen Jian, Meng Qingxiang, He Guoqing. Effects of Different Sowing Densities on the Morphological Traits and Yields of Three Adzuki Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 137-142.
[5] Lü Weisheng, Xiao Xiaojun, Huang Tianbao, Xiao Guobin, Li Yazhen, Xiao Fuliang, Han Depeng, Zheng Wei. Application Effect of Slow-Released Formulated Fertilizer on Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) under Late Sowing Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 143-150.
[6] Han Yunfei, Gao Riping, Ren Yongfeng, Zhao Peiyi, Liu Xiaoyue, Gao Yu, Zhang Peng, Liang Guangrong, Gao Jinlong. Effects of Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Hairy Vetch [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 151-157.
[7] Guo Dandan, Liu Zhewen, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Shi Shubing. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Wheat with Different Gluten Types [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 158-162.
[8] Fu Xuepeng, Shen Tongfei, Sun Xiaobo, Liu Xiaohan, Yang Xiaojie. Effects of Streptomyces sp. FXP04 on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 163-169.
[9] Yang Wanjun, Pan Xiangyu, Wang Xiuhua, Wang Lu, Zhao Yan. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Traits of 119 Alfalfa Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 17-22.
[10] Ji Jingchun, Liu Jianli, Niu Yujie, Xuan Kefan, Jiang Yifei, Deng Haodong, Li Xiaopeng. Comparison of Estimation Methods for Growth Parameters of Winter Wheat Based on Full-Band Hyperspectral Data [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 180-188.
[11] Jian Liqun, Zhang Yifei, Yang Kejun, Wang Yufeng, Chen Tianyu, Zhang Jiwei, Zhang Jinsong, Li Qing, Liu Tianhao, Xiao Shanshan, Peng Cheng, Wang Baosheng. Effects of Low Temperature under Different Phases between Sowing and Seedling Periods on Growth and Physiological Resistance of Maize Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 61-68.
[12] Zhu Tongquan, Song Quanhao, Meng Xiangfeng. Influences of Various Growth Factors on Yield and Grain Quality in Wheat——Taking Zhumadian’s Wheat Production in the Past Ten Years as Example [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 80-88.
[13] Zhang Gang, Zhang Shijie, Wang Dejian, Yu Yuanchun. Analysis of Yield and Economic Benefit of Straw Incorporation under Rice-Wheat Double Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 97-103.
[14] Cao Xiaochuang, Li Yefeng, Wu Longlong, Zhu Chunquan, Zhu Lianfeng, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu. Effects of Organic Soluble Fertilizer on the Accumulation and Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 110-118.
[15] Sun Qi, Geng Yanqiu, Jin Feng, Liu Lixin, Zheng Huantong, Guo Liying, Shao Xiwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield, Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocationin Organs after Anthesis of Direct Seeding Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 119-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!