Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 80-86.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.04.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive Analysis of High Yield and High Quality Sesame Shangzhi 6 Based on GGE Biplot and TOPSIS Method

Lü Shuli(), Tian Zhuangbo, Ding Fang, Lü Zhuoyang   

  1. Shangqiu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shangqiu 476000, Henan, China
  • Received:2025-01-09 Revised:2025-03-20 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-12

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

129

Abstract:

In order to accurately evaluate the high and stable yield, adaptability and comprehensive trait of sesame variety Shangzhi 6, and promote the production and breeding utilization of the variety. Based on the field trials data of Shangzhi 6 at 11 experimental sites in the Huang-Huai area for two years, the GGE biplot and TOPSIS method were used to comprehensively analyze it. The results showed that the average contents of fat and protein of Shangzhi 6 were 54.02% and 21.50% in two years, respectively. The comprehensive disease resistance was resistance to stem spot blight and high resistance to blight. In the analysis of high and stable yield, the comprehensive evaluation of high and stable yield of Shangzhi 6 in the two years was better than that of the control variety Yuzhi 4, ranking first and fourth, respectively. In the analysis of suitable planting areas, Shangzhi 6 had high yield performance in two years, and there were many suitable planting sites in the Huang-Huai area. In the comprehensive evaluation of variety yield, quality and disease resistance, Shangzhi 6 ranked first and third respectively in two years, which were better than the control varieties. In summary, Shangzhi 6 has good high and stable yield, excellent quality, strong disease resistance and excellent comprehensive traits. It is suitable for promotion and planting in the Huang-Huai area and similar ecological environments.

Key words: Sesame, Shangzhi 6, GGE biplot, TOPSIS method, Comprehensive analysis

Table 1

Field trial varieties and their institutions in 2021-2022"

2021 2022
代号Code 品种Variety 育种单位Breeding institution 代号Code 品种Variety 育种单位Breeding institution
F1 阜芝303 阜阳市农业科学院 H1 漯芝107 漯河市农业科学院
F2 商芝3号 商丘市农林科学院 H2 商芝6号 商丘市农林科学院
F3 驻19B11 驻马店市农业科学院 H3 商芝7号 商丘市农林科学院
F4 漯芝106 漯河市农业科学院 H4 商芝8号 商丘市农林科学院
F5 皖芝24 安徽省农业科学院作物研究所 H5 宛芝23 南阳市农业科学院
F6 驻19B10 驻马店市农业科学院 H6 信芝H12 信阳市农业科学院
F7 商芝6号 商丘市农林科学院 H7 豫芝4号 驻马店市农业科学院
F8 漯芝100 漯河市农业科学院 H8 驻19B10 驻马店市农业科学院
F9 豫芝4号 驻马店市农业科学院 H9 驻19B11 驻马店市农业科学院
F10 阜芝125 阜阳市农业科学院
F11 商芝7号 商丘市农林科学院
F12 周芝23 周口市农业科学院

Fig.1

The yield performance of Shangzhi 6 in field trials in 2021-2022"

Table 2

The quality and disease resistance of Shangzhi 6 in field trials in 2021-2022"

年份
Year		 脂肪含量
Fat content (%)		 蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)		 茎点枯病Stem spot blight 枯萎病Blight
发病率Morbidity (%) 病情指数Disease index 发病率Morbidity (%) 病情指数Disease index
2021 53.42 21.40 16.15 13.94 0.98 0.78
2022 54.61 21.60 10.27 7.58 0.32 0.05
平均Mean 54.02 21.50 13.21 10.76 0.65 0.42

Table 3

Joint variance analysis of yield of tested varieties in field trials in 2021-2022"

年份Year 变异来源Variation source 自由度df 平方和Quadratic sum 均方Mean square F值F-value
2021 区组 10 189 412.17 18 941.22
环境（E） 4 49 226 274.58 12 306 569.00 1927.11**
基因型（G） 11 2 998 014.33 272 546.80 42.68**
基因型×环境（GE） 44 6 787 395.42 154 259.00 24.16**
误差 110 702 463.17 6386.03
总变异 179 59 903 559.66
2022 区组 12 83 628.69 6969.06
环境（E） 5 16 436 428.48 3 287 285.70 856.89**
基因型（G） 8 728 657.05 91 082.13 23.74**
基因型×环境（GE） 40 1 909 013.25 47 725.33 12.44**
误差 96 330 691.98 3444.71
总变异 161 19 488 419.44

Fig.2

Yield GGE biplot in field trials in 2021 and 2022"

Fig.3

Functional analysis of suitable planting areas in GGE biplot of yield in field trials in 2021 and 2022"

Table 4

Comprehensive analysis of the main traits of varieties in the field trials in 2021-2022"

年份
Year		 品种代码
Variety
code		 与最优值距离
Distance from the
optimal value		 与最劣值距离
Distance from
the worst value		 统计量
Statistic		 排序
Sort
2021 F1 1.329 1.359 0.506 7
F2 1.106 1.500 0.576 4
F3 1.121 1.542 0.579 3
F4 1.311 1.016 0.437 10
F5 1.518 1.153 0.432 11
F6 1.009 1.404 0.582 2
F7 1.037 1.878 0.644 1
F8 1.531 1.298 0.459 9
F9 1.430 1.072 0.428 12
F10 1.217 1.417 0.538 6
F11 0.972 1.316 0.575 5
F12 1.405 1.315 0.483 8
2022 H1 1.218 1.185 0.493 6
H2 0.879 1.595 0.645 3
H3 1.235 1.557 0.558 4
H4 1.537 1.340 0.466 7
H5 1.679 0.924 0.355 9
H6 1.282 1.362 0.515 5
H7 1.559 1.154 0.425 8
H8 0.711 1.841 0.721 1
H9 0.769 1.784 0.699 2
[1] 李忠峰, 赵凯, 巩方平, 等. 1979-2019 年中国5种主要油料作物的时空分布变化. 中国油脂, 2024, 49(9):1-9.
[2] 周芳, 赵应忠, 周婷, 等. 近40年来中国芝麻新品种的国家区域试验进展及建议. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(4):1383-1392.
[3] Anyogu A, Somorin Y M, Oladipo A O, et al. Food safety issues associated with sesame seed value chains: current status and future perspectives. Heliyon, 2024, 10(16):e36347.
[4] Sabag I, Bi Y, Sahoo M M, et al. Leveraging genomics and temporal high‐throughput phenotyping to enhance association mapping and yield prediction in sesame. The Plant Genome, 2024, 17(3):e20481.
[5] 张体德, 王保勤, 杜振伟, 等. 河南省芝麻育种成果回顾与展望. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(10):32-37.
[6] Avashthi H, Angadi U B, Chauhan D, et al. Sesame genomic web resource (SesameGWR): a well-annotated data resource for transcriptomic signatures of abiotic and biotic stress responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Briefings in Functional Genomics, 2024, 23(6):828-842.
[7] 刘海礁, 邱雅洁, 周萌, 等. 河南省芝麻生产成本收益分析. 农业经济, 2024(3):29-31.
[8] 宫慧慧, 赵逢涛, 裴伟, 等. 芝麻种质资源及相关分子生物学研究进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(3):517-522.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.017
[9] 崔彦芹, 徐婧, 郭元章, 等. 芝麻品种区域试验北方片区综合剖析及育种变化趋势. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(3):401-410.
[10] 王芳, 沈希华, 邢晓宁, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在花生高产稳产和适应性分析中的应用——以我国北方片小粒花生新品种安花3号为例. 花生学报, 2024, 53(1):19-25.
[11] Gabriel K R. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 1971, 58(3):453-467.
[12] Kempton R A. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1984, 103(1):123-135.
[13] 陈国立, 徐超峰, 许卫猛, 等. 河南省玉米新品种产量与主要农艺性状综合分析及评价. 种子, 2024, 43(9):53-58,77.
[14] Tian H J, Liu H, Zhang D, et al. Screening of salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.) lines using membership function value and GGE biplot analysis. PeerJ, 2024, 12(4):e16838.
[15] Reshma O, Surendra P, Reddy S B, et al. Evaluation of rice genotypes for yield stability and adaptability across multiple environments using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 2024, 27(8):1164-1176.
[16] Silva M F, Soares J M, Martins M S, et al. Artificial aging for predicting the storability of soybean seeds via GGE biplot. Journal of Seed Science, 2024, 46:e202446001.
[17] Shojaei S H, Mostafavi K, Ghasemi S H, et al. Sustainability on different canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars by GGE biplot graphical technique in multi-environment. Sustainability, 2023, 15(11):8945.
[18] Kona P, Ajay B C, Gangadhara K, et al. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for yield and yield contributing traits in confectionery groundnut. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1):2943.
[19] Cong Z J, Gu J, Li C Q, et al. Enhancing soil conditions and maize yield efficiency through rational conservation tillage in aeolian semi-arid regions: a TOPSIS analysis. Water, 2024, 16(16):2228.
[20] 聂迎彬, 穆培源, 桑伟, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图法在新疆冬小麦区域试验产量分析上的应用. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(9):1569-1575.
[21] 张忠信, 韩锁义, 刘华, 等. 基于GGE双标图及TOPSIS法对高油酸花生豫花155号主要性状综合分析. 种子, 2024, 43(7):116-120,157.
[22] Azadi A, Jalali A S, Navidi M N. Land evaluation approaches comparing TOPSIS and SAW with parametric methods for rice cultivation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195(11):1296.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11849-8 pmid: 37821796
[23] Oliveira D B R, Zuffo A M, Aguilera J G, et al. Selection of soybean genotypes under drought and saline stress conditions using Manhattan distance and TOPSIS. Plants, 2022, 11(21):2827.
[24] 张秀荣, 冯祥运. 芝麻种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[25] 中华人民共和国农业部. 油料种籽含油量的测定残余法:NY/T 1285-2007. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
[26] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定:GB 5009.5-2016. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
[27] 昝凯, 陈亚光, 徐淑霞, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在大豆区试中的应用. 大豆科技, 2019(4):16-20.
[28] Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2000, 114(1):1-9.
[29] 郭敏杰, 邓丽, 任丽, 等. 基于R语言的AMMI和GGE双标图在花生区试中的应用. 花生学报, 2017, 46(2):24-31.
[30] 徐东阳, 郭瑶晴, 胡敏杰, 等. 基于AMMI模型和GGE双标图对芝麻新品种周芝11号的综合评价. 种子, 2024, 43(9):71-77.
[31] 胡峰, 张建涛, 张杰, 等. 河南省芝麻种植气候适宜度时空变化研究. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(8):56-68.
[32] 吕树立, 丁芳. 豫东地区芝麻籽粒品质与产量对气候生态条件的响应. 陕西农业科学, 2024, 70(2):59-66.
[33] 谢富欣, 李成焕, 刘焱, 等. 南阳市芝麻病虫草渍害发生规律及轻简化绿色防控技术研究. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47(1):59-66.
[34] 侯凡, 陈佑源, 林建荣, 等. 基于GGE双标图分析籼粳杂交稻新品种浙粳优27的丰产稳产性和适应性. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(4):93-97.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.04.018
[35] 李梦, 周显兵, 刘锋博, 等. 基于GGE双标图的油菜新品种陕油1609丰产稳产适应性分析. 种子, 2023, 42(7):122-128.
[36] 张赫楠, 徐浩策, 刘颖慧, 等. 基于GGE双标图对‘张杂谷21’的丰产稳产性及适应性分析. 作物杂志,(2024-10-12)[2025-01-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1808.S.20241012.1246.003.html.
[37] 殷君华, 邓丽, 郭敏杰, 等. 基于BLUP值和GGE双标图对小粒花生品种的综合评价. 作物杂志,(2024-11-06)[2025-01-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1808.S.20241105.1739.008.html.
[38] 潘守慧, 王开义, 王志彬, 等. 基于改进灰色关联度和TOPSIS的作物育种材料评价方法. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(3):145-154.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0613
[1] Yin Junhua, Deng Li, Guo Minjie, Miao Jianli, Hu Junping, Li Shaowei, Ren Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Small-Seeded Peanut Varieties Based on BLUP Values and GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 118-125.
[2] Gao Shuguang, Xu Dongyang, Hu Minjie, Wang Ruixia, Zhang Chunhua, Xu Bohan, Li Weifeng, Zhang Liuping. Preliminary Identification and Evaluation of Quality Traits of Sesame Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 58-64.
[3] Zhang Zhengjie, Yang Guohua, Guo Ruihong, Cheng Kaihua, Mi Xingwang, Liu Fei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Regional Trials for the Spring Maize in Northwest China Based on DTOPSIS Method and Membership Function Method [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 78-84.
[4] Lü Shuli, Ding Fang, Zheng Dongfang. Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Sesame Capsule to Different Chemical Ripening Agents [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 155-161.
[5] Lü Weisheng, Wang Xinyue, Chen Ming, Deng Xueyun, Zhang Chen, Li Zijing, Luo Junyuan, Liu Xiaosan, Xiao Guobin. The Effect and the Residual Effect of Special Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer for Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under Rapeseed-Sesame Rotation System in Red-Soil Dryland [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(6): 113-119.
[6] Yu Mu, Yang Haitang, Hu Yanling, Liu Ruanzhi, Shi Yanzhao, Li Pan, Han Yanhong, Zhu Zhenzhen, Li Shizhong, Guo Zhenchao. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Stability of Yield Components in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(6): 55-60.
[7] Zhao Jun, Duan Xianqin, Chen Yanni, Wang Wenqian, Zeng Yuanlinjun, Wei Wenliang, Sun Jian. Analysis of the Contribution Rate of Capsule Photosynthesis to the Traits Related to Grain Weight Formation in Sesamum indicum [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 121-129.
[8] Wang Ruopeng, Lü Wei, Liu Wenping, Wen Fei, Han Junmei, Liu Xiaxia. Effects of Different Cultivation Modes on Yield of Sesame and Water and Heat of Soil [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 247-252.
[9] Su Xiaoyu, Gao Tongmei, Zhang Pengyu, Li Feng, Wu Yin, Wang Dongyong, Tian Yuan, Wei Shuangling. Comprehensive Evaluation of Heat Resistance of Sesame Seedlings Based on Principal Component Analysis and Membership Function Method [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 52-59.
[10] Xie Wenjin, Li Fangming, Li Ning, Yang Hailong, Fu Jun, Zhang Zhongwei, Gao Xudong, Feng Guang. Analysis of Yield, Quality Traits and TestingSite Discrimination of Fresh Waxy Corn in Northern China Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 85-90.
[11] Xiao Jibing, Liu Zhi, Kong Fanxin, Xin Zongxu, Wu Hongsheng. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield Stability of Sorghum Varieties Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 36-45.
[12] Wang Huimin, Li Minghao, Li Yun, Li Han, Wang Shuang, Lin Xiaohu, Han Yucui. Identification and Evaluation of Salt-Alkali Tolerance of Foxtail Millet Cultivars (Lines) at Germination Stage [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 57-66.
[13] Huang Guibin, Guan Yaobing, Niu Yongqi, Zhou Lilei, Zhao Yongfeng. Comprehensive Evaluation of 12 Major Agronomic Traits of 103 Chickpea Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 6-13.
[14] Hou Jingjing, Jin Fang, Zhao Li, Wang Bin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic and Quality Traits of 16 New Oil Flax Lines [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 42-48.
[15] Zhang Chunyan, Zhuang Kezhang, Wu Ronghua, Li Jing, Li Xinxin, Wang Heng, Dong Xichen, Xu Geng, Wu Benhua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 11 Feed Oat Varieties in Southern Shandong by DTOPSIS Method Based on Entropy Weighting [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 62-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!