Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 151-157.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.06.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Hairy Vetch

Han Yunfei1,2,3,4(), Gao Riping1,2,3,4, Ren Yongfeng2,3,4, Zhao Peiyi1,2,3,4(), Liu Xiaoyue1,2,3,4, Gao Yu2,3,4, Zhang Peng2,3,4, Liang Guangrong5, Gao Jinlong5   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, Inner Mongolia, China
    2Institute of Resources, Environment and Testing Technology Sciences, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Hohhot 010031, Inner Mongolia, China
    3Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming, Hohhot 010031, Inner Mongolia, China
    4Inner Mongolia Agricultural Conservation Scientific Observation Laboratory Station of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hohhot 011705, Inner Mongolia, China
    5Agriculture Animal Husbandry Science and Technology Bureau of Qingshuihe County, Hohhot 011600, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2020-04-10 Revised:2020-07-22 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Zhao Peiyi E-mail:ambitieuxhyf@163.com;zhpy1972@163.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

373

Abstract:

To solve practical problems such as unstable seedling condition, low yield and late ripening of hairy vetch on the Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia, a field plot research with four sowing dates was designed. The four sowing dates were April 10th (ST1), April 20th (ST2), April 30th (ST3) and May 10th (ST4). The research explored the changes of different sowing dates on growth duration, agronomic characters, dry matter accumulation and grain yield of hairy vetch. Through the field plot experiment for two consecutive years, the results showed that the sowing date had a significant effect on the duration of each growth period and seedling emergence rate of hairy vetch. There were significant differences in plant height, pods per plant, seeds per plant and root nodules per plant under different sowing dates. Dry matter accumulation showed a slow-fast-slow growth trend. Among them, ST2 sowing had the best performance. In terms of yield, ST2 treatment was the highest in both years, which was 942.45-1 056.75kg/ha. The formation of grain yield was significantly related to accumulated temperature and precipitation, and the accumulated temperature had the greatest effect on grain yield. To sum up, Sowing hairy vetch on April 20th could adapt to local hydrothermal conditions to a large extent, increased the number of pods per plant, seeds per plant and root nodules per plant, and achieve stable and high yield. It is suggested that suitable sowing date for hairy vetch planting in the Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia should be on April 20th.

Key words: Sowing date, Hairy vetch, Growth and development, Yield

Fig.1

Precipitation and temperature change during growth period of hairy vetch in 2018-2019"

Table 1

Growth period and duration of hairy vetch at different sowing dates 月/日Month/day"

年份 处理
Treatment		 播种期
Sowing date		 苗期
Seedling
stage		 分枝期
Branch
stage		 现蕾期
Budding
stage		 盛花期
Full flowering
stage		 结荚期
Podding
stage		 收获期
Harvest
stage		 生育期
Growth
period (d)
2018 ST1 04/10 04/24 05/12 06/04 06/15 06/30 07/30 111
ST2 04/20 05/05 05/22 06/14 06/25 07/09 08/05 107
ST3 04/30 05/12 05/28 06/17 06/28 07/13 08/07 99
ST4 05/10 05/20 06/04 06/24 07/05 07/19 08/09 91
2019 ST1 04/10 04/24 05/12 06/05 06/16 07/02 08/06 114
ST2 04/20 05/05 05/22 06/16 06/26 07/11 08/10 112
ST3 04/30 05/13 05/29 06/21 07/01 07/16 08/11 103
ST4 05/10 05/21 05/26 06/17 06/27 07/11 08/02 94

Fig.2

Emergence rates of hairy vetch at different sowing dates Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level, the same below"

Table 2

Agronomic characters of hairy vetch at different sowing dates"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter
(cm)		 单株分枝数Branches
per plant		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 单荚粒数
Seeds per
pod		 单株根瘤数
Root nodules
per plant
2018 ST1 140.7±2.5b 0.30±0.02a 9.00±0.7a 205.00±6.8b 2.00±0.1c 20.50±0.9b
ST2 147.5±3.4a 0.32±0.01a 6.50±0.9b 222.50±7.5a 3.50±0.2a 27.00±1.8a
ST3 135.7±2.8c 0.31±0.05a 7.00±0.6b 175.50±5.7c 3.00±0.1b 13.45±1.2c
ST4 126.5±4.2d 0.30±0.03a 4.00±0.5c 145.60±8.6d 2.00±0.3c 8.56±0.7d
2019
 ST1 143.5±3.3b 0.32±0.01a 11.00±0.7a 215.00±8.2b 2.50±0.2c 22.30±2.0b
ST2 150.6±5.0a 0.34±0.02a 8.50±0.8b 235.60±6.9a 4.00±0.1a 31.00±2.2a
ST3 130.5±2.9c 0.31±0.06a 7.50±0.7b 194.70±6.6c 3.50±0.4b 12.65±1.0c
ST4 121.3±4.1d 0.30±0.01a 4.50±0.6c 162.00±8.7d 2.50±0.2c 9.36±0.7d

Table 3

Correlation matrix of agronomic characters of hairy vetch at different sowing dates"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (cm)		 单株分枝数
Branches
per plant		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 单荚粒数
Seeds
per pod		 单株根瘤数
Root nodules
per plant
2018 株高Plant height 1
茎粗Stem diameter 0.705 1
单株分枝数Branches per plant 0.633 0.021 1
单株荚数Pods per plant 0.991** 0.608 0.684 1
单荚粒数Seeds per pod 0.651 0.986* 0.041 0.544 1
单株根瘤数Root nodules per plant 0.982* 0.661 0.560 0.987* 0.578 1
2019 株高Plant height 1
茎粗Stem diameter 0.962* 1
单株分枝数Branches per plant 0.797 0.608 1
单株荚数Pods per plant 0.987* 0.960* 0.788 1
单荚粒数Seeds per pod 0.516 0.683 0.093 0.617 1
单株根瘤数Root nodules per plant 0.979* 0.985* 0.667 0.952* 0.548 1

Fig.3

Dynamics of dry matter accumulation of hairy vetch at different sowing dates"

Table 4

Effects of sowing date on dry matter accumulation of hairy vetch kg/hm2"

年份Year 处理Treatment 苗期Seedling stage 盛花期Full flowering stage 结荚期Podding stage 收获期Harvest stage
2018 ST1 50.38±8.7c 1 135.38±35.5b 2 917.93±55.7b 3 248.25±103.4b
ST2 60.54±9.5a 1 260.65±43.6a 3 121.67±78.4a 3 759.75±111.3a
ST3 55.76±11.4b 1 115.95±36.7b 2 746.25±86.5c 2 979.75±97.5c
ST4 38.25±10.7d 1 038.34±40.0c 2 368.55±101d 2 799.75±97.4d
2019 ST1 45.86±11.6b 1 254.45±32.9b 2 688.84±86.5b 3 026.40±123.4b
ST2 52.68±8.5a 1 357.64±45.0a 2 875.30±89.4a 3 367.05±100.7a
ST3 50.45±7.7a 1 258.35±48.9b 2 320.00±68.8c 2 859.75±96.3c
ST4 37.40±10.0c 1 138.76±37.6c 2 189.75±98.4d 2 740.20±89.6d

Fig.4

Effects of sowing dates on grain yields of hairy vetch"

Fig.5

Regression analysis of the grain yield of hairy vetch and the accumulated temperature and precipitation during the growth period"

[1] 刘国彬, 王兵, 卫伟, 等. 黄土高原水土流失综合治理技术及示范. 生态学报, 2016,36(22):7074-7077.
[2] 陈士平. 论绿肥在现代化农业生态系统中的地位. 土壤通报, 1980(1):35-40.
[3] 谢树果, 韩文斌, 冯文强, 等. 豆科绿肥对四川丘陵旱地作物的产量及经济效益初探. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(5):82-85.
[4] 田光兰, 张晓琦, 葛亚龙, 等. 豆科植物毛苕子在农牧业应用的现状. 农业工程技术(农产品加工业), 2014(3):37.
[5] Anugroho F, Kitou M, Nagumo F, et al. Potential growth of hairy vetch as a winter legume cover crop in subtropical soil conditions. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2010,56(2):254-262.
[6] Shepherd M A, Webb J. Effects of overwinter cover on nitrate loss and drainage form a sandy soil: consequences for want management. Soil Use and Management, 1999,15(2):109-116.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00073.x
[7] 孙启忠, 桂荣, 韩建国. 赤峰地区敖汉苜蓿冻害及其防御技术. 草地学报, 2001(1):50-57.
[8] 王炎, 周良, 李振宙, 等. 不同播期对苦荞生长发育及产量和品质的影响. 分子植物育种, 2019,17(10):3456-3460.
[9] 范霞, 段玉, 段海燕, 等. 播种期、播种量和肥料用量对毛叶苕子产草量及籽实产量的影响. 内蒙古农业科技, 2012(6):60-61,69.
[10] 韩梅, 张宏亮, 郭石生, 等. 不同绿肥毛苕子品种农艺性状评价. 广东农业科学, 2012,39(16):21-23.
[11] 杨玉敏, 庞良玉, 张庆玉, 等. 川中丘陵区不同播期和播种量对光叶紫花苕鲜草生产的影响. 西南农业学报, 2011,24(3):882-887.
[12] 景宇鹏, 段玉, 张君, 等. 播期对阴山北麓干旱半干旱区华油杂62生长及养分吸收的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(9):111-116.
[13] 郑洪建, 董树亭, 郭玉秋, 等. 生态因素对不同类型玉米品种生长特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2002(1):25-29.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2002.01.006
[14] 豆攀, 李孝东, 孔凡磊, 等. 播期对川中丘区玉米干物质积累与产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017,25(2):221-229.
[15] 黄振喜, 王永军, 王空军, 等. 产量15000kg·ha-1以上夏玉米灌浆期间的光合特性. 中国农业科学, 2007(9):1898-1906.
[16] 吕新, 白萍, 张伟, 等. 不同播期对玉米干物质积累的影响及分析. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2004(4):285-288.
[17] 夏光利, 董浩, 毕军, 等. 播期对两种桃园绿肥生长及养分积累特性的影响. 山东农业科学, 2016,48(7):95-98.
[18] 刘万代, 杜沛鑫, 尹钧, 等. 播期对豫麦49-198群体质量和产量性状的影响. 江西农业学报, 2009,21(5):7-9.
[19] 李树臣, 陈学珍, 谢皓, 等. 不同播期对夏播大豆产量及农艺性状的影响. 北京农学院学报, 2003(4):266-269.
[20] 魏云山, 林在隆, 周学超, 等. 旱区不同播期绿豆群体生长及产量动态分析. 作物杂志, 2017(2):109-113.
[21] 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 李本银, 等. 不同播期对紫云英“信紫1号”生长状况、产量及养分积累的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):127-133.
[22] 张晓明, 郝保平, 张鑫, 等. 缩节胺对毛叶苕子生长及籽粒产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2017,45(10):1627-1630.
[23] 张晓龙, 何俊龙, 宋海星, 等. 播期、密度和施肥量对直播油菜重要农艺性状与产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(5):70-74.
[24] 王永刚. 播期与刈割期对不同品种燕麦产量及品质的影响. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2019.
[25] 赵建武, 白文斌, 刘贵锋, 等. 不同播期、积温、降水量对高粱农艺性状形成及产量的影响. 农学学报, 2014,4(4):1-4,37.
[26] 张钦, 于恩江, 林海波, 等. 连续种植不同绿肥作物耕层的土壤团聚体特征. 西南农业学报, 2019,32(1):148-153.
[1] Wang Chuanqi, Wang Hongmei, Wei Xiaoxing, Ma Xiang, Zhou Qingping. Research Progress of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 1-7.
[2] Wang Huiwen, Li Lei, Yu Shaobo, Wang Qiang, Feng Yu, Ren Aixia, Lin Wen, Sun Min, Gao Zhiqiang. Contribution of Deep Ploughing and Furrow Sowing to Yield and Its Formation of Dryland Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 116-122.
[3] Qian Aiping, Cao Xiuxia, Zhang Wei, Yan Kuanjiang, Lu Junwu. Effects of Different Slow-Release Fertilizer Mix Proportions on the Growth and Yield of Dryland Flax [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 128-131.
[4] Xu Lin, Wu Kaichao, Pang Tian, Deng Zhinian, Zhang Ronghua, Huang Chengfeng, Huang Hairong, Li Yijie, Liu Xiaoyan, Qin Wenxian, Wang Weizan. Effects of Root Promoting Agent on the Development and Yield in Single Bud of Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 132-136.
[5] Liu Zhenxing, Zhou Guimei, Ya Xiuxiu, Chen Jian, Meng Qingxiang, He Guoqing. Effects of Different Sowing Densities on the Morphological Traits and Yields of Three Adzuki Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 137-142.
[6] Lü Weisheng, Xiao Xiaojun, Huang Tianbao, Xiao Guobin, Li Yazhen, Xiao Fuliang, Han Depeng, Zheng Wei. Application Effect of Slow-Released Formulated Fertilizer on Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) under Late Sowing Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 143-150.
[7] Guo Dandan, Liu Zhewen, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Shi Shubing. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Wheat with Different Gluten Types [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 158-162.
[8] Yang Wanjun, Pan Xiangyu, Wang Xiuhua, Wang Lu, Zhao Yan. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Traits of 119 Alfalfa Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 17-22.
[9] Zhu Tongquan, Song Quanhao, Meng Xiangfeng. Influences of Various Growth Factors on Yield and Grain Quality in Wheat——Taking Zhumadian’s Wheat Production in the Past Ten Years as Example [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 80-88.
[10] Zhang Gang, Zhang Shijie, Wang Dejian, Yu Yuanchun. Analysis of Yield and Economic Benefit of Straw Incorporation under Rice-Wheat Double Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 97-103.
[11] Cao Xiaochuang, Li Yefeng, Wu Longlong, Zhu Chunquan, Zhu Lianfeng, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu. Effects of Organic Soluble Fertilizer on the Accumulation and Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen of Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 110-118.
[12] Sun Qi, Geng Yanqiu, Jin Feng, Liu Lixin, Zheng Huantong, Guo Liying, Shao Xiwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield, Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocationin Organs after Anthesis of Direct Seeding Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 119-126.
[13] Hao Xiyu, Xiao Huanyu, Liang Jie, Wang Yingjie, Guo Wenyun. Effects and Optimum Rates of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer for Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 127-132.
[14] Luo Yuqiong, Yan Bo, Wu Ke, Xie Huimin, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of No-Tillage and Straw Returning on Soil Fertility and Rice Yield in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 133-139.
[15] Ding Kaixin, Shan Ying, Feng Naijie, Zheng Dianfeng, Liang Xilong, Wu Qiong, Huang Wenting. Effects of DTA-6 on Physiological Metabolism and Yield of Two Edible Legumes [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 148-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!