Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 51-57.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.06.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of High Yield, Stable Yield, and Adaptability of ʻZhangzagu 21ʼ Based on GGE Biplot

Zhang Henan1(), Xu Haoce1, Liu Yinghui1, Feng Xiaolei2, Wang Feng2, Yuan Jincheng1(), Zhao Zhihai2()   

  1. 1 Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
    2 Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2024-06-06 Revised:2024-10-11 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-12-12

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

141

Abstract:

To accurately and objectively analyze and evaluate high yield, stable yield and adaptability of the foxtail meillet variety ?Zhangzagu 21?, we analyzed its yield data from the 2018 and 2019 national joint regional adaptability tests for foxtail millet varieties (early-maturing group in the Northwest Spring Millet Region). The results showed that ?Zhangzagu 21? had the highest average yield over two years among the 26 varieties tested, compared with the control (Datong 29), the average yield of ?Zhangzagu 21? was increased by 17.24% and 23.72%, respectively, ?Zhangzagu 21? achieved yield increases across all eight pilot sites. The GGE biplot analysis confirmed high yield and stable yield, as well as adaptability. In conclusion, ?Zhangzagu 21? is a suitable variety for planting in the Northwest Spring Millet Region.

Key words: Zhangzagu 21, GGE biplot, High yield, Stable yield, Adaptability

Table 1

National joint identification test of regional adaptability of foxtail millet varieties (early-maturing group in the Northwest Spring Millet Region) materials"

2018 2019
编号
Code		 品种名称
Variety name		 编号
Code		 品种名称
Variety name
G1 陇谷17号 G5 大同45号
G2 长杂谷2922 G6 大同48号
G3 赤优金谷 G9 张杂谷21号
G4 陇谷16号 G13 豫谷35
G5 大同45号 G14 大同29号
G6 大同48号 G15 榆14-31
G7 太选谷27 G16 022-4-1-1-1
G8 冀张谷2号 G17 2012FGZ19-1
G9 张杂谷21号 G18 峰优谷4号
G10 M56-1 G19 峰红9号
G11 赤谷25 G20 赤谷26
G12 豫杂谷1号 G21 豫谷38
G13 豫谷35
G14 大同29号

Table 2

Yield performance of foxtail millet varieties tested in 2018 kg/hm2"

编号
Code		 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 均值
Mean
G1 5419.5±793.5cde 7890.0±504.0a 4725.0±219.0bcd 4470.0±322.5a 4555.5±394.5fgh 6663.0±58.5fgh 7440.0±136.5abcd 4263.0±111.0defg 5679.0
G2 7609.5±24.0a 6570.0±519.0bcde 5613.0±454.5ab 5040.0±277.5a 6648.0±459.0abc 7242.0±597.0abc 7632.0±387.0abcd 5212.5±379.5abc 6447.0
G3 4770.0±96.0de 5680.5±420.0ef 5842.5±297.0a 4255.5±334.5a 5545.5±555.0cdef 5410.5±307.5cdef 6888.0±67.5bcd 5238.0±291.0abc 5452.5
G4 4467.0±42.0e 6180.0±283.5cdef 4563.0±157.5cd 5347.5±736.5a 3978.0±76.5ghi 5884.5±165.0ghi 6649.5±154.5d 3925.5±106.5fg 5124.0
G5 4743.0±97.5de 5265.0±469.5ef 5104.5±235.5abcd 4792.5±484.5a 3169.5±246.0i 5577.0±123.0i 7767.0±181.5abc 4050.0±198.0efg 5058.0
G6 5523.0±286.5cde 5020.5±622.5f 4240.5±126.0d 5547.0±307.5a 6040.5±82.5bcde 6348.0±105.0bcde 7309.5±258.0abcd 4437.0±249.0cdefg 5557.5
G7 4962.0±387.0cde 5400.0±184.5ef 4638.0±192.0bcd 4605.0±517.5a 4747.5±319.5fgh 5787.0±318.0fgh 7180.5±49.5abcd 3687.0±336.0g 5127.0
G8 5175.0±390.0cde 3460.5±340.5g 4645.5±153.0bcd 5085.0±364.5a 3672.0±684.0hi 7639.5±90.0hi 6820.5±213.0bcd 4887.0±168.0bcd 5172.0
G9 7357.5±337.5ab 7759.5±304.5ab 6064.5±264.0a 5898.0±1119.0a 7035.0±319.5ab 7834.5±669.0ab 8224.5±345.0a 5700.0±163.5a 6985.5
G10 5568.0±430.5cde 6000.0±457.5def 3352.5±280.5e 4522.5±999.0a 4065.0±421.5.0ghi 4548.0±367.5ghi 4945.5±466.5e 3750.0±234.0g 4593.0
G11 5644.5±288.0cde 5755.5±235.5ef 5130.0±573.0abcd 5310.0±619.5a 5358.0±210.0def 6655.5±604.5def 6742.5±594.0cd 4812.0±63.0cde 5676.0
G12 6205.5±808.5bc 7185.0±583.5abcd 4810.5±222.0bcd 5122.5±361.5a 7252.5±123.0a 6949.5±445.5a 7812.0±99.0ab 5625.0±300.0ab 6382.5
G13 7240.5±106.5ab 7294.5±183.0abc 5359.5±381.0abc 5922.0±916.5a 6304.5±316.5abcd 5257.5±717.0abcd 8125.5±538.5a 4624.5±373.5cdef 6265.5
G14 5950.5±543.0cd 7609.5±93.0ab 5550.0±210.0abc 5512.5±225.0a 4890.0±420.0efg 6570.0±331.5efg 7302.0±261.0abcd 4462.5±156.0cdefg 5980.5

Table 3

Yield performance of foxtail millet varieties tested in 2019 kg/hm2"

编号
Code		 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 均值
Mean
G5 5005.5±244.5bcd 7803.0±312.0bcd 2860.5±51.0ef 4677.0±469.5f 3451.5 4848.0±124.5bc 6507.0±93.0abcd 5748.0±504.0c 5149.5
G6 3933.0±283.5e 6717.0±303.0fg 3085.5±90.0de 6297.0±612.0bcd 5242.5 2640.0±150.0d 6604.5±316.5abcd 7015.5±235.5b 5556.0
G9 7594.5±223.5a 8950.5±88.5a 5002.5±28.5b 7707.0±364.5a 6633.0 6597.0±36.0a 6862.5±358.5ab 7932.0±228.0a 7239.0
G13 5577.0±84.0bc 8377.5±177.0ab 3753.0±186.0c 7087.5±366.0ab 5242.5 3379.5±228.0d 7087.5±342.0a 7255.5±202.5ab 6337.5
G14 5787.0±412.5b 7023.0±199.5defg 3450.0±27.0cd 6072.0±220.5bcd 6423.0 5425.5±142.5b 5970.0±459.0bcde 6207.0±186.0c 5847.0
G15 4668.0±108.0cde 6457.5±276.0g 2928.0±78.0ef 6349.5±492.0bcd 4332.0 1545.0±498.0e 5358.0±244.5e 7197.0±366.0ab 5325.0
G16 4714.5±186.0cde 7710.0±301.5bcde 2547.0±96.0f 6232.5±132.0bcd 5302.5 5500.5±223.5b 6562.5±322.5abcd 6070.5±223.5c 5590.5
G17 4390.5±396.0de 6930.0±319.5efg 1939.5±70.5g 4960.5±222.0ef 2181.0 5257.5±27.0bc 5610.0±136.5de 4810.5±220.5d 4402.5
G18 5523.0±583.5bc 5385.0±258.0h 2847.0±163.5ef 5505.0±150.0def 6262.5 2625.0±244.5d 5782.5±214.5cde 7717.5±213.0ab 5574.0
G19 4780.5±207.0cde 8140.5±259.5bc 3393.0±322.5cd 5637.0±172.5def 5703.0 4582.5±429.0c 5632.5±519.0de 6109.5±255.0c 5626.5
G20 4825.5±205.5cde 7369.5±115.5cdef 5997.0±40.5a 6820.5±247.5abc 6643.5 3312.0±346.5d 6724.5±43.5abc 7752.0±216.0ab 6589.5
G21 5097.0±120.0bcd 6783.0±297.0fg 3490.5±54.0cd 5940.0±294.0cde 4462.5 1785.0±196.5e 5775.0±402.0cde 7117.5±202.5ab 5521.5

Table 4

The yield performance of ‘Zhangzagu 21’ in 2018-2019"

试验地点
Test site		 2018 2019
产量Yield (kg/hm2) 较CK± Compared to CK (±%) 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 较CK± Compared to CK (±%)
E1 7357.5 23.65 7594.5 31.23
E2 7759.5 1.97 8950.5 27.45
E3 6064.5 9.27 5002.5 45.00
E4 5898.0 6.99 7707.0 26.93
E5 7035.0 43.87 6633.0 3.27
E6 7834.5 19.25 6597.0 21.59
E7 8224.5 12.63 6862.5 14.95
E8 5700.0 27.73 7932.0 27.79

Table 5

Analysis of combined variance of grain yield of tested foxtail millet varieties in 2018-2019"

年份
Year		 变异来源
Source of variation		 自由度
df		 平方和
SS		 均方
MS		 F值
F-value		 占总平方和百分比
Percentage of total sum of squares (%)
2018 地点内区组 16 20.59 1.29 1.60 －
基因型（G） 13 243.35 18.72 23.23 22.89
环境（E） 7 386.18 55.17 68.47 36.33
基因型×环境（GE） 91 245.28 2.70 3.35 23.07
误差 208 167.60 0.81 － －
总和 335 1063.00 － － －
2019 地点内区组 15 13.97 0.93 2.24 －
基因型（G） 11 214.90 19.54 46.97 15.34
环境（E） 7 798.67 114.10 274.30 57.02
基因型×环境（GE） 77 304.58 3.96 9.51 21.74
误差 165 68.63 0.42 － －
总和 275 1400.76 － － －

Fig.1

Analysis of yield and stability of tested foxtail millet varieties in 2018 and 2019"

Fig.2

Comprehensive analysis of yield and stability of tested foxtail millet varieties in 2018 and 2019"

Fig.3

Adaptability analysis of tested foxtail millet varieties in 2018 and 2019"

[1] 李顺国, 刘斐, 刘猛, 等. 中国谷子产业和种业发展现状与未来展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):459-470.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.001
[2] 刁现民, 程汝宏. 十五年区试数据分析展示谷子糜子育种现状. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(23):4469-4474.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.23.001
[3] 赵利蓉, 马珂, 张丽光, 等. 不同生态区谷子品种农艺性状和品质分析. 作物杂志, 2022(2):44-53.
[4] Srinivasan N, Palanisamy K, Fawzi M M, et al. Nutritional and functional roles of millets-a review. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2019, 43(7):e12859.
[5] Mansha G, Medhanie D A, Govintharaj P. Millets: a nutritional powerhouse with anti-cancer potential. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 2023, 15(10):47769.
[6] Saini S, Saxena S, Samtiya M, et al. Potential of underutilized millets as Nutri-cereal: an overview. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 58(12):4465-4477.
doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-04985-x pmid: 34629510
[7] 金石桥, 许乃银. GGE双标图在中国农作物品种试验中应用的必要性探讨. 种子, 2012, 31(12):89-92.
[8] 严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用. 作物学报, 2010, 36(11):1805-1819.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01805
[9] 杨璐, 杨峰, 刘奇颀. 基于GGE双标图的长江中下游中籼迟熟区试品种丰产适应性及抗稻瘟病性评价. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(3):27-35.
[10] 谢文锦, 李方明, 李宁, 等. 基于GGE双标图的北方地区鲜食糯玉米产量和品质性状及试点鉴别力分析. 作物杂志, 2023 (4):85-90.
[11] 许乃银, 荣义华, 李健, 等. GGE双标图在陆地棉高产稳产和适应性分析中的应用——以长江流域棉区国审棉花新品种‘鄂杂棉30’为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(6):884-892.
[12] 王芳, 沈希华, 邢晓宁, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在花生高产稳产和适应性分析中的应用——以我国北方片小粒花生新品种安花3号为例. 花生学报, 2024, 53(1):19-25.
[13] 罗俊, 张华, 邓祖湖, 等. 用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种性状稳定性及试点代表性. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5):1319-1325.
[14] 严威凯, 盛庆来, 胡跃高, 等. GGE叠图法─分析品种×环境互作模式的理想方法. 作物学报, 2001, 27(1):21-28.
[15] 肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 等. 基于GGE双标图的高粱品种农艺性状和稳产性分析. 作物杂志, 2023(2):36-45.
[16] 李梦, 周显兵, 刘锋博, 等. 基于GGE双标图的油菜新品种陕油1609丰产稳产适应性分析. 种子, 2023, 42(7):122-128.
[17] 张晓申, 杨育峰, 雒峰, 等. GGE双标图对甘薯‘郑红23号’丰产稳产性和适应性的评价. 分子植物育种,(2024-02-21) [2025-08-13].
[18] 张晓申, 杨育峰, 曹辉, 等. 采用GGE双标图评价甘薯郑红22的丰产稳产性和适应性. 种子, 2023, 42(3):133-138.
[19] 崔同霞, 张保军, 姚友旭, 等. 基于GGE双标图法的甘肃省西片区域春小麦新品种的丰产性及适应性评价. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(3):58-65.
[20] 曹元元, 丁逸帆, 左示敏, 等. 基于GGE双标图和AMMI模型对江苏省水稻区试品种的丰产性和稳定性分析. 种子, 2021, 40(6):38-43.
[21] 李余良, 熊婷. 甜玉米品种区域试验产量和试点环境的GGE双标图分析. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(3):47-53.
[22] 孙瑞, 杨刚, 张华, 等. 基于GGE双标图的北方旱寒区冬油菜适应性分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(5):12-21.
[23] 周丙月, 袁剑龙, 张玉梅, 等. 马铃薯品种(系)农艺性状的适应性和稳定性分析. 核农学报, 2023, 37(2):274-289.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.02.0274
[24] 樊永强, 郜惠苹, 韩燕丽, 等. 基于GGE双标图对‘豫谷28’的丰产稳产性及适应性分析. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(1):178-187.
[25] 宋慧, 刘金荣, 王素英, 等. GGE双标图评价谷子‘豫谷18’的丰产稳产性和适应性. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(1):29-38.
[26] 陈彩锦, 张尚沛, 师尚礼, 等. 基于GGE双标图对苜蓿品种丰产性和稳定性综合评价. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5):912-918.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.007
[1] Sun Xianyin, Zhang Jibo, Lü Guangde, Qi Xiaolei, Sun Yingying, Mi Yong, Mu Qiuhuan, Yin Xundong, Wang Ruixia, Qian Zhaoguo, Gao Minggang. Comparison of High and Stable Yield Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Wheat under Dryland and Supplemental Irrigation Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 104-110.
[2] Yin Junhua, Deng Li, Guo Minjie, Miao Jianli, Hu Junping, Li Shaowei, Ren Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Small-Seeded Peanut Varieties Based on BLUP Values and GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 118-125.
[3] Lü Shuli, Tian Zhuangbo, Ding Fang, Lü Zhuoyang. Comprehensive Analysis of High Yield and High Quality Sesame Shangzhi 6 Based on GGE Biplot and TOPSIS Method [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 80-86.
[4] Wu Lu, Zhang Hao, Yang Feiyun, Guo Erjing, Si Linlin, Cao Kai, Cheng Chen. Adaptability Assessment of WOFOST Model for Simulating Rice Growth and Development in the Jianghuai Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 215-221.
[5] Long Weihua, Xian Zhihui, Zhang Zheng, Alibieligen·Hazitai , Zulehumaer·Wusimanjiang , Pu Huiming, Hu Maolong. Adaptability Analysis of Non-Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Hybrid Rapeseed Lines from Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River in Ili River Valley, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 111-116.
[6] Yu Mu, Yang Haitang, Hu Yanling, Liu Ruanzhi, Shi Yanzhao, Li Pan, Han Yanhong, Zhu Zhenzhen, Li Shizhong, Guo Zhenchao. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Stability of Yield Components in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(6): 55-60.
[7] Bao Xuelian, Wen Feng, Jin Xiaoguang, Hu Ruimei, Huang Qianjing, Zhang Guihua, Qi Jinquan, Bai Yingzhe, Wuyuehan , Baiyilatu . Adaptability Analysis of Different Millet Varieties in the Main Grain-Producing Areas of Eastern Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 201-206.
[8] Li Lu, Yang Dan, Wang Suhua, Wan Guoan, Jiang Wan, Li Shuju, Zhang Shuguang, Li Bing. Stability Analysis and Adaptability Evaluation of Potato Cultivars in Winner Paddy Field [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 47-53.
[9] Wang Shen, Fan Baojie, Liu Changyou, Wang Yan, Zhang Zhixiao, Su Qiuzhu, Shi Huiying, Shen Yingchao, Wang Xueqing, Tian Jing. Identification and Evaluation of Yield and Main Agronomic Characteristics of New Mung Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 90-99.
[10] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
[11] Xie Wenjin, Li Fangming, Li Ning, Yang Hailong, Fu Jun, Zhang Zhongwei, Gao Xudong, Feng Guang. Analysis of Yield, Quality Traits and TestingSite Discrimination of Fresh Waxy Corn in Northern China Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 85-90.
[12] Zhang Haibin, Wu Xiaohua, Yu Meiling, Wang Xiaobing, Ye Jun, Cui Siyu, Li Yuanqing, Wang Zhanxian, Zhang Hongxu, Xue Wei, Li Yan, Cui Guohui, Zhao Xuanwei, Liu Juan. AMMI Model Analysis of Grain Yield of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Inner Mongolia Regional Trials [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 27-34.
[13] Xiao Jibing, Liu Zhi, Kong Fanxin, Xin Zongxu, Wu Hongsheng. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield Stability of Sorghum Varieties Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 36-45.
[14] Zhao Caixia, Yuan Yuting. Adaptability Analysis of High-Quality Rapeseed Dadi 95 in Main Agricultural Areas in Tibet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 51-56.
[15] Wang Yanxun, Tian Jichun. Wide Adaptability Performance and Genetic Analysis of National Certified Wheat Variety Shannong 20 with High and Stable Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 46-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!