Crops ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 47-53.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.03.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Stability Analysis and Adaptability Evaluation of Potato Cultivars in Winner Paddy Field

Li Lu1(), Yang Dan1, Wang Suhua2, Wan Guoan1, Jiang Wan1, Li Shuju1(), Zhang Shuguang1, Li Bing1   

  1. 1Changde Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Changde 415000, Hunan, China
    2Crop Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, Hunan, China
  • Received:2024-01-10 Revised:2024-03-26 Online:2024-06-15 Published:2024-06-18

RichHTML

10

PDF (PC)

121

Abstract:

In order to reveal the variation pattern of potato main agronomic traits and screen out the superior cultivars suitable for winner paddy field, six potato cultivars were used as test materials in three years (2018- 2021), and main agronomic characteristics were detected and analyzed by variance analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis. The results showed that there were different or significantly different among main agronomic characteristics of different cultivars. The year effects and genetic effects of all characteristics were different or significantly different, and the year effects were more than genetic effects, but only the plant height exhibited a greater genetic effects. Correlation analysis indicated that the plant height was extremely significantly positively correlated with single tuber weight, potato weight of per plant, large-medium potato rate and fresh potato yield. The number of main stems was extremely significantly positively correlated with tuber number per plant, but extremely significantly negatively correlated with single tuber weight and large-medium potato rate. Based on principal component analysis, the comprehensive evaluation model for the adaptability of table potato cultivars in winner paddy field were established and two quality cultivars suitable for popularization were screened out.

Key words: Potato, Winner paddy field, Principal component analysis, Adaptability, Evaluation model

Fig.1

Meteorological data during the test"

Table 1

The appearance performances of different varieties"

品种
Cultivar		 生育期
Growth
period (d)		 出苗率
Emergence
rate (%)		 茎色
Stem
color		 叶色
Leaf
color		 块茎外观特点
Tuber appearance trait
中薯13号Zhongshu 13 65 88.33 绿 浅绿 椭圆形，表皮光滑，皮色淡黄，肉色淡黄，芽眼浅
中薯191 Zhongshu 191 67 75.52 绿 绿 椭圆形，表皮光滑，皮色黄色，肉色黄色，芽眼浅
华薯3号Huashu 3 70 97.11 绿 绿 长椭圆，表皮光滑，皮色淡黄，肉色乳白色，芽眼浅
华薯5号Huashu 5 69 96.90 绿 绿 短椭圆，表皮光滑，皮色黄色，肉色黄色，芽眼浅
红美Hongmei 56 84.46 淡紫 绿 长形，表皮光滑，皮色红色，肉色红色，芽眼红色，浅
中薯3号Zhongshu 3 67 81.34 绿 绿 椭圆形，表皮光滑，皮色淡黄，肉色淡黄，芽眼浅

Table 2

Comparison of potato main agronomic traits"

品种
Cultivar		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 主茎数
Main stem number		 单薯重
Weight per tuber (g)		 单株薯数
Tuber number per plant
中薯13号Zhongshu 13 41.63±7.72cdCD 3.30±0.85aA 64.41±17.23cC 7.06±1.09aA
中薯191 Zhongshu 191 44.63±7.59cC 2.01±0.65cB 84.82±26.07abAB 5.73±1.09bBC
华薯3号Huashu 3 54.11±8.26bB 1.82±0.72cBC 94.77±17.71aA 5.54±1.10bC
华薯5号Huashu 5 60.84±5.03aA 2.23±0.89cB 94.29±23.49aA 5.91±1.61bABC
红美Hongmei 39.54±7.43dD 1.34±0.46dC 75.68±12.80bcBC 5.60±1.13bC
中薯3号Zhongshu 3 42.90±7.24cCD 2.86±1.08bA 81.28±20.65bAB 6.91±1.24aAB

Table 3

The coefficient variation of main agronomic traits of different cultivars %"

品种
Cultivar		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎数
Main stem
number		 单薯重
Weight
per tuber		 单株薯数
Tuber number
per plant		 单株薯重
Potato weight
per plant		 大中薯率
Large-medium
potato rate		 鲜薯产量
Fresh potato
yield		 干物质率
Dry
matter		 总变异系数
Coefficient of
total variation
中薯13号Zhongshu 13 18.54 25.71 26.76 15.44 30.65 26.86 9.88 6.49 160.33
中薯191 Zhongshu 191 17.01 32.37 30.74 19.11 15.24 21.27 14.19 7.50 163.52
华薯3号Huashu 3 15.27 39.27 18.69 19.80 20.32 9.34 20.07 3.34 146.10
华薯5号Huashu 5 8.27 40.24 24.91 27.18 13.99 13.03 13.23 8.18 149.03
红美Hongmei 18.80 34.11 16.91 20.16 11.54 13.91 9.67 3.46 128.56
中薯3号Zhongshu 3 16.88 37.80 25.40 17.98 15.93 24.78 15.22 5.65 159.64

Table 4

The coefficient variation of main agronomic traits %"

年份
Year		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎数
Main stem
number		 单薯重
Weight per
tuber		 单株薯数
Tuber number
per plant		 单株薯重
Potato weight
per plant		 大中薯率
Large-medium
potato rate		 鲜薯产量
Fresh potato
yield		 干物质率
Dry matter
rate
2018 11.57 39.75 16.76 16.42 13.43 4.62 13.01 5.14
2019 16.53 29.08 18.87 16.89 15.98 17.41 12.22 7.11
2020 30.65 42.81 27.19 23.69 15.62 13.39 19.78 6.36
平均Average 19.58 37.21 20.94 19.00 15.01 11.81 15.00 6.20

Table 5

ANOVA analysis of potato main agronomic characteristics"

变异来源
Variation
source		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎数
Main stem
number		 单薯重
Weight
per tuber		 单株薯数
Tuber number
per plant		 单株薯重
Potato weight
per plant		 大中薯率
Large-medium
potato rate		 鲜薯产量
Fresh potato
yield		 干物质率
Dry matter
rate
年份Year (Y) 49.96** 52.33** 25.79** 14.37** 49.81** 96.45** 42.70** 2.71
基因型Gene (G) 61.22** 23.74** 7.10** 4.64** 8.95** 8.91** 26.53** 2.20
Y×G 10.75** 2.10 2.82* 1.66 2.62* 3.05** 7.24** 0.66

Table 6

Correlation analysis of agronomic traits of different cultivars"

性状
Trait		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎数
Main stem
number		 单薯重
Weight
per tuber		 单株薯数
Tuber number
per plant		 单株薯重
Potato weight
per plant		 大中薯率
Large-medium
potato rate		 鲜薯产量
Fresh potato
yield
主茎数Main stem number -0.184
单薯重Weight per tuber 0.517** -0.523**
单株薯数Tuber number per plant -0.180 0.663** -0.573**
单株薯重Potato weight per plant 0.491** -0.064 0.531** 0.220
大中薯率Large-medium potato rate 0.546** -0.567** 0.693** -0.355** 0.600**
鲜薯产量Fresh potato yield 0.668** -0.297* 0.576** -0.214 0.478** 0.448**
干物质率Dry matter rate 0.086 0.065 0.063 -0.090 0.085 0.195 0.132

Table 7

Principal component analysis of potato agronomic traits"

性状
Trait		 主成分1 Component 1 主成分2 Component 2 主成分3 Component 3
特征值
Eigenvalue		 特征向量
Eigenvector		 特征值
Eigenvalue		 特征向量
Eigenvector		 特征值
Eigenvalue		 特征向量
Eigenvector
X1 0.729 0.308 0.343 0.145 -0.061 -0.026
X2 -0.628 -0.265 0.618 0.261 0.122 0.052
X3 0.884 0.373 -0.108 -0.046 -0.067 -0.028
X4 -0.523 -0.221 0.772 0.326 -0.143 -0.060
X5 0.612 0.258 0.645 0.272 -0.137 -0.058
X6 0.856 0.361 0.031 0.013 0.049 0.021
X7 0.746 0.315 0.259 0.109 -0.018 -0.008
X8 0.165 0.070 0.144 0.061 0.971 0.410
总特征值Total eigenvalue 3.672 － 1.613 － 1.007 －
贡献率Contribution rate (%) 45.904 － 20.167 － 12.588 －
累计贡献率Accumulative contribution rate (%) 45.904 － 66.071 － 78.660 －

Table 8

Comprehensive scores and ranking of different potato cultivars"

品种
Cultivar		 主成分Component 综合得分
Comprehensive
score		 排名
Ranking
PC1 PC2 PC3
中薯13号
Zhongshu 13		 -2.277
 0.792
 0.650
 -1.022
 6
中薯191
Zhongshu 191		 -0.243
 -0.369
 -0.107
 -0.254
 4
华薯3号
Huashu 3		 1.613
 -0.151
 0.200
 0.935
 2
华薯5号
Huashu 5		 2.187
 -0.052
 -0.317
 1.212
 1
红美
Hongmei		 -0.761
 -0.984
 -0.472
 -0.772
 5
中薯3号
Zhongshu 3		 -0.519
 0.764
 0.047
 -0.099
 3
[1] 罗赛男, 汤睿, 张文, 等. 五个马铃薯品种在湖南冬闲田种植的适应性. 作物杂志, 2017(3):25-28.
[2] 李亚庆. 湖南省马铃薯产业发展问题研究. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017.
[3] 黄艳岚, 刘明月, 周虹, 等. 湖南省马铃薯生产现状及发展对策. 湖南农业科学, 2009(7):108-110.
[4] 胡新喜, 刘明月, 熊兴耀. 2013年湖南省马铃薯产业现状、存在问题及发展建议// 2014年中国马铃薯大会, 2014.
[5] 李大恒, 麻琼方. 湘西州马铃薯产业现状与发展对策. 作物研究, 2017, 31(4):437-440.
[6] 李艳兰, 张春帆, 李灶福, 等. 不同海拔点食粒豌豆新品种丰产性和稳定性分析. 农学学报, 2021, 11(10):75-82.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0169
[7] 曹元元, 丁逸帆, 左示敏, 等. 基于GGE双标图和AMMI模型对江苏省水稻区试品种的丰产性和稳定性分析. 种子, 2021, 40(6):38-43,51.
[8] 何虎翼, 谭冠宁, 何新民, 等. 63份马铃薯品种(系)资源农艺性状的主成分与聚类分析. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(1):27-33.
[9] 李亚杰, 李德明, 范士杰, 等. GGE双标图在马铃薯品种适应性及产量稳定性分析中的应用评价. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 52(5):617-622.
[10] 肖富良, 黄天宝, 吕伟生, 等. 红壤旱地食用型甘薯主要农艺性状的稳定性分析及适应性评价. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33 (7):6-12.
[11] 潘哲超, 王颖, 徐宁生, 等. 马铃薯重要农艺性状的相关性,主成分与聚类分析. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(5):1626-1636.
[12] 马光亮, 王晓, 李海潮. 马铃薯块茎发育与地上茎叶生长关系的研究. 陕西农业科学, 1999(4):12-13.
[13] 莫庆忠, 罗凯, 岳永贵, 等. 马铃薯产量与主要农艺性状的相关性及灰色关联度分析. 耕作与栽培, 2017(1):17-18,3.
[14] 李艳双, 曾珍香. 主成分分析法在多指标综合评价方法中的应用. 河北工业大学学报, 1999(1):94-97.
[15] 杜培兵, 张永福, 白小东, 等. 主成分分析和隶属函数法对马铃薯品种抗旱性的评价. 种子, 2019, 38(8):120-126.
[16] 何文, 张秀芬, 郭素云, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对22份马铃薯种质的综合评价. 种子, 2021, 40(3):80-86.
[1] Chen Biwei, Ju Xikai, Sun Yiming, Li Qinghua, Liu Qing, Zeng Lusheng. Effects of Drought in Different Periods on Yield Formation and Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Starchy Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 141-147.
[2] Liu Yajun, Lu Yun, Wang Wenjing, Hu Qiguo, Chu Fengli, Li Zhijie. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Soil Conditioner on the Growth and Development of Continuous Cropping Sweet Potato and Soil Fertility [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 168-174.
[3] Bao Xuelian, Wen Feng, Jin Xiaoguang, Hu Ruimei, Huang Qianjing, Zhang Guihua, Qi Jinquan, Bai Yingzhe, Wuyuehan , Baiyilatu . Adaptability Analysis of Different Millet Varieties in the Main Grain-Producing Areas of Eastern Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 201-206.
[4] Luo Yuankai, Li Ranqiu, Li Yimeng, Tang Wei, Liu Yaju. Effects of Planting Density and EBR Concentration on the Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 231-237.
[5] Lou Shubao, Yang Mengping, Xing Jinyue, Zhai Lingxia, Wang Hui, Liu Chunsheng, Wang Lichun, Song Jiling. Molecular Marker Screening of Potato Late Blight Resistant Gene R8 and Evaluation of Field Resistance [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 247-251.
[6] Wang Shen, Fan Baojie, Liu Changyou, Wang Yan, Zhang Zhixiao, Su Qiuzhu, Shi Huiying, Shen Yingchao, Wang Xueqing, Tian Jing. Identification and Evaluation of Yield and Main Agronomic Characteristics of New Mung Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 90-99.
[7] Du Qingfu, Shang Lili, Lü Jiahao, Zhang Ruiqing, Yao Jiangang, Qiu Pengfei, Zhao Jianwei, He Shaozhen. Effects of Different Light Intensity on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Flowering of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 172-177.
[8] Li Sheng, Li Xiang, Zhu Meiru, Wang Xia, Li Haoyang, Tan Xinru, Wang Haiyan. Screening of Antagonistic Bacteria against Potato Bacterial Wilt and Study on Its Control Effect in Greenhouse [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 242-248.
[9] Xu Shihao, Zhao Chunbo, Huangfu Liyun, Fan Xintong, Chen Shanshan, Han Zhongcai, Han Yuzhu. Effects of Different Potassium Sources on Potassium Accumulation, Transport and Yield Components in Potato [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 202-208.
[10] Zhang Rong, Chen Xiaowen, Lu Ping, You Yanrong, Zhou Delu, Li Deming. Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Temperature and Yield of Potato in Dry Land [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 145-150.
[11] Hu Xinyuan, Liu Yongqiang, Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil Physical Chemistry Properties and Potato Quality under Continuous Cropping in Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 159-164.
[12] Ding Kaixin, Wang Lichun, Tian Guokui, Wang Haiyan, Li Fengyun, Pan Yang, Pang Ze, Shan Ying. Review on the Response Reasearch of Potato Growth and PhysiologicalCharacteristics to Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 16-21.
[13] Zhai Xinna, Yang Jiawei, Xu Chunjiang, Qi Lipan, Tian Zaimin, Feng Yan, Yin Jiang, Gong Xuechen. Effects of Grafting on Interspecific Hybridization Compatibility of Potato and Its Physiological Regulation Mechanism [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 182-187.
[14] Su Xiaoyu, Gao Tongmei, Zhang Pengyu, Li Feng, Wu Yin, Wang Dongyong, Tian Yuan, Wei Shuangling. Comprehensive Evaluation of Heat Resistance of Sesame Seedlings Based on Principal Component Analysis and Membership Function Method [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 52-59.
[15] Lou Shubao, Yang Mengping, Xing Jinyue, Zhai Lingxia, Wang Hui, Liu Chunsheng, Wang Lichun, Song Jiling. Molecular Marker-Assisted Screening of Potato Germplasm Resources for Virus Resistance [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 65-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!