Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 181-187.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.04.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Combined Lime and Pig Manure Application on Grain Quality of Double-Cropping High-Quality Rice

Deng Zhou(), Gong Chenxu, He Yuxuan, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan()   

  1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding/College of Agriculture, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2024-05-29 Revised:2024-07-03 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-12

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

134

Abstract:

Using high-quality rice varieties Qiliangyou 2012 (early rice) and Taiyou 871 (late rice) as experimental materials, three treatments: application of chemical fertilization (NPK), 50% of chemical nitrogen substituted by pig manure (1/2N+M), and combined application of lime with pig manure (1/2N+M+L) were set up to explore the effects of lime and pig manure combination application on the quality of the high-quality double-cropping rice. The results showed that in terms of milling quality, compared with NPK, 1/2N+M and 1/2N+M+L in the early rice season increased the milled rice rate by 1.20 and 2.18 percentage points in 2019, with the head rice rate increased by 1.40 and 1.76 percentage points in 2020, respectively. In terms of appearance quality, compared with NPK, 1/2N+M and 1/2N+M+L in the early rice season reduced the chalky grain rate by 3.65 and 4.99 percentage points, and reduced chalkiness by 1.45 and 1.52 percentage points in 2020, respectively. Compared with NPK, 1/2N+M+L reduced the chalkiness of the late rice by 3.11 percentage points in 2019. Compared with NPK and 1/2N+M, 1/2N+M+L in the early rice season reduced the amylose content by 1.27 and 1.01 percentage points and increased gel consistency by 4.74% and 7.19% in 2019, respectively. Compared with 1/2N+M, the 1/2N+M+L in the late rice season reduced the amylose content by 0.89 percentage points and increased gel consistency by 2.37% in 2020. Compared with NPK, 1/2N+M+L in the late rice season reduced the setback by 8.58% in 2020, but increased the breakdown by 38.04% and 11.22% in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Compared with NPK, 1/2N+M significantly increased the cadmium concentration in polished early rice in 2020, while 1/2N+M+L significantly reduced the cadmium concentration relative to 1/2N+M. Therefore, the combined application of lime and pig manure can promote soil fertility as well as improving the processing, appearance, taste and hygiene quality of the high-quality double-cropping rice.

Key words: Double-cropping rice, Soil acidification, Organic fertilizer, Rice quality, Cadmium

Table 1

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the milling quality of the early rice %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 糙米率
Brown rice rate		 精米率
Milled rice rate		 整精米率
Head rice rate
2019 NPK 78.63±1.25a 61.99±1.07b 38.75±0.11b
1/2N+M 79.36±0.72a 63.19±1.10a 40.77±1.80b
1/2N+M+L 79.37±0.72a 64.17±0.97a 46.19±0.53a
2020 NPK 78.27±0.30a 55.82±0.54a 42.90±0.63b
1/2N+M 77.90±0.33a 55.26±0.10a 44.30±0.10a
1/2N+M+L 77.44±0.79a 56.00±0.65a 44.66±0.64a

Table 2

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the milling quality of the late rice %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 糙米率
Brown rice rate		 精米率
Milled rice rate		 整精米率
Head rice rate
2019 NPK 75.80±1.59a 64.61±4.60a 46.34±5.60a
1/2N+M 77.35±0.87a 62.58±0.56a 43.92±2.06a
1/2N+M+L 79.18±2.25a 65.10±2.45a 49.36±4.86a
2020 NPK 81.44±0.38a 69.87±0.08a 60.89±0.86a
1/2N+M 81.25±0.23a 69.39±0.62a 59.46±1.66a
1/2N+M+L 81.37±0.47a 69.53±0.02a 61.94±1.07a

Table 3

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the appearance quality of the early rice %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 垩白粒率
Chalky grain rate		 垩白度
Chalkiness
2019 NPK 17.75±0.81a 5.67±0.13a
1/2N+M 16.38±0.89a 5.25±0.68ab
1/2N+M+L 15.66±1.41a 4.68±0.19b
2020 NPK 18.46±2.66a 5.73±0.28a
1/2N+M 14.81±0.80b 4.28±0.13b
1/2N+M+L 13.47±0.77b 4.21±0.13b

Table 4

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the appearance quality of the late rice %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 垩白粒率
Chalky grain rate		 垩白度
Chalkiness
2019 NPK 18.87±3.76a 8.61±1.86a
1/2N+M 15.15±1.16a 6.79±0.59ab
1/2N+M+L 14.28±2.32a 5.50±0.76b
2020 NPK 5.90±0.08a 1.35±0.02a
1/2N+M 5.88±1.14a 1.38±0.06a
1/2N+M+L 5.83±0.53a 1.37±0.12a

Table 5

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the amylose content and gel consistency of the early rice"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 直链淀粉含量
Amylose content (%)		 胶稠度
Gel consistency (mm)
2019 NPK 16.81±0.15a 70.00±0.24b
1/2N+M 16.55±0.40a 68.40±0.97b
1/2N+M+L 15.54±0.65b 73.32±1.94a
2020 NPK 16.55±0.23a 69.56±2.10b
1/2N+M 16.17±0.36ab 73.86±0.82ab
1/2N+M+L 15.94±0.23b 75.56±1.00a

Table 6

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the amylose content and gel consistency of the late rice"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 直链淀粉含量
Amylose content (%)		 胶稠度
Gel consistency (mm)
2019 NPK 18.23±2.58a 81.36±2.20a
1/2N+M 18.43±1.58a 81.29±1.50a
1/2N+M+L 18.86±0.92a 84.64±1.46a
2020 NPK 17.03±0.45ab 64.15±0.53ab
1/2N+M 17.70±0.30a 64.05±0.15b
1/2N+M+L 16.81±0.25b 65.57±0.77a

Table 7

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the RVA of the early rice"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 最高黏度
Peak
viscosity (cP)		 热浆黏度
Hot paste
viscosity (cP)		 最终黏度
Final
viscosity (cP)		 崩解值
Breakdown
(cP)		 消减值
Setback
(cP)		 峰值时间
Peak time
(min)		 糊化温度
Pasting
temperature (℃)
2019 NPK 3821±135.97a 1791±81.87a 3074±98.33b 2030±135.91a -747±99.36a 5.69±0.03a 76.30±0.05a
1/2N+M 3773±141.99a 1779±98.60a 3090±58.28ab 1993±105.31a -682±106.88a 5.71±0.03a 76.33±0.08a
1/2N+M+L 3990±74.32a 1905±100.71a 3272±119.04a 2085±155.89a -718±183.53a 5.78±0.08a 76.85±0.95a
2020 NPK 3307±133.99a 1970±65.09a 3120±122.05a 1337±119.49a -187±40.95a 6.05±0.17a 80.30±2.35a
1/2N+M 3398±343.43a 2006±154.72a 3225±179.23a 1392±190.58a -266±28.58a 6.00±0.07a 78.73±0.06a
1/2N+M+L 3623±225.87a 2004±156.92a 3240±184.72a 1619±90.32a -384±45.83b 5.82±0.04a 80.02±2.33a

Table 8

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the RVA of the late rice"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 最高黏度
Peak viscosity
(cP)		 热浆黏度
Hot paste
viscosity (cP)		 最终黏度
Final viscosity
(cP)		 崩解值
Breakdown
(cP)		 消减值
Setback
(cP)		 峰值时间
Peak time
(min)		 糊化温度
Pasting
temperature (℃)
2019 NPK 2749±82.33b 1516±52.35b 2809±102.58b 1233±103.57b 60±8.72a 5.69±0.06a 78.43±0.09a
1/2N+M 3278±193.62a 1803±88.72a 3201±145.72a 1481±149.86ab -77±8.83ab 5.67±0.03a 78.47±0.87a
1/2N+M+L 3644±206.18a 1942±79.45a 3412±149.86a 1702±98.62a -232±30.26b 5.76±0.07a 78.17±0.46a
2020 NPK 1803±28.94b 1207±47.43a 2476±85.85a 597±20.03b 699±10.97a 5.94±0.12a 92.58±0.45a
1/2N+M 1822±53.01ab 1223±40.95a 2492±83.34a 599±21.78b 666±24.11b 5.93±0.07a 92.28±0.06a
1/2N+M+L 1925±63.09a 1261±27.07a 2567±44.88a 664±36.02a 639±6.43b 5.89±0.03a 92.30±0.02a

Fig.1

Effects of combined lime and pig manure application on the cadmium concentration in polished rice Different lowercase letters mean significant differences among treatments in the same year (P < 0.05)."

[1] 徐峰, 刘德普, 彭俊明, 等. 南方双季稻栽植机械化发展的影响因素和关键技术措施. 中国农机化学报, 2023, 44(2):1-7.
[2] 赵学强, 潘贤章, 马海艺, 等. 中国酸性土壤利用的科学问题与策略. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5):1248-1263.
[3] 高建伟. 耕地耕层土壤酸化的危害及治理模式探索. 河南农业, 2023(13):24.
[4] McGahan D G, Southard R J, Zasoski R J. Mineralogical comparison of agriculturally acidified and naturally acidic soils. Geoderma, 2003, 114(3):355-368.
[5] Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010.
doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447
[6] Cheng H, Zhang D, Huang B, et al. Organic fertilizer improves soil fertility and restores the bacterial community after 1, 3- dichloropropene fumigation. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 738:140345.
[7] 黄红蕾. 水稻有机肥替代化肥的效果研究. 中国农业文摘-农业工程, 2024, 36(2):87-91.
[8] 胡明成, 邱子健, 王洲章, 等. 农田土壤地力提升和固碳减排协同研究进展. 农业环境科学学报, 2025, 44(2):275-286.
[9] Li P, Li Y B, Xu L Y, et al. Crop yield-soil quality balance in double cropping in China’s upland by organic amendments: a meta-analysis. Geoderma, 2021, 403:115197.
[10] Du S, Ma Z, Chen J, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer proportion on the distribution of soil aggregates and their associated organic carbon in a field mulched with gravel. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12:11513.
[11] 本刊编辑部, 王亚辉. 异位发酵床:养殖废弃物资源化利用新模式. 中国猪业, 2017, 12(7):22.
[12] 覃丽霞. 养殖源有机肥的重金属污染及环境风险评价研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
[13] 胡天睿, 蔡泽江, 王伯仁, 等. 有机肥替代化学氮肥提升红壤抗酸化能力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(11):2052-2059.
[14] Holland J E, Bennett A E, Newton A C, et al. Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 610:316-332.
[15] Li Y, Cui S, Chang S X, et al. Liming effects on soil pH and crop yield depend on lime material type, application method and rate, and crop species: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19:1393-1406.
[16] Yin C T, Schlatter D C, Kroese D R, et al. Responses of soil fungal communities to lime application in wheat fields in the pacific northwest. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12:576763.
[17] Li S, Liu J, Yao Q, et al. Short-term lime application impacts microbial community composition and potential function in an acid black soil. Plant and Soil, 2022, 470:35-50.
[18] 闫淑兰, 赵秀红, 罗启仕. 基于文献计量的重金属固化稳定化修复技术发展动态研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(2):229-238.
[19] 刘鑫, 尹泽润, 盛浩, 等. 水稻土微生物群落、酶活性及理化性质对有机肥、石灰连续施用的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(1):63-73.
[20] 黄建凤, 吴腾飞, 叶芳, 等. 有机肥与石灰配施对华南酸性土壤的改良效果. 农业资源与环境学报, 2024, 41(3):106-113.
[21] 刘芳禧, 方畅宇, 庾振宇, 等. 绿肥、秸秆和石灰联用对红壤性水稻土酸度特征和水稻产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(6):1616-1627.
[22] 陈雅慧, 杨星莲, 刘磊, 等. 施用不同石灰类物质对双季优质稻产量和品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3):62-66.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.011
[23] 刘红江, 郭智, 张岳芳, 等. 不同类型有机肥对水稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(4):645-651.
[24] 张祺. 长期施用有机肥对稻田土壤健康状况的影响. 荆州: 长江大学, 2022.
[25] Leesawatwong M, Jamjod S, Kuo J, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer increases seed protein and milling quality of rice. Cereal Chemistry, 2005, 82(5):588-593.
[26] 杜雪. 有机和无机氮肥对稻米品质影响的比较. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.
[27] Khaliq A, Abbasi M K. Improvements in the physical and chemical characteristics of degraded soils supplemented with organic-inorganic amendments in the Himalayan region of Kashmir, Pakistan. Catena, 2015, 126:209-219.
[28] 高捷. 有机肥、生物菌剂与化学氮肥配施对水稻产量和品质的影响及其机理. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2023.
[29] 董慧, 文继兵, 李娜, 等. 生物有机肥部分替代化肥对水稻产量和品质的影响. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(15):107-108.
[30] 王雪冬. 有机无机肥料配施对水稻产量品质和土壤肥力的影响. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2022.
[31] 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 等. 稻米品质形成机理研究——品质不同的粳稻品种籽粒灌浆过程中胚乳内含物质积累动态的比较研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2000, 31(2):105-111.
[32] Chen Y, Wang M, Pieter B. Molecular and environmental factors determining grain quality in rice. Food and Energy Security, 2013, 1(2):111-132.
[33] 张龙辉, 李源环, 陈治锋, 等. 施用石灰和绿肥及生物有机肥后的酸性土壤pH和理化性状动态变化. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(3):60-66.
[34] 杨星莲. 施用不同石灰类物质对双季稻系统秸秆腐解、产量和米质的影响. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2022.
[35] 魏竞智, 郭磊磊, 李徐凤. 猪粪、底泥和土壤中6种重金属测定与污染情况分析. 江苏预防医学, 2023, 34(5):605-607.
[36] Qian M R, Wu H Z, Wang J M, et al. Occurrence of trace elements and antibiotics in manure-based fertilizers from the Zhejiang Province of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 559:174-181.
[37] Xu C, Zheng S, Huang D Y, et al. Phytoavailability of cadmium in rice amended with organic materials and lime: effects of rhizosphere chemical changes and cadmium sequestration in iron plaque. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 265:115525.
[38] 窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 土壤pH对镉形态影响的研究进展. 土壤, 2020, 52(3):439-444.
[39] 罗秋红, 吴俊, 柏斌, 等. 水稻镉吸收与转运机理的研究进展. 土壤, 2021, 53(6):1142-1151.
[40] 肖敏, 范晶晶, 王华静, 等. 紫云英还田配施石灰对水稻镉吸收转运的影响. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(1):276-284.
[41] Liu J, Feng X, Qiu G, et al. Inhibition roles of calcium in cadmium uptake and translocation in rice: a review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(14):11587.
[42] 朱奇宏, 黄道友, 刘国胜, 等. 改良剂对镉污染酸性水稻土的修复效应与机理研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(4):847-851.
[43] 贺迪. 重金属污染土壤的植物修复及钙离子的调节作用研究. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2007.
[44] 肖欢. 不同播期对水稻重金属吸收积累的影响研究. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2019.
[45] Zhao J F, Wang P. Arsenic and cadmium accumulation in rice and mitigation strategies. Plant and Soil, 2020, 446:1-21.
[46] Zou M M, Zhou S L, Zhou Y J, et al. Cadmium pollution of soil-rice ecosystems in rice cultivation dominated regions in China: a review. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 280:116965.
[47] Chi Y H, Li F B, Tam N F, et al. Variations in grain cadmium and arsenic concentrations and screening for stable low-accumulating rice cultivars from multi-environment trials. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 643:1314-1324.
[1] Zhu Jindi, Zhu Xuegang, Du Wenqing, Qiu Tuoyu, Zhao Xinbin. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer Application on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Quality and Yield of Tomatoes Cultivated in Facilities [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 185-189.
[2] Li Hu, Huang Qiuyao, Wu Zishuai, Liu Guanglin, Chen Chuanhua, Luo Qunchang, Zhu Qinan. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Rice Quality of High-Quality Conventional Rice Guiyu 12 [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 195-201.
[3] Jiang Suzhen, Xu Chao, Wang Zhongyuan, Zheng Shen, Chen Jianguo, Zhu Hanhua, Huang Daoyou, Zhang Quan, Zhu Qihong. Effects of Sepiolite and Biochar on the Uptake and Accumulation of Cadmium and Arsenic in Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 241-248.
[4] Tian Qinqin, Zhuo Le, Chen Nana, Zheng Dechao, Wu Xiaojing, Yu Peng, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Calcium-Magnesium Hydrotalcite on Cadmium Content in Brown Rice of Double-Cropping Rice and Soil Characteristics [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(5): 131-139.
[5] Liu Zichen, Shang Liyan, Ye Jiayu, Sheng Tian, Li Ruijie, Deng Jun, Tian Xiaohai, Zhang Yunbo, Huang Liying. Effects of Dense Planting with Reduced Nitrogen Input Cultivation on the Grain Quality of Hybrid Indica Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(5): 194-203.
[6] He Jiahui, Li Yanfeng, Yan Tianze, Zhang Xuanwen, Qin Peng, Guo Jinyou, Wang Kai, Liu Xionglun, Yang Yuanzhu. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on the Yield and Quality of Super Rice Weiliangyou 8612 [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(5): 73-79.
[7] Yuan Shuai, He Mingjuan, Cui Can, Han Yu, Yu Peng, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Different Base Application Amounts of Calcium- Magnesium Hydrotalcite in Early Rice on Yield and Rice Quality of Double-Cropping Rice in Southern Hunan [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 113-120.
[8] Zhou Zhou, Shen Xinya, Wang Jun, Liu Lijun. Effects of Combination of Controlled-Release Fertilizer and Common Urea on Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Grain Quality in Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 180-187.
[9] Li Hu, Wu Zishuai, Liu Guanglin, Luo Qunchang, Chen Chuanhua, Zhu Qinan. Effects of Different Cultivation Conditions on Cadmium Content of Grains and Main Characteristics in Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 203-208.
[10] Yao Qi, Wang Hao, Xu Lingqing, Xing Wang, Liu Dali, Lu Zhenqiang. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of C2H2 Zinc-Finger Protein Transcription Factor Family in Sugar Beet under Cadmium Stress [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 33-42.
[11] Yi Qin, Huang Miao, Yang Guotao, Hu Yungao, Chen Hong, Wang Xuechun. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Rapeseed in Sichuan [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 163-167.
[12] Liu Yajun, Lu Yun, Wang Wenjing, Hu Qiguo, Chu Fengli, Li Zhijie. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Soil Conditioner on the Growth and Development of Continuous Cropping Sweet Potato and Soil Fertility [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 168-174.
[13] Wang Han, Zheng Dechao, Tian Qinqin, Wu Xiaojing, Zhou Wenxin, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Harvest Time on Yield and Cadmium Accumulation and Distribution Characteristics of Early Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 105-112.
[14] Xie Jin, Li Jincheng, Liang Zengfa, Huang Hao, Zhang Xi, Gao Renji, Jin Baofeng, Zeng Fandong, Lu Zhiwei, Cai Yixia, Wang Wei. Effects of Ridging Height and Ratio of Organic Fertilizer on Root Growth and Quality of Upper Tobacco Leaves [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 165-171.
[15] Xiao Min, Guo Lang, Cui Can, Cheng Zhouqi, Liu Yuwu, Zhuo Le, Wu Si, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Phosphate Fertilizer Management on Yield Components and Nutrient Uptake and Utilization in Mechanical Transplanting Double-Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 178-188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!