Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 155-160.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Improving the Control Ability of Anti-Cropping Agent on Sunflower Verticillium wilt

Wang Yujie1,Liu Baoyu2,Zhou Lei2,Zhou Xiping2,Liu Shuangping1,Wang Qi3,Zhao Jun4,Zhou Hongyou4   

  1. 1 Agricultural and Animal Technical Extension Center of Bayannur City,Linhe 015000,Inner Mongolia,China
    2 Plant Protection Station of Inner Mongolia Bayannur City,Linhe 015000,Inner Mongolia,China
    3 College of Plant Protecion,China Agriculture University,Beijing 100126,China
    4 Department of Agronomy,Inner Mongolia Agriculture University,Huhhot 010018,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2017-02-15 Revised:2017-06-14 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Hongyou Zhou

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

139

Abstract:

Verticillium wilt is the main disease on sunflower in Inner Mongolia planting area, with the aggravating trend and the incidence increased gradually. In 2016, 5 sunflower varieties, 4 anti cropping agents were chosed for testing the control efficiency of anti- continuous cropping agents on sunflower verticillium wilt in Linhe town, Bayannaoer city, Inner Mongolia. Our results suggested that the control efficiency of artificial planting was significantly better than that of the mechanical furrow, and the control efficiency of the powder was better than that of the granules.The highest control efficiency of fertilizing anti continuous cropping agent achieved 84.4% before watering, and 73.9% after watering. The control efficiency by using resistant cultivar SH363 was 79.5%, but the efficiency on susceptible varieties LD5009 was only 33.5%. Therefore, the usage of powder formulation, combined with subsequent irrigation on resistant varieties could significantly improve the control efficiency on sunflower verticillium wilt.

Key words: Anti cropping agent, Sunflower, Verticillium wilt

Table 1

Experimental design of prevent efficiency on Verticillium wilt with different dosage form, application methods and amount of anti cropping agents"

处理
Treatment		 使用剂型
Dosage form		 用量(kg/hm2)
Amount		 施入方法
Method		 处理
Treatment		 使用剂型
Dosage form		 用量(kg/hm2)
Amount		 施入方法
Method
1 粉剂 30 浇水前人工穴播 21 粉剂 30 浇水前机械沟施
2 45 22 45
3 75 23 75
4 105 24 105
5 135 25 135
CK 0 CK 0
6 颗粒剂 30 浇水前人工穴播 26 颗粒剂 30 浇水前机械沟施
7 45 27 45
8 75 28 75
9 105 29 105
10 135 30 135
CK 0 CK 0
11 粉剂 30 浇水后人工穴播 31 粉剂 30 浇水后机械沟施
12 45 32 45
13 75 33 75
14 105 34 105
15 135 35 135
CK 0 CK 0
16 颗粒剂 30 浇水后人工穴播 36 颗粒剂 30 浇水后机械沟施
17 45 37 45
18 75 38 75
19 105 39 105
20 135 40 135
CK 0 CK 0

Table 2

Comparison and statistical analysis among control effect of different anti cropping agents on sunflower Verticillium wilt"

处理Treatment 发病率Incidence (%) 病情指数Disease index 防效Control effect (%) 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 增产Increase production (kg/hm2)
葵花抗重茬菌剂 20.5 9.8 46.4a 3 607.5 883.5
989抗重茬菌剂 22.9 10.3 43.7a 3 600.0 876.0
禾苗抗重茬菌剂 28.1 16.7 10.9b 3 154.5 430.5
康肽灵 26.3 15.1 17.5b 3 229.5 505.5
对照 36.2 18.3 - 2 724.0 -

Table 3

Efficiency of different applying methods and dosage of sunflower anti cropping agents on Verticillium wilt"

施用方法
Methods		 剂型
Dosage form		 用量(kg/hm2)
Amount		 发病率(%)
Incidence		 病情指数
Disease index		 防效(%)
Control effect		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增产(kg/hm2)
Increase production
人工穴播(浇水前施入) 粉剂 30 20.4 8.9 42.2ijk 3 156.0 312.0
45 18.7 4.1 73.4bc 3 468.0 624.0
75 15.5 4.2 72.7bc 3 592.5 748.5
105 15.1 3.4 77.9b 3 841.5 997.5
135 10.1 2.4 84.4a 4 005.0 1 161.0
CK 25.1 15.4 - 2 844.0 -
颗粒剂 30 25.4 11.2 31.7lm 3 126.0 312.0
45 21.7 10.1 38.4ijkl 3 331.5 517.5
75 19.9 9.1 44.5i 3 504.0 690.0
105 17.4 5.1 68.9cd 3 735.0 921.0
135 12.3 3.9 76.2b 3 604.5 790.5
CK 26.5 16.4 - 2 814.0 -
人工穴播(浇水后施入) 粉剂
 30 22.1 9.1 43.4ij 3 148.5 369.0
45 19.9 7.6 52.8fg 3 336.0 556.5
75 17.5 7.1 55.9fg 3 619.5 840.0
105 16.4 5.5 65.8d 3 814.5 1 035.0
135 12.1 4.2 73.9bc 4 051.5 1 272.0
CK 25.5 16.1 - 2 779.5 -
颗粒剂 30 23.4 10.1 35.3klm 3 139.5 273.0
施用方法
Methods		 剂型
Dosage form		 用量(kg/hm2)
Amount		 发病率(%)
Incidence		 病情指数
Disease index		 防效(%)
Control effect		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增产(kg/hm2)
Increase production
45 20.1 9.2 41.0ijk 3 547.5 681.0
75 20.3 9.1 41.7ijk 3 595.5 729.0
105 17.3 7.6 51.3gh 3 856.5 990.0
135 15.1 5.6 64.1de 3 994.5 1 128.0
CK 26.1 15.6 - 2 866.5 -
机械沟施(浇水前施入) 粉剂 30 26.3 12.3 18.5n 3 301.5 342.0
45 24.6 11.8 21.9n 3 318.0 358.5
75 24.1 9.8 35.1klm 3 291.0 331.5
105 20.1 8.8 41.7ijk 3 531.0 571.5
135 17.9 7.1 53.0fg 3 609.0 649.5
CK 25.0 15.1 - 2 959.5 -
颗粒剂 30 25.1 13.4 10.1o 3 202.5 250.5
45 20.1 10.2 31.5lm 3 604.5 652.5
75 21.3 9.9 33.6lm 3 468.0 516.0
105 22.4 10.5 29.5m 3 591.0 639.0
135 17.4 8.1 45.6hi 3 844.5 892.5
CK 24.9 14.9 - 2 952.0 -
机械沟施(浇水后施入) 粉剂 30 23.6 10.5 31.8lm 3 159.0 313.5
45 22.1 12.3 20.1n 3 297.0 451.5
75 23.0 14.6 5.5o 3 079.5 234.0
105 19.4 9.7 37.0jkl 3 403.5 558.0
135 18.4 8.5 44.8i 3 469.5 624.0
CK 25.6 15.4 - 2 845.5 -
颗粒剂 30 21.3 13.6 9.3o 3 016.5 52.5
45 20.4 12.5 16.7n 3 151.5 187.5
75 18.4 11.5 23.3n 3 219.0 255.0
105 18.0 8.7 42.0ijk 3 384.0 420.0
135 19.1 6.1 59.3ef 3 433.5 469.5
CK 25.7 15.0 - 2 964.0 -

Table 4

Effect of anti cropping agent pervetion on Verticillium wilt against watering times"

处理Treatment 发病率Incidence (%) 病情指数Disease index 防效Control effect (%) 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 增产Increase production(kg/hm2)
浇3次水 13.6 6.7 61.5a 3 876.0 1 200.0
浇2次水 17.6 8.5 51.1b 3 549.0 873.0
浇1次水 21.1 10.1 42.0c 3 309.0 633.0
对照(不浇水) 25.6 17.4 - 2 676.0 -

Table 5

Influence of the effeciency of anti cropping agent on Verticillium wilt against different sunflower varieties"

处理
Treatment		 发病率(%)
Incidence		 病情指数
Disease index		 防效(%)
Control effect		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增产(kg/hm2)
Increase production
LD5009+葵花抗重茬菌剂 20.0 10.3 33.5d 241.3 38.0
LD5009(CK) 25.1 15.5 - 203.3 -
3638C+葵花抗重茬菌剂 14.1 5.1 46.9c 256.2 34.8
3638C(CK) 19.4 9.6 - 221.4 -
SH363+葵花抗重茬菌剂 5.0 1.6 79.5a 273.2 42.2
SH363(CK) 10.4 7.8 - 231.0 -
RH318+葵花抗重茬菌剂 6.2 1.8 67.3b 253.6 24.3
RH318(CK) 9.3 5.5 - 229.3 -
X3939+葵花抗重茬菌剂 11.3 7.8 39.5cd 245.9 29.8
X3939(CK) 19.9 12.9 - 216.1 -
[1] 崔良基, 刘悦, 王德兴 . 我国发展向日葵生产潜力及对策. 杂粮作物, 2008,28(5):336-338.
[2] 中国农业年鉴编辑委员会. 中国农业年鉴2012.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[3] 商鸿生, 胡小平 . 向日葵的检疫性有害生物.植物检疫. 2001,15(3):152-154.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2001.03.010
[4] 盖钧镒 . 试验统计方法.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[5] De Romano A B, Vazquez A, Piubello S , et al. Quantifying the relationship between Verticillium wilt intensity and yield loss of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and feasibility of utilizing the hypodermic inoculation technique as a selection method. Helia, 1994,17(20):49-54.
[6] 张总泽, 刘双平, 罗礼智 , 等. 向日葵播种期对防治向日葵螟和黄萎病的影响. 植物保护学报, 2010,37(5):413-418.
[7] 方中达 . 植物研究方法(第3版).北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
[8] 曹雄, 孟庆林, 刘继霞 , 等. 不同向日葵品种资源对黄萎病抗性的田间鉴定.作物杂志, 2014(1):67-72.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2014.01.016
[1] Youyu Jia,Xiong Zhang,Yu Gao,Jian Zhang,Yongfeng Ren,Xiulan Yin,Peiyi Zhao,Shengpeng Diao,Jing Nie,Caixia Di,Hao An. Effects of Mulching Ways on Soil Hydro-Thermal Condition and Yield of Sunflowers on Rainfed Farmland [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 72-78.
[2] Miao Xu,Wenshou He,Kun Ma. Effects of Chemical and Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Oilseed Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 129-135.
[3] Changhui Feng,Youchang Zhang,Shu Bie,Jiaohai Zhang,Xiaogang Wang,Songbo Xia,Cheng Zhang,Hongde Qin. Research Progress on Improvement for Verticillium Wilt Resistance by Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection in Cotton [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 21-25.
[4] Jixia Liu,Junjian Shan,Yuanchun Ma,Baoan Zeng. Pathogenicity and Biological Characteristics of Verticillium wilt of Sunflower in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 161-164.
[5] Wenhao Wang,Hongyuan Zheng,Wenjun Liu,Lifen He,Yuxing Yan. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 169-172.
[6] Xiaoling She,Zijin Nie,Jing Zhao,Lin Li. Row Intercropping System of Purple Sweetpotato with Different Density’s Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 79-82.
[7] Wei Bai,Sumei Yang,Haifeng Yin,Tao Jin,Feng Li,Baoying Zhang,Jinli Cui. Influence of N P K Fertilizers on Yield and Benefit of Confectionary Sunflowers in Northwest of Hebei [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 131-134.
[8] Weimin Chen,Jun Jing,Jiehua Wang,Fujie Ma,Yue Liang. Effects of Filming Plus Cryoprotectants for Preventing Sunflower White Rust,Black Stem Disease and Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 163-166.
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 29-31.
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 131-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .