间作蚕豆对马铃薯干物质、氮和磷积累的影响

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.03.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过田间试验,研究了单作马铃薯、马铃薯/蚕豆间作和单作蚕豆对干物质积累以及氮、磷积累量的影响。结果表明,在马铃薯和蚕豆共生期内,马铃薯植株和各器官干物质累积受到明显的抑制作用,蚕豆收获后,马铃薯各器官干物质累积促进,间作处理马铃薯植株干物质累积为304.03g/株,大于单作处理的298.29g/株。在苗期,间作处理较单作处理对马铃薯根和叶的全氮累积分别提高了36.52%和17.41%,间作对茎全氮累积具有抑制作用,在生长后期间作处理较单作对马铃薯根、茎和叶全氮累积分别提高了68.68%、42.98%和109.48%,促进作用很明显。在苗期间作处理较单作处理对马铃薯各器官全磷累积具有促进作用而在块茎形成期只对根和叶全磷累积有促进作用,但随着生育期推进反而对不同器官全磷累积都起到抑制作用。

关键词: 间作, 马铃薯, 蚕豆, 氮, 磷, 干物质

Abstract:

The effects of cultivation of 3 treatments: potato only (T1), potato/faba bean interplanting (T2) and faba bean only (T3) on potato dry matter, nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation were examined by field experiments. We found that the treatment of interplanting potato/faba bean had significant inhibitory effect on dry matter accumulation of different organs of potato than single-planting potato in the symbiotic period during the experiment. After harvest of faba bean, treatment of interplanting faba bean had distinctive stimulant effect on dry matter accumulation of different organs of potato. The potato dry matter of interplanting faba bean and single-planting potato were 304.03g/plant and 298.29g/plant, respectively. At seedling stage the total N of potato root and leaf of interplanting faba bean/potato increased by 36.52% and 17.41%, respectively compared to those in the single-planting potato. However, there was a distinctive inhibitory effect on total N accumulation of the tuber of the interplanting faba bean/potato. The treatment of interplanting faba bean had a stimulative effect on total N accumulation of potato root, stalk and leaf in which increased significantly by 68.68%, 42.98% and 109.48%, respectively compared to the single-planting potato at mature stage. Although the treatment of interplanting potato showed a stimulative effect on total P accumulation of all organs in potato at seedling stage, the stimulative effect only occurred on root and leaf of the potato at tuber initiation stage. Generally the treatment of interplanting faba bean had an inhibitory effect on total P accumulation in all different potato organs compared to single-planting potato with the advance of growth.

Key words: Interplanting, Potato, Faba bean, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Dry matter

顾旭东,孟炀,何文寿. 间作蚕豆对马铃薯干物质、氮和磷积累的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017 (3): 115–120

Xudong Gu,Yang Meng,Wenshou He. Effects of Interplanting Faba Bean on Accumulation of Dry Matter, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus of Potato[J]. Crops, 2017(3): 115–120

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 16

[1]	吴秋云, 黄科, 宋勇 , 等. 2000 ~2009年世界马铃薯生产状况分析. 中国马铃薯, 2012(2):115-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2012.02.014
[2]	何文寿, 马琨, 代晓华 , 等. 宁夏马铃薯氮、磷、钾养分的吸收累积特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0618
[3]	Wang S, Nie S, Zhu F . Chemical constituents and health effects of sweet potato. Food Research International, 2016,89:90-116. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.08.032 pmid: 28460992
[4]	段玉, 妥德宝, 赵沛义 , 等. 马铃薯施肥肥效及养分利用率的研究. 中国马铃薯, 2008,22(4):197-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2008.04.002
[5]	赵亚妮, 王科, 王佳锐 , 等. 施氮对单作和套作小麦产量和氮素利用特征的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016,24(7):845-852. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150937
[6]	Bokhtiar S M, Hossain M S, Mahmud K , et al. Site specific nutrient management for sugarcane-potato and sugarcane-onion in intercropping systems.Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003(17):1205-1208.
[7]	李萍, 张永成, 田丰 . 马铃薯蚕豆间套作系统的生理生态研究进展与效益评价.安徽农业科学, 2012(27):13313-13314. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2012.27.034
[8]	孟品品, 刘星, 邱慧珍 , 等. 连作马铃薯根际土壤真菌种群结构及其生物效应. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(11):3079-3086.
[9]	陈光荣, 杨文钰, 张国宏 , 等. 薯/豆套作模式下不同熟期大豆品种的生长补偿效应. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(3):455-467. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.005
[10]	Jalloh M B Sulaiman W H W, Talib J , ,et al.A simulation model estimates of the intercropping advantage of an immature-rubber,banana and pineapple system. American Journal of Agricultural & Biological Science, 2009,4(3):1032-1034.
[11]	黄承建, 赵思毅, 王龙昌 , 等. 套作模式下马铃薯干物质生产特性及产量研究.农机化研究, 2013(4):116-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-188X.2013.04.028
[12]	党小燕, 刘建国, 帕尼古丽 , 等. 棉花间作模式中作物养分竞争吸收和积累动态的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(1):166-173. doi: 10.11674／zwyf.2013.0120
[13]	Wahbi S, Maghraoui T, Hafidi M , et al. Enhanced transfer of biologically fixed N from faba bean to intercropped wheat through mycorrhizal symbiosis. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016,107:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.008
[14]	Ferreira R B, Teixeira I R , Reis E F D,et al.Management of top-dressed nitrogen fertilization in the common bean/castor intercropping system. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2014,8(7):1086-1092.
[15]	李洪英 . 马铃薯、蚕豆间作对二者根系的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2014,53(15):3495-3496. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2014.15.006
[16]	强继业, 陈宗瑜, 马明安 . 应用示踪法研究光、CO₂对蚕豆吸收磷素营养的影响.云南农业大学学报, 1999(3):257-260.

相关文章 15

[1]	宿飞飞张静华李勇刘尚武刘振宇王绍鹏万书明陈曦高云飞胡林双吕典秋. 不同灌溉方式对两个马铃薯品种#br# 生理特性和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 97–103
[2]	张瑞栋曹雄岳忠孝梁晓红刘静黄敏佳. 氮肥和密度对高粱产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 110–115
[3]	陈瑛瑛王徐艺凌朱宇涵武威刘涛孙成明. 水稻穗部氮素含量高光谱估测研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 116–120
[4]	隋阳辉, 高继平刘彩虹, 徐正进王延波赵海岩. 东北冷凉地区秸秆还田方式对水稻#br# 光合、干物质积累及氮素吸收的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 137–143
[5]	高文俊杨国义高新中玉柱许庆方原向阳孙耀武. 氮磷钾肥对青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 144–149
[6]	赵存虎孔庆全陈文晋贺小勇田晓燕. 蚕豆田除草剂筛选初报[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 167–172
[7]	商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143–148
[8]	柴莹,徐永清,付瑶,李秀钰,贺付蒙,韩英琦,冯哲,李凤兰. 马铃薯干腐病病原镰孢菌体内产细胞壁降解酶特性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 154–160
[9]	柏文恋,郑毅,肖靖秀. 豆科禾本科间作促进磷高效吸收利用的地下部生物学机制研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 20–27
[10]	章星传, 黄文轩, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 施氮量对不同水稻品种氮肥利用率与农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 69–78
[11]	张晓勇,杨友联,李树江,熊荣川,向红. 外源激素对低温胁迫下脱毒马铃薯扦插苗早衰的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 95–101
[12]	权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102–105
[13]	张凯伦,陈寿明,殷红,李斌,谢良文,贺帆. 外源一氧化氮对盐胁迫下烟草幼苗生理及抗氧化性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 123–128
[14]	叶怡然,达布希拉图,沙本才,王文祥,叶宏达,耿世娴,成京晋,海梅荣. 不同肥料对冬马铃薯光合特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 135–140
[15]	唐志强,董立强,李睿,张丽颖,何娜,李跃东. 氮素与土壤类型对水稻秧苗素质及养分吸收的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 141–147

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

土层(cm) Soil depth	有机质(g/kg) Organic matter	全氮(g/kg) Total nitrogen	碱解氮(mg/kg) Alkaline nitrogen	速效磷(mg/kg) Available phosphorus	全磷(g/kg) Total phosphorus	速效钾(mg/kg) Available potassium	pH	容重(mg/kg) Bulk density
0~20	10.31	0.43	50	42.62	0.0066	330	8.2	1.34
20~40	10.03	0.37	67	40.05	0.0064	310	8.1	1.41