Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 178-182.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.02.026

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Relationship between Trace Elements in Tobacco Leaves and Soil pH in Qujing

Zhang Yunping1(), Guo Shanhu2, Zhang Jintao2, Xie Yan3, Yi Ke2, Li Qiang1()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    2China Hunan Tobacco Industrial Corporation, Changsha 410000, Hunan, China
    3Yunnan Provincial Tobacco Company Qujing Branch, Qujing 655000, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Revised:2021-02-24 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-04-16
  • Contact: Li Qiang E-mail:zyp12135@163.com;zqiangli@126.com

Abstract:

To explore the influence of soil pH on trace element content of tobacco leaves in Qujing, a total of 3656 soil samples and tobacco leaf samples were collected. The multivariate statistical analysis, correlation analysis, and smooth regression analysis were used to study the relationship between trace element content of tobacco leaves and pH value of soil in Qujing, Yunnan. The results showed that the mean value of soil pH was 6.28. The soil samples with a pH below 5.5 and above 7.0 accounted for 22.62% and 24.45%, respectively. The contents of iron and zinc in Qujing tobacco leaves was high. Boron, molybdenum, and chlorine were at low levels. The optimum proportion of manganese content in tobacco leaves was the highest, and about 70% of the leaf samples were at a moderate level. The contents of manganese, zinc, and chlorine in tobacco leaves were negatively correlated with the soil pH, while the contents of boron, molybdenum, and iron of tobacco leaves were positively correlated with the soil pH. In Qujing tobacco production area, we should pay attention to the abundance and lack of trace elements in tobacco leaves, scientifically and rationally increase boron and molybdenum fertilizers, increase trace elements in tobacco leaves and improve the quality of tobacco leaves.

Key words: Tobacco soil, Qujing, pH value, Trace elements, Flue-cured tobacco

Table 1

Grading standard for micro nutrient elements in tobacco leaves"

元素Element 很低Very low 低Low 中等Medium 高High 很高Very high
Mn (mg/kg) ≤20.0 (20.0~50.0] (50.0~200.0] (200.0~500.0) ≥500.0
B (mg/kg) ≤10.0 (10.0~20.0] (20.0~30.0] (30.0~40.0) ≥40.0
Mo (mg/kg) ≤0.1 (0.1~0.5] (0.5~1.0) ≥1.0 -
Zn (mg/kg) ≤7.0 (7.0~20.0] (20.0~50.0] (50.0~70.0) ≥70.0
Fe (mg/kg) ≤55.0 (55.0~90.0] (90.0~120.0] (120.0~200.0) ≥200.0
Cl (%) ≤0.10 (0.10~0.30] (0.30~0.80) ≥0.80 -

Table 2

Statistical characteristics of trace elements in tobacco leaves"

元素
Element
均值±标准差
Mean±standard deviation
变幅
Range
变异系数
Coefficient of variation (%)
微量元素各级所占比例
The proportion of trace elements at various levels(%)
很低Very low 低Low 适中Medium 高High 很高Very high
Mn (mg/kg) 145.74±102.29 13.73~853.36 11.99 0.11 9.87 68.65 19.80 1.57
B (mg/kg) 16.13±8.21 0.07~74.41 11.03 21.67 52.47 21.88 3.98 1.52
Mo (mg/kg) 0.26±0.35 0.02~8.01 4.37 0.49 87.84 9.17 2.50 -
Zn (mg/kg) 56.59±31.49 5.29~460.14 55.65 0.03 1.57 46.61 30.92 20.87
Fe (mg/kg) 294.32±174.27 47.90~1575.00 59.21 0.03 2.03 5.85 25.26 66.83
Cl (%) 0.27±0.32 0.02~3.47 118.52 36.28 34.26 22.13 7.33 -

Fig.1

Normal distribution of pH value of soil in Qujing tobacco area"

Table 3

Correlation between trace elements and soil pH in Qujing tobacco area"

项目
Item

Cl

Zn

Fe

Mn

B

Mo
pH -0.071** -0.116** 0.122** -0.292** 0.046** 0.206**

Fig.2

Regression analysis of Mn, Zn and Cl contents in tobacco leaves and soil pH"

Fig.3

Regression analysis of B, Mo and Fe content in tobacco leaves and soil pH"

[1] 郭孝, 李明, 介晓磊, 等. 基施硒肥对莜麦产量和微量元素含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(5):1235-1242.
[2] 柳均, 何伟, 周冀衡, 等. 红河植烟区. 中国烟草科学, 2010,31(1):37-40.
[3] 徐雪芹, 陈志燕, 王维刚, 等. 广西主烟区土壤和初烤烟中微量元素含量分析. 广东农业科学, 2010,37(4):106-108.
[4] 王影影, 梁洪波, 王勇, 等. 山东植烟土壤与烤烟微量元素分布特点及相关分析. 中国烟草科学, 2014,35(2):64-68.
[5] 依娜, 刘洪斌. 农田土壤有效态微量元素空间预测方法及影响因子定量分析. 土壤, 2019,51(2):399-405.
[6] 尹春艳, 李彬, 黄斌, 等. 鄂尔多斯高原农田土壤类型与养分组成对微量元素的影响——以鄂托克旗为例. 中国水土保持, 2020,40(5):40-43.
[7] 穆桂珍, 罗杰, 蔡立梅, 等. 广东揭西县土壤微量元素与有机质和pH的关系分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(10):208-215.
[8] 梁兵, 黄坤, 阙劲松, 等. 红河植烟区烟叶品质与土壤中微量元素含量关系研究. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(4):824-829.
[9] 李晓婷, 张静, 林跃平, 等. 云南保山烟区土壤与烟叶钙镁含量分布特征及相关性. 土壤通报, 2019,50(1):131-136.
[10] 王子维, 解燕, 程昌新, 等. 曲靖烤烟钾含量空间变异特征及主控因素解析. 江西农业大学学报, 2018,40(2):306-315.
[11] 温心怡, 李良木, 高云, 等. 曲靖市植烟土壤有效钼含量状况及与土壤因素的关系分析. 土壤通报, 2019,50(3):691-697.
[12] 刘芬. 株洲地区土壤pH值测定方法研究. 农业环境保护, 1998,17(2):37-50.
[13] 邓杰, 戴林建, 杨苏, 等. 石墨消解-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定烟叶中12种微量元素. 热带作物学报, 2017,38(9):1759-1763.
[14] 阙劲松, 唐佐芯, 李贤峰, 等. 红河州弥勒市植烟土壤pH和有机质分析. 西南农业学报, 2019,32(7):1633-1638.
[15] 赵晓绕, 李哲, 朱江, 等. 罗平土壤及烟叶主要中、微量元素含量分析. 中国烟草科学, 2014,35(3):27-31.
[16] 任胜超, 闫新甫, 陈越立, 等. 曲靖烤烟叶质重与主要化学成分及感官质量的关系分析. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(7):1258-1263.
[17] 李强, 张芸萍, 解燕, 等. 曲靖植烟土壤pH分布特征及其影响因素研究. 核农学报, 2020,34(4):887-895.
[18] 钱笑杰, 肖靖, 洪雅芳, 等. 福建龙岩烟区植烟土壤pH时空变异研究. 热带作物学报, 2019,40(10):2061-2067.
[19] 李强, 闫晨兵, 刘勇军, 等. 郴州植烟土壤pH空间分布及影响因素初探. 中国烟草学报, 2019,25(4):50-58.
[20] 买合甫拉提·乃比, 玉苏甫·买买提. 渭-库河绿洲种棉土壤pH与微量元素的相关性分析. 农学学报, 2017,7(6):21-26.
[21] 农金花, 梁增芳, 石永莲, 等. 岩溶区植烟土壤pH、有效铁锰和交换性钙的空间异质性——以重庆市酉阳县为例. 土壤, 2016,48(4):769-776.
[22] 谭军, 刘晓颖, 李强, 等. 文山植烟土壤有效锌含量及其影响因素研究. 土壤, 2017,49(4):719-24.
[23] 陈玉真, 单睿阳, 王峰, 等. 闽中茶园土壤和茶叶铁锰含量及影响因素研究. 福建农业学报, 2018,33(9):986-993.
[24] 王小兵, 周冀衡, 李强, 等. 曲靖不同pH烟区土壤有效锰和烟叶锰含量的分布状况分析. 土壤通报, 2013,44(4):969-73.
[25] 方秀, 卢秀萍, 许自成, 等. 曲靖中海拔红壤烟区烤烟锌含量分布状况及土壤影响因子分析. 中国农业科技导报, 2017,19(12):82-90.
[26] 杨苏. 湖南烤烟主产区增施中、微量元素对烟叶产质量的影响. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2017.
[27] 尤晓莹, 周方, 邢雪霞, 等. 水肥一体化对烤烟叶片氯含量及烟田土壤氯离子迁移的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019,40(4):38-43.
[28] 赵攀攀. 豫中烟区土壤—烤烟氯含量分布、相关及对烟叶品质的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[29] 张静, 严君, 杨景华, 等. 云烟品牌云南原料基地土壤、烟叶氯素含量特征研究. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(31):50-55.
[30] Goli E, Hiemstra T, Rahnemaie R. Interaction of boron with humic acid and natural organic matter:Experiments and modeling. Chemical Geology, 2019,515:1-8.
[31] 穆童, 卢秀萍, 许自成, 等. 罗平烟区土壤有效硼、钼含量与烟叶硼、钼含量的关系分析. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017,53(6):44-50.
[32] 谭军, 刘晓颖, 李强, 等. 文山烟区土壤和烟叶氯素特征及影响因子研究. 中国烟草科学, 2016,37(5):40-46.
[33] 张继, 付继刚, 潘和平, 等. 黔东南州植烟土壤及烟叶钼营养评价与相关性分析. 热带农业科学, 2016,36(3):53-57.
[34] 姚旺, 黎娟, 向德明, 等. 龙山县植烟土壤有效硼含量空间分布及其影响因素. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,55(6):64-70.
[35] 卢晓鹏, 李静, 曹雄军, 等. 湘西椪柑园土壤pH值和树龄与土壤养分及果实品质的关系. 中国南方果树, 2015,44(1):21-25.
[36] 王影影. 烤烟典型产区土壤与烟叶铁、锰、铜、锌分布特点研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2013.
[37] 张祥, 王典, 姜存仓, 等. 生物炭对我国南方红壤和黄棕壤理化性质的影响. 中国生态农业报, 2013,21(8):979-984.
[1] Duan Junya, Zhao Yuanyuan, Wei Jianyu, Wang Dexun, Wang Zheng, Wang Tingting, Shi Hongzhi. Effects of Foliar Spraying Polyaspartic Acid on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 195-201.
[2] Liu Chen, Yang Mingfeng, Yang Long, Zhang Nan, Yu Tao. Effects of Wide-Narrow Row Configuration in Double-Row Concave Ridge on Growth and Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 151-156.
[3] Liu Xiaomin, Xu Rui, Sun Jingguo, Zhao Fanchong, Si Zhenxing, Liang Zhizhe, Xu Zicheng, Han Dan. The Effects of Well Cellar Depth and Mulching Methods on the Gas- Thermal Environment and Flue-Cured Tobacco Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 157-163.
[4] Guan Qinglin, Piao Shengyuan, Zhang Siwei, Wang Jun, Lei Yunkang, Zhong Qiu, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Combined Application of Medium-Trace Elements on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism, Yield and Quality of Cigar Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 187-196.
[5] Duan Junya, Zhao Yuanyuan, Peng Zhiliang, Zhang Yongfeng, Duan Weidong, Yang Qingxi, Wang Songling, Chen Xiaolong, Shi Hongzhi. Effects of Once-Over Harvesting Period on the Qualities of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Shaanxi [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 231-237.
[6] Jia Guotao, Wang Xiaoyu, Sun Yiming, Nie Cong, He Jingyu, Feng Yingjie, Ma Shengtao, Cui Ting, Cheng Dongxu, Yao Qian, Li Yue, Zhang Ziying, Wang Baolin, Liu Huimin. Analysis on the Relationship between Contents of Free Amino Acids and the Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Eight Flavor Ecological Regions of China [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 195-199.
[7] Shan Jiaye, Zhang Xuewei, Yan Min, Yang Jian, Wang Fei, He Jixian, Hu Gang, Wang Yuchen, Jing Yanqiu, Lei Qiang. Effects of Spraying Rare Earth Micro-Fertilizer on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 100-105.
[8] Han Yuhuan, Liu Chen, Yang Long, Yu Tao. Effects of Topping Period and Number of Remained Leaves on Growth and Development of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 157-162.
[9] Wang Yuehua, Zhou Junxue, Ma Yilin, Ma Junhong, Wang Yanfang, Zhao Shimin, Shen Hongtao, Li Youjun, Liu Ling. Effects of Different Harvest Maturity of Upper Six Leaves on Physiological Metabolism and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco Line LY1306 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 171-177.
[10] Zhang Yifei, Zu Qingxue, Nie Zhongyang, Lin Song, Rao Chen, Cheng Zhijun. Research on Contribution of Glutamic Acid to Nitrogen Nutrition and Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 186-192.
[11] Wang Dequan, Liu Yang, Liu Jiang, Chen Keling, Wang Yi, Du Chuanyin, Du Yuhai, Ma Xinghua. Research Progress of Furrow and Ridge Rain-Harvesting Farming Technology and its Application Prospects in Flue-Cured Tobacco Production [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 1-5.
[12] Chen Dong, Zou Jing, Guo Ganggang, Dai Wendian, Song Shaoguang, Huang Ying. Effects of Different Specifications of Seedling Trays on Quality and Main Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 129-135.
[13] Zhang Yonggang, Ren Zhiguang, Xu Zhiqiang, Liu Jianguo, Zhang Xiaobing, Liu Huabing, Xia Chen, Cheng Changhe. Chemical Quality Evaluation of Flue-Cured Tobacco Based on Maximization of Deviation and BP Neural Network [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 190-195.
[14] Li Diqin, Yao Shaoyun, Wang Qing, Yi Ke, Liu Yiyun, Tang Xiaoming, Peng Yuanyuan, Fu Changwu. Effects of Different Nitrogen Sources on the Growth and Development of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 201-206.
[15] Wang Yuan, Wang Jiming, Nian Fuzhao, Zheng Yuanxian, Xu Yinlian, Li Cuifen, Cui Yongquan, Zhang Qifu, Zhao Leifeng, Liao Xiaolin, He Yuansheng. Effects of Continuous Cropping with Rice Hull Biochar on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Growth of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 219-225.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!