Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 148-153.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.04.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on Sugar Metabolism and Yield of Potato Leaves and Tubers

Qi Deqiang1,Zhao Jingjing1,Feng Naijie1,2,Zheng Dianfeng1,2,Liang Xiaoyan1   

  1. 1 Chemical Control Research Room/Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Improvement and Cultivation in Cold Land, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
    2 Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Revised:2019-06-08 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-06
  • Contact: Naijie Feng

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

273

Abstract:

Under field cultivation conditions, potato Kexin 1 was sprayed with regulators S3307 and DTA-6 at seedling stage. The effects of different growth regulators on photosynthate change and yield between potato leaves and tubers were studied with water as a control. The results showed that the treatment of S3307 and DTA-6 could significantly increase the yield of potato and the content of sucrose and starch in early leaves. At the 34th day after spraying, S3307 and DTA-6 treatment promoted the transfer of starch from leaves to tubers, reduced starch content in leaves, and facilitated the export of substances from source organs; S3307 and DTA-6 significantly increased starch content in potato tubers at different sampling stages. S3307 and DTA-6 significantly increased the soluble sugar content in tubers on the 18th and 34th days after spraying. The changes of starch content in potato tubers were positively correlated with sucrose and starch content in leaves, and negatively correlated with invertase and amylase activity. The treatment of S3307 and DTA-6 significantly increased the weight per plant, and number of tuber per plant in DTA-6 treatment was significantly higher than that in control.

Key words: S3307, DTA-6, Potato, Growth and development, Yield

Table 1

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on potato yield and yield components"

处理Treatment 单株薯数Number of tuber per plant 单薯重Weight per plant (kg) 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 增产Increase (%)
CK 4.61±0.01Bb 0.09±0.04Cc 28 705.89±260.73Bb —
S3307 4.52±0.04Bb 0.12±0.06Aa 36 796.16±339.42Aa 28.18
DTA-6 4.83±0.06Aa 0.11±0.01Bb 37 618.78±279.90Aa 31.05

Table 2

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on starch content in leaves %"

处理Treatment 2d 10d 18d 26d 34d
CK 5.96±0.36Cc 5.13±0.23Bb 3.93±0.36Bb 5.13±0.37Aa 43.24±0.10Aa
DTA-6 13.37±0.30Aa 9.82±0.36Aa 8.69±0.43Aa 2.81±0.30Ab 38.90±0.75Bc
S3307 10.27±0.26Bb 3.98±0.39Bc 7.89±0.47Aa 4.07±1.08Aab 40.82±0.68ABb

Table 3

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on sucrose content in leaves %"

处理Treatment 2d 10d 18d 26d 34d
CK 12.28±0.73Bb 13.28±0.79Bb 20.52±0.61Bb 23.42±0.37Cc 20.52±0.66Bab
DTA-6 19.58±0.53Aa 16.74±0.76Aa 19.38±0.25Bb 27.73±0.57Aa 19.38±0.48Bb
S3307 19.90±0.34Aa 18.31±0.06Aa 22.64±0.10Aa 25.69±0.15Bb 22.68±0.59Aa

Table 4

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on amylase and invertase activities in leaves mg/(g·h)"

酶Enzyme 处理Treatment 2d 10d 18d 26d 34d
淀粉酶Amylase CK 9.23±0.30Cc 8.89±0.23Bb 14.85±0.85Aa 9.85±0.43Bc 6.43±0.48Bb
DTA-6 29.66±1.01Aa 15.46±0.65Aa 14.32±1.06ABa 13.94±0.77Ab 9.25±0.46Aa
S3307 18.85±0.83Bb 13.72±0.84Aa 10.86±0.33Bb 16.63±0.61Aa 3.65±0.10Cc
转化酶Invertase CK 6.42±0.21Aa 6.19±0.19Aa 6.88±0.28Aa 5.35±0.01Aab 4.49±0.10Aa
DTA-6 6.82±0.10Aa 5.18±0.13Bb 5.84±0.06Bb 5.72±0.20Aa 4.58±0.09Aa
S3307 6.41±0.15Aa 5.64±0.14ABb 5.29±0.02Bc 5.16±0.04Ab 4.90±0.25Aa

Fig.1

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on starch content in tubers Capital and lowercase letters show extremely significant difference (P<0.01) and significant difference (P<0.05) between different treatments, respectively. The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on soluble sugar content in tubers"

Fig.3

Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on sucrose content in tubers"

Table 5

Correlations between sugar contents and invertase activities in potato leaves and tubers"

项目Item 叶片Leaf
淀粉含量
Starch content		 蔗糖含量
Sucrose content		 转化酶活性
Invertase activity		 淀粉酶活性
Amylase activity
块茎Tuber 淀粉含量Starch content -0.536** -0.663** -0.539** -0.368*
蔗糖含量Sucrose content -0.631** -0.670** -0.285* -0.434**
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content -0.652** -0.586** -0.420** -0.292*
[1] 齐红岩, 李天来, 刘海涛 , 等. 番茄不同部位中糖含量和相关酶活性的研究. 园艺学报, 2005,32(2):239-243.
[2] Sturm A, Tang G Q . The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development,growth and carbon partitioning. Trends in Plant Science, 1999,4(10):401-407.
[3] Devi K N, Vyas A K, Singh M S , et al. Effect of bioregulators on growth,yield and chemical constituents of soybean (glycine max). Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011,3(4):151-160.
[4] Iqbal N, Nazar R, Khan M I R , et al. Role of gibberellins in regulation of source-sink relations under optimal and limiting environmental conditions. Current Science, 2011,100(7):998-1007.
[5] Liu Y, Fang Y, Huang M J , et al. Uniconazole-induced starch accumulation in the bioenergy crop duckweed (Landoltia punctata) II:transcriptome alterations of pathways involved in carbohydrate metabolism and endogenous hormone crosstalk. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015,8(1):57.
[6] Huang M J, Fang Y, Liu Y , et al. Using proteomic analysis to investigate uniconazole-induced phytohormone variation and starch accumulation in duckweed (Landoltia punctata). BMC Biotechnology, 2015,15(1):1-13.
[7] 张洪鹏, 张盼盼, 李冰 , 等. 烯效唑对淹水胁迫下大豆叶片光合特性及产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2016,38(5):611-618.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2016.05.011
[8] 杨文钰, 于振文, 于松烈 . 烯效唑干拌种对小麦的增产作用. 作物学报, 2004,30(4):502-506.
[9] 郜舒蕊, 赵志刚, 侯俊玲 , 等. 植物生长延缓剂烯效唑对丹参植株形态及生物量分配的影响. 中国中药杂志, 2015,40(10):1925-1929.
[10] 童相兵, 严飞龙, 王胜曼 , 等. 烯效唑对马铃薯产量影响的探讨. 中国马铃薯, 1990(4):221-222.
[11] 李艳霞, 范建芝, 张敬敏 , 等. 烯效唑不同喷施时期对烟薯25生长及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(11):39-41.
[12] 杨国放, 姜河, 纪志雨 , 等. 叶面喷施烯效唑对马铃薯生长及产量的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2006(2):81-82.
[13] Brown R H . Influence of succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide on yield and morphological characteristics of starr peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Crop Science, 1973,13(5):507-510.
[14] 张明才, 何钟佩, 田晓莉 , 等. 植物生长调节剂DTA-6对花生产量、品质及其根系生理调控研究. 农药学学报, 2003,5(4):47-52.
[15] 项洪涛, 孙巨峰, 冯乃杰 , 等. SODM、DTA-6及Cc对马铃薯叶片碳代谢相关生理指标的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(1):166-170.
[16] 项洪涛, 孙巨峰, 冯乃杰 , 等. DTA-6、SODM及Cc对马铃薯地下主茎生长及同化物代谢生理的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013,31(6):134-139.
[17] 宫占元 . 植物生长调节剂对马铃薯匍匐茎生理代谢及产量的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2011,23(4):7-10.
[18] Madore M A . Carbohydrate metabolism in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic tissues of variegated leaves of Coleus blumei Benth. Plant Physiology, 1990,93(2):617-622.
[19] 高俊凤 . 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[20] 张志良, 李小方, 瞿伟青 . 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009.
[21] Suksoon L, Jaehyeun K . Total sugars,α-amylase activity,and germination after priming of normal and aged rice seeds. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 2000,45(2):108-111.
[22] Morell M K, Rahman S, Abrahams S L . The biochemistry and molecular biology of starch synthesis in cereals. Austrilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1995,22(4):647-660.
[23] 李东, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰 , 等. 植物生长调节剂对玉米籽粒形态及鲜重产量的影响. 南方农业学报, 2016,47(8):1285-1289.
[24] 冯乃杰, 赵黎明, 郑殿峰 , 等. DTA-6和Cc对大豆生育中后期功能叶片生理特性的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2009,31(1):23-28.
[25] 孙福东, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰 , 等. 不同生长调节剂对无限结荚习性大豆蔗糖积累及转化酶活性的影响. 大豆科学, 2015,34(2):271-276.
[26] 张伟, 邱强, 赵婧 , 等. 不同化控调节剂对杂交大豆产量及产量相关性状的调控效应. 作物杂志, 2015(4):81-84.
[27] 张锴, 王宇, 李凯 , 等. 植物生长调节剂Cabrio和Opera对大豆生长以及产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2013,32(3):371-375.
[28] 王熹, 俞美玉, 陶兴龙 . 烯效唑的生物学效应及农业应用研究// 全国作物化控技术第8次研讨会论文集. 1997.
[29] 黄卫东, 张平, 李文清 . 6-BA对葡萄果实生长及碳、氮同化物运输的影响. 园艺学报, 2002,29(4):303-306.
[30] Dragićević I, Konjević R, Vinterhalter B , et al. The effects of IAA and tetcyclac was on tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoot cultures in vitro. Plant Growth Regulation, 2008,54(3), 189-193.
[31] 唐秀梅, 刘超, 钟瑞春 , 等. 多效唑、缩节胺和矮壮素对花生化学调控效应的比较研究. 南方农业学报, 2011,42(6):603-605.
[32] Arumugam G, Mohamed Sadiq A, Nagalingam M , et al. Production of invertase enzymes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain isolated from sugarcane and grape juices. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014,4(5):29-32.
[33] 王少君, 沈海铭 . 月光花素对马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum L.)糖代谢的影响. 绍兴文理学院学报, 2002,22(10):26-29.
[1] Yan Wei,Li Guolong,Li Zhi,Cao Yang,Zhang Shaoying. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density Interaction on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Root Yield of Sugar Beet under Full-Film Mulching in Arid Regions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 100-106.
[2] Wan Xiaoju,Zhang Guoqiang,Wang Keru,Xie Ruizhi,Shen Dongping,Chen Jianglu,Liu Chaowei,Li Shaokun. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching and Drip Irrigation on Spring Maize in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 107-112.
[3] Abudukadier Kuerban,Xia Dong,Zhang Jusong,Cui Jianping,Guo Rensong,Lin Tao. Effects of Drip Irrigation Frequency on Yield and Quality of Chemical Defoliated Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 113-119.
[4] Huang Wan,Li Chenxi,Tan Xueming,Zeng Yongjun,Wu Ziming,Liu Taoju,Shi Qinghua,Pan Xiaohua,Zeng Yanhua. Effects of Different Direct Seeding Methods on Growth and Development Characteristics and Yield of Late-Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 159-163.
[5] Wang Jian,Yao Dandan,Hao Ruxue,Yu Qingsong,Han Jinling,Zhou Yinfu,Wang Wenpo. Grain Filling Characteristics of Nine Main Spring Corn Varieties in Eastern Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 120-124.
[6] Zhou Yun,Li Yongmei,Fan Maopan,Wang Zilin,Xu Zhi,Zhang Dan,Zhao Jixia. Effects of Nitrogen in Organic Manure Replacing Chemical Nitrogenous Fertilizer on Aggregates of Red Soil, Maize Yield and Quality [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 125-132.
[7] Liang Junmei,Zhang Jun,An Hao,Jing Yupeng,Li Huanchun,Duan Yu. Effects of Recommended Fertilization by Management Nutrition Expert System on Potato Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 133-138.
[8] Gu Jiaojiao,Hu Bowen,Jia Yan,Sha Hanjing,Li Jingwei,Ma Chao,Zhao Hongwei. Effects of Salt Stress on Root Related Traits and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 176-182.
[9] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Variation Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Waxy Sorghum Varieties (Lines) in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 17-23.
[10] Zhang Haibin,Meng Meilian,Liu Kunyu,Zhang Lingxiang,Chen Youjun. Effects of Different Rotation Patterns on Dry Matter Accumulation, Disease Occurrence and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 170-175.
[11] Gong Dan,Pan Xiaowei,Wang Suhua,Wang Lixia,Cheng Xuzhen. Multi-Loci Identifications on New Varieties (Lines) of Mungbean from China Agriculture Research System on Food Legume [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 30-36.
[12] Zhang Suyu,Huang Jie,Yang Mingda,Ma Shouchen,Wang Hezhou,Li Xiangdong,Yang Cheng,Zhang Deqi,Fang Baoting. Effects of Base-Topdressing Ratio of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Water Use Efficiency and Yield of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 94-99.
[13] Zhang Meng,Gou Jiulan,Wei Quanquan,Chen Long,He Jiafang. Effects of Different Biological Organic Fertilizers on the Growth of Spring Potato and Soil Fertility at High Altitude Region in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 132-136.
[14] Quan Baoquan,Lü Ruizhou,Wang Guijiang,Ren Jiecheng. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures during Vegetative Propagation on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 158-161.
[15] Wang Yonggang,Ji Mingze,Zhao Xuhan,Yu Lihe,Xue Yingwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 106-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[2] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[3] Yuan Wang,Ze Guo,Xiaohui Li,Shixiao Xu,Xuexia Xing,Siqi Zhang,Jia He,Chao Liu,Fang Chen,Tiezhao Yang. Effects of Meloidogyne incognita Infection on Tobacco Root System under Different Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 161 -166 .
[4] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28 -31 .
[5] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56 -61 .
[6] Jie Wang,Bo Zeng,Cailin Lei,Zhichao Zhao,Jiulin Wang,Zhijun Cheng. Variety Analysis of Northern Rice Regional Trials in Recent 15 Years[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 71 -76 .
[7] . [J]. Crops, 2010, 26(4): 4 -9 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2010, 26(3): 15 -19 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(4): 93 -95 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(5): 84 -89 .