烤烟烟叶钾含量的遗传效应分析

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选用烟叶钾含量不同的5个烤烟基因型为亲本,按照Griffing第Ⅱ种设计方法组配成5×5双列杂交组合,利用盆栽试验研究钾素供应充足时烤烟旺长期烟叶钾含量的遗传规律。结果表明：15个烤烟基因型旺长期烟叶钾含量存在显著差异,亲本一般配合力方差和F₁特殊配合力方差均达到极显著水平,表明在这一性状的遗传中加性和非加性效应基因共同起作用。并且,烟叶钾含量的广义遗传率为71.84%,狭义遗传率为33.09%,表明遗传效应在表型中起重要作用,其中显性遗传效应占主导地位;10个F₁杂交组合中70%的组合表现出中亲优势,该性状杂种优势较强,可以利用这一特点培育烟叶钾含量高的基因型;秦烟96、农大203和农大202等3个亲本的一般配合力均较高,是提高烤烟烟叶钾含量的较为理想的亲本。

关键词: 烤烟, 烟叶钾含量, 遗传力, 配合力, 杂种优势

Abstract:

15 hybrids were goten by crossing 5 genotypes of flue-cured tobacco with different potassium content selected according to GriffingⅡ model. The research on genetic effects was conducted for potassium content in leaf in fast-growing stage of flue-cured tobacco under plenty of potash via pot cultivating method. According to the results, there were significant differences in potassium content in leaf in fast-growing stage of 15 flue-cured tobacco genotypes, and the variance of the general combining ability and special combining ability both reached the extremely significant level, suggesting that additive and non-additive genes work together in the inheritance of this trait. Its broad-sense heritability was 71.84% and its narrow-sense heritability was 33.09%, indicating that the variance was mainly controlled by genetic factors. The heritability of potassium content of flue-cured tobacco was mainly controlled by dominance effect, and the heterosis of F₁ generation was also stronger: 70% of F₁ combinations showed a mid-parent advantage. High potassium content flue-cured tobacco could be obtained through heterosis utilization. Qinyan 96, Nongda 203 and Nongda 202 could be choosen as materials to breed flue-cured tobacco varieties (lines) of high potassium content for their high general combining ability.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Potassium, Heritability, Combining ability, Heterosis

许杰,潘磊,杨帅,陈云松,邓盛斌,杨晓东,马文广. 烤烟烟叶钾含量的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018 (2): 30–34

Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco[J]. Crops, 2018(2): 30–34

图/表 5

表1

图1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 22

[1]	陆景陵 . 植物营养学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 50-59.
[2]	Bowing J D, Bowan D E . Role of potash in growth and nutrition of Marryland tobacco. Technical Bulletins, 1947: 933.
[3]	刘国顺 . 烟草栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 143-145.
[4]	牛佩兰, 石屹, 刘好宝 , 等. 烟草基因型间钾效率差异研究初报.烟草科技, 1996(1):33-35.
[5]	解燕, 王文楷, 赵杰 , 等. 烟草钾素营养与钾肥研究. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(8):302-307.
[6]	闫慧峰, 石屹, 李乃会 , 等. 烟草钾素营养研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2013,15(1):123-129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2013.01.20
[7]	熊维亮, 李舟, 高明 , 等. 我国烟草钾素营养研究进展. 四川农业科技, 2013(1):46-47.
[8]	曹志洪, 周秀如, 李仲林 , 等. 我国烟叶含钾状况及其与植烟土壤环境条件的关系. 中国烟草, 1990(3):6-13,20.
[9]	伍宏业, 曾宪坤, 黄景 , 等. 论提高我国化肥利用率. 磷肥与复肥, 1999,14(2):11-13.
[10]	Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of High Plant. London: Academic Press, 1986.
[11]	郭强, 赵久然, 滕海涛 , 等. 不同玉米基因型对钾素吸收利用的研究. 玉米科学, 2000,8(1):74-76.
[12]	杨铁钊, 张小全, 李群平 , 等. 烤烟新品种豫烟6号的选育及特征特性. 中国烟草科学, 2010,31(3):7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2010.03.002
[13]	焦芳婵, 肖炳光, 李永平 , 等. 烤烟新品种“云烟203”的选育及特征特性. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(3):625-628.
[14]	何冰 . 烟草基因型间钾吸收特性差异及其吸收机理的探讨. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[15]	孙渭, 陈志强, 马英明 , 等. 烤烟新品种秦烟96的选育及其特征特性. 中国烟草科学, 2012,33(2):28-33.
[16]	王毅, 林国平, 黄文昌 , 等. 白肋烟烟碱、总氮含量及氮碱比的配合力与遗传力分析. 中国烟草学报, 2007,13(3):52-56. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2007.03.011
[17]	Satti M, Lopez S . Effect of increasing potassium levels for alleviating sodium chloride stress on the growth and yield of tomato. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1994,25(15):2807-2823.
[18]	Gabelman W H, Louughman B C . Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Martiugs Nijhoff Publishers, 1987: 369-382. doi: 10.2307/2404582
[19]	Pinton R, Varanini Z, Maggioni A . Properties of potassium uptake by seedling roots of grape cultivars. Plant and Soil, 1990,123(2):175-179. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_19
[20]	舒海燕, 常胜合, 杨铁钊 . 烟草生育后期烟叶钾含量杂种优势及遗传分析. 河南农业科学, 2005(7):39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2005.07.013
[21]	胡日生, 詹莜国, 朱列书 , 等. 烤烟胞质雄性不育杂种化学品质性状的遗传分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,34(6):643-647.
[22]	潘著, 戴林建, 吴成林 . 不同供钾水平下烤烟高钾新品系钾含量的配合力. 烟草科技, 2012(7):76-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2012.07.017

相关文章 15

[1]	李志华,穆婷婷,刘鑫,李会霞,田岗. 4个谷子不育系主要农艺性状的配合力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 61–67
[2]	江莹芬,吴新杰,费维新,陈凤祥. 油菜隐性细胞核雄性不育的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 11–16
[3]	龚丝雨,钟思荣,张世川,聂亚平,梁喜欢,杨帅强,刘齐元. 增施生物炭对烤烟生长及产量、质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 154–160
[4]	李忠南,王越人,邬生辉,曲海涛,许正学,李光发. 玉米主要性状GCA效应值的因子分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 25–29
[5]	廖红蕖,陈红丽,范文思,陈宇,韩秋静,于建军,马明. 河南主产烟区土壤颗粒分形特征及对烟叶理化性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 118–125
[6]	戴林建,:陈武,:周田,:钟军. 利用花药培养选育烤烟抗黑胫病突变体[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 66–70
[7]	王曙光,史雨刚,史华伟,曹亚萍,孙黛珍. 春小麦光合特性与抗旱性的关系研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 23–29
[8]	闫寒,宋杭霖,张丽,闫晶,石贤吉,朱诗苗,刘璐,李虎林. 镉胁迫对烤烟农艺性状及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 156–161
[9]	黄刘亚,孙永波,刘书武,张永辉,年夫照,顾勇. 生物炭对植烟土壤主要性状和烤烟产质量影响的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (4): 15–20
[10]	宋国亮,冯小磊,范光宇,史高雷,李双东,王峰,王晓明,赵治海. 谷子新不育系的配合力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 44–50
[11]	卢秉生,高洪敏,姚永祥,白向历,陈增齐. 10个玉米自交系穗部性状的配合力和遗传参数分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 23–28
[12]	刘青丽,李志宏,徐艳丽,李军营,张云贵. 基于移栽期、施肥和品种的云南烤烟协同调控技术研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (6): 128–134
[13]	扈强,金保锋,郑璞帆,陈富彩,李司童,毛凯伦,刘海轮,唐永红,张立新. 外源GA₃和IAA对陕南烤烟上部叶品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (6): 135–141
[14]	朱协飞,李圣华,王森. 5个抗黄萎病棉花品种的抗性配合力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (6): 33–37
[15]	倪先林,龙文靖,赵甘霖,刘天朋,胡炯凌,丁国祥. 糯高粱主要农艺性状配合力与杂种优势的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (5): 50–55

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

编号Numbering	亲本Parents
1	农大202 Nongda 202
2	NC628
3	秦烟96 Qinyan 96
4	农大203 Nongda 203
5	云烟85 Yunyan 85
编号Numbering	F₁
6	NC628×农大202 NC628×Nongda 202
7	秦烟96×农大202 Qinyan 96×Nongda 202
8	农大203×农大202 Nongda 203×Nongda 202
9	云烟85×农大202 Yunyan 85×Nongda 202
10	农大203×NC628 Nongda 203×NC628
11	云烟85×NC628 Yunyan 85×NC628
12	秦烟96×NC628 Qinyan 96×NC628
13	秦烟96×云烟85 Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85
14	农大203×秦烟96 Nongda 203×Qinyan 96
15	云烟85×农大203 Yunyan 85×Nongda 203

变异来源 Source of variation	自由度 Degree of freedom	烟叶钾含量 K content
GCA	4	36.76^**
SCA	10	14.53^**
误差Deviation	28	0.74
GCA/SCA		2.53

亲本 Parents	一般配合力 GCA	F₁	特殊配合力 SCA	F₁	特殊配合力 SCA
农大203 Nongda 203	2.29	NC628×农大202 NC628×Nongda 202	1.17	云烟85×NC628 Yunyan 85×NC628	6.22
秦烟96 Qinyan 96	1.49	秦烟96×农大202 Qinyan 96×Nongda 202	1.82	秦烟96×NC628 Qinyan 96×NC628	-3.15
农大202 Nongda 202	0.84	农大203×农大202 Nongda 203×Nongda 202	-0.99	秦烟96×云烟85 Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85	1.92
云烟85 Yunyan 85	-1.28	云烟85×农大202 Yunyan 85×Nongda 202	-4.01	云烟85×农大203 Yunyan 85×Nongda 203	1.86
NC628	-3.35	农大203×NC628 Nongda 203×NC628	5.21	农大203×秦烟96 Nongda 203×Qinyan 96	-0.36

F₁	中亲优势In the pro-advantage	超高亲优势Super pro-affinity	超低亲优势Ultra-low pro-affinity
NC628×农大202 NC628×Nongda 202	9.39	-10.27	40.08
秦烟96×农大202 Qinyan 96×Nongda 202	3.49	3.25	3.73
农大203×农大202 Nongda 203×Nongda 202	-0.16	-1.40	1.12
云烟85×农大202 Yunyan 85×Nongda 202	-8.61	-18.21	3.55
秦烟96×NC628 Qinyan 96×NC628	-2.27	-19.98	25.51
农大203×NC628 Nongda 203×NC628	28.42	6.39	61.95
云烟85×NC628 Yunyan 85×NC628	35.91	23.05	51.75
农大203×秦烟96 Nongda 203×Qinyan 96	2.91	1.39	4.47
秦烟96×云烟85 Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85	9.89	-1.86	24.82
云烟85×农大203 Yunyan 85×Nongda 203	13.84	3.04	27.19