检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2017, 第1期: 32–37 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.01.006

• 遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

激光辐射和杂交对高粱DNA甲基化变异的影响

王欢,刘冰,白子裕,史俊丽,叶锦琳   

  1. 吉林农业大学农学院,130118,吉林长春
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-18 修回日期:2016-12-08 出版日期:2017-02-15 发布日期:2018-08-26
  • 作者简介:王欢,讲师,从事作物逆境生理及分子生物学研究
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省教育厅“十三五”科学技术研究(2016195)

Effects of Laser Irradiation and Hybridization on the DNA Methylation Alteration in Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Wang Huan,Liu Bing,Bai Ziyu,Shi Junli,Ye Jinlin   

  1. Department of Agronomy,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun 130118,Jilin,China
  • Received:2016-08-18 Revised:2016-12-08 Online:2017-02-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

244

摘要：

选择高粱正交F1杂种和它们纯系亲本作为试验材料,用He-Ne激光器在低强度下处理其萌发种子,用甲基化敏感扩增片断多态性（MSAP）分子标记技术在全基因组范围内检测分析高粱各种基因型DNA甲基化水平和变异模式,旨在探讨激光辐射和杂交对基因组DNA甲基化的交互作用机制。结果表明,激光辐射诱导高粱F1杂种和相应亲本在DNA甲基化水平和模式上发生一定变化,再次证明激光辐射诱导是一种表观遗传诱变手段。从甲基化水平上看,激光辐射诱导使高粱3种基因型整体表现为去甲基化。从甲基化变异模式看,CG位点甲基化变异模式要高于CNG位点甲基化变异模式。比较激光辐射对不同基因型的影响,发现F1杂交种的甲基化总体水平要低于两纯系亲本甲基化总体水平的中间值。总之,通过试验证明激光辐射是一种直接的表观遗传诱变手段,激光辐射和杂交联用诱导高粱产生更复杂的甲基化变异,这两种手段联用可能是一个重要改良作物的手段,值得深入研究。

关键词: 高粱, 激光辐射, DNA胞嘧啶甲基化, 表观变异, MSAP

Abstract:

In this study, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) inter-strain hybrids was used as the test organism, and their germinating seeds were treated by the He-Ne laser irradiation, then the level and pattern of the different genotype DNA methylation in the plants were analyzed by methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) to reveal genome-wide DNA methylation alterations in the recipient sorghum genome. We aimed to probe the possible interactive effect of low-dose laser irradiation and hybridization. Results showed that low-dose laser irradiation induced the whole level and pattern of DNA methylation in plant intraspecific F1 hybrids relative to their pure-line parents. The results can demonstrate that low-dose laser irradiation is epigenetically mutagenic in plants. The first finding suggests that variation of the whole DNA methylation in different genotypes sorghum is accompanied by hypomethylation. The second finding indicates the CG sites variation more than the CNG sites variation in the DNA methylation variation mode. Comparing the effects of laser irradiation on the different genotypes, the DNA methylation level of the F1 hybrids lower than the inter mediate value of the corresponding pure line parents. Therefore, we propose that the combined use of intraspecific hybridization and an epigenetically mutagenic treatment like low-dose laser irradiation could be a useful means to generate heritable epigenetic variations in plants, should be further investigated.

Key words: Sorghum bicolor L., Iaser irradiation, Cytosine DNA methylation, Epigenetic variations, MSAP

表1

高粱MSAP中接头序列、预扩增引物和选择性扩增引物序列及组合"

命名Name 5'-3'序列5'-3' sequence
接头序列Sequence of adaptors EcoRⅠ-adapter1 5'-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3'
EcoRⅠ-adapter2 5'-AATTGGTACGCAGTC-3'
H/M-adapter1 5'-GATCATGAGTCCTGCT-3'
H/M-adapter2 5'-CGAGCAGGACTCATGA-3'
预扩增引物Pre-amplification primers E-A 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCA-3'
H/M-0 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGG-3'
选择性扩增引物Selective amplification primers 1H/M-TCT 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTCT-3'
2H/M-TCG 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTCG-3'
3H/M-TTC 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTTC-3'
4H/M-TTG 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTTG-3'
5H/M-TTA 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTTA-3'
6H/M-TGT 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTGT-3'
7H/M-TGA 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTGA-3'
8H/M-TAC 5'-ATCATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTAC-3'
E-AAC a 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAC-3'（1,2,3和8引物组合）
E-AAG b 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCAAG-3'（3和4引物组合）
E-ACA c 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCACA-3'（3和4引物组合）
E-ACG f 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCACG-3'（4和5引物组合）
E-AGC g 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCAGC-3'（1,3,6和7引物组合）
E-AGG h 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCAGG-3'（1,3,4,5和7引物组合）
E-ATC j 5'-GACTGCGTACCAATTCATC-3'（7引物组合）

图1

He-Ne激光处理高粱DNA甲基化变异总体水平（亲本M和N及其正交杂种MN,A图横坐标数字为不同单珠,B图处理数值为重复平均值±标准误,*表示差异显著）"

图2

He-Ne激光处理高粱不同单株MSAP结果,箭头所指的是随机型变异（EcoRⅠ+HpaⅡ简写为E+H,EcoRⅠ+MspⅠ简写为E+M）"

图3

He-Ne激光处理高粱的甲基化变异形式"

表2

高粱发生胞嘧啶甲基化变异带的可能功能、同源性及限制性酶切位点"

MSAP片段
MSAP profiles		 去甲基化变异位点
Hypomethyl
ated site		 基因型和单株个体Genotype and the
different individual		 染色体Chromosome
位置Location
同源性Idendity		 预测功能
Predicted function		 长度（bp）和限制性酶切位点
Size (bp) and restriction map
Z-2 CG or CNG MN-4 Chr.8; 6.1e-32
Sb08g000720.1
Position:634595..636034		 漆酶-23前体
Laccase-23 precursor		 EcoRI H/M
↓ 291 ↓
N-4 CG N-5 Chr.4; 6.8e-130
Sb04g004650.1
Position:4450817..4452596		 未知蛋白
Putative uncharacterized protein		 EcoRI M
↓ 243 ↓
F-13 CG NM-1 Chr.2; 5.7e-80
Sb02g005470.1
Position:6482952..6489780		 未知蛋白
Putative uncharacterized protein		 EcoRI H
↓ 159 ↓
Z-14 CNG MN-2 Chr.3; 1.7e-23
Osa5(12001:8156651-16748019) 165 loci		 高粱–水稻同源片段
Sorghum-Rice syntenic segments		 EcoRI H
↓ 360 ↓
[1] Morris J R . Genes,genetics,and epigenetics:a correspondence. Science, 2001,293(1):1103-1105.
doi: 10.1126/science.293.5532.1103
[2] Ou X F, Long L K, Wu Y , et al. Spaceflight-induced genetic and epigenetic changes in the rice (Oryza sativa L.) genome are independent of each other. Genome, 2010,53(7):524-532.
doi: 10.1139/G10-030
[3] Tariq M, Paszkowski J . DNA and histone methylation in plants. Trends in Genetics, 2005,20(1):244-251.
[4] Riddle N C, Richards E J . The control of natural variation in cytosine methylation in arabidopsis. Genetics, 2002,162(1):355-363.
[5] 陈兆贵, 曾灰鸿, 林若徐 . 马铃薯不同株系之间的DNA甲基化变异研究.作物杂志, 2014(1):63-67.
[6] Wada Y, Miyamoto K, Kusano T . Association between up-regulation of stress-responsive genes and hypomethylation of genomie DNA in tobacco plants. Genomics, 2004,271(1):658-666.
[7] 徐妍, 张海玲, 徐香玲 , 等. 逆境胁迫下植物甲基化变异的研究进展. 中国生物工程杂志, 2014,34(10):87-93.
doi: 10.13523/j.cb.20141014
[8] Chinnusamy V, Zhu J K . Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2009,12(2):133-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.006
[9] 陈芳, 王子成, 何艳霞 , 等. 超低温保存小麦种子和幼苗的遗传变异分析. 核农学报, 2009,23(4):548-554.
[10] 何玲莉, 沈虹, 王燕 , 等. 铅胁迫下萝卜基因组DNA甲基化分析. 核农学报, 2015,9(7):1278-1284.
[11] 徐小万, 雷建军, 张长远 , 等. 高温多湿胁迫下辣椒DNA甲基化分析. 核农学报, 2014,28(7):1175-1180.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2014.07.1175
[12] 李娜, 张旸, 解莉楠 , 等. 植物DNA甲基化研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2012,48(11):1027-1036.
[13] 杨震, 郭会君, 赵林姝 , 等. 60Co-射线诱导的小麦基因组DNA的甲基化变异 . 核农学报, 2015,29(1):1-9.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.01.0001
[14] 张从宇, 王敏, 张子学 , 等. 60Coγ射线、激光及两者复合处理小麦的生物学效应 . 核农学报, 2008,22(3):253-255.
[15] 杨巍 . 玉米自交系DNA甲基化多态性与杂种优势关系及EMS处理诱导DNA甲基化变异的研究. 长春:东北师范大学, 2011.
[16] 文定青, 姚全胜, 王松标 , 等. 植物杂种优势分子机理研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(12):28-31.
[17] Zhang M S, Xu C M, Wettstein D V , et al. Tissue-specific differences in cytosine methylation and their association with differential gene expression in sorghum. Plant Physiology, 2011,156(4):1955-1966.
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176842
[18] Zhang M S, Xu C M, Yan H . Limited tissue culture-induced mutations and linked epigenetic modifications in F1 hybrids of sorghum pure lines are accompanied by increased transcription of DNA methyltransferases and 5-methylcytosine glycosylases. Plant Journal, 2009,57(4):666-679.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2009.57.issue-4
[19] 王海风, 新楠, 吴仙花 , 等. 甜高粱育种的现状、问题与对策.作物杂志, 2013(2):23-26.
[20] Liu L, Guo W, Zhu X , et al. Inheritance and fine mapping of fertility-restoration for cytoplasmic male sterility in Gossypium hirsutum L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003,106(3):461-469.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1084-0
[21] Salmon A, Ainouche M L, Wendel J F . Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Molecular Ecology, 2005,14(2):1163-1175.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02488.x
[22] Boyko A, Kovalchuk I . Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2007,49(1):61-72.
[23] Chen Y, Yue M, Wang X . Influence of He-Ne laser irradiation on seeds thermodynamic parameters and seedlings growth of isatis indogotica. Plant Science, 2005,168(1):601-606.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.09.005
[24] Choi C S, Sano H . Abiotic-stress induces demethylation and transcriptional activation of a gene encoding a glycerophosphodieste-rase-like protein in tobacco plants. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2007,277(1):589-600.
doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0209-1
[25] Ou X F, Long L K, Zhang Y H . Spaceflight induces both transit and heritable alterations in DNA methylation and gene expression in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mutation Research, 2009,662(1):44-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.12.004
[26] Birchler J A, Auger D L, Riddle N C . In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell, 2003,15(1):2236-2239.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.151030
[27] Springer N M, Stupar R M . Allelic variation and heterosis in maize:how do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Research, 2007,17(1):264-275.
doi: 10.1101/gr.5347007
[28] He G, He H, Deng X W . Epigenetic variations in plant hybrids and their potential roles in heterosis. Journal Genet Genomics, 2013,40(5):205-210.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.011
[29] Guo M, Rupe M A, Zinselmeier C . Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell, 2004,16(1):1707-1716.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.022087
[1] 张一中, 周福平 张晓娟 邵 强 杨 彬 柳青山. 高粱种质材料光合特性和水分#br# 利用效率鉴定及聚类分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 45–53
[2] 张瑞栋 曹 雄 岳忠孝 梁晓红 刘 静 黄敏佳. 氮肥和密度对高粱产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 110–115
[3] 张建华 郭瑞峰 曹昌林 范 娜 江佰阳. 几种茎叶除草剂防除高粱田杂草药效和安全性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 162–166
[4] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138–142
[5] 张姣,吴奇,周宇飞,王艺陶,张瑞栋,黄瑞冬. 苗期和灌浆期干旱-复水对高粱光合特性和物质生产的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 148–154
[6] 崔江辉,崔福柱,薛建福,郝建平,杜天庆,孙隆祥. 化肥减施对小麦-高粱系统土壤团聚体分布及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 126–132
[7] 郝艳芳,王良群,刘勇,张微,杨伟,白鸿雁,武擘. 高粱幼叶细胞悬浮系的建立[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 35–40
[8] 张微,王良群,刘勇,郝艳芳,杨伟,白鸿雁,武擘. 农杆菌介导高粱遗传转化的相关因素优化[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 56–61
[9] 朱凯,张飞,柯福来,王艳秋,邹剑秋. 种植密度对适宜机械化栽培高粱品种产量及生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 83–87
[10] 高杰,李青风,汪灿,张国兵,彭秋. 不同氮素水平对糯高粱物质生产及氮素利用特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 126–130
[11] 王聪,杨广东,胡尊艳,陈林祺,任思琪. 种植密度对高粱冠层结构及光辐射特征的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 119–123
[12] 丁超,张建华,白文斌,郭瑞峰,曹昌林. 高粱田常用除草剂对高粱生理生化及产量品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 149–155
[13] 于纪珍,王瑞,詹鹏杰,平俊爱,张福耀. 中国主要高粱杂交种农艺及品质性状多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 49–54
[14] 张伟,张阳,赵威军,邵荣峰,卜华虎,常玉卉,李金梅,王花云. 烯效唑对甜高粱农艺性状及倒伏率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (4): 113–116
[15] 张晓娟,周福平,张一中,邵强,范昕琦,刘勇,柳青山. 复粒高粱不育系的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 72–75
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2] 权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3] 黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4] 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5] 赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6] 陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7] 王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8] 朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .