Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 148-153.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.025

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Chemical Weeding Mulching Film on Growth and Development of Succeeding Crop Linseed in Corn Field of Whole-Mulching Plastic Films on Double Ridges

Yue Decheng,Shi Guangliang,Han Juhong,Jiang Yanjun,Liu Jianwei,Li Qingmei   

  1. Pingliang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Pingliang 744000,Gansu,China
  • Received:2016-06-08 Revised:2016-10-17 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

118

Abstract:

Effects of chemical weeding mulching film on growth and development of succeeding crop linseed in corn field of whole-mulching plastic films on double ridges was measured under the background of normal soil environment and climate in Longdong dryland area. The results showed that seeding emergence, density, stem length, root dry weight, dry weight of overground part, fruit grain number, thousand seed weight and yield of succeeding crop linseed in corn field of whole-mulching plastic films on double ridges with chemical weeding mulching film were reduced 2.21%, 3.39%-3.67%, 0.04-2.05cm, 0.00-6.33mg/plant, 8.33-84.67mg/plant, 0.55 grain/fruit, 0.06g and 2.66% comparing with covering ordinary white film, respectively. Effective points stem number and capsule number were increased 0.04 per plant and 0.69 fruit/plant, respectively. Dry weight of overground part at the beginning of flowering was significantly different between two treatments, and other major agronomic characters and yield were not significantly different. Taken together, major agronomic characters and yield of succeeding crop linseed had positive influence in corn field of whole-mulching plastic films on double ridges with chemical weeding mulching film, but the effect was weak and had certain security. When crop arrangement is tighter, the succeeding crop linseed can be arranged in corn field of whole-mulching plastic films on double ridges with chemical weeding mulching film.

Key words: Corn field of whole-mulching plastic films on double ridges, Chemical weeding mulching film, Succeeding crop linseed, Safety

Table 1

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on seeding emergence of succeeding crop linseed"

处理Treatments 播种粒数(万粒/hm2)
Seeding number		 平均出苗数(万株/hm2)
Average seedling emergence		 平均出苗率(%)
Average seedling rate		 较CK降低(%)
Reduction rate
化学除草地膜Chemical weeding mulching film 6.7 654.07±78.533 64.97aA 2.21
白色地膜White plastic film (CK) 6.7 676.27±56.667 67.18aA -

Table 2

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on density of succeeding crop linseed"

处理
Treatments		 幼苗期Seedling stage 快速生长期Fast growing period 成熟期Mature stage
密度(万株/hm2)
Density		 较CK降低(%)
Decreased than CK		 密度(万株/hm2)
Density		 较CK降低(%)
Decreased than CK		 密度(万株/hm2)
Density		 较CK降低(%)
Decreased than CK
化学除草地膜
Chemical weeding mulching film		 653.33±78.267aA

 3.39

 651.07±94.133aA

 3.63

 486.67±33.733aA

 3.67
白色地膜（CK）
White plastic film		 676.27±30.333aA
 -
 675.60±38.267aA
 -
 505.20±35.533aA
 -

Table 3

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on plant height of succeeding crop linseed cm"

处理
Treatments		 枞形期
Fir pattern stage		 现蕾期
Budding stage		 始花期
First-flowering stage		 盛花期
Full-bloom stage		 成熟期
Mature stage
平均株高
Average plant height		 较CK降低Decreased than CK 平均株高
Average
plant height		 较CK降低Decreased than CK 平均株高
Average plant height		 较CK降低Decreased than CK 平均株高
Average
plant height		 较CK降低Decreased than CK 平均株高
Average plant height		 较CK降低Decreased than CK
化学除草地膜Chemical weeding mulching film 9.57±
1.61aA
 0.04

 22.16±
5.92aA
 0.53

 46.82±
1.90aA
 0.76

 49.15±
3.51aA
 2.05

 50.30±
1.55aA
 1.82
白色地膜(CK) White plastic film 9.61±
1.06aA		 - 22.69±
5.47aA		 - 47.58±
0.30aA		 - 51.20±
3.35aA		 - 52.12±
4.22aA		 -

Table 4

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on plant dry weight of succeeding crop linseed"

处理
Treatments		 根部Root (mg/株) 地上部Overground part (mg/株)
枞形期
Fir pattern stage		 现蕾期
Budding stage		 始花期
First-flowering stage		 枞形期
Fir pattern stage		 现蕾期
Budding stage		 始花期
First-flowering stage
化学除草地膜
Chemical weeding
mulching film		 13.67±0.00aA

 31.67±4.67aA

 57.67±1.33aA

 76.00±20.33aA

 220.67±30.67aA

 545.00±20.33aA
白色地膜（CK）
White plastic film		 13.67±2.33aA
 35.00±5.67aA
 64.00±8.00aA
 84.33±20.67aA
 251.33±22.67aA
 629.67±68.33bA

Table 5

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on main economic characteristics of succeeding crop linseed"

处理
Treatments		 有效分茎数(个/株)
Effective stems		 蒴果数(果/株)
Capsule number		 果粒数(粒/果)
Fruit grain numbers		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
化学除草地膜Chemical weeding mulching film 0.20±0.07aA 11.81±2.98aA 5.89±1.44aA 6.69±0.34aA
白色地膜White plastic film (CK) 0.16±0.06aA 11.12±0.78aA 6.44±1.93aA 6.75±0.16aA

Table 6

Effect of chemical weeding mulching film on yield of succeeding crop linseed"

处理Treatments 小区产量(g/m2)
Stem yield		 较CK减产(%)
Yield reduction rate
化学除草地膜
Chemical weeding mulching film		 164.06±31.22aA

 2.66
白色地膜(CK)
White plastic film		 168.54±20.51aA
 -
[1] 岳德成, 姜延军, 史广亮 , 等. 甘肃省平凉市全膜双垄沟播玉米田杂草种类及主要群落类型. 植物保护, 2015,41(3):159-164.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2015.03.031
[2] 李锦嘉, 陈昆松, 李方 . 除草地膜的研究与应用.浙江农业科学, 1996(4):186-187.
[3] 黄颂禹, 方学连, 张洪奇 , 等. 除草地膜在春玉米田应用的效果.江苏农业科学, 1993(1):27-28.
[4] 吴田铲, 余同海, 施茂荣 . 除草地膜在海涂土壤主栽作物上的应用效果及使用技术研究.耕作与栽培, 1996(2):50-51.
[5] 徐光良, 凌建刚, 舒巧云 . 除草地膜在马铃薯上的应用效果. 中国马铃薯, 1999,13(3):147-148.
[6] 黄立方, 张太保 . 都尔除草地膜在大棚菜地上的应用效果.长江蔬菜, 1999(2):21-22.
[7] 高旭华, 黄健, 黄瑶珠 . 玉米专用除草地膜田间应用效果研究. 农学学报, 2014,4(3):11-13.
[8] 李福, 孙多鑫, 李城德 , 等. 半干旱地区全膜双垄沟播技术规程( BD62/821-2002).农业科技与信息, 2013(7):19-20.
[9] 董中东, 张东志, 陈若礼 , 等. 风干和烘干条件下不同小麦品种在灌浆过程中植株和子粒干物质积累的动态变化. 河南农业大学学报, 2012,46(4):364-369.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2340.2012.04.003
[10] 钟昀, 陶诗顺, 李智会 . 水稻旱育秧床施用除草剂对不同萌发状态种子出苗和秧苗生长的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012,40(31):15250-15251.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2012.31.059
[11] 李会宾, 吴思荣, 王琳 . 3种除草剂对后茬作物出苗率及成活率的影响.甘肃农业科技, 2009(12):25-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2009.12.010
[12] 曹秀霞, 安维太, 钱爱萍 , 等. 密度和施肥量对旱地亚麻产量及农艺性状的影响.陕西农业科学, 2012(1):87-89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2012.01.031
[13] 杨建春, 吴瑞香 . 不同栽培密度对晋亚10号亚麻产量及农艺性状的影响.耕作与栽培, 2012(6):10-11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2012.06.005
[14] 黄开健, 黄艳华 . 玉米株高整齐度对产量及其构成因素的影响.广西农业科学, 1997(2):61-63.
[15] 黄瑞冬, 李广权 . 玉米株高整齐度及其测定方法的比较.玉米科学, 1995(2):61-63.
[16] 成文联, 柳海鹰, 王世冬 . 生物量与其影响因素之间关系的研究. 内蒙古大学学报, 2000,31(3):285-287.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1638.2000.03.011
[17] 单正军, 蔡道基, 陈祖义 . 除草剂对植物光合作用和吸肥能力影响初探.农村生态环境, 1993(2):47-49.
[18] 原向阳, 毕耀宇, 王鑫 , 等. 除草剂对抗草甘膦大豆光合作用和蒸腾作用的影响. 农业现代化研究, 2006,27(4):311-313.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0275.2006.04.019
[19] 吕建伟, 马天进, 黄万兵 , 等. 花生田除草剂筛选及其对花生农艺性状的影响. 花生学报, 2016,45(1):53-56.
doi: 10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2016.01.011
[20] 张国宾, 冯秀杰, 周星洋 , 等. 稻田除草剂残留对后茬作物烟草农艺性状和生理代谢的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2016,37(1):41-45.
[21] 李巍, 杜晓华, 尚辉 , 等. 除草剂对苎麻生长及经济性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(9):138-144.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.09.027
[22] 刘惠君, 詹秀明, 刘维屏 . 四种酰胺类除草剂对土壤酶活性的影响. 中国环境科学, 2005,25(5):611-614.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2005.05.024
[23] 张爱云, 蔡道基 . 除草剂对土壤微生物活性、土壤氨化作用和硝化作用的影响.农村生态环境, 1990(3):62-65.
[24] 汤树德, 李汉昌, 石晶波 . 化学除草剂对土壤中微生物生态和物质转化过程的影响. 土壤学报, 1984,21(1):95-103.
[25] 苏少泉 . 长残留除草剂对后茬作物安全性问题. 农药, 1998,37(12):4-7.
[26] 夏振华, 黄葵 . 土壤中除草剂甲卤黄隆的行为研究. 安徽化工, 1999,97(1):20-22.
[27] 卢信, 赵炳梓, 张佳宝 , 等. 除草剂草甘膦的性质及环境行为综述. 土壤通报, 2005,36(5):785-789.
[1] Zhang Jianhua, Guo Ruifeng, Cao Changlin, Fan Na, . Study on Effect and Safety of Controlling Weed#br# in Sorghum Field by Several Stem and#br# Leaf Treatment Herbicide [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 162-166.
[2] Zhao Cunhu, Kong Qingquan, Chen Wenjin, . Screening of Postemergence Herbicides#br# in the Broad Bean Field [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 167-172.
[3] Yue Jiao,Wei Fu,Yong Zhai. Application of RNAi in Crop Breeding and Its Safety Assessment [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 9-15.
[4] Yue Jiao,Jingang Liang,Yong Zhai. Progress in Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .