Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 158-162.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.06.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Wheat with Different Gluten Types

Guo Dandan1,2(), Liu Zhewen1,2(), Chang Xuhong1, Wang Demei1, Tao Zhiqiang1, Wang Yanjie1, Yang Yushuang1, Zhao Guangcai1(), Shi Shubing2()   

  1. 1Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China
    2School of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2020-08-06 Revised:2020-11-05 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Zhao Guangcai,Shi Shubing E-mail:2529986483@qq.com;liuzhewen333@163.com;zhaoguangcai@caas.cn;shubshi@sina.com

RichHTML

9

PDF (PC)

331

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of nitrogen application on plant characteristics, grain yield and quality of wheat with different gluten types. Pot experiment was carried out, strong gluten wheat Zhongmai 578 (A1) and Zhongmai 5051 (A2), weak gluten wheat Yangmai 15 (A3) and Yangmai 24 (A4) were selected as test varieties. Under the same nitrogen application rate, basal application (B1) and topdressing (B2) treatments were carried out. The results showed that the ear length, total spikelets, 1000-grain weight and grain yield of strong gluten wheat were better than those of weak gluten wheat under the same cultivation measures. The yield of A1 were 0.44%, 49.81% and 15.27% higher than that of A2, A3 and A4, respectively; plant height, ear length, grain number per spike, total spikelet number and grain yield of B2 were higher than those of B1 in nitrogen application treatment among the different treatments, the plant and yield traits of strong gluten variety A1B2 were better than other treatments; the protein content and protein yield of strong gluten varieties were higher than those of weak gluten varieties, and the difference was extremely significant (P < 0.01). In this experiment, strong gluten variety A2 was the best to achieve high benefit by giving consideration to grain yield, protein content and protein yield in B2 treatment.

Key words: Wheat, Nitrogen fertilizer, Variety, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Comparison of plant and yield traits of different varieties"

品种
Variety		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 穗长
Ear length (cm)		 穗粒数
Grains per spike		 总小穗数
Total spikelets		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 籽粒产量(g/盆)
Grain yield (g/pot )
A1 39.60aA 5.80bB 15.05aA 15.20bA 34.63aA 4.00aA
A2 30.60bB 7.54aA 14.20abA 16.55aA 34.28aAB 3.83aA
A3 31.27bB 4.13cC 11.53bA 12.73cB 28.88bB 2.67bB
A4 38.18aA 6.05bB 14.23abA 14.83bA 30.33bAB 3.47aAB

Table 2

Comparison of different fertilization treatments on plant and yield traits"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 穗长
Ear length (cm)		 穗粒数
Grains per spike		 总小穗数
Total spikelets		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 籽粒产量(g/盆)
Grain yield (g/pot)
B1 33.06bA 5.66aA 13.52aA 14.59aA 30.59bA 3.33aA
B2 36.77aA 6.10aA 13.99aA 15.06aA 33.48aA 3.66aA

Table 3

Comparison of different treatment combinations on plant and yield traits"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 穗长
Ear length (cm)		 穗粒数
Grains per spike		 总小穗数
Total spikelets		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 籽粒产量(g/盆)
Grain yield (g/pot)
A1B1 34.63bcAB 5.43cdBC 14.37abA 14.97abABC 33.33abcAB 3.87aAB
A1B2 44.57aA 6.17bcB 15.73aA 15.43aAB 35.93abAB 4.13aA
A2B1 30.43cB 6.78bAB 14.33abA 16.23aA 31.26bcAB 3.57abAB
A2B2 30.77cB 8.30aA 14.07abA 16.87aA 37.30aA 4.10aA
A3B1 31.60cB 5.43cdBC 11.73abA 12.33cC 28.43cB 2.67bB
A3B2 30.93cB 4.27deC 11.33bA 13.13bcBC 29.33cAB 2.67bB
A4B1 35.57bcAB 6.43bcB 13.63abA 14.83abABC 29.33cAB 3.20abAB
A4B2 40.80abAB 5.67bcBC 14.83abA 14.83abABC 31.33bcAB 3.73aAB

Table 4

Comparison of grain protein content and yield of different varieties"

处理
Treatment		 蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)		 蛋白质产量(g/盆)
Protein yield (g/pot)
A1 16.70aA 0.67aA
A2 17.02aA 0.66aA
A3 15.00bB 0.40bB
A4 13.15cC 0.46bB

Table 5

Comparison of protein content and protein yield of different fertilization treatments"

处理
Treatment		 蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)		 蛋白质产量(g/盆)
Protein yield (g/pot)
B1 15.28aA 0.51aA
B2 15.66aA 0.57aA

Table 6

Comparison of protein content and protein yield of different treatment combinations"

处理
Treatment		 蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)		 蛋白质产量(g/盆)
Protein yield (g/pot)
A1B1 16.76aAB 0.65aAB
A1B2 16.64aAB 0.68aAB
A2B1 16.54aAB 0.59abABC
A2B2 17.49aA 0.72aA
A3B1 14.94bBC 0.40cD
A3B2 15.06bBC 0.40cD
A4B1 12.85cD 0.41cCD
A4B2 13.44cCD 0.50bcBCD
[1] 赵广才, 常旭虹, 刘利华, 等. 施氮量对不同强筋小麦产量和加工品质的影响. 作物学报, 2006,32(5):723-727.
[2] 常旭虹, 赵广才, 王德梅, 等. 生态环境与施氮量协同对小麦籽粒微量元素含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(4):885-895.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0410
[3] 王德梅, 赵广才, 常旭虹, 等. 土壤相对含水量对冬小麦氮素积累、蛋白质组成和加工品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014,34(9):1245-1252.
[4] 王月福, 姜东, 于振文, 等. 高低土壤肥力下小麦基施和追施氮肥的利用效率和增产效应. 作物学报, 2003,29(4):491-495.
[5] 朱英杰, 刘富启, 张燕, 等. 不同土壤条件下氮肥处理对小麦产量及品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(3):184-190.
[6] 张艳华, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 等. 不同土壤条件下追施锌肥对小麦产量及品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(5):109-113.
[7] 王丽娜, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 等. 不同土壤条件下追施硼肥对小麦产量和品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(6):94-98.
[8] 杨帆, 孟远夺, 姜义, 等. 2013年我国种植业化肥施用状况分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(1):217-225.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0124
[9] 贺明荣, 杨雯玉, 王晓英, 等. 不同氮肥运筹模式对冬小麦籽粒产量品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31(8):1047-1051.
[10] 石玉, 于振文, 王东, 等. 施氮量和底追比例对小麦氮素吸收转运及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2006,32(12):1860-1866.
[11] 赵广才, 何中虎, 田奇卓, 等. 应用15N研究施氮比例对小麦氮素利用的效应. 作物学报, 2004,30(2):159-162.
[12] 张定一, 党建友, 王姣爱, 等. 施氮量对不同品质类型小麦产量、品质和旗叶光合作用的调节效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(4):535-542.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2007.0401
[13] 朱新开. 不同类型专用小麦氮素吸收利用特性与调控. 扬州:扬州大学, 2006.
[14] 马瑞琦. 追氮量对不同筋型小麦产量、品质及生理指标的影响. 晋中:山西农业大学, 2019.
[15] 张绍林, 朱兆良, 徐银华, 等. 关于太湖地区稻麦上氮肥的适宜用量. 土壤, 1988,20(1):5-9.
[16] 金绍龄, 兰晓泉, 常向东, 等. 春小麦施氮时期的研究. 土壤肥料, 1985(6):25-29.
[17] 张志力, 田效瑞. 栽培因子与冬小麦籽粒蛋白质产量的关系. 干旱地区农业研究, 1994(4):22-25.
[1] Wang Chuanqi, Wang Hongmei, Wei Xiaoxing, Ma Xiang, Zhou Qingping. Research Progress of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 1-7.
[2] Wang Huiwen, Li Lei, Yu Shaobo, Wang Qiang, Feng Yu, Ren Aixia, Lin Wen, Sun Min, Gao Zhiqiang. Contribution of Deep Ploughing and Furrow Sowing to Yield and Its Formation of Dryland Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 116-122.
[3] Qian Aiping, Cao Xiuxia, Zhang Wei, Yan Kuanjiang, Lu Junwu. Effects of Different Slow-Release Fertilizer Mix Proportions on the Growth and Yield of Dryland Flax [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 128-131.
[4] Xu Lin, Wu Kaichao, Pang Tian, Deng Zhinian, Zhang Ronghua, Huang Chengfeng, Huang Hairong, Li Yijie, Liu Xiaoyan, Qin Wenxian, Wang Weizan. Effects of Root Promoting Agent on the Development and Yield in Single Bud of Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 132-136.
[5] Liu Zhenxing, Zhou Guimei, Ya Xiuxiu, Chen Jian, Meng Qingxiang, He Guoqing. Effects of Different Sowing Densities on the Morphological Traits and Yields of Three Adzuki Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 137-142.
[6] Lü Weisheng, Xiao Xiaojun, Huang Tianbao, Xiao Guobin, Li Yazhen, Xiao Fuliang, Han Depeng, Zheng Wei. Application Effect of Slow-Released Formulated Fertilizer on Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) under Late Sowing Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 143-150.
[7] Han Yunfei, Gao Riping, Ren Yongfeng, Zhao Peiyi, Liu Xiaoyue, Gao Yu, Zhang Peng, Liang Guangrong, Gao Jinlong. Effects of Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Hairy Vetch [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 151-157.
[8] Yang Wanjun, Pan Xiangyu, Wang Xiuhua, Wang Lu, Zhao Yan. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Traits of 119 Alfalfa Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 17-22.
[9] Zhu Tongquan, Song Quanhao, Meng Xiangfeng. Influences of Various Growth Factors on Yield and Grain Quality in Wheat——Taking Zhumadian’s Wheat Production in the Past Ten Years as Example [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 80-88.
[10] Huang Shaohui, Yang Junfang, Liu Xuetong, Yang Yunma, Xing Suli, Han Baowen, Liu Mengchao, Jia Liangliang, He Ping. Effects of Wheat Long-Term Straw Returning on Soil Phosphorus Content and Phosphorus Balance in Loamy Tidal Soil [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 89-96.
[11] Zhang Gang, Zhang Shijie, Wang Dejian, Yu Yuanchun. Analysis of Yield and Economic Benefit of Straw Incorporation under Rice-Wheat Double Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 97-103.
[12] Cao Xiaochuang, Li Yefeng, Wu Longlong, Zhu Chunquan, Zhu Lianfeng, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu. Effects of Organic Soluble Fertilizer on the Accumulation and Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 110-118.
[13] Sun Qi, Geng Yanqiu, Jin Feng, Liu Lixin, Zheng Huantong, Guo Liying, Shao Xiwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield, Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocationin Organs after Anthesis of Direct Seeding Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 119-126.
[14] Hao Xiyu, Xiao Huanyu, Liang Jie, Wang Yingjie, Guo Wenyun. Effects and Optimum Rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer for Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 127-132.
[15] Luo Yuqiong, Yan Bo, Wu Ke, Xie Huimin, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of No-Tillage and Straw Returning on Soil Fertility and Rice Yield in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 133-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!