Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 144-151.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.04.021

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Annual Variation of Nitrogen Fertilizer Threshold for Optimal Yield of Northern Japonica Rice and Its Influencing Factors Analysis

Chen Yue(), Gong Liang(), Jin Dandan, Zhang Xin, Li Bo, Zou Xiaojin, Sui Shijiang, Ye Xin, Liu Yan   

  1. Institute of Plant Nutrition and Environmental Resources, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2023-04-20 Revised:2023-05-16 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15
  • Contact: Gong Liang E-mail:cyuewxf@126.com;gongliang1900@sina.com

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

314

Abstract:

In order to explore the interannual change of nitrogen fertilizer threshold for rice and its impact factors and provide a theoretical basis for the scientific development of fertilizer reduction strategy, based on eight years field positioning experiments, interannual changes and the impact factors were determined under the target yield of rice by fertilizer response linear plus plateau and quadratic model. The results showed that target yields and threshold nitrogen of rice were 9860-10 019kg/ha and 205.02-220.61kg/ha. The maximum range of interannual change was 7.60% based on nitrogen surface balance in paddy field. The order of direct impact factors were inorganic nitrogen content > nitrogen acquisition of plant > input nitrogen through irrigation, and the indirect factor was nitrogen in precipitation.

Key words: Rice, Fertilizer reduction, Nitrogen fertilizer threshold, Recommended fertilization rate, Nitrogen balance

Fig.1

Recommended fertilizer application rate and annual change during 2011-2018"

Fig.2

Rainfall, irrigation and inorganic N input during the rice growth period (2011-2018)"

Fig.3

Variation tendency of inorganic N concentration in the soil arable layer (0-20cm) under different treatments"

Table 1

Correlation of soil inorganic N content and N application kg/hm2"

年份
Year		 线性加平台
Linear plus plateau		 R2 饱和施氮量
Saturated N
application		 最高无机氮含量
Highest inorganic
nitrogen content		 推荐施氮量
Recommend
N application		 推荐施氮量下的无机氮含量
Inorganic nitrogen content
of recommend N application
2011
 y=0.477x-15.925 x≤287.35
y=121.15 x>287.35		 0.957
 287.35
 121.15
 211.64
 85.03
2012
 y=0.475x-12.832 x≤289.71
y=124.78 x>289.71		 0.970
 289.71
 124.78
 205.02
 81.87
2013
 y=0.509x-19.599 x≤284.85
y=125.39 x>284.85		 0.976
 284.85
 125.39
 218.84
 88.46
2014
 y=0.487x-15.384 x≤287.77
y=124.76 x>287.77		 0.988
 287.77
 124.76
 207.39
 83.00
2015
 y=0.537x-24.482 x≤277.77
y=124.68 x>277.77		 0.978
 277.77
 124.68
 216.65
 87.42
2016
 y=0.561x-28.84 x≤274.42
y=125.11 x>274.42		 0.979
 274.42
 125.11
 218.07
 88.09
2017
 y=0.58x-33.094 x≤273.61
y=125.6 x>273.61		 0.983
 273.61
 125.60
 220.36
 89.19
2018
 y=0.549x-24.753 x≤274.34
y=125.86 x>274.34		 0.983
 274.34
 125.86
 220.61
 89.31

Fig.4

Correlation of N uptake and N application"

Fig.5

Correlation of N harvesting index and N application"

Fig.6

Relationship between the apparent loss amount of inorganic N in the soil arable layer (0-20cm) and N application"

Table 2

N apparent balance at recommended N application rates from 2011 to 2018 kg/hm2"

年份
Year		 推荐施氮量
Recommended N
application		 植株吸氮量
N uptake
by plants		 土壤无机氮含量
Soil mineral N		 无机氮表观损失量
Apparent loss amount
of inorganic N		 降雨携氮量
N in precipitation		 灌溉携氮量
N in irrigation
2011 211.64±6.35 195.49±2.10 84.98±3.03 164.28±4.15 13.51±0.08 21.39±0.21
2012 205.02±6.00 189.11±2.14 84.55±2.85 178.88±4.66 16.68±0.17 18.28±0.18
2013 218.84±5.99 191.51±2.16 91.79±3.05 179.45±4.65 7.04±0.04 17.61±0.13
2014 207.39±4.29 187.37±1.69 85.62±2.09 167.82±3.30 8.50±0.05 17.68±0.22
2015 216.65±6.40 192.12±2.50 93.54±3.44 178.16±4.84 9.27±0.07 20.94±0.21
2016 218.07±3.97 192.24±1.60 79.01±0.90 181.92±2.99 16.83±0.08 18.00±0.27
2017 220.36±5.48 196.43+2.20 80.83±1.28 179.89±4.18 10.54±0.01 20.00±0.19
2018 220.61±3.91 192.51±1.10 80.81±0.85 181.06±2.98 11.52±0.01 19.05±0.14

Table 3

Effects of various factors on annual changes of recommended N application rate under N apparent equilibrium condition"

参数估算Parameter estimation 项目
Item		 方差分析Variance analysis
变量
Variable		 参数
Parameter		 标准差
Standard deviation		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 平方和
Sum of squares		 均方
Mean square		 F P
y 3.94 8.89 模型Model 5 1502.77 300.55 58.21 0.0001
x1 2.63 4.26 误差Error 15 77.46 5.16
x2 1.80 7.47 总和Sum 20 1580.23
x3 -0.57 8.14 均方根Root mean square 2.27
x4 1.28 5.51 均值Mean value 1.29
x5 -4.13 2.26 变异系数Coefficient of variation 175.36

Table 4

Path analysis of the annual changes of nitrogen apparent balance and recommended nitrogen application"

因素
Factor		 通径系数Path coefficient 相关系数
Correlation coefficient
x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
x1 1.2616** 0.6440 -0.0084 -0.3881* -0.7260** 0.7831**
x2 0.5362 1.5152** -0.1423 -0.5722** -0.6283** 0.7087**
x3 0.0201 0.4080 -0.5283** 0.2104 0.2019 0.3121
x4 -0.6125* -1.0846** -0.1390 0.7994** 0.4704* -0.5663**
x5 0.8720** 0.9063** 0.1015 -0.3580* -1.0504** 0.4715*
[1] Pan J R, Ju X T, Liu X J, et al. Fate of fertilizer nitrogen for winter wheat sunner maize rotation in North China Plain under optimization of irrigation and fertilization. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 23(2):334-340.
[2] 贺帆, 黄见良, 崔克辉, 等. 实时实地氮肥管理对不同杂交水稻氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2):470-479.
[3] 朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):259-273.
[4] 俞巧钢, 叶静, 杨梢娜, 等. 不同施氮量对单季稻养分吸收及氨挥发损失的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4):487-494.
[5] Delgado J A, Shaffer M J, Lai H, et al. Assessment of nitrogen losses to the environment with a Nitrogen Trading Tool (NTT). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008, 63(2):193-206.
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.009
[6] 朱兆良. 推荐氮肥适宜施用量的方法论刍议. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(1):1-4.
[7] 卜容燕, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, 等. 中稻氮磷钾肥的施肥效果及推荐用量. 中国农学通报, 2010(14):218-221.
[8] Peng S, Garcia F V, Laza R C, et al. Increased N-use efficiency using a chlorophyll meter on high yielding irrigated rice. Field Crops Research, 1996, 47(1/2):243-252.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00018-4
[9] Dobermann A, Witt C, Dawe D, et al. Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia. Field Crops Research, 2002, 74(1):37-66.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00197-6
[10] 贺帆, 黄见良, 崔克辉, 等. 实时实地氮肥管理对水稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(1):123-132.
[11] 宫亮, 曲航, 刘艳, 等. 辽河三角洲地区高产水稻氮肥投入阈值及利用率. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5):23-28.
[12] 连彩云, 马忠明. 北方平原区春玉米化学氮肥投入阈值. 西北农业学报, 2016, 25(1):9-15.
[13] 何萍, 金继运, Mirasol F P, 等. 基于作物产量反应和农学效率的推荐施肥方法. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2):499- 505.
[14] 刘东海, 陈云峰, 李双来, 等. 养分专家系统推荐施肥对湖北中稻产量和养分利用率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(4):84-88.
[15] 王永欢, 韩晓日, 王丽, 等. 盘锦地区水稻肥料效应函数法推荐施肥模型研究. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(2):373-378.
[16] 李波, 宫亮, 曲航, 等. 辽河三角洲稻区施氮水平对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(1):173-178.
[17] 巨晓棠. 理论施氮量的改进及验证—兼论确定作物氮肥推荐量的方法. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(2):249-260.
[18] 宁运旺, 张永春. 基于土壤氮素平衡的氮肥推荐方法——以水稻为例. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(2):281-292.
[19] 陈新平, 周金池, 张福锁, 等. 小麦―玉米轮作制中氮肥效应模型的选择——经济、环境效益分析. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(3):346-354.
[20] 贾良良, 陈新平, 张福锁, 等. 北京市冬小麦氮肥适宜用量评价方法的研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2001, 6(3):67-73.
[21] 崔振岭. 华北平原冬小麦―夏玉米轮作体系优化氮肥管理——从田块到区域尺度. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.
[22] Ding W C, Xu X P, He P, et al. Estimating regional N application rates for rice in China based on target yield, indigenous N supply, and N loss. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 263:114408.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114408
[23] 吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 等. 中国水稻区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(9):1-13.
[24] Xu X P, He P, Pampolino M F, et al. Spatial variation of yield response and fertilizer requirements on regional scale for irrigated rice in China. Scientific Reports, 2019(9):3589.
[25] 彭显龙, 王伟, 周娜, 等. 基于农户施肥和土壤肥力的黑龙江水稻减肥潜力分析. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(12):2092-2100.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.12.007
[26] Hartmann T E, Yue S C, Schulz R, et al. Nitrogen dynamics, apparent mineralization and balance calculations in a maize- wheat double cropping system of the North China Plain. Field Crop Research, 2014, 160:22-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.014
[27] Yan X Y, Ti C P, Vitousek P M, et al. Fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiencies in crop production systems of China with and without consideration of the residual effect of nitrogen. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9:095002.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/095002
[28] Pathak H, Mohanty S, Jain N, et al. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium budgets in Indian agriculture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 86(3):287-299.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9292-5
[29] 陈星, 李亚娟, 刘丽, 等. 灌溉模式和供氮水平对水稻氮素利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2):283-290.
[30] 江立庚, 曹卫星, 甘秀芹, 等. 不同施氮水平对南方早稻氮素吸收利用及其产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37 (4):490-496.
[31] 谢黎虹, 叶定池, 胡培松, 等. 氮肥用量和施用方式对水稻“甬优6号”产量和品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(4):789-794.
[32] 晏娟, 尹斌, 张绍林, 等. 不同施氮量对水稻氮素吸收与分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(5):835-839.
[33] 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 等. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3):763- 772.
[34] 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 等. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9):1095-1103.
[35] Ju X T, Christie P. Calculation of theoretical nitrogen rate for simple nitrogen recommendations in intensive cropping systems: A case study on the North China Plain. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(3):450-458.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.08.002
[36] Ding L, Gao C, Li Y, et al. The enhanced drought tolerance of rice plants under ammonium is related to aquaporin (AQP). Plant Science, 2015, 234:14-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.01.016 pmid: 25804805
[37] 董桂春, 陈琛, 袁秋梅, 等. 氮肥处理对氮素高效吸收水稻根系性状及氮肥利用率的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3):642-651.
[38] 陆大克, 段骅, 王维维, 等. 不同干湿交替灌溉与氮肥形态耦合下水稻根系生长及功能差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(8):1362-1372.
[39] 晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强, 等. 基于稻田控水减排的氮肥运筹试验研究. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2):229-236,245.
[1] Sun Rumeng, Zhang Nan, Yin Jia, Ru Yan, Jing Wenjiang, Zhang Hao. Research Progress on Response of Rice Root Exudates to Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 1-8.
[2] Liu Qing, Sun Luhong, Gao Shiwei, Liu Yuqiang, Chang Huilin, Ma Cheng, Wang Jingze, Wang Cuiling, Nie Shoujun. Effects of Chromium Stress on Physiological Traits and Morphological Characteristics of Rice Leaves [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 143-151.
[3] Tang Cuifeng, A Xinxiang, Dong Chao, Zhang Feifei, Yang Yayun, Yang Hongmei, Dai Luyuan, Su Zhenxi. Analysis of Genetic Diversity by SSR Markers and Correlation of Main Agronomic Traits of Rice Germplasm Resources in Border Areas of Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 33-46.
[4] Jiang Kunwei, Sun Guocai, Wang Jian, Wang Guiyan, Cui Yuefeng. Identification, Evaluation and Screening of Cold Tolerance in Japonica Rice at Germination Stage in Northern China [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 54-59.
[5] Zha Wenjun, Li Xingrun, Zhou Fasong, Feng Fang, Wu Bian, Chen Junxiao, Shi Shaojie, Zhou Lei, Wang Jing, You Aiqing. Development and Characterization of Photo-Thermo-Sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Line 19XS [J]. Crops, 2026, 42(1): 9-14.
[6] Chen Lei, Tang Maoyan, Zhang Zhanying, Zhong Xiaoyuan, Gao Guoqing, Zhang Xiaoli, Liang Tianfeng, Pan Yinghua. Analysis and Evaluation of Grain Appearance Quality Traits in Rice Germplasm Resources under Heat Stress during Flowering Stage [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 132-139.
[7] Zhong Guoxing, Yang Xin, Zhang Shaobo, Guo Wei, Yang Qihang, Li Huaiyuan, Chen Jianjun, Chen Xiaoheng, Huang Ruiyin, Deng Shiyuan. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Tobacco-Planting Soil and Root Growth of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 181-188.
[8] Wang Zhanhai, Li Long, Zhao Haibo. The Impact of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Facility Soil Environment and Tomato Quality [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 231-239.
[9] Sun Qiang, Ruan Xinsen, Zhou Zhihao, Sun Huijuan, Xu Ran, Ling Dong, Zhao Cuirong. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Phenotypic Traits in Different Rice Varieties [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(6): 28-36.
[10] Teng Wen, Ye Fan, Zhou Zhou, Wang Yule, Liu Lijun. Effects of Wheat and Rapeseed Straw Returning on Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 11-18.
[11] Zhi Xianhong, Ji Zixian, Xu Zhenwang, Tan En, Liang Rishen, Ma Shuaipeng, Tang Huiwu. Expression Analysis of the CYP450 Family Gene Os78A5 in Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 135-141.
[12] Peng Binfeng, Lu Chusheng, Yin Yuanhong, Zhu Feifei, Ye Qunhuan, Pan Junfeng, Liu Yanzhuo, Hu Xiangyu, Hu Rui, Li Meijuan, Wang Xinyu, Liang Kaiming, Fu Youqiang. Physiological Mechanism of Ammonium-Nitrate Mixed Nutrition Promoting Rice Growth under High-Temperature Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 165-170.
[13] Du Hanmeng, Chen Yuqiong, Liu Ruotong, Chen Yinglong, Dai Qigen, Zhang Hongcheng, Liao Ping. Effects of Chlormequat Chloride and Gypsum Application on Rice Yield and Lodging Risk under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(5): 29-34.
[14] Yang Linsheng, Xi Min, Tu Debao, Li Zhong, Zhou Yongjin, Xu Youzun, Sun Xueyuan, Wu Wenge. Assessment of Resource Input and Carbon, Nitrogen Footprint for Major Types of Rice in Yangtze River Delta Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 150-156.
[15] Deng Zhou, Gong Chenxu, He Yuxuan, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Combined Lime and Pig Manure Application on Grain Quality of Double-Cropping High-Quality Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 181-187.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!