Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1-8.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.05.001

    Next Articles

Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province

Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong   

  1. Institute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Cotton in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/National Cotton Improvement Center Hebei Branch, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, China
  • Received:2019-07-18 Revised:2019-08-19 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-11-07
  • Contact: Xiangyun Zhang,Jianhong Zhang

RichHTML

9

PDF (PC)

365

Abstract:

Hybrid breeding is the main means to improve crop varieties, including interspecific hybridization which is commonly used in cotton breeding. Hybrid breeding has been developing since 1930 in Hebei Province. 63 hybrid cotton varieties had been released by 2017. Among these varieties, 50 hybrid cotton varieties were approved by the Hebei Crop Variety Approval Committee. Cotton yields were increased gradually based on the analysis of 63 hybrid cotton varieties. Breaking tenacity and micronaire value were the main limiting factors for enhancing the level of cotton grade. The resistance of Fusarium wilt was overcome in general for hybrid cotton varieties, but the resistance of Verticillium wilts required urgent improvement. The breeding of Verticillium wilts-resistant hybrid cotton varieties is the most important task in the future. The situation and problems in hybrid cotton breeding were analyzed, and the trend for future development of hybrid cotton in Hebei Province were proposed.

Key words: Hebei Province, Hybrid cotton, Status, Tendency

Fig.1

Changes of lint yield of hybrid cotton cultivated in Hebei Province"

Table 1

Steps of fiber of hybrid cotton approved in Hebei Province"

杂交棉
Hybrid cotton		 审定
年份
Approved year		 上半部平均长度(mm)
Upper half mean length		 断裂比强度(cN/tex)
Breaking tenacity		 马克隆值
Micronaire value		 综合评价
Comprehensive
evaluation
实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type		 实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type		 实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type
杂66 F1 Za66 F1 1998 29.5 Ⅱ 31.4 Ⅱ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅱ
石标杂棉1号Shibiaozamian 1 2003 29.2 Ⅱ 29.5 Ⅲ 5.1 Ⅲ Ⅲ
农大棉6号F1Nongdamian 6 F1 2004 29.7 Ⅱ 26.7 Ⅲ 4.3 Ⅱ Ⅲ
GKz11 2005 29.6 Ⅱ 32.2 Ⅰ 4.0 Ⅰ Ⅱ
GKz41 2005 29.0 Ⅱ 29.8 Ⅲ 4.4 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀杂3268 Jiza 3268 2005 30.0 Ⅱ 29.4 Ⅲ 4.4 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀杂566 Jiza 566 2005 29.9 Ⅱ 20.2 Ⅲ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀H239 Ji H239 2006 30.6 Ⅱ 29.3 Ⅲ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀优杂69 Jiyouza 69 2006 31.4 Ⅰ 31.2 Ⅱ 4.9 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀优01 Jiyou 01 2006 31.4 Ⅰ 31.1 Ⅱ 3.8 Ⅰ Ⅱ
国欣4号 Guoxin 4 2006 30.1 Ⅱ 29.7 Ⅲ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
邯杂429 Hanza 429 2006 29.2 Ⅱ 30.5 Ⅱ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀创棉1 Jichuangmian 1 2006 30.3 Ⅱ 30.8 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀杂6268 Jiza 6268 2006 31.8 Ⅰ 29.9 Ⅲ 3.8 Ⅰ Ⅲ
GKz19 2006 30.3 Ⅱ 30.3 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
欣抗棉318 Xinkangmian 318 2007 31.2 Ⅰ 29.5 Ⅲ 4.9 Ⅱ Ⅲ
红杂111 Hongza 111 2007 30.6 Ⅱ 28.1 Ⅲ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀棉3536 Jimian 3536 2008 28.7 Ⅲ 26.9 Ⅲ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀创18 F1 Jichuang 18 F1 2008 28.7 Ⅲ 27.5 Ⅲ 5.3 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀农棉杂1号 Jinongmianza 1 2008 29.6 Ⅱ 28.2 Ⅲ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅲ
合丰202 Hefeng 202 2008 29.7 Ⅱ 28.4 Ⅲ 4.9 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀H156 Ji H156 2008 29.9 Ⅱ 28.3 Ⅲ 5.1 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀杂708 Jiza 708 2009 31.8 Ⅰ 30.6 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
石杂101 Shiza 101 2009 30.8 Ⅱ 29.4 Ⅲ 4.9 Ⅱ Ⅲ
希普3 Xipu 3 2010 29.4 Ⅱ 28.6 Ⅲ 5.5 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀FRH3018 Ji FRH3018 2010 30.3 Ⅱ 28.5 Ⅲ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
农大棉9号Nongdamian 9 2011 29.7 Ⅱ 28.6 Ⅲ 5.1 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀丰光杂棉1号
Jifengguangzamian 1		 2011 30.1 Ⅱ 28.5 Ⅲ 4.9 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀H170 Ji H170 2011 29.7 Ⅱ 27.8 Ⅲ 5.1 Ⅲ Ⅲ
邯6402 Han 6402 2012 28.7 Ⅲ 29.7 Ⅲ 5.1 Ⅲ Ⅲ
神牛6号F1 Shenniu 6 F1 2012 30.0 Ⅱ 30.9 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
农大KZ05 Nongda KZ05 2013 30.1 Ⅱ 31.9 Ⅱ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
硕杂棉1号Shuozamian 1 2013 29.7 Ⅱ 30.0 Ⅱ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
硕杂棉2号Shuozamian 2 2013 29.6 Ⅱ 30.1 Ⅱ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀丰杂6号Jifengza 6 2013 29.4 Ⅱ 30.9 Ⅱ 5.4 Ⅲ Ⅲ
邯杂160 Hanza 160 2013 29.5 Ⅱ 29.9 Ⅲ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
欣杂16 Xinza 16 2014 30.1 Ⅱ 30.6 Ⅱ 4.5 Ⅱ Ⅱ
欣杂15 Xinza 15 2014 30.6 Ⅱ 30.1 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
科龙2068 Kelong 2068 2014 29.3 Ⅱ 29.0 Ⅲ 5.4 Ⅲ Ⅲ
冀丰杂9号Jifengza 9 2014 27.9 Ⅲ 27.3 Ⅲ 4.3 Ⅱ Ⅲ
衡优12 Hengyou 12 2015 30.2 Ⅱ 30.6 Ⅱ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅱ
YM111 2015 28.9 Ⅲ 31.6 Ⅱ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
农大棉10号Nongdamian 10 2015 30.1 Ⅱ 32.0 Ⅰ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀丰杂8号Jifengza 8 2015 29.6 Ⅱ 31.2 Ⅱ 5.4 Ⅲ Ⅲ
邯258 Han 258 2015 30.0 Ⅱ 30.5 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
邯杂1692 Hanza1692 2016 30.1 Ⅱ 31.7 Ⅱ 5.4 Ⅲ Ⅲ
运杂208 F1 Yunza 208 F1 2017 29.8 Ⅱ 31.9 Ⅱ 5.3 Ⅲ Ⅲ
邯棉10号Hanmian 10 2017 29.6 Ⅱ 29.8 Ⅲ 5.5 Ⅲ Ⅲ
硕杂棉1号Shuozamian 1 2017 29.0 Ⅱ 30.2 Ⅱ 5.3 Ⅲ Ⅲ

Table 2

Steps of fiber of hybrid cotton approved in China"

杂交棉
Hybrid cotton		 审定
年份
Approved year		 上半部平均长度(mm)
Upper half mean length		 断裂比强度(cN/tex)
Breaking tenacity		 马克隆值
Micronaire value		 综合评价
Comprehensive
evaluation
实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type		 实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type		 实测值
Measured value		 类型
Type
银棉2号Yinmian 2 2005 29.0 Ⅱ 27.7 Ⅲ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅲ
邯杂98-1 Hanza 98-1 2006 29.6 Ⅱ 29.2 Ⅲ 4.5 Ⅱ Ⅲ
国欣棉6 Guoxinmian 6 2006 30.2 Ⅱ 28.5 Ⅲ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅲ
冀杂1号Jiza 1 2006 30.7 Ⅱ 31.3 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
GKz19 2006 30.1 Ⅱ 30.5 Ⅱ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅱ
创杂棉20 Chuangzamian 20 2007 30.4 Ⅱ 30.4 Ⅱ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀杂2号Jiza 2 2007 30.4 Ⅱ 30.7 Ⅱ 4.7 Ⅱ Ⅱ
国欣棉8 Guoxinmian 8 2007 30.9 Ⅱ 31.5 Ⅱ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅱ
邯杂154 Hanza 154 2007 30.3 Ⅱ 30.0 Ⅱ 4.4 Ⅱ Ⅱ
邯杂429 Hanza 429 2007 28.8 Ⅲ 27.9 Ⅲ 4.6 Ⅱ Ⅲ
邯棉646 Hanmian 646 2008 29.6 Ⅱ 30.2 Ⅱ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅱ
冀杂999 Jiza 999 2009 30.2 Ⅱ 28.7 Ⅲ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅲ
石杂101 Shiza 101 2009 30.8 Ⅱ 29.8 Ⅲ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
邯杂301 Hanza 301 2009 28.2 Ⅲ 28.0 Ⅲ 5.0 Ⅱ Ⅲ
合丰202 Hefeng 202 2010 30.0 Ⅱ 29.0 Ⅲ 4.8 Ⅱ Ⅲ
希普3 Xipu 3 2012 30.2 Ⅱ 30.3 Ⅱ 5.3 Ⅲ Ⅲ
SGKZ73 2015 30.4 Ⅱ 31.9 Ⅱ 5.4 Ⅲ Ⅲ
硕杂棉2 Shuozamian 2 2015 29.0 Ⅱ 32.3 Ⅰ 5.5 Ⅲ Ⅲ
国欣棉16 Guoxinmian 16 2016 31.2 Ⅰ 31.5 Ⅱ 5.2 Ⅲ Ⅲ
YM111 2017 28.1 Ⅲ 31.0 Ⅱ 5.3 Ⅲ Ⅲ

Fig.2

The resistant of Fusarium wilt of hybrid cotton cultivated in Hebei Province"

Fig.3

The resistant of Verticillium wilt of hybrid cotton cultivated in Hebei Province"

[1] 王晓辉 . 杂交棉的发展历史及应用前景研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2012.
[2] 王恒铨 . 河北棉花. 石家庄:河北科学技术出版社, 1992.
[3] 张香云, 崔瑞敏, 付会期 . 棉花杂交种冀棉18号的选育及其应用. 北京农业大学学报, 1993,19(增刊):100-103.
[4] 王远, 张锐, 祖茂堂 , 等. 双价转基因抗虫三系杂交棉银棉2号. 中国棉花, 2005,32(9):20.
[5] 杜雄明, 刘国强 . 中国棉花品种志(1978-2007). 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009.
[6] 梁晋刚, 姜伟丽, 宋贤鹏 , 等. 我国2007-2018年转基因抗虫棉品种审定情况评析. 中国棉花, 2019,46(4):1-6.
[7] 郭振生, 李俊兰 . 棉花去雄授粉简易器械研制和杂交制种技术研究. 河北农业大学学报, 1992,15(2):50-54.
[8] 张建宏, 王海涛, 刘存敬 . 一种棉花去雄器:中国,201721301414.3. 2017-10-10.
[9] 纪从亮, 邹芳刚, 史伟 . 杂交棉化学杀雄制种技术进展. 中国棉花, 2010,37(7):2-5.
doi: 1000-632X(2010)07-0002-03
[10] 季道藩 . 棉花知识百科. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001.
[11] 马卫军, 任爱民, 张玉娟 , 等. 抗虫三系杂交棉邯杂98-1高产配套栽培技术研究. 河北农业科学, 2008, 12(7): 18,21.
[12] 任爱民, 马维军 . 转双价基因三系杂交棉—邯杂429. 中国棉花, 2008,35(2):26.
[13] 马维军, 任爱民 . 转基因抗虫三系杂交棉邯杂301的选育及其栽培技术. 中国棉花, 2010,37(11):30.
[14] 郭宝生, 刘素恩, 王兆晓 , 等. 高产优质“三系”杂交棉品种冀FRH3018的选育. 河北农业科学, 2010,14(7):63-65.
[15] 刘存敬 . 河北省转基因抗虫杂交棉育成品种分析//中国棉花学会.中国棉花学会2010年年会论文汇编. 安阳:中国棉花杂志社, 2010.
[16] 崔瑞敏 . 河北棉花品种志. 石家庄: 河北科学技术出版社, 2013.
[17] 赵贵元, 张建宏, 张香云 , 等. 国审抗枯黄萎病抗虫棉新品种冀杂 1号选育研究. 河北农业科学, 2012,16(9):55-59.
[18] 王凯辉, 耿香利, 李军英 , 等. 我国杂交棉发展存在的问题及建议. 河北农业科学, 2011,15(5):14-16.
[19] 王兆晓, 崔瑞敏, 耿军义 , 等. 自然昆虫传粉转Bt基因棉花核质不育系的主要性状研究. 河北农业科学, 2004,9(3):36-38.
[20] 宇文璞, 宇文钢, 王淑霞 , 棉花核雄性不育系芽黄A光温互作繁种方法:中国:200510071011.X. 2011-05-04.
[21] 田梦云 . 棉花细胞核雄性不育系在杂种优势中的应用. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2013.
[22] 崔瑞敏, 田海燕, 刘素恩 , 等. 河北省棉花生产的历史回顾. 中国棉花, 2016,43(8):10-15,20.
[23] 盛承发, 王少丽, 宣维健 , 等. 抗虫杂交棉研究与应用进展, 农业现代化研究, 2002,23(5):347-351.
[24] 何六奇, 方光华 . 棉花化学去雄杂交制种技术的初步研究. 上海农业科技, 1979(10):20-21.
[25] 华兴鼐 . 去雄剂MH应用在海陆杂种棉花制种技术上的效果. 江苏农学报, 1964,3(3):127.
[26] 张传忍, 谢九皋, 张秀如 , 等. 棉花新杀雄药剂的筛选及其效果研究. 中国棉花, 1983(3):11-12.
[27] 张学贤 . 棉花化学杀雄制种增产效果试验. 湖北农业科学, 1982(7):8-9.
[28] 李根源, 刘金海 . 我国杂交棉产业化现状与发展趋势. 中国棉花, 2011,38(5):2-5.
doi: 1000-632X（2011）05-0002-04
[29] 陈全求, 蓝家样, 韩光明 , 等. 三系杂交棉品种的现状和发展建议. 棉花科学, 2017,39(5):2-6.
[30] 匡政成, 李痒, 张学文 , 等. 我国杂交棉产业发展现状及建议. 湖南农业科学, 2012(22):37-39.
[31] 邢朝柱, 郭立平, 李威 , 等. 棉花杂种优势利用研究十年成就和未来发展. 棉花学报, 2017,29(S1):28-36.
[32] 黄滋康, 黄观武, 袁有禄 , 等. 中国棉花杂交种及杂种优势利用. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008.
[33] 董合忠, 代建龙, 孔祥强 , 等. 棉花轻简化栽培技术及其理论基础//中国棉花学会2017年年会论文汇编. 安阳:中国棉花杂志社, 2017.
[34] 喻树迅, 范术丽, 王寒涛 , 等. 中国棉花高产育种研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(18):3465-3476.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.18.001
[35] 袁有禄, 魏晓文, 毛树春 , 等. 棉花育种行业创新与进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018,19(3):455-463.
[1] Wang Jian,Yao Dandan,Hao Ruxue,Yu Qingsong,Han Jinling,Zhou Yinfu,Wang Wenpo. Grain Filling Characteristics of Nine Main Spring Corn Varieties in Eastern Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 120-124.
[2] Xiao Guo, Shouyi Wang, Tianyi Yuan, Yuting Ye, Yifu Zhang, Yifu Jin, Ruihong Zhang, Hongcheng Zhang. Research Status and Prospects on Wheat No-Tillage Seeder [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 39-45.
[3] Shaohui Huang,Yunma Yang,Ketong Liu,Yanming Sun,Junfang Yang,Liangliang Jia. Yield Potential, Yield Gap and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Gap of Winter Wheat in Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 118-122.
[4] Shaohui Huang,Yunma Yang,Ketong Liu,Junfang Yang,Suli Xing,Yanming Sun,Liangliang Jia. Effects of Different Fertilization Method on Wheat Yield and Fertilizer Contribution Rate in Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 113-117.
[5] Haihua Luo,Deyi Shao,Gong Chen,Xiumin Xu,Xin Gao,Changkai Yuan,Jinjian Peng,Feiyu Tang. Comparative Analysis of Trait Correlation between Conventional Varieties (Lines) and Hybrids of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 31-37.
[6] Liying Guo,Yanqiu Geng,Feng Jin,Wei Song,Xiwen Shao. Research Advances about Low Temperature,Cold Damage Defense Cultivation Techniquesof Rice in Cold Region of China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 7-14.
[7] Xuejiao Zhang,Jingjing Shi,Na Chang,Yaqin Zhang,Yongzhi Qi,Wenchao Zhen,Baozhong Yin. Isolation and Identification of Antagonistic Bacteria of Fusarium Head Blight of Winter Wheat in Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 157-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Liu Nianxi,Chen Liang,Li Zhi,Liu Baoquan,Liu Jia,Yi Zhigang,Dong Zhimin,Wang Shuming. Advances in Molecular Markers of Soybean Disease Resistance[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 10 -16 .
[2] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104 -108 .
[3] Meng Fanlai,Guo Huachun. Effects of Enhanced UV-B on Photosynthetic Characteristics and UV-Absorbing Compounds of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 114 -119 .
[4] Zhang Yanhua,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Zinc Topdressing Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 109 -113 .
[5] Hua Yuhui,Gao Zhiqiang. Hyperspectral Estimation of SPAD Values in Different Varieties of Autumn Maize[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 173 -179 .
[6] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120 -124 .
[7] Shi Liran,Hao Hongbo,Cui Haiying,Li Mingzhe. Effects of Shading on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetic Characteristics of Foxtail Millet[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 125 -128 .
[8] Li Chunxi,Li Sisi,Shao Yun,Ma Shouchen,Liu Qing,Weng Zhengpeng,Li Xiaobo. Effects of Organic Materials Returning on Enzyme Activities and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Wheat Field under Nitrogen-Reducing Conditions[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 129 -134 .
[9] Liang Xiaohong,Zhang Ruidong,Huang Minjia,Liu Jing,Cao Xiong. Interaction of Film Mulching and Nitrogen Application on Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 135 -142 .
[10] Chen Li,Zhang Luxin,Wu Feng,Li Zhen,Long Xingzhou,Yang Yurui,Yin Baozhong. Effects of Wheat-Maize Double Crops Rotational Tillage on Soil Characteristics and Crop Yield in Hebei Plain[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 143 -150 .