Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 167-172.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.05.027

Previous Articles    

Screening of Postemergence Herbicides in the Broad Bean Field

Zhao Cunhu,Kong Qingquan,Chen Wenjin,He Xiaoyong,Tian Xiaoyan   

  1. Plant Protection Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural, Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2018-03-21 Revised:2018-06-27 Online:2018-10-15 Published:2018-10-12

RichHTML

7

PDF (PC)

151

Abstract:

To screen out the herbicide suitable for use in broad bean field in central Inner Mongolia, three species of broadleaf weed herbicides were recombined as one grass weed herbicide and used to control weeds in broad bean field. The efficiency and safety of the combined herbicides were detected in the tested broad bean field. The results showed that the three herbicides were 10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC, 21.4% acifluorfensodium AS and 48% hentazon AS and 5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC compound, they all had good control effect on weeds in the broad bean field whether it was the constant combination treatment or doubling combination treatment. The control effect of all treatments on the fresh weight of weeds was higher than that on plants of weeds, and the control effect of barnyard weeds was not significantly different. The total control effect of weeds and the control effect of broadleaf weeds that goosefoots and Amaranthus retroflexus was doubling combination treatment significantly better than the combination treatment, and the difference was extremely significant. Field safety investigation showed that 5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 60g/hm 2+48% hentazon AS 720, 1440g/hm2 treatments were very safe for broad bean. 5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 60g/hm2+21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 321, 642g/hm2 treatments ranked the second. 5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 60g/hm2+10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 90, 180g/hm2 treatments was not safe.

Key words: Broad bean, Herbicide, Control efficiency, Safety

Table 1

The design of compound combination for stem, leaf treatment of herbicides"

药剂Herbicide 施药剂量(g/hm2)
Dosage
5%精喹禾灵乳油 (60g/hm2) 48%苯达松AS 720
5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 48% bentazon AS 1 440
10%乙羧氟草醚EC 90
10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 180
21.4%三氟羧草醚AS 321
21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 642
空白对照CK —

Table 2

The height of broad bean after the application 15d"

药剂Herbicide 施药剂量(g/hm2)
Dosage		 株高Plant height (cm) 平均(cm)
Average		 比空白对照降低(%)
Reduce than CK
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ
5%精喹禾灵乳油(60g/hm2) 48%苯达松AS 720 46.6 46.0 46.4 46.0 46.3aA 0.2
5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 48% bentazon AS 1 440 46.5 45.8 46.0 46.3 46.2aA 0.4
10%乙羧氟草醚EC 90 46.2 46.0 45.8 46.5 46.1aA 0.6
10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 180 44.3 42.6 44.0 43.6 43.6bB 6.0
21.4%三氟羧草醚AS 321 42.6 43.7 41.5 42.6 42.6cBC 8.2
21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 642 43.0 41.2 40.3 42.5 41.8cC 9.9
空白对照CK — 46.7 46.0 46.5 46.5 46.4aA —

Table 3

Strain control effect of respective treatment on broad bean field weeds after the application 15d"

药剂Herbicide 施药剂量
(g/hm2)
Dosage		 株防效Strain control effect (%) 总株防效(%)
Sum strain
control effect
稗草
Barnyard grass		 藜
Goosefoots		 反枝苋
Amaranthus retroflexus
5%精喹禾灵乳油(60g/hm2) 48%苯达松AS 720 93.0aA 87.2bB 85.8cdC 90.2bB
5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 48% bentazon AS 1 440 94.0aA 100.0aA 94.0bAB 94.9aA
10%乙羧氟草醚EC 90 94.6aA 65.6cC 88.2cBC 88.6bcBC
10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 180 94.0aA 89.3bB 96.1aA 94.0aA
21.4%三氟羧草醚AS 321 92.9aA 71.7cC 80.9dC 86.7cC
21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 642 93.4aA 91.4bB 95.3abAB 93.7aA

Table 4

Strain control effect of respective treatment on broad bean field weeds after the application 30d"

药剂Herbicide 施药剂量
(g/hm2)
Dosage		 株防效Strain control effect (%) 总株防效(%)
Sum strain
control effect
稗草
Barnyard grass		 藜
Goosefoots		 反枝苋
Amaranthus retroflexus
5%精喹禾灵乳油(60g/hm2) 48%苯达松AS 720 93.0aA 94.3bB 86.8cdCD 92.6bB
5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 48% bentazon AS 1 440 94.0aA 100aA 93.3abAB 96.6aA
10%乙羧氟草醚EC 90 94.6aA 71.2cD 90.1bcBC 90.7bcB
10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 180 94.0aA 90.6bBC 95.7aA 95.7aA
21.4%三氟羧草醚AS 321 92.9aA 79.3cCD 83.3dD 89.5cB
21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 642 93.4aA 92.7bB 94.5aAB 95.5aA

Table 5

Fresh weight control effect of respective treatment on broad bean field weeds after the application 30d"

药剂Herbicide 施药剂量
(g/hm2)
Dosage		 鲜重防效Fresh weight control effect (%) 总鲜重防效(%)
Sum fresh weight control effect
稗草
Barnyard grass		 藜
Goosefoots		 反枝苋
Amaranthus retroflexus
5%精喹禾灵乳油(60g/hm2) 48%苯达松AS 720 97.5aA 98.7bB 92.0cC 95.4cB
5% quizalofop-p-ethyl EC 48% bentazon AS 1 440 98.6aA 100.0aA 98.0aA 99.0aA
10%乙羧氟草醚EC 90 98.4aA 89.1cC 94.2bB 92.1dC
10% fluoroglycofen-ethyl EC 180 98.6aA 98.0bB 98.7aA 98.4bA
21.4%三氟羧草醚AS 321 97.3aA 91.7cC 90.9cC 91.7dC
21.4% acifluorfensodium AS 642 98.1aA 98.0bB 98.6aA 98.3bA
[1] 包世英 . 蚕豆生产技术丛书. 北京: 北京教育出版社, 2016.
[2] 张辉, 曲文祥, 李书田 , 等. 内蒙古特色作物的种类及分布—内蒙古特色作物. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2010.
[3] 孙立晨, 董世臣, 黄立坤 , 等. 几种除草剂在豆科作物除草效果及安全性测定. 大豆科学, 2009(5):931-934.
[4] 程玉臣, 赵存虎, 贺小勇 , 等. 绿豆田土壤处理除草剂筛选. 植物保护, 2015,41(5):212-216.
[5] 黄家会, 胡志良, 蔡红 , 等. 蚕豆田阔叶杂草防除技术探索. 农药, 2001(6):44-45.
[6] 赵存虎, 孔庆全, 贺小勇 , 等. 96%异丙甲草胺乳油防除蚕豆田和豌豆田一年生杂草田间试验. 内蒙古农业科技, 2011(2):64-65.
[7] 白全江, 曹丽霞, 云晓鹏 , 等. 金都尔防除向日葵田一年生杂草试验示范. 内蒙古农业科技, 2009(6):40-41.
[8] 姜超, 殷建军, 郭秀娟 . 6种不同除草剂对糜子田杂草的防除效果. 作物杂志, 2016(5):167-169.
[9] 李志华, 景小兰, 李会霞 , 等. 谷子苗期除草剂的安全性及杂草防效研究. 作物杂志, 2017(1):150-154.
[10] 赵怀斌, 赵长山, 郁延坤 . 不同除草剂施用量和施用时间对水稻产量及株高的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):163-167.
[11] 王俊红, 裴雪霞, 党建友 , 等. 两种除草剂及其用量对小麦生长发育及旗叶抗氧化酶活性的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(3):157-161.
[12] 李燕敏, 祁显涛, 刘昌林 , 等. 除草剂抗性农作物育种研究进展. 作物杂志, 2017(2):1-6.
[13] 曹建国, 张夕林 . 40%盖草灵乳油防除蚕豆田杂草技术研究. 杂草科学, 2009(3):61-62.
[14] 张夕林, 吴国祥, 张谷丰 , 等. 广灭灵防除蚕豆田杂草应用技术研究初报. 农药, 2001(2):40-41,43.
[1] Zhang Jianhua,Guo Ruifeng,Cao Changlin,Fan Na,Jiang Baiyang,Li Guang,Shi Lijuan,Peng Zhidong,Bai Wenbin. Study on Effect and Safety of Controlling Weed in Sorghum Field by Several Stem and Leaf Treatment Herbicide [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 162-166.
[2] Jianguang Liu,Guiyuan Zhao,Junli Zhao,Zhao Geng,Yongqiang Wang,Hanshuang Zhang. Progress in the Structure, Expression and Function of Plant Carboxylesterases [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 32-36.
[3] Min Song,Haipeng Zhang,Xingtao Lu,Cuixia Wu,Yong Zhang. Control Effect of Six Soil-Applied Herbicides on Lamium amplexicaule L. in Winter Wheat Field [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 161-165.
[4] Yue Jiao,Wei Fu,Yong Zhai. Application of RNAi in Crop Breeding and Its Safety Assessment [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 9-15.
[5] Chao Ding,Jianhua Zhang,Wenbin Bai,Ruifeng Guo,Changlin Cao. Effects of Commonly Used Herbicides on Physiological, Biochemical and Yield Quality of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 149-155.
[6] Junhong Wang,Xuexia Pei,Jianyou Dang,Xueping Wu. Effects of Two Herbicides and Application Dosage on Growth and Antioxidase Activities of Flag Leaf in Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 157-161.
[7] Yanmin Li,Xiantao Qi,Changlin Liu,Fang Liu,Chuanxiao Xie. Progress of Crop Breeding on Resistance to Herbicides [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 1-6.
[8] Zhihua Li,Xiaolan Jing,Huixia Li,Gang Tian,Xin Liu,Tingting Mu. Safety and Weed Control Efficiency of Foxtail Millet Seedling Stage Herbicides [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 150-154.
[9] Decheng Yue,Guangliang Shi,Juhong Han,Yanjun Jiang,Jianwei Liu,Qingmei Li. Effects of Chemical Weeding Mulching Film on Growth and Development of Succeeding Crop Linseed in Corn Field of Whole-Mulching Plastic Films on Double Ridges [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 148-153.
[10] Yue Jiao,Jingang Liang,Yong Zhai. Progress in Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 1-7.
[11] Chao Jiang,Jianjun Yin,Xiujian Guo. Control Effect of Six Kinds of Herbicides on Field Weed in Panicum miliaceum L. [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 167-169.
[12] Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Fuyao Zhang. Simplified Cultivation Techniques for Millet Hybrid Jingu 50 of Herbicide Resistance [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 168-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .