Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 118-125.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.04.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of Small-Seeded Peanut Varieties Based on BLUP Values and GGE Biplot

Yin Junhua(), Deng Li, Guo Minjie, Miao Jianli, Hu Junping, Li Shaowei, Ren Li()   

  1. Kaifeng Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China
  • Received:2023-12-11 Revised:2024-02-18 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-12

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

157

Abstract:

In order to screen the peanut varieties with high and stable yields and wide adaptability, the study was carried based on the data of new peanut varieties from 2019 and 2020 regional trials in the northern region of China to analyze the main agronomic traits of 12 small-seeded peanut varieties through variation analysis, correlation analysis and GGE biplot method, and the BLUP values of pod yield of 12 tested varieties in each pilot were obtained using Genstat software. The results showed that after correction with BLUP values, the pod yield of some varieties decreased compared to the original yield, and the accuracy was improved. The coefficient of variation of BLUP values for each variety in different pilot sites decreased compared to the original value. The results of agronomic traits analysis of different varieties in different environments showed that different traits were affected to varying degrees by the environment. The length of lateral branch, main stem height, number of branches with pods, number of total branches, total number of pods per plant, number of full pods per plant, 100-pod weight, and pod yield were greatly affected by the environment, while the 100-seed weight, shelling percentage, and growth period were less affected by the environment. The analysis of variation showed that the coefficient of variation for shelling percentage and growth period were relatively small, while the coefficient of variation for total number of pods per plant and number of full pods per plant were relatively large. Among them, the main stem height and lateral branch length of Shanghua 588 (G10) had the greatest variation, with coefficients of variation of 35.22% and 30.76%, respectively. Puhua 66 (G9) had the greatest variation in number of total branches, Huayu 20 (G1) had the greatest variation in number of branches with pods, and Huayu 655 (G4) had the greatest variation in number of branches with pods and number of full pods per plant. Correlation analysis showed that pod yield was highly significantly positively correlated with 100-seed weight, 100-pod weight, shelling percentage, and growth period, and these four agronomic traits were the key factors for increasing the yield of small-pod peanuts. The GGE biplot showed that Puhua 66 (G9) had the best comprehensive evaluation of high and stable yield, Jinonghua 16 (G6) and Kainong 111 (G7) were suitable for planting in multiple areas.

Key words: Peanut, BLUP value, GGE biplot, Comprehensive evaluation

Table 1

Test varieties name"

品种代号
Variety code		 品种名称
Variety name		 品种代号
Variety code		 品种名称
Variety name
G1 花育20号 G7 开农111
G2 花育6311 G8 漯花22号
G3 花育6312 G9 濮花66号
G4 花育655 G10 商花588
G5 花育6811 G11 徐26
G6 冀农花16号 G12 郑农花26号

Table 2

Test locations and codes"

试点代号
Code of test
location		 试点名称
Location
name		 试点代号
Code of test
location		 试点名称
Location
name
E1 安徽固镇 E10 辽宁锦州
E2 河北保定 E11 山东菏泽
E3 河北石家庄 E12 山东济宁
E4 河南漯河 E13 山东青岛
E5 河南濮阳 E14 山东泰安
E6 河南商丘 E15 山东潍坊
E7 河南郑州 E16 山东烟台
E8 河南驻马店 E17 山西汾阳
E9 辽宁阜新

Fig.1

Comparison of the original data and BLUP data of different peanut varieties on pod yield E1-E17 indicate the original data of pod yield in each test site, E1′-E17′ indicate the BLUP data of pod yield in each test site."

Table 3

Comparison of the coefficient of variation between the original values and BLUP values of pod yield of different peanut varieties %"

年份Year 指标Indicator G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12
2019 原始值 24.52 26.90 25.33 24.56 26.72 25.04 23.07 24.33 25.22 25.55 25.35 24.32
BLUP值 23.80 26.08 24.63 23.91 25.97 24.40 22.48 23.71 24.54 24.88 24.62 23.63
2020 原始值 24.56 27.50 26.29 26.30 26.57 31.63 28.81 25.40 24.74 23.44 23.47 28.92
BLUP值 23.96 26.81 25.62 25.70 25.93 30.87 28.16 24.80 24.20 22.91 22.92 28.12

Fig.2

Analysis of agronomic traits of peanuts in different pilot projects ◆ represents discrete values; in the box plot ■ represents mean values."

Table 4

The coefficient of variation of each trait in different peanut varieties %"

品种
代号
Variety
code		 主茎高
Main
stem
height		 侧枝长
Lateral
branch
length		 总分枝数
Number
of total
branches		 结果枝数
Number of
branches
with pods		 单株总果数
Total number
of pods
per plant		 单株饱果数
Number of
full pods
per plant		 百果重
100-pod
weight		 百仁重
100-seed
weight		 出米率
Shelling
percentage		 生育期
Growth
period		 荚果产量
Pod yield
G1 25.57 24.10 26.41 69.15 38.20 38.41 16.60 14.46 3.94 6.17 23.54
G2 25.80 26.11 29.38 48.74 35.19 33.71 14.41 13.96 5.40 5.71 26.11
G3 28.44 25.90 27.88 25.28 42.75 36.74 15.97 15.99 4.50 6.39 25.11
G4 29.01 29.89 24.39 26.41 47.75 43.31 13.08 13.84 4.76 5.69 24.44
G5 28.48 26.39 24.21 26.83 45.78 38.53 16.07 14.19 7.11 5.48 25.56
G6 30.35 28.45 23.02 25.90 43.69 36.34 16.75 18.04 4.13 6.33 27.57
G7 25.80 25.82 20.78 24.24 45.57 38.45 14.81 15.93 3.95 6.66 25.05
G8 27.23 25.02 24.03 26.07 43.28 34.23 14.43 14.43 3.78 6.53 24.24
G9 27.99 26.14 30.37 24.08 45.12 41.71 15.25 14.50 5.91 5.90 24.07
G10 35.22 30.76 24.11 23.47 39.07 31.80 15.72 14.85 3.26 6.24 23.62
G11 25.86 23.44 19.18 19.18 35.82 29.76 13.83 14.42 4.26 5.79 23.50
G12 25.83 24.49 33.67 30.01 45.90 41.87 16.60 18.13 3.66 6.54 26.14

Fig.3

Correlation analysis of agronomic traits and yield of different peanut varieties “*”and“**”indicate significant and extremely significant correlations at the levels of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively."

Fig.4

GGE biplot analysis of high yield and stable yield"

Fig.5

GGE biplot analysis of suitable planting areas"

Fig.6

GGE biplot analysis of ideal varieties"

[1] 孙海艳, 侯乾, 董文召, 等. 我国花生品种发展现状. 中国种业, 2022(7):15-17.
[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistical database FAOSTAT. (2022-12-04)[2023-12-05]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
[3] 张立伟, 王辽卫. 我国花生产业发展状况、存在问题及政策建议. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(11):116-122.
[4] 俞渭江, 洪振中. 种公牛选择方法研究——应用最优线性无偏估计乳用种公牛育种值的方法. 中国农业科学, 1984, 17(5):77-83.
[5] 王楚端, 张沅. 动物模型BLUP在猪育种中的应用. 中国畜牧杂志, 1995(5):54-56.
[6] 钱宏光, 布仁, 巴图, 等. BLUP法在肉羊育种中的应用初探. 中国草食动物, 2000, 2(4):22-24.
[7] 任长宏, 格桑曲珍, 胡希远. 经验性最佳线性无偏预测(eBLUP)在油菜区域试验品种评价的效果. 作物学报, 2017, 43(3):371-377.
[8] 郭敏杰, 邓丽, 苗建利, 等. 基于BLUP值的大粒花生农艺性状与产量的相关和通径分析. 河北农业大学学报, 2021, 44(5):36-41.
doi: 10.13320/j.cnki.jauh.2021.0081
[9] 常世豪, 耿臻, 杨青春, 等. 基于BLUP值的夏大豆产量与农艺性状的相关分析. 作物杂志, 2023(5):10-15.
[10] 李金花. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的黑杨派无性系生长性状基因型与环境互作效应. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6):64-73.
[11] 周志淑, 王瑞, 李加纳. GGE双标图对油菜双列杂交试验结果的分析. 种子, 2009, 28(6):102-104.
[12] 郭敏杰, 邓丽, 任丽, 等. 基于R语言的AMMI和GGE双标图在花生区试中的应用. 花生学报, 2017, 46(2):24-31.
[13] 周宇飞, 依兵, 吴奇, 等. 基于GGE双标图的高粱品种产量及其稳定性分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2018, 49(6):649-654.
[14] 孟令聪, 路明, 王敏, 等. GGE双标图模型在玉米新品种测试中的应用. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(3):330-334.
[15] 宋慧, 刘金荣, 王素英, 等. GGE双标图评价谷子‘豫谷18’的丰产稳产性和适应性. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(1):29-38.
[16] 王磊, 程本义, 鄂志国, 等. 基于GGE双标图的水稻区试品种丰产性稳产性和适应性评价. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4):408-416.
doi: 10．3969/j．issn．1001G7216．2015．04．010
[17] 程玲, 张心菲, 张鑫鑫, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的林木多地点试验分析. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3):87-93.
[18] 于经川, 张善勇, 刘兆晔, 等. 植株展开度、穗幅宽与小麦产量关系的研究. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2004, 25(1):63-65.
[19] 杭雅文, 武威, 张莀茜, 等. 弱筋小麦品质指标的相关性分析及筛选. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(3):320-327.
[20] 董明辉, 赵步洪, 徐大勇, 等. 江苏省主要粳稻品种穗部性状及其与产量构成的关系. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 36(4):85-89.
[21] 张先亮, 刘克锋, 楚宗燕, 等. 棉花杂交种和常规种产量与产量构成因素相关性的比较分析. 中国棉花, 2012, 39(3):16-18.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.20120304
[22] 王敏, 徐萍, 刘新江, 等. 黄淮海地区夏玉米农艺性状与产量的通径分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(5):1229-1236.
[23] 赵强, 赵满义, 吴迅, 等. 基于温热玉米F2:3家系的株型相关性状遗传分析. 种子, 2019, 38(10):77-79.
[24] 刘歆, 杨芳, 邓军波, 等. 江汉平原大豆品系表型分析及综合评价. 作物杂志, 2021(5):57-63.
[25] 朱亚娟, 甄志高, 赵金环, 等. 河南省小粒花生品种主要农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析. 湖南农业科学, 2016(6):34-36,39.
[26] 张晓杰, 姜慧芳, 任小平, 等. 中国花生核心种质的主成分分析及相关分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(3):298-304.
[27] 赵锋, 包奇军, 潘永东, 等. 70份大麦种质资源遗传多样性评价. 作物杂志, 2021(6):54-61.
[28] 史关燕, 王娟菲, 麻慧芳, 等. 谷子杂交种产量与主要农艺性状的相关性及回归分析. 作物杂志, 2022(6):82-87.
[29] 刘洪, 任永浩. 花生新品种DUS测试原理与技术. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2012.
[30] 邓丽, 李绍伟, 郭敏杰, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的大果型花生分产稳产适应性分析种子. 种子, 2023, 42(7):117-121,150.
[31] 冯亚平, 韩燕, 江金春, 等. 北方大花生品种主要农艺性状的相关性分析. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9):97-101.
[32] 王慧敏, 彭振英, 李新国, 等. 67个花生品种主要农艺性状的变异及相关性分析. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9):91-96.
[33] Yan W K, Kang M S. GGE biplot analysis:a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. Boca raton: CRC Press, 2002.
[34] 金石桥, 许乃银. GGE双标图在中国农作物品种试验中应用的必要性探讨. 种子, 2012, 31(12):89-92.
[35] 张忠信, 董文召, 秦利, 等. GGE双标图在河南省夏播花生品种区域试验中的应用. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(36):62-65.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030077
[36] 郭敏杰, 邓丽, 苗建利, 等. 我国北方片区大粒花生品种基因环境互作的综合分析. 花生学报, 2021, 50(2):57-63.
[1] Lü Shuli, Tian Zhuangbo, Ding Fang, Lü Zhuoyang. Comprehensive Analysis of High Yield and High Quality Sesame Shangzhi 6 Based on GGE Biplot and TOPSIS Method [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 80-86.
[2] Lü Rongzhen, Maihemuti∙Rouzi , Zhang Yong, Maihemuti∙Remutula , Yaermaimaiti∙Alimu , Zhang Jiancheng, Yu Tianyi. Effects of Exogenous Hormones and Inhibitors on Hormone Content, Growth and Development of Peanut in Acidified Soil [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 218-224.
[3] Zhang Zhengjie, Yang Guohua, Guo Ruihong, Cheng Kaihua, Mi Xingwang, Liu Fei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Regional Trials for the Spring Maize in Northwest China Based on DTOPSIS Method and Membership Function Method [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 78-84.
[4] Zhao Fuyang, Ma Bo, Hu Jifang, Tan Kefei, Liu Chuanzeng, Yan Feng, Dong Yang, Hou Xiaomin, Li Qingquan, Han Yehui. Evaluation of Photoperiod Sensitivity of Japonica Rice in Cold Regions under Different Photoperiod Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 135-140.
[5] Lu Jing, Yu Bo, Jiang Mi, Peng Lianxin, Ren Yuanhang, Wu Qi. Assessment of Genetic Diversity in 58 Germplasm Resources of Highland Barley [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 20-28.
[6] Shi Huiying, Fan Baojie, Liu Changyou, Wang Yan, Wang Shen, Zhang Zhixiao, Su Qiuzhu, Tian Jing. Identification and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Mung Bean Germplasm Resources during Germination [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 66-75.
[7] Zhang Ying, Wang Haiyang, Jiang Lin, Guo Xueqing, Zhong Xiaoli, Zhang Xing, Lu Minjiao, Ji Xiaoming, Yang Xiaopeng, Wu Shusong. Comprehensive Evaluation and Spatial Distribution of Soil Fertility Suitability in Changting Tobacco-Growing Area [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(6): 171-178.
[8] Yu Mu, Yang Haitang, Hu Yanling, Liu Ruanzhi, Shi Yanzhao, Li Pan, Han Yanhong, Zhu Zhenzhen, Li Shizhong, Guo Zhenchao. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Stability of Yield Components in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(6): 55-60.
[9] Li Yawei, Zhang Lei, Liu Tianpeng, He Jihong, Dong Kongjun, Ren Ruiyu, Yang Tianyu. Analysis and Evaluation of Agronomic and Economic Characteristics of Foxtail Millet in Northwest Ecological Region [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(5): 48-53.
[10] Ma Yanhua, Sun Dequan, Li Suiyan, Lin Hong, Pan Liyan, Li Donglin, Fan Jinsheng, Wu Jianzhong, Yang Guowei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits and Screening of Excellent Germplasms of Maize Landraces in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 103-112.
[11] Yuan Di, Zhi Hui, Wang Haigang, Zhang Hui, Yao Qi, Liang Hongkai, Wang Junjie, Chen Ling, Diao Xianmin, Jia Guanqing. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Registered Varieties of Foxtail Millet in China [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 14-23.
[12] Li Qingchao, Zhang Dengfeng, Li Chunhui, Yang Shan, Liu Jianxin, Wu Xun. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Maize Landraces in Southwest China [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 24-32.
[13] Liu Yue, Jia Yonghong, Yu Yuehua, Zhang Jinshan, Wang Runqi, Li Dandan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Growth and Development, Yield and Quality of Peanut in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 119-126.
[14] Jiang Zhiming, Zhang Zhongwen, Zhang Cheng, Zheng Hongbin, Wang Weimin, Li Sijun, Hou Jianlin, Deng Xiaoqiang, Wu Wenxin, Zhu Lin, Deng Yongsheng, Deng Xiaohua. Study on Maturity of One-Time Harvesting of Four Lower Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves in Tobacco-Rice Rotation Field [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 129-138.
[15] Yang Enze, Xie Rui, Han Ping'an, Zhang Yonghu, Liu Jinchuan, Niu Suqing, Wen Rui, Wang Chunyong, Jin Xiaolei. Genetic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits of 162 Tartary Buckwheat Resources in Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 15-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!