Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 174-180.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.06.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Interaction on Physiological Characteristics and Growth of Peanut during the Pod-Pin Stage

Xiu Junjie(), Liu Xueliang()   

  1. Tieling Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tieling 112000, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2022-06-27 Revised:2022-07-15 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-15

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

124

Abstract:

To clarify the effects of water and nitrogen interaction on physiological characteristics and growth of peanut during the pod-pin stage, the changes of traits of peanut plants, endogenous protective enzyme activity, soluble protein, MDA, root activity and dry matter weight in peanut leaves were examined with soil water stress. The experiment was conducted by a normal irrigation with a short drought treatment under the rainproof shelter of Tieling peanut demonstration base and each treatment was imposed by three nitrogen levels: 0, 90, 180kg N/ha (N0, N1, N2). The results showed that, compered with control, the character indexes of peanut, the activity of CAT, solube protein content, root activity, and dry matter weight were reduced; SOD and POD activity, MDA and proline content, the root/shoot ratio (R/S) were increased. The drought resistant of peanut with N1 treatment had a good performance, and the N0 and N2 had a opposite performance. Ten days after rehydration, the endogenous protective enzyme activities, soluble protein, MDA and proline contents recovered rapidly, but root activity and dry matter weight were showed still lower than normal water treatment levels. In addition, N application could promote the traits of peanut plants, such as endogenous protective enzyme activities, soluble protein and proline content, root ability, dry matter weight, R/S, and reduced water stress index. To sum up, N1 treatment was the most suitable N application for the drought stress, and the antioxidant ability of peanut can be improved by optimal application of nitrogen fertilizer, and then enhance the drought resistance.

Key words: Peanut, Pod-pin stage, Water and nitrogen interaction, Physiological characteristics

Table 1

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the soil relative water content under water-stress of peanut during pod-pin stage %"

水分处理
Water treatment		 T1 T2
N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
干旱处理
Drought-stress		 32.75c 25.19c 19.31c 77.15c 78.13c 76.83c
正常灌水
Well-watering		 75.95a 72.87a 72.12a 75.04a 74.78a 74.01a

Table 2

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on peanut characteristics at pod-pin stage"

水分处理
Water
treatment		 氮素水平
Nitrogen
level		 T1 T2
根长
Root length
(cm)		 主茎高
Main stem
height (cm)		 侧枝长
Branch
length (cm)		 分枝数
Branch
number		 主茎叶数
Main stem
leaves		 根长
Root length
(cm)		 主茎高
Main stem
height (cm)		 侧枝长
Branch
length (cm)		 分枝数
Branch
number		 主茎叶数
Main stem
leaves
干旱处理
Drought-stress		 N0 27.5f 16.4e 18.1f 5.9d 12.9e 31.1e 18.2f 20.4e 6.3e 13.5e
N1 30.9d 21.2c 23.8d 7.3c 13.8d 35.5c 24.9d 26.8c 8.2c 14.9d
N2 34.7b 25.5b 29.1b 8.2b 15.2b 40.1a 30.5b 32.4b 9.4b 16.4b
正常灌水
Well-watering		 N0 28.6e 19.1d 20.9e 6.2d 13.1e 30.7e 20.8e 23.7d 6.8d 14.1e
N1 32.3c 25.3b 28.2c 8.2b 14.5c 34.2d 29.2c 31.8b 9.3b 15.7c
N2 36.8a 30.8a 35.4a 9.5a 16.1a 38.4b 36.3a 38.7a 10.8a 17.8a

Fig.1

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on the activities of SOD at the pod-pin stage Different lowercase letters means significant difference at the 5% level, the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on the activities of POD at the pod-pin stage"

Fig.3

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on the activities of CAT at the pod-pin stage"

Fig.4

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on soluble protein contents at the pod-pin stage"

Fig.5

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on the content of MDA at the pod-pin stage"

Fig.6

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on Pro contents at the pod-pin stage"

Fig.7

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on root vigor at the pod-pin stage"

Table 3

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation in peanut at the pod-pin stage"

水分处理
Water
treatment		 氮素水平
Nitrogen
level		 T1 T2
干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation (g)		 根冠比
Root/shoot		 水分胁迫指数
Water stress index		 干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation (g)		 根冠比
Root/shoot		 水分胁迫指数
Water stress index
干旱处理
Drought-stress
 N0 192.2b 0.085a 0.071c 327.1c 0.075b 0.092a
N1 255.1a 0.077b 0.109b 416.8b 0.076b 0.075b
N2 269.3a 0.078b 0.143a 475.3a 0.078a 0.053c
正常灌水
Well-watering		 N0 206.8c 0.084a 360.3c 0.062d
N1 286.3b 0.076b 450.8b 0.063d
N2 314.2a 0.077b 502.1a 0.065c
[1] 张立伟, 王辽卫. 我国花生产业发展状况、存在问题及政策建议. 油料资源, 2020, 11(45):116-122.
[2] 郝西, 张俊, 丁红, 等. 不同花生品种抗旱性评价. 花生学报, 2020, 49(4):47-51.
[3] 张艳正. 不同耐性花生品种响应干旱胁迫的机理研究. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[4] Mackay A. Climate change 2007:impacts,adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2008, 37(6):2407.
doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0015br
[5] 丁红, 张智猛, 戴良香, 等. 干旱胁迫对花生生育中后期根系生长特征的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(12):1477-1483.
[6] 姜慧芳, 任小平. 干旱胁迫对花生叶片SOD活性和蛋白质的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2):169-174.
[7] Sun L, Hu R, Shen G, et al. Genetic engineering peanut for higher drought and salt tolerance. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2013, 4(6):1-7.
[8] 赵小波, 张廷婷, 闫彩霞, 等. 花生中三个LEA基因的克隆与表达分析. 花生学报, 2016, 45(4):14-19.
[9] 陈容钦, 舒文, 葛奎, 等. 干旱胁迫训练对花生生长及胁迫相关基因表达的影响. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(10):1921-1927.
[10] Abid M, Tian Z, Tahir A, et al. Nitrogen nutrition improves the potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to alleviate the effects of drought stress during vegetative growth periods. Front Plant Sciences, 2016, 7:981.
[11] 李广浩, 刘平平, 赵斌, 等. 不同水分条件下控释尿素对夏玉米产量和叶片衰老特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2):571-580.
[12] 刘艳, 汪仁, 华利民, 等. 施氮量对玉米生育后期叶片衰老与保护酶系统的影响. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(2):124-127.
[13] 王慧, 李鑫, 陈梦妮. 水氮配合对不同耐旱性红小豆根际土壤酶活性的影响. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(11):1812-1819.
[14] Du J, Shen T H, Xiong Q Q, et al. Combined proteomics, metabolomics and physiological analyses of rice growth and grain with heavy nitrogen application before and after drought. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1):556.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02772-y
[15] 李鑫鑫, 刘洪光, 林恩. 基于15N示踪技术的干旱区滴灌葡萄氮素利用分析. 核农学报, 2020, 34(11):2551-2560.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.11.2551
[16] 石珊珊, 周苏玫, 尹钧, 等. 高产水平下水肥耦合对小麦旗叶光合特性及产量的影响. 麦类作学报, 2013, 33(3):549-554.
[17] 胡云平, 张静, 刘丹. 水肥耦合对春小麦叶片生态特性及产量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(12):48-52.
[18] 胡梦芸, 门福圆, 张颖君, 等. 水氮互作对作物生理特性和氮素利用影响的研究进展. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(3):332-340.
[19] 吕广德, 王超, 靳雪梅, 等. 水氮组合对冬小麦干物质及氮素积累和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8):2593-2603.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.029
[20] Maranov A, Samedovam A, Shirvany T. Root-shoot relationships in plant adaptation to nitrogen deficiency develop. Plant Soil Science, 82:147-154.
[21] 张国盛, 张仁陟, 黄高宝. 水分胁迫条件下春小麦根系对施肥的响应. 草业学报, 2003, 12(3):105-109.
[22] 张凤翔, 周明耀, 周春林, 等. 水肥耦合对水稻根系形态与活力的影响. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(5):197-200.
[23] 张立军, 樊金娟. 植物生理学实验教程. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007.
[24] Pinheiro C, Passarinho J A, Ricardo C P. Effects of drought and re-watering on the metabolism of Lupinus albus organs. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161:1203-1210.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.016 pmid: 15602812
[25] Burgess S S O, Turner N C, White D A, et all. Tree roots:Conduits for deep recharge of soil water. Oecologia, 2001, 126:158-165.
doi: 10.1007/s004420000501
[26] Jiang Y W, Huang B R. Drought and heat stress injury to two cool-season turfgrasses in relation to antioxidant metabolism and lipid peroxidation. Crop Science, 2001, 41(2):436-442.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412436x
[27] 张立新, 李生秀. 氮、钾、甜菜碱对水分胁迫下夏玉米叶片膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(3):482-490.
[28] Saneoka H, Moghaieb R E, Premcahandra G S, et al. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relation in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2004, 52:131-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.011
[29] 章崇玲, 曾国平, 陈建勋. 干早胁迫对菜苔叶片保护酶活性和膜脂过氧化的影响. 植物资源与环境学报, 2000, 9(4):23-26.
[1] Liu Ying, Gu Yunyi, Zhang Weiyang, Yang Jianchang. Research Advances in the Effects of Water and Nitrogen and Their Interaction on the Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 7-15.
[2] Niu Hanhui, Wei Xiaokai, Yu Shikang, Gu Huizhan, He Jixian, Zhang Qili, Li Junju, Jing Yanqiu, Lei Qiang. Effects of Exogenous Salicylic Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco Seedlings under Low Temperature Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 151-156.
[3] Chen Dong, Zou Jing, Guo Ganggang, Dai Wendian, Song Shaoguang, Huang Ying. Effects of Different Specifications of Seedling Trays on Quality and Main Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 129-135.
[4] Zhang Panpan, Wu Xiong, Ji Jiangtao, Wang Xiaolin. Effects of EDTA on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Cucumber Seedlings under Chromium Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 196-200.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Liang Xiaohong, Liu Jing, Nan Huailin, Wang Songyu, Cao Xiong. Effects of Seed Priming on Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Seeds under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 234-240.
[6] Zhang Jianye, Du Qingzhi, Liu Xiang, Deng Jiahui, Jiao Qin, Gong Luo, Jiang Xingyin. The Effects of S-ABA on Germination and Growth of Maize under Salt-Alkali Stress [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 167-173.
[7] Dong Yang. Study on the Physiological Response of Broomcorn Millet to Different Herbicides [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 255-260.
[8] Cui Yaʼnan, Zhang Man, Zhang Penglei, Liu Bing, Hao Xi, Zang Xiuwang. Effects of H2O2 on the Seed Germination of Peanut under Imbibition and Chilling Injury [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 236-241.
[9] Liang Haiyan, Li Hai, Ding Chao, Yang Fang, Song Xiaoqiang, Deng Yarui, Liu Guishan, Lin Fengxian, Zhang Xiangyu, Su Zhanming, Jiang Chao. Effects of Potassium Fertilizer on Morphology, Mechanical Properties, Physiological Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 177-181.
[10] Liu Weixing, Fan Xiaoyu, Zhang Fengye, He Qunling, Chen Lei, Li Ke, Wu Jihua. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Seed Coating Agent Dosage on Peanut Diseases, Pests and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 199-204.
[11] Lin Ruxia, Guo Fengdan, Wang Xingjun, Xia Han, Hou Lei. Advances in Peanut Molecular Breeding [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 1-5.
[12] Chen Fang, Gu Xiaoping, Yu Fei, Hu Jiamin, Zuo Jin, Hu Xinxin, Liu Yupeng, Hu Feng. Response of Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics of Pepper in Guizhou under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 160-165.
[13] Yu Tianyi, Zheng Yaping, Qiu Shaofen, Jiang Daqi, Wu Zhengfeng, Zheng Yongmei, Sun Xuewu, Shen Pu, Wang Caibin, Zhang Jiancheng. Effects of Calcium (Ca) Application in Acidified Soil on Ca Absorption, Utilization and Yield of Different Peanut Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 80-85.
[14] Shi Yahan, Du Tianqing, Zhai Hongmei, Yang Shutian, Gong Rui, Li Yuhang, Lu Boyu, Cui Fuzhu, Gao Zhiqiang. Effects of Selenium on Seed Germination, Physiological Characteristics and Nutritional Quality of Kidney Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 210-216.
[15] Wang Tong, Zhao Xiaodong, Zhen Pingping, Chen Jing, Chen Mingna, Chen Na, Pan Lijuan, Wang Mian, Xu Jing, Yu Shanlin, Chi Xiaoyuan, Zhang Jiancheng. Genome-Wide Identification and Characteristic Analyzation of the TCP Transcription Factors Family in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 35-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!