盐逆境下缓/控释肥对水稻生长发育、产量和品质的影响

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.01.021

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the effects of slow/controlled release fertilizer application on rice growth, yield and rice quality under salt stress, Nanjing 5055 was used as material to conduct pot experiments. Three salt levels and four nitrogen fertilizer types were set in the experiment, three soil salt levels including 0.0 (S0), 1.5 (S1) and 3.0g/kg (S2), and four nitrogen fertilizer types including urea (F1), slow-release special fertilizer for rice (F2), large granule urea (F3) and sulfur-coated urea (F4). The amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer application in each treatment were the same. Treatment without nitrogen fertilizer were set up as control (CK). The results showed that, the maximum tiller number, plant height and percentage of productive tillers of F2 treatment were higher than those of other treatments under salt stress. Compared with F1 treatment, the yields of F2, F3 and F4 treatments were increased by 11.89%, 5.58% and 17.14% under S0 level, respectively. Under S1 and S2 levels, the yield of F2 treatment were 30.28% and 37.20% higher than that of F1 treatment, respectively. But F3 and F4 treatments had poor yield increase. Under S1 and S2 levels, the increase of F2 yield were mainly due to the significant increase of effective panicle number and grain number per panicle and 1000-grain weight. The grain weight per panicle of F2, grain weight, 1000-grain weight and seed-setting rate of primary branch, grain weight and 1000-grain weight of the secondary branch of F2 treatment were higher than those of other treatments under salt stress. Under S1 and S2 levels, F2 treatment had higher brown rice rate, milled rice rate, gel-consistency and lower amylose and protein content. Under the conditions of this experiment, F2 treatment had the best yield increase, and had certain favorable effects on improving rice quality under salt stress. F2 treatment could alleviate the damage of salt stress to rice to a certain extent.

Key words: Rice, Salt stress, Slow/controlled release fertilizer, Yield, Quality

Zhai Caijiao, Zhang Jiao, Cui Shiyou, Chen Pengjun, Han Jijun. Effects of Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress[J].Crops, 2023, 39(1): 143-151.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 33

[1]	张晓祥, 严长清, 徐盼, 等. 近代以来江苏沿海滩涂围垦历史演变研究. 地理学报, 2014, 68(11):1549-1558.
[2]	Chen Q, He A B, Wang W Q, et al. Comparisons of regeneration rate and yields performance between inbred and hybrid rice cultivars in a direct seedling rice-ratoon rice system in central China. Field Crops Research, 223:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.010
[3]	章秀福, 王丹英, 方福平, 等. 中国粮食安全和水稻生产. 农业现代化研究, 2005(2):85-88.
[4]	张蛟, 崔士友, 胡帅栋, 等. 水稻种植对沿海滩涂土壤有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3):107-112.
[5]	周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 等. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2):146-154.
[6]	高显颖. 不同浓度盐碱胁迫对水稻生长及生理生态特性影响. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2014.
[7]	步金宝. 盐碱胁迫下寒地粳稻产质量形成机理的研究. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2012.
[8]	余为仆. 秸秆还田条件下盐胁迫对水稻产量与品质形成的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2014.
[9]	吕艳超. 施氮量对盐胁迫下寒地粳稻生长发育籽粒淀粉积累及产质量的影响. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2016.
[10]	朱兆良. 中国土壤氮素研究. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):778-783.
[11]	杨丞, 汪洋, 张万洋, 等. 灌溉模式与施氮量互作对水稻茎蘖产量形成的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2):155-165. doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.0519
[12]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):915-924.
[13]	侯均昊, 张晨晖, 许轲, 等. 优化控释尿素施用方式提高沙质低肥力土壤水稻产量和品质. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(4):630-642.
[14]	吕玉虎. 豫南稻区水稻缓/控释肥应用效果研究. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(9):97-101.
[15]	邢晓鸣, 李小春, 丁艳锋, 等. 缓/控释肥组配对机插常规粳稻群体物质生产和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24):4892-4902.
[16]	田昌, 周旋, 刘强, 等. 控释尿素减施对双季稻田氮素渗漏淋失的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10):3267-3274. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.029
[17]	侯红乾, 黄永兰, 冀建华, 等. 缓/控释肥对双季稻产量和氮素利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(4):389-396. doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5163
[18]	Sun Y, Mi W H, Su L J, et al. Controlled-release fertilizer enhances rice grain yield and N recovery efficiency in continuous non-flooding plastic film mulching cultivation system. Field Crops Research, 2019, 231:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.11.013
[19]	Geng J B, Sun Y B, Zhang M, et al. Long-term effects of controlled release urea application on crop yields and soil fertility under rice oilseed rape rotation system. Field Crops Research, 2015, 184:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.09.003
[20]	程金秋. 缓/控释肥类型及运筹对早熟晚粳水稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2018.
[21]	金丹丹, 宫亮, 李波, 等. 2种缓/控释肥对滨海盐碱地区水稻产量及氮代谢的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4):334-339.
[22]	董晓亮, 侯红燕, 张金凤, 等. 缓释肥和无机肥配施对滨海盐碱地水稻生长和食味品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37 (4):1-7.
[23]	李武, 邓飞, 胡慧, 等. 缓/控释氮肥对机插杂交籼稻稻米品质的影响. 核农学报, 2018, 32(4):779-787. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.04.0779
[24]	俞卫星, 胡新春, 王新溪, 等. 缓/控释肥对籼粳杂交稻产量、品质和经济效益的影响. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(21):1-5.
[25]	罗兰芳, 郑圣先, 廖育林, 等. 控释氮肥对杂交水稻糙米蛋白质品质和氮代谢关键酶活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(4):403-410.
[26]	Lee C K, Yoon Y H, Shin J, et al. Growth and yield of rice as affected by saline water treatment at different growth stages. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 2002, 47(6):402-408.
[27]	梁正伟, 杨福, 王志春, 等. 盐碱胁迫对水稻主要生育性状的影响. 生态环境, 2004, 13(1):43-46.
[28]	张瑞珍, 邵玺文, 童淑媛, 等. 盐碱胁迫对水稻源库及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(1):116-118.
[29]	刘真娟. 有机质对黑土磷吸附-解吸特性的影响. 长春:吉林大学, 2019.
[30]	张洪程, 吴桂成, 吴文革, 等. 水稻“精苗稳前、控蘖优中、大穗强后”超高产定量化栽培模式. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(13):2645-2660.
[31]	彭玉, 马均, 蒋明金, 等. 缓/控释肥对杂交水稻根系形态、生理特性和产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(5):1048-1057.
[32]	张小翠, 戴其根, 胡星星, 等. 不同质地土壤下缓释尿素与常规尿素配施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(8):1494-1503.
[33]	居静, 吴海波, 陈永林, 等. 日本产包膜控释氮肥对稻米品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(2):67-70.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Xia Yuying, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Hu Chuanjun, Lü Yandong, Zhao Haicheng, Zheng Guiping. Effects of Seedling Raising Methods on Seedling Quality, Yield and Quality of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 103-108.
[2]	Gao Wei, Hao Qingting, Zhang Zeyan, Wang Qian, Yan Hubin, Zhu Huijun, Zhao Xueying, Zhang Yaowen. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on Yield, Root Morphology and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 109-114.
[3]	Wang Yujiao, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield and Quality of Different Varieties of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 122-128.
[4]	Chen Dong, Zou Jing, Guo Ganggang, Dai Wendian, Song Shaoguang, Huang Ying. Effects of Different Specifications of Seedling Trays on Quality and Main Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 129-135.
[5]	Zhao Jingyun, Lü Xinyun, Liu Xiaorong, Ren Haihong, Ren Xiaojun, Ma Junkui. Effects of Strip Compound Intercropping under Young Walnut Forest on Soybean Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 136-142.
[6]	Yu Yongtao, Zhang Nan, Xie Lihua, Li Guangyu, Liu Jianhua, Li Wu, Li Gaoke, Hu Jianguang. A Preliminary Study on Preference of Consumers in Eating Quality Evaluation of Sweet Corn Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 14-19.
[7]	Li Wenshan, Zhang Junyao, Tang Jianghua, Xu Wenxiu, Xu Qinghua. Effects of Different Doses of AFD on Growth and Yield of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 158-162.
[8]	Ma Ruiqi, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Weak Gluten Wheat in Northern Winter Wheat Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 163-169.
[9]	Jia Zhengrong, Hao Jiali, Hao Yanfang, Bai Wenbin, Zhang Jianhua, Guo Ruifeng, Liu Yong. Effects of Four Bacillus Species on Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato at Different Stages [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 170-175.
[10]	Su Cuicui, Wu Lingling, Zhao Xi, Shi Zhiguo, Zhou Yanfang, Wei Yujie. Effects of Sowing Date on the Growth, Quality and Yield of Safflower in Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 176-183.
[11]	Zhang Lixia, Guo Xiaoyan, Shi Pengfei, Nie Liangpeng, Ling Jingwei, Shen Peilin, Ding Li, Zhang Lin, Lü Yuhu, Pan Ziliang. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth, Yield and Benefits of Kenaf in Vigorous Growing Period [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 184-189.
[12]	Zhang Yonggang, Ren Zhiguang, Xu Zhiqiang, Liu Jianguo, Zhang Xiaobing, Liu Huabing, Xia Chen, Cheng Changhe. Chemical Quality Evaluation of Flue-Cured Tobacco Based on Maximization of Deviation and BP Neural Network [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 190-195.
[13]	Jin Haiyang, Zhang Suyu, Cui Jingyu, Li Xiangdong, Yue Junqin, Zhang Deqi, Yang Cheng, Fang Baoting, Wang Hanfang, Qin Feng. Regulatory Effects of Different Nitrogen Management Methods on Quality of Strong and Medium-Strong Gluten Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 212-218.
[14]	Wang Yanxun, Tian Jichun. Wide Adaptability Performance and Genetic Analysis of National Certified Wheat Variety Shannong 20 with High and Stable Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 46-51.
[15]	Wang Qi, Xu Yanli, Yan Peng, Dong Haosheng, Zhang Wei, Lu Lin, Dong Zhiqiang. Effects of Polyaspartic Acid-Chitosan on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nitrogen Use of Spring Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

盐逆境 Salinity	肥料类型 Fertilizer	每穴产量 Yield of per hole (g)	每穴有效穗数 Number of effective panicles per hole	穗粒数 Grains number per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	结实率 Seed-setting rate (%)
S0	CK	11.14gh	6.00gh	74.94bcd	26.55d	89.92abc
	F1	30.11c	13.11cd	81.21a	29.42b	93.61ab
	F2	33.69ab	14.44abc	80.94a	30.25a	94.56a
	F3	31.79bc	15.11a	77.45abc	27.63c	94.62a
	F4	35.27a	15.67a	77.66abc	29.71b	94.82a
S1	CK	4.71jk	4.22i	66.39e	19.62i	81.22cd
	F1	19.19e	12.00de	80.39ab	23.61f	82.73cd
	F2	25.00d	14.89ab	73.19cd	25.50e	85.32bcd
	F3	19.50e	13.33bcd	73.43cd	21.58g	80.87d
	F4	15.97f	12.56de	67.16e	20.65h	80.17d
S2	CK	1.79k	2.33j	73.46cd	13.18n	55.37f
	F1	9.30hi	10.11f	70.64de	16.60l	68.14e
	F2	12.76g	11.00ef	77.08abc	18.70j	68.18e
	F3	6.34ij	5.78hi	77.90abc	17.06k	59.71ef
	F4	5.73j	7.56g	75.92abcd	13.88m	55.11f
方差分析Variance analysis
盐分处理Salinity (S)		**	**	**	**	**
施肥处理Fertilizer (F)		**	**	**	**	*
S×F		**	**	**	**	ns

盐逆境 Salinity	肥料类型 Fertilizer	穗长 Length per panicle (cm)	穗重 Weight per panicle (g)	每穗实粒数 Total filled grains per panicle	每穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle (g)	着粒密度（个/cm） Grain density (individual/cm)
S0	CK	13.43def	1.90c	67.40bc	1.86c	5.58bcd
	F1	14.41a	2.39a	76.04a	2.29ab	5.64bc
	F2	14.07abc	2.45a	76.58a	2.34a	5.75ab
	F3	14.20ab	2.20b	73.29ab	2.11b	5.45bcd
	F4	13.99abcd	2.34ab	73.64ab	2.26ab	5.55bcd
S1	CK	11.93h	1.13gh	53.93def	1.12f	5.57bcd
	F1	13.20efg	1.67de	66.53bc	1.60de	6.09a
	F2	13.93abcd	1.76cd	62.36cd	1.68cd	5.26de
	F3	13.67bcde	1.53e	59.36cde	1.46e	5.37cd
	F4	13.58cde	1.33f	53.82ef	1.27f	4.95e
S2	CK	12.65g	0.76j	40.98g	0.71h	5.81ab
	F1	12.93fg	0.96hi	48.33fg	0.91g	5.47bcd
	F2	13.44def	1.22fg	52.75ef	1.15f	5.74ab
	F3	13.55cde	1.17fg	46.43fg	1.11f	5.75ab
	F4	13.44def	0.79ij	41.91g	0.76gh	5.65bc
方差分析Variance analysis
盐分处理Salinity (S)		**	**	**	**	*
施肥处理Fertilizer (F)		**	**	**	**	*
S×F		*	*	ns	*	**

盐逆境 Salinity	肥料类型 Fertilizer	一次枝梗Primary branch					二次枝梗Secondary branch
盐逆境 Salinity	肥料类型 Fertilizer	枝梗数 PBN	总粒重 GWPB (g)	实粒数 FGPB	千粒重 1000-GW (g)	结实率 SRPB (%)	枝梗数 SBN	总粒重 GWSB (g)	实粒数 FGSB	千粒重 1000-GW (g)	结实率 SRSB (%)
S0	CK	8.15bc	1.30b	45.75abc	27.97e	91.33ab	11.27abcd	0.56cd	21.66bcd	25.14e	87.12a
	F1	9.02a	1.59a	51.08a	30.44c	95.11a	12.30ab	0.70ab	24.96ab	27.42c	90.65a
	F2	8.47ab	1.58a	50.23a	31.44a	96.14a	12.49a	0.77a	26.35a	28.64a	91.65a
	F3	8.39ab	1.46a	49.50a	28.48d	96.13a	11.50abcd	0.64bc	23.78abc	26.20d	91.62a
	F4	7.79bcd	1.47a	46.62ab	30.94b	96.35a	12.27ab	0.78a	27.02a	28.15b	92.26a
S1	CK	7.05ef	0.80fg	38.79defg	19.84j	86.01bc	10.00d	0.32g	15.14gh	18.58j	71.29b
	F1	7.86bcd	1.11cd	45.79abc	24.41g	90.87ab	12.58a	0.49de	20.74cde	21.84g	68.85b
	F2	7.46de	1.17bc	43.06bcd	26.51f	91.43ab	10.97bcd	0.51de	19.30def	24.12f	74.12b
	F3	7.38def	1.03de	42.28bcde	22.12h	89.86abc	11.33abcd	0.43ef	17.08efg	19.99h	64.64b
	F4	6.78f	0.91ef	38.58defg	21.41i	88.25abc	10.27cd	0.36fg	15.24fgh	18.98i	65.09b
S2	CK	7.96bcd	0.53i	31.82h	13.63n	64.41f	10.85bcd	0.18i	9.16i	12.75n	37.29de
	F1	7.57cde	0.69gh	36.82efgh	16.70l	76.65de	10.14d	0.22hi	11.51hi	15.89l	49.97c
	F2	7.70cde	0.86f	40.58cdef	19.47j	81.22cd	11.76abc	0.29gh	12.17hi	17.76k	43.91cd
	F3	7.66cde	0.81fg	35.53fgh	18.07k	72.59def	11.97ab	0.30gh	10.90i	15.84l	38.26de
	F4	7.43def	0.58hi	33.48gh	14.30m	68.77ef	11.48abcd	0.18i	8.43i	13.25m	30.56e
方差分析Variance analysis
盐分处理Salinity (S)		**	**	**	**	**	*	**	**	**	**
施肥处理Fertilizer (F)		**	**	**	**	*	ns	**	*	**	ns
S×F		ns	ns	ns	**	ns	*	**	ns	**	ns

盐逆境 Salinity	肥料类型 Fertilizer	糙米率 BR (%)	精米率 MR (%)	整精米率 HMR (%)	粒长 KL (mm)	长宽比 L/W	胶稠度 GC (mm)	直链淀粉含量 AC (%)	蛋白质含量 PC (%)
S0	CK	81.8f	73.0g	71.7b	4.6ab	1.6a	78.0f	10.6a	7.5i
	F1	84.2c	75.6c	70.8d	4.7a	1.6a	84.0a	8.7d	8.5g
	F2	85.0a	76.3a	72.2a	4.7a	1.6a	82.0b	9.4b	9.8a
	F3	84.6b	75.8bc	69.9e	4.6ab	1.6a	80.0d	9.3b	9.2d
	F4	84.4bc	75.9b	68.1g	4.6ab	1.6a	80.7c	8.3f	8.8f
S1	CK	80.0g	69.9h	69.3f	4.5b	1.6a	79.0e	9.4b	8.1h
	F1	83.1e	73.8f	72.2a	4.6ab	1.7a	76.0g	8.8d	8.9e
	F2	83.7d	74.6d	71.6b	4.6ab	1.6a	78.0f	8.4ef	9.3c
	F3	83.0e	74.0f	71.1c	4.6ab	1.7a	78.0f	8.5e	9.5b
	F4	83.1e	74.3e	72.1a	4.6ab	1.7a	78.0f	9.1c	9.5b
方差分析Variance analysis
盐分处理Salinity (S)		**	**	**	ns	ns	**	**	**
施肥处理Fertilizer (F)		**	**	**	ns	ns	**	**	**
S×F		*	**	**	ns	ns	**	**	**

Effects of Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress

RichHTML

PDF (PC)